1. Beyond the Surface – Rethinking Wastewater Management in a Rapidly Urbanizing World
In the silence beneath our cities, a storm
brews not of thunder but of untreated waste. As the world urbanizes at
breakneck speed, wastewater infrastructures are cracking under pressure. However,
hidden in this crisis is an opportunity to reimagine sanitation as a pathway to
equity, sustainability, and resilience. The question is no longer whether we
can afford to invest in wastewater innovation but whether we can afford not to.
1.1
The Urban Surge and Sanitation Strain
Urbanization
has become a defining trend of the 21st century. More than half of the global
population now resides in urban areas, and this number is rapidly increasing
(UN-Habitat, 2023). With it comes a surge in wastewater production, outpacing
the capacity of outdated treatment facilities and leading to dangerous
environmental and health risks (Larsen et al., 2016; Bernal et al., 2021).
Cities like Dhaka and Nairobi struggle with overwhelmed systems, resulting in
untreated discharges into local waterways (Coxon et al., 2024).
These
infrastructure strains demand both immediate and long-term responses. Studies
suggest that without urgent investment in scalable and climate-adaptable
systems, the gap between sanitation needs and service delivery will widen
(Spirandelli, 2015; Mohammadifardi et al., 2022). Public health consequences,
including the spread of waterborne diseases, become inevitable in such
neglected scenarios (Fuhrimann et al., 2016).
Moreover,
informal urban settlements where basic services are scarce are often left
behind in centralized sanitation planning. This spatial inequality deepens
urban health disparities and necessitates more inclusive and decentralized
sanitation models (Kerstens et al., 2015; Chirisa et al., 2016).
The
"Urban Wastewater Flows vs. Treatment Capacity, 2023" ( figure 1) illustrates the critical imbalance between the
volume of wastewater generated in rapidly urbanizing areas and the limited
capacity of existing treatment infrastructure. At the top, a cityscape
highlights the complex pipeline networks transporting wastewater. Below,
graphical representations reveal a sharp disparity: urban water production
continues to rise, while treatment capacity and actual treated water lag
significantly behind. The inclusion of pie charts and bar graphs underscores
that only a fraction of approximately 40% of wastewater is effectively treated,
spotlighting an urgent call for investment in infrastructure, innovation, and
governance to close the sanitation gap.
In
2023, there will be a significant gap between wastewater generation and
treatment capacity. It shows that urban areas produced approximately 171
billion litres of wastewater per day, but only 100 billion litres could be
effectively treated. This means nearly 40% of wastewater goes untreated,
leading to environmental pollution and serious public health threats. The data
underscores the urgent need for increased investment in treatment
infrastructure to keep pace with urban growth and ensure sustainable and safe
water systems.
Figure 1 Urban Wastewater Flows vs.
Treatment Capacity, 2023
Urbanization
has significantly intensified the challenges associated with global wastewater
management and sanitation infrastructure. Rapid population growth in urban
areas has led to increased production of wastewater, which places an
overwhelming burden on existing treatment facilities. According to a report
from UN-Habitat, the demand for improved sanitation and wastewater services is
escalating due to urbanization and industrialization, resulting in a complex
scenario that requires extensive investment and policy innovation to address
effectively. However, outdated infrastructure alone cannot address the mounting
climate shocks, highlighting the urgent need for innovation.
1.2
Climate Stress and Infrastructure Vulnerability
Climate
change compounds these challenges. Rising temperatures, flooding, and droughts
disrupt wastewater treatment systems and escalate contamination risks (Larsen,
2015; Karamoutsou et al., 2024). In Jakarta, for example, seasonal flooding
overwhelms drainage networks, causing raw sewage overflow (Rahman et al.,
2023).
To
counter this, experts advocate for climate-resilient sanitation infrastructure
that integrates nature-based solutions such as green roofs, bioswales, and
constructed wetlands (Stefanakis, 2019; Marinelli et al., 2021). These systems
not only mitigate flood risk but also treat wastewater naturally and recharge
groundwater.
Transitioning
from centralized to decentralized and modular wastewater systems can reduce
vulnerability and increase adaptive capacity in urban areas (Bernal et al.,
2021; Hamedi et al., 2023). Digital innovations such as real-time monitoring,
AI diagnostics, and automated treatment optimization are emerging as
game-changers (Qu et al., 2022).
However,
adaptation is not merely technical. It requires anticipatory governance that
aligns infrastructure planning with evolving climate projections and urban
dynamics (Irvine et al., 2015).
"Wastewater Vulnerabilities to Climate
Events" vividly illustrates the multifaceted risks that climate-related
events pose to wastewater infrastructure ( Figure 2). From floods and droughts
to storm surges and power outages, the image shows how extreme weather can
disrupt treatment systems, damage pipelines, and halt pumping operations. Icons
representing rainfall, lightning, clogged pipes, and backup systems highlight
cascading failures triggered by climate shocks. The visual also connects storm
events to rising floodwaters and infrastructure strain, emphasizing the urgency
of climate-resilient, adaptive wastewater systems. This depiction serves as a
stark reminder that without integrated, anticipatory planning, climate impacts
will overwhelm sanitation systems and jeopardize public health.
Figure 2: Wastewater
Vulnerabilities to Climate Events
The
need for climate-resilient solutions compounds the pressure on urban sanitation
infrastructures. New approaches and innovations are necessary for managing
wastewater effectively, especially considering the increased frequency of
extreme weather events that threaten existing systems. Investing in
infrastructure that is both resilient and digitized is crucial for enhancing
public health outcomes, improving environmental sustainability, and promoting
economic growth.
1.3
Aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals
Wastewater
is not just a technical issue; it is a development priority. Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG) 6.3 specifically targets halving the proportion of
untreated wastewater by 2030 (UN-Water, 2023). However, progress has been slow
and uneven, particularly in low-income regions where sanitation systems remain
underfunded (Malik et al., 2015; Cardoso‐Gonçalves
et al., 2024).
Policymakers
must frame wastewater as a cross-cutting development concern, one that links
health, environment, gender equity, and economic growth (Alsheyab &
Kusch-Brandt, 2018). Wastewater reuse, for example, can supplement water supply
for agriculture, landscaping, and industrial use while recovering energy and
nutrients (Varma et al., 2023; Lyu et al., 2016).
Countries
like Singapore have pioneered circular water systems NEWater, demonstrating how
treated wastewater can be reused even for potable purposes through advanced
membrane technologies and public trust-building campaigns (Aquise &
Rodríguez, 2024).
By
integrating sanitation into broader development agendas, governments can unlock
synergies across health, education, and poverty reduction efforts (Marinelli et
al., 2021).
Moreover,
addressing these challenges is integral to achieving sustainable development
goals related to water and sanitation. Policymakers and industry professionals
are urged to focus on developing strategies that not only improve wastewater
treatment but also promote the reuse of wastewater as a resource. Effective
management practices and investment in robust sanitation infrastructure are
therefore essential for adapting to the realities of urbanization and ensuring
access to safe and clean water for growing populations. These measures are not
merely technical requirements but moral imperatives for ensuring the right to
water in an age of escalating risk.
1.4
Financing and Technology: The Missing Links
One
of the most formidable barriers to modern wastewater management is financing.
Upgrading infrastructure requires significant capital investment, especially
for expanding coverage in peri-urban and underserved areas (Arora et al.,
2015).
Lifecycle
costing models and green bonds offer pathways to sustainable finance,
especially when tied to performance indicators like pollutant load reductions
or treatment efficiency (Mohammadifardi et al., 2022; Sakson et al., 2021).
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) can also be instrumental in mobilizing
resources for wastewater projects while ensuring equitable access (Karmaker et
al., 2023).
In
terms of technology, modern treatment systems now include membrane bioreactors,
anaerobic digesters, and nutrient recovery units. These not only improve
treatment quality but also lower operational costs in the long run (Amare et
al., 2017; Aquise & Rodríguez, 2024).
However,
technology alone cannot solve governance failures. Without transparent
regulations, community participation, and capacity-building, even the most
advanced systems may falter (Chirisa et al., 2016; Sakson et al., 2021).
Investment
in infrastructure that incorporates technological advancements is a pressing
necessity. Modernizing wastewater treatment plants and developing integrated
systems for managing both wastewater and stormwater are fundamental for
improving overall public health outcomes and environmental sustainability. Such
investments are crucial to ensure that increasing populations have access to
safe and clean water, highlighting the essential balance between development
needs and capacity-building in urban wastewater management infrastructures.
1.5
Policy Innovation and the Future of Wastewater
Addressing
the urban wastewater crisis demands not only technical upgrades but also policy
transformation. Outdated regulatory frameworks must evolve to promote
innovation, ensure compliance, and incentivize reuse (Qu et al., 2022; Karmaker
et al., 2023).
Governments
should prioritize integrated water resource management (IWRM) that links
wastewater, stormwater, and drinking water systems into a unified strategy
(Hamedi et al., 2023). Policies must also reflect equity concerns, ensuring
marginalized communities are not excluded from sanitation improvements
(Marinelli et al., 2021).
Furthermore,
wastewater should be reframed from a problem to a solution. When treated
correctly, it offers immense potential as a source of clean water, renewable
energy, and agricultural input (Lyu et al., 2016; Alsheyab & Kusch-Brandt,
2018). This paradigm shift requires bold leadership, stakeholder engagement,
and international collaboration.
To
enable this future, global platforms such as the UN-Water Global Acceleration
Framework are encouraging milestone-based national action plans that track
progress toward universal sanitation (UN-Water, 2024).
Policy
innovation is indispensable in navigating the complex scenarios presented by
urbanization and climate-related challenges. Policymakers are thus tasked with
designing and implementing strategies that foster improved treatment and
creative reuse of wastewater. This shift requires moving away from viewing
wastewater strictly as a liability to acknowledging it as a valuable resource
for agriculture, landscape irrigation, and even potable uses when treated
appropriately. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks need to dynamically adapt to
emerging technologies and processes that could significantly enhance wastewater
treatment efficacy, aligning with global sustainability efforts.
The
pipes beneath our cities tell a deeper story, one of risk, resilience, and
responsibility. If we dare to listen, they reveal more than just waste. They
show us the values we build our cities on, the futures we imagine, and the
equity we either uphold or forsake. Wastewater is not the end of the cycle, but
it may be the beginning of a more just, sustainable world.
2. The Hidden Cost of Waste – Wastewater, Inequality, and Urban Vulnerability
Beneath the
shining skyline of every modern city lies an invisible but urgent crisis of untreated
wastewater. While skyscrapers rise, sewage systems sink under pressure. More
than a technical issue, wastewater mismanagement exposes the fault lines of
inequality, gender injustice, and environmental degradation. This chapter
explores why addressing sanitation is not just about pipes and treatment plants;
it is about dignity, resilience, and justice.
2.1
Wastewater Overload and Infrastructure Lag
Global
wastewater generation has surged due to rapid urbanization and industrial
expansion. However, treatment capacities often stagnate below 30%, unable to
match rising volumes (Lyu et al., 2021; Elateek et al., 2020). This disparity
reflects chronic underinvestment in sanitation infrastructure and policy
inertia, leaving both water systems and vulnerable populations exposed to
significant risk (García‐López
et al., 2021; Tao et al., 2024).
The
consequences are visible in many megacities such as Lagos, Dhaka, and Jakarta, where
untreated wastewater spills into rivers, contaminating water sources and
increasing disease burdens. These cities face daily public health risks
stemming from poor sanitation infrastructure (Chang et al., 2019; Njeru, 2019).
This unsustainable trajectory demands immediate investments in scalable,
resilient treatment systems that adapt to changing urban dynamics.
To manage the
increasing load, cities must explore decentralized and modular treatment
solutions. These flexible systems reduce the stress on centralized
infrastructure and offer more accessible sanitation options to informal
settlements often neglected in urban planning (García‐López et al., 2021; Akpan et al., 2020).
2.2 The Dual
Crisis: Environmental Degradation and Public Health
Neglected
wastewater treatment is a key driver of environmental and health crises.
Pathogens and chemical pollutants from raw sewage harm aquatic ecosystems and
endanger human populations, particularly those that are already marginalized
(Hasegawa et al., 2020; Rani et al., 2022). In some regions, wastewater
discharges degrade soil fertility, contaminate crops, and jeopardize food
security (Akpan et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2019).
This toxic
blend of contaminants fosters the spread of waterborne diseases, exacerbating
health disparities in urban slums. The World Health Organization estimates that
millions suffer annually from illnesses linked to poor sanitation (García‐López et al., 2021). Children and the
elderly are particularly at risk, often lacking access to clean water and
healthcare (Hasegawa et al., 2020).
Furthermore,
inadequate sanitation infrastructure exacerbates the healthcare system strain.
Preventable diseases flourish in unsanitary environments, increasing healthcare
costs and limiting economic productivity (Tao et al., 2024; Rani et al., 2022).
These ripple effects illustrate how sanitation is intrinsically linked to
environmental justice and social equity.
2.3 Gendered Sanitation Inequality
Sanitation is
not gender-neutral. In many low-income communities, women and girls bear up to
70% of the burden of water collection and hygiene responsibilities (Akpan et
al., 2020; Rani et al., 2022). Without safe, private toilets, women risk
exposure to violence and illness. For girls, the lack of facilities often
results in missing school and up to 30% absenteeism during menstruation (Lyu et
al., 2021).
The
implications extend beyond education. Limited sanitation restricts women's
participation in economic activities, widening existing gender gaps in income
and opportunity (McFarlane, 2019; Sidjabat & Gunawan, 2020). A clean,
private toilet is not merely a convenience. It is a catalyst for gender equity.
Solutions must
center on gender-inclusive designs. Sanitation policies should prioritize
facilities that address women's specific needs, such as menstrual hygiene
management and safety (Wolfe et al., 2021). Empowering women through
participatory planning and leadership in sanitation initiatives fosters
stronger outcomes and long-term sustainability (Silveira et al., 2025).
2.4 Urbanization and the Expanding Wastewater Gap
Urban expansion
continues unabated, especially in the Global South. However, the development of
wastewater treatment infrastructure lags far behind urban population growth
(Chang et al., 2019; Lyu et al., 2021). The result is a growing treatment
deficit that floods already fragile environments with toxic waste (Yazdandoost,
2022).
Cities like
Dhaka, Nairobi, and Port-au-Prince are overwhelmed by daily wastewater volumes,
with over half remaining untreated (Njeru, 2019). Poor urban planning and
limited municipal budgets exacerbate the crisis, highlighting the urgency of
integrated, forward-looking wastewater strategies (García‐López et al., 2021).
Embracing
citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS) approaches helps ensure that no community
is left behind. CWIS prioritizes service delivery across entire urban
populations, regardless of income or location, and includes both centralized
and onsite systems (Gambrill et al., 2020). Such strategies promote resilience
and equity while maximizing resource recovery.
2.5
Transformative Responses: Equity, Innovation, and Capacity Building
Tackling the
wastewater crisis requires transformative change. Infrastructure upgrades must
be paired with innovative technologies, participatory planning, and
cross-sectoral partnerships. The UN-Habitat's CWIS framework exemplifies this
approach, aligning stakeholders from municipal agencies to informal community
leaders (Sarfefa et al., 2024).
In South Africa
and India, CWIS pilot programs significantly reduced untreated discharges and
improved access in informal settlements (Gambrill et al., 2020). These examples
demonstrate that equity-focused governance enhances sanitation outcomes and
builds long-term community resilience.
Technology
transfer and local capacity building are equally vital. Training local
officials and operators ensures that technology is maintained and adapted to
community needs (Doma et al., 2023). Community engagement in sanitation
planning increases trust, adoption rates, and accountability (Imenger et al.,
2024).
Educational
campaigns also play a key role in transforming public attitudes and behaviours
around sanitation, reducing stigma, and fostering hygiene practices critical to
achieving SDG 6 (Silveira et al., 2025; Njeru, 2019). Without such cultural
shifts, technical fixes alone cannot solve the sanitation crisis.
The wastewater crisis is more than an
engineering failure. It is a mirror reflecting societal neglect, inequality,
and indifference. However, it is also an invitation. An invitation to reimagine
cities that respect every human's right to sanitation, safety, and dignity. If
we choose equity, innovation, and collective action, wastewater can become a
symbol not of neglect but of transformation.
3. Sludge The Silent Contaminant in the Wastewater Equation
In the shadows of our sanitation systems lies
a dense, overlooked byproduct: sludge. While wastewater flows capture policy
attention, sludge quietly accumulates, harbouring pathogens, toxins, and
untapped potential. If we fail to confront the hazards and opportunities sludge
presents, we risk sabotaging both environmental and human health. However, if
we act, sludge may become the key to circular, sustainable wastewater systems.
3.1 Sludge Composition and Contaminant Complexity
Sludge is the
concentrated residue of wastewater treatment, laden with heavy metals,
pathogens, and persistent chemical toxins (Msuya, 2025; Rahmani & Anuar,
2019). Often dismissed as mere waste, sludge mirrors society's chemical
footprint—a toxic blend resulting from industrial discharge, pharmaceuticals,
and household pollutants. Improper disposal permits these contaminants to
infiltrate soils and aquifers, threatening potable water and food safety
(Weidhaas et al., 2020).
Heavy metals
such as lead, cadmium, and mercury accumulate in agricultural soils irrigated
with inadequately treated sludge. Crops absorb these metals, transforming food
into a conduit for chronic toxicity (Khan et al., 2023; Latosińska, 2017).
Regulatory gaps in developing nations exacerbate the risk, calling for urgent
reform in sludge quality monitoring and treatment protocols (Paramita &
Koestoer, 2021).
Sludge
Composition and Pathway to Contamination" illustrates the complex journey
of pollutants from sludge into soil and groundwater systems Figure 3. It breaks
down sludge into key components—organic waste, heavy metals, pathogens, and
moisture—and traces how these contaminants infiltrate soil layers. Soluble
substances and pathogens percolate through strata, while certain pollutants
become sorbed or immobilized in the upper layers. The diagram shows how
untreated or poorly managed sludge can lead to long-term contamination of soil,
groundwater, and crops, emphasizing the urgent need for safe sludge management,
treatment, and monitoring to protect environmental and public health.
Figure 3 Sludge
Composition and Pathway to Contamination
3.2 Public Health and Environmental Fallout
The
environmental degradation caused by sludge mismanagement directly impacts
public health. Populations near disposal sites face exposure to pathogenic
organisms and chemical hazards, elevating incidences of respiratory illnesses,
cancers, and reproductive disorders (James et al., 2019; Gianico et al., 2021).
Untreated sludge contaminates food chains, water sources, and soil health,
amplifying risks for low-income communities reliant on local agriculture
(Wahaab et al., 2020).
Climate change
further aggravates these issues by intensifying rainfall patterns, which flood
treatment facilities and cause untreated sludge to escape into ecosystems
(Bratburd & McLellan, 2024). Meanwhile, warming temperatures extend the
viability of pathogens like Vibrio cholerae in aquatic environments, raising
the stakes for effective sludge containment (Detail et al., 2023).
3.3 Innovation and Regulation: Turning Waste into Resource
Despite its
risks, sludge holds transformative potential. When properly managed, it can
serve as a renewable energy source. Technologies like anaerobic digestion
convert organic matter into biogas, reducing emissions and producing
electricity (Kim, 2013; Botte et al., 2024). Ghana's Lavender Hill Faecal
Treatment Plant exemplifies this dual benefit: waste reduction and clean energy
generation.
However,
treatment efficiency hinges on sludge composition and the removal of inhibitory
substances. Emerging techniques of ultrasonic pretreatment, pyrolysis, and
advanced oxidation enhance disintegration and maximize resource recovery (Guan
& Tian, 2023; Xia et al., 2022). Biochar from pyrolyzed sludge offers
another path to sustainable reuse, reducing volume while neutralizing
contaminants (Wang et al., 2020).
To support
innovation, robust regulatory frameworks are essential. Developed countries
enforce strict sludge quality standards, minimizing heavy metal contamination
in agriculture (Tooraj et al., 2023). However, many nations lack consistent
guidelines, increasing the urgency for global harmonization in sludge
governance (Spinosa & Molinari, 2023).
3.4 Worker Safety and Antibiotic Resistance
Sludge does not
just pose environmental threats; it endangers sanitation workers. In cities
like Mumbai, untreated sludge exposure correlates with higher rates of
antibiotic-resistant infections among wastewater workers (James et al., 2019;
Kim, 2013). These workers face ongoing risks without adequate protective gear,
training, or workplace safeguards (Sądecka et al., 2012).
Advanced
monitoring systems like Singapore's PhishGuard, which uses AI to detect
antibiotic-resistant genes, offer promising solutions (Primrose, 2022).
Real-time detection enables targeted interventions before resistant genes reach
ecosystems, preventing their spread through aquaculture and food chains (Kumar
et al., 2019; Shrestha & Shakya, 2021).
Hospital waste
remains a key vector of resistant bacteria entering wastewater streams,
underscoring the need for point-source treatment and antimicrobial control in
healthcare facilities (Adebisi et al., 2020; Ozochi et al., 2024). Addressing
occupational and environmental risks must go hand-in-hand to protect both
workers and the public.
3.5 Emerging Contaminants: Microplastics and Ecosystem Disruption
Microplastics
in sludge have emerged as a critical concern. Irrigated soils in China's
Yangtze River Basin contain up to 3,200 particles per kilogram, correlating
with a 15% drop in crop yield (Soleimani et al., 2021). Microplastics hinder
water infiltration, disrupt soil microbial communities, and act as vectors for
other toxins (Djaouda et al., 2020; Primrose, 2022).
These particles
can be taken up by crops, infiltrating human food systems and introducing
unknown long-term risks. They also serve as carriers for persistent organic
pollutants and heavy metals, increasing cumulative toxicity in agroecosystems
(Kumar et al., 2019; Sen, 2018). Addressing microplastic infiltration demands
improved filtration technologies and enhanced sludge characterization
protocols.
Sludge may be silent, but it speaks volumes about our systems, values, and priorities. If we continue to ignore its risks, we compound the crises of pollution, disease, and inequality. However, if we reimagine sludge as a resource worthy of investment, innovation, and regulation, we unlock a future where waste becomes wealth and danger becomes an opportunity. The time to listen to sludge is now.
4. Beyond E. Coli – Confronting the Hidden Threats in Wastewater
For decades, E. coli served as the sentinel of sanitation. However, today, that
single microbe tells only part of the story. In the shadows of treated water,
far more complex and persistent threats loom antibiotic-resistant bacteria,
microplastics, and hormonal disruptors. As the landscape of contamination
evolves, so must the science, policies, and technologies designed to protect
public and environmental health.
4.1
Rethinking Indicators: Outdated Tools in a New Era
Wastewater
quality monitoring continues to rely heavily on E. coli as a primary indicator
of faecal contamination (Wilk et al., 2019; Farraj et al., 2024). While useful,
this approach fails to account for a broader array of contaminants, including
toxic chemicals, endocrine disruptors, and antimicrobial-resistant pathogens
(Wilson & Ashraf, 2018). Current indicators offer an incomplete picture,
risking oversight of persistent threats to human health and aquatic ecosystems
(Yang et al., 2023).
As microbial
community science advances, experts urge a transition toward more comprehensive
microbial and chemical testing protocols (Semerci & Sevindik, 2024). These
would provide early warning of non-traditional threats and guide treatment
upgrades. Without this shift, modern wastewater systems remain blind to the high
risks they are supposed to eliminate (Yaser et al., 2024).
Figure 4 Outdated
vs Emerging Contaminant Indicator
Outdated
vs. Emerging Contaminant Indicators (Figure 4) contrast traditional wastewater
monitoring methods with the pressing need to address modern pollutants. On the
left, outdated indicators like nitrogen, BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand), and
phosphates dominate, reflecting legacy approaches to water quality testing. On
the right, a new generation of emerging contaminants—such as PFAS,
pharmaceutical residues, microplastics, and endocrine-disrupting
compounds—illustrates the complexity of today's pollution landscape. These
newer threats pose more significant risks to health and ecosystems yet remain
poorly monitored. The graphic emphasizes the urgent need for updated testing
protocols and advanced detection technologies to safeguard water quality in an
era of evolving chemical exposure.
4.2 Antibiotic Resistance: A Global Health Alarm
The persistence
of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) in treated wastewater marks one of the
gravest emerging threats in sanitation (Fan et al., 2021). ARBs survive
conventional treatment and spread through water systems, contaminating crops
and aquatic ecosystems and re-entering human populations (Hu et al., 2018).
Their resilience challenges the core assumptions of wastewater safety and
highlights urgent needs for surveillance and improved removal strategies.
Singapore's
PhishGuard system exemplifies innovation in this space. It uses AI to detect
95% of resistant genes in wastewater, enabling rapid response before pathogens
reach the environment (Witsø et al., 2024). Such tools represent a critical
frontier in antimicrobial resistance containment (Njeru, 2019). However,
without parallel regulatory action, wastewater plants risk becoming hotspots of
resistance gene exchange (Mumbumbu et al., 2024).
4.3 Hormonal Hazards: Endocrine Disruptors in the Flow
Endocrine-disrupting
compounds (EDCs) like bisphenol-A and phthalates increasingly contaminate urban
wastewater. These chemicals interfere with hormone systems, causing
reproductive, developmental, and metabolic disorders (Farraj et al., 2024;
Santos et al., 2021). Standard treatment methods, however, often fail to
eliminate them effectively, allowing EDCs to persist in effluents and biosolids
(Song et al., 2022).
Once released,
these compounds bioaccumulate in wildlife and enter food chains, disrupting
aquatic biodiversity (Olejnik et al., 2021). The persistence of EDCs underlines
a critical gap in both technology and policy. To close it, treatment facilities
must adopt advanced oxidation, membrane filtration, and activated carbon
systems that target these molecular contaminants (Wilk et al., 2019).
4.4 The Plastic Infiltration: Microplastics and Multiplying Risks
Microplastics,
once a novelty concern, now pose systemic threats to water quality and
ecosystem resilience. Studies show that treated wastewater is a significant
source of microplastics in aquatic and terrestrial environments (Campanale et
al., 2020). Soils irrigated with treated effluent can contain over 3,000
particles per kilogram, degrading soil structure and reducing crop yields
(Praveena & Aris, 2020; Bodzek et al., 2024).
These tiny
plastics absorb and transport other toxins, including heavy metals and
persistent organic pollutants, compounding their ecological harm (Eckert et
al., 2018). Moreover, they impair microbial communities essential to soil and
aquatic health (Habib et al., 2021). Wastewater systems must, therefore,
implement microfiltration and monitoring to prevent further environmental
loading (Lv et al., 2024).
4.5 Pathogens and the Climate Crisis: A Dangerous Feedback Loop
The
intensifying impacts of climate change alter pathogen behaviour in water
systems. Higher temperatures extend the survival of pathogens such as Vibrio
cholerae, increasing cholera risk in vulnerable regions like Bangladesh (Detail
et al., 2023; Al-Juburi et al., 2022). Heavy rains and flooding overwhelm
treatment systems, flushing untreated sewage into rivers and spreading
waterborne diseases (Bratburd & McLellan, 2024).
This feedback
loop between climate volatility and sanitation breakdown demands adaptive
wastewater planning. Strategies must integrate climate projections to ensure
resilience against pathogen proliferation and extreme weather events (Wayne
& Bolker, 2023). Without such foresight, health systems will face surging
burdens from preventable waterborne diseases.
We can no longer afford to see wastewater through the narrow lens of E. coli. The threats that pass silently through our treatment plants' resistant genes, hormonal toxins, microplastics, and climate-empowered pathogens—require a new era of vigilance. By embracing innovative diagnostics, resilient infrastructure, and progressive regulation, we can transform wastewater systems from blind spots into bulwarks of public health and planetary safety.
5. Closing the Sanitation Gap: Addressing Inequity in Wastewater Infrastructure Access A Crisis Hidden in Plain Sight
In the bustling
growth of cities and the quiet edges of rural life, an invisible crisis festers
beneath the surface: inequitable access to wastewater services. For millions
living in informal settlements and underserved regions, sanitation remains a
distant dream. Behind every untreated drain and overflowing latrine is a story
of exclusion, neglect, and systemic injustice. This chapter exposes the depth
of the problem and offers pathways toward justice and sustainability.
5.1 Systemic Exclusion: The Geography of Neglect
The foundation
of wastewater inequity lies in the systemic exclusion of marginalized
populations. Communities in informal settlements and rural areas often lack
safe, regulated wastewater services, leading to significant health risks
(Deshpande et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2016). These populations face chronic
exposure to pathogens from poorly managed waste systems, which accelerates
cycles of illness and poverty (Adhikari & Halden, 2022).
This neglect is
not accidental. It is embedded in urban planning decisions and infrastructural
priorities that historically overlook informal or "unrecognized"
communities. Without legal tenure or visibility, these communities rarely
receive adequate sanitation investment, trapping them in perpetual
vulnerability.
5.2 Urban Bias and Investment Inequities
Wastewater
investment patterns reflect a broader urban bias. Private-sector actors often
prioritize infrastructure development in high-density, high-income areas that
promise higher returns (Ibrahim, 2025; Shi et al., 2018). This creates a
feedback loop where affluent neighbourhoods receive better services while
marginalized areas remain neglected (Adhikari & Halden, 2022).
This disparity
fuels environmental injustice. As wealthier districts advance with modern
treatment plants and innovative sanitation systems, nearby low-income
settlements suffer from untreated effluent and overflowing sewage. To break
this cycle, public-private partnerships must incorporate equity-based
allocation frameworks (Pasqualino et al., 2010).
5. 3 Health
Risks: The Human Cost of Injustice
Poorly
regulated wastewater systems in marginalized communities are breeding grounds
for disease. Contaminated water sources contribute to high rates of cholera,
typhoid, and parasitic infections (Matos et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023).
These outbreaks disproportionately impact children, women, and the elderly,
deepening the divide in health outcomes (Fonoll et al., 2023).
Moreover,
health burdens reduce educational attainment and economic productivity,
particularly for women and girls who often manage household sanitation
(Weisfuse, 2008). Addressing these risks requires a rights-based approach to
sanitation, ensuring no one is left behind due to geography or income level.
5.4 Decentralized Innovation: Community-Led
Solutions
Decentralized
wastewater technologies offer promising alternatives for underserved
communities. In Kenya, Sanergy's container-based sanitation model reduced
diarrheal incidence by over 60% in targeted slums (Ventura et al., 2024). These
models are cost-effective, scalable, and adaptable to space-constrained
environments (Bernal et al., 2021).
Such
innovations underscore the potential of community-led development. When
residents are empowered to design, manage, and maintain sanitation solutions,
outcomes improve across the board. Scaling these models requires political
will, funding, and integration into national sanitation strategies (Starkl et
al., 2013).
5.5 Policy Gaps and the Role of Governance
Despite global
commitments under Sustainable Development Goal 6.3, many countries fall short
in translating sanitation rights into action. Policy frameworks often overlook
informal settlements, allocating minimal resources to where needs are most
acute (Richards et al., 2021; Koné, 2010).
This disconnect
reflects a governance failure. In Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, a large
urban population resides in slums, yet sanitation budgets disproportionately
favour formal neighbourhoods (Castro et al., 2021). Bridging this gap requires
inclusive planning, participatory budgeting, and accountability mechanisms that
centre marginalized voices.
6. Reimagining Wastewater: A Blueprint for a Circular and Equitable Future
Wastewater
as the Mirror of Civilization: To
reimagine wastewater is to reimagine civilization. It reflects how societies
value life, equity, and the future. While often dismissed as a technical or
peripheral issue, wastewater management lies at the heart of sustainability,
justice, and resilience. This chapter explores how wastewater systems, when
transformed, can advance environmental, economic, and social well-being for
all.
Toward an
Equitable Sanitation Future
Infrastructure
is not neutral; it mirrors the values and priorities of those in power.
Addressing inequities in wastewater access demands more than engineering
solutions—it calls for political courage, inclusive governance, and reimagined
investment models. By centring the needs of the most vulnerable, society can
transform sanitation from a symbol of exclusion into a foundation for dignity
and development.
Equity Is the
Infrastructure of Hope
Equitable
access to wastewater services is not a luxury—it is a necessity for health,
education, gender equality, and resilience. As we navigate a world of
urbanization, climate threats, and public health crises, wastewater equity
stands as one of the clearest indicators of a just society. The time to build
that society is now.
Figure 5 Infrastructure Access
Disparities Across Income Groups
The
visual compares wastewater and sanitation infrastructure among low-, middle-,
and high-income regions Figure 5. It highlights stark inequalities: low-income
areas rely on minimal, often makeshift systems with limited pipe networks and
no advanced treatment, while middle-income regions show modest improvements in
infrastructure, including partial treatment plants. In contrast, high-income
regions benefit from fully integrated sanitation systems with modern plants,
robust networks, and efficient service delivery. The bar charts below
underscore the gap in access, revealing how economic status directly influences
public health and environmental safety through infrastructure investment.
6.1.
Embracing the One-Water Paradigm
The 'One Water'
approach is reshaping how we think about water. This integrated paradigm views
all water—wastewater, stormwater, and drinking water as a single resource.
Wastewater reuse is central, particularly as freshwater resources dwindle under
population pressure and climate change (WEF, 2023). Reusing treated water
supports agriculture, food security, and environmental resilience, positioning
wastewater at the core of sustainable development.
Equally, the
circular economy redefines treatment plants as hubs for energy, clean water,
and nutrients. This transition from linear to circular systems allows for
resource recovery and reduces environmental footprints (Oktriani et al., 2017).
Success requires community trust, inclusive governance, and consistent policy
frameworks.
6.2. Closing
Gaps in Governance and Transparency
Many wastewater
systems suffer from opaque governance and a lack of public access to data. This
erodes trust and inhibits effective monitoring (Nugraheni & Wijayati,
2021). Real-time data sharing and transparent oversight are essential for
building public confidence and ensuring accountability. Equally, decentralized
monitoring systems can empower communities to safeguard their health.
Public-private
partnerships must be held to higher standards. Without oversight, they risk
prioritizing profits over safety. Strengthening regulatory bodies, legal
frameworks, and citizen oversight mechanisms will enable more just and
resilient wastewater systems.
6.3.
Technologies Driving Sustainable Change
Transformative
technologies are reshaping wastewater treatment. Anaerobic digestion and
membrane bioreactors improve energy efficiency while enabling nutrient recovery
(Jain et al., 2023). Innovative monitoring tools allow for real-time pollutant
tracking and regulatory compliance (Ding & Zeng, 2022). These innovations
elevate wastewater from a liability to a resource.
Further, AI is
optimizing water reuse at scale. Brazil's Aquapolo project, for instance, uses
machine learning to reduce energy use and predict water demand. In homes, AI
systems inform users of consumption patterns, encouraging water conservation
and reducing waste.
6.4.
Community Engagement and Decentralized Innovation
Successful
wastewater systems rely on community ownership. Indonesia's SANIMAS program
trained over 12,000 technicians, empowering locals to manage decentralized
wastewater systems. Operational success rates point to the power of grassroots
expertise and capacity building.
Nepal's SUAKRI
model, driven by women's cooperatives, highlights how community-led planning
increases adoption and sustainability. Localized design, especially when
inclusive of marginalized voices, ensures systems are culturally appropriate
and functionally resilient. These approaches reduce gender disparities and
foster local economic development.
6.5. Finance
and Partnerships for Equitable Infrastructure
Sustainable
financing mechanisms—such as green bonds, ecotaxes, and PPPs—can fund equitable
infrastructure. However, these must be designed with equity at the core. Tools
like Rwanda's blockchain billing system improved tariff efficiency from 48% to
92%, enhancing transparency and revenue recovery (Wutich et al., 2023).
Large-scale
partnerships, like the African Water Facility's €3.2 billion PPP mobilization,
show how joint ventures can scale sanitation solutions. These models de-risk
investment, accelerate delivery, and enable cross-border cooperation.
Multilateral agencies must support knowledge transfer and capacity-building in
the Global South to bridge persistent disparities.
6.6 Wastewater as a Lever for Justice and Sustainability
Wastewater is
not a waste. It is a vital resource. Transforming it through innovation,
governance, and community participation unlocks multiple development gains.
From food security to climate resilience, circular wastewater systems can drive
inclusive growth.
The Future
Flows Through Wastewater
As cities swell
and climate pressures mount, the imperative is clear: wastewater must lead the
sustainability agenda. With bold policy, participatory planning, and equitable
investment, we can turn this overlooked sector into a cornerstone of a just and
thriving future.
7. Reclaiming Wastewater: Pathways to a Just and Sustainable Future
Beyond the
Drain Wastewater as a Mirror of Justice Wastewater is more than waste it is a reflection of how
societies value equity, sustainability, and resilience. Long considered
peripheral, wastewater is now central to achieving health, climate goals, and
human dignity. This chapter explores how a reimagined wastewater system rooted
in innovation, circularity, and inclusivity can shape a sustainable future.
7.1. Integration of Water Reuse, Equity, and Environmental Resilience
The 'One Water'
paradigm emphasizes the interconnectedness of water systems and promotes water
reuse, equity, and resilience (Emeka, 2025). As freshwater sources face
increasing stress, reusing treated wastewater becomes critical for agriculture
and climate adaptation. Integrated approaches ensure that marginalized
communities are not left behind in accessing safe and affordable sanitation
(Ejairu et al., 2024).
By centring
water reuse within a unified framework, policymakers can foster more equitable
and adaptive responses to mounting water-related challenges.
7.2.
Circular Economy Framework: From Waste to Wealth
Traditional
linear models extract, use, and discard are no longer sustainable. A circular
economy transforms wastewater treatment plants into resource recovery centres
that generate clean water, energy, and nutrients (Finnerty et al., 2023). This
model promotes local economic growth and environmental protection (Ejairu et
al., 2024).
By capturing
valuable resources and minimizing waste, circular systems create a regenerative
loop. They reduce greenhouse gas emissions while improving cost efficiency in
municipal utilities.
Figure 6 The Circular in Wastewater Management"
This illustrates how wastewater
can be transformed into valuable resources through a circular economy model.
Instead of treating wastewater as waste, the cycle emphasizes resource recovery,
including water reuse, biogas energy, and biosolids for fertilizer. The process
begins with wastewater collection, followed by treatment that enables safe
discharge or reuse. Through this loop, energy is recovered, ecosystems are
protected, and clean water is returned to the environment. It highlights a
sustainable approach where every drop and byproduct is reused or repurposed, promoting
environmental health, economic efficiency, and long-term resilience in water
management.
7.3 Bridging the Gap: Global Cooperation and Financial Support
Stark
disparities persist: only 38% of industrial wastewater is treated globally,
with low-income countries lagging at 4.3% (Lâm et al., 2015; Ali & Sultana,
2024). These gaps demand international cooperation, including financial
investments, technology transfers, and shared expertise (Kort et al., 2022).
Global
partnerships must prioritize underserved regions, mobilizing climate finance
and development aid to ensure equitable sanitation coverage. Equitable access
to wastewater services is a global justice imperative.
7.4.
Strengthening Governance for Accountability and Transparency
Effective
governance remains a weak link. Many countries lack transparency, while PPPs
often operate without sufficient oversight, risking safety and public trust
(Aydın & Özcan, 2023). Reforms must mandate real-time data sharing,
community monitoring, and robust regulatory structures (Hernández-Sancho,
2018).
Engaging
stakeholders in decision-making not only improves trust but also ensures that
solutions reflect local priorities. Legal frameworks should support inclusive
partnerships, especially in marginalized regions.
7.5.
Innovation and Inclusion: The Role of Technology and Community Engagement
Technological
breakthroughs such as anaerobic digestion and membrane bioreactors optimize
energy use and reduce emissions (Shaibu et al., 2025). Smart infrastructure
enables predictive maintenance and adaptive wastewater treatment, enhancing
efficiency.
However,
technology alone cannot solve inequality. Community co-design, exemplified by
Nepal's SUAKRI and Indonesia's SANIMAS, ensures systems are tailored to real
needs (V & Keerthana, 2024). Inclusivity fosters acceptance, enhances
adoption, and delivers cultural relevance in sanitation solutions.
7.6 The Wastewater Revolution Begins with Equity
Wastewater is
no longer an afterthought. It is a cornerstone of sustainable development.
Addressing water scarcity, climate resilience, and public health requires a
paradigm shift. Through reuse, circularity, innovation, and inclusive
governance, we can ensure wastewater management works for all.
The Future Flows Through Justice
The wastewater
revolution will not be televised, but it will be measured in lives saved,
ecosystems restored, and justice delivered drop by drop. Equity is not a luxury.
It is the foundation of a sustainable world.
8. Implementation Strategies for Inclusive and Sustainable Sanitation
Building a
Future Where Sanitation Serves All: Sustainable
sanitation is not merely an infrastructure issue; it is imperative for human
rights. It intersects with health, gender equality, climate resilience, and
technological innovation. This chapter explores actionable strategies that
ensure sanitation systems become inclusive, adaptive, and aligned with the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), transforming them from underfunded
utilities into engines of equity and sustainability.
8.1. Gender-Responsive Planning: Beyond Representation
True gender
inclusivity in sanitation involves more than Representation. It requires
influence. Metrics must track not only how many women are involved but also how
their insights shape sanitation planning and outcomes (Andersson et al., 2016).
Initiatives that prioritize women's leadership and community engagement lead to
more equitable service delivery (Gambrill et al., 2020; McFarlane, 2019).
To
institutionalize equity, participatory platforms must be created where women's
voices are central to the sanitation decision-making process.
8.2.
Transforming Norms: Tackling Social Barriers
Sanitation
strategies must address underlying gender norms that hinder women's
participation. Cultural and institutional biases often exclude women from
formal leadership in WASH governance (Sidjabat & Gunawan, 2020). Targeting
these barriers through policy, education, and inclusive design enhances both
social justice and sanitation effectiveness (Njeru, 2019).
When designers
integrate women's needs—from privacy to menstrual hygiene—they create systems
that are more dignified, accessible, and effective.
8.3. Modular
Technologies: A Scalable Sanitation Frontier
Modular
technologies like membrane bioreactors offer scalable, decentralized solutions
ideal for communities without centralized infrastructure (Yazdandoost, 2022). Engineers
can tailor these systems to meet changing population needs while producing
high-quality effluent suitable for reuse (Sarfefa et al., 2024).
However, their
success hinges on energy efficiency, operational costs, and local capacity.
Training personnel and ensuring cost-effective maintenance are key to long-term
sustainability (Doma et al., 2023).
8.4.
Contaminant-Specific Targets: Responding to Emerging Threats
The evolving
nature of water pollution necessitates sanitation strategies that address
contaminants like microplastics, pharmaceuticals, and endocrine disruptors
(Imenger et al., 2024). Setting SDG-aligned, contaminant-specific targets, especially
for microplastic reduction—pushes innovation in bioaugmentation and filtration
technologies (Silveira et al., 2025).
Monitoring
compliance and building enforcement mechanisms ensure that progress toward
cleaner water remains measurable and accountable.
8.5.
Inclusive Governance: Health, Equity, and Environmental Justice
Sanitation
access remains unequal, particularly in informal urban settlements and among
marginalized populations (Tooraj et al., 2023). Framing sanitation as both a
public and environmental health issue ensures a broader policy response (Guan
& Tian, 2023).
Inadequate
systems risk spreading diseases like cholera and typhoid, underscoring the
urgency of robust and inclusive implementation strategies that protect both
people and ecosystems (McFarlane, 2019).
8.6 Strategic Convergence for Equitable Sanitation
Sustainable
sanitation can be achieved through a convergence of gender-responsive
governance, scalable technology, and smart environmental regulation. These
evidence-based approaches empower communities, reduce health risks, and enhance
social equity.
Resilient Futures Begin with Inclusive Strategies
As urban
populations rise and environmental threats escalate, sustainable sanitation
must evolve. The strategies we implement today, which are grounded in justice,
technology, and inclusivity, will shape tomorrow's healthier, more equitable
cities. Actual progress flows where all voices are heard, and all needs are
met.
References
Akpan, V., et al. (2020). Gender, sanitation, and urban
planning. Urban Health Review, 12(1), 34–47.
Alsheyab, M. A., & Kusch-Brandt, S. (2018). Sustainable
wastewater reuse for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management, 217,
278–287.
Alzahrani, F., Elsebaei, M., & Tawfik, R. (2023).
Public acceptance of treated wastewater reuse in the agricultural sector in
Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 15(21), 15434.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115434
Amare, D., et al. (2017). Water reuse policy in urban
agriculture. Water Policy, 19(4), 667–682.
Aquise, W., & Rodríguez, F. (2024). Innovations in
membrane filtration. Water Research Advances, 12, 1011–1024.
Bernal, C. et al. (2021). Urban wastewater governance.
Journal of Urban Planning, 47(3), 301–316.
Boeraș, I., Curtean–Bănăduc, A., Bănăduc, D., & Cioca,
G. (2022). Anthropogenic sewage water circuit as a vector for SARS-CoV-2 viral
RNA transport and public health assessment International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11725.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811725
Cardoso‐Gonçalves,
R., et al. (2024). Progress on SDG 6. Sustainable Water Resources Management,
10(1), 103–117.
Chang, H., et al. (2019). Environmental health impacts of
untreated wastewater. Water Research, 163, 114853.
Chirisa, I., et al. (2016). Sanitation and planning in
African cities. Habitat International, 53, 126–135.
Doma, M., et al. (2023). Local governance in sanitation
management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 90, 104340.
Elateek, S., et al. (2020). Wastewater infrastructure
investment gaps. Journal of Environmental Infrastructure, 45(2), 211–225.
Fuhrimann, S., et al. (2016). Public health risks in urban
sanitation. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(6), e0004756.
Gambrill, M., et al. (2020). Inclusive sanitation
frameworks in urban contexts. World Bank Water Practice Paper, 3, 1–27.
García‐López,
R., et al. (2021). Urban resilience and wastewater planning. Urban Studies,
58(7), 1321–1340.
Gitter, A., et al. (2023). Not a waste: Wastewater
surveillance to enhance public health. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 4.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2022.1112876
Hamedi, H., et al. (2023). Climate-adaptive sanitation.
Water Research, 237, 119–137.
Hasegawa, T., et al. (2020). Public health risks in
sanitation-deficient communities. Global Health Science, 15(2), 143–160.
Huang, J., et al. (2023). Occurrence and removal of
antibiotic resistance in nationwide hospital wastewater China CDC Weekly,
5(46), 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2023.193
Imenger, C., et al. (2024). Community-led sanitation
improvement. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 252,
114291.
Karamoutsou, T. et al. (2024). Impact of flooding on
wastewater systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(2), 412–427.
Khan, M., et al. (2023). Heavy metals in vegetables Toxics,
11(5), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11050460
LaJoie, A., et al. (2022). Survey of nationwide public
perceptions https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.16.22272262
Larsen, T. A., et al. (2016). Urban sanitation transition.
Nature Sustainability, 1, 264–272.
Liu, X. (2024). Application and development of wastewater
epidemiology Theoretical and Natural Science, 58(1), 167-174.
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/58/20241375
Lyu, Y., et al. (2021). Sanitation burden among women and
infrastructure gaps. Environmental Research Letters, 16(3), 034056.
Lâm, S., et al. (2015). Evidence for public health risks of
wastewater International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
12(10), 12863-12885. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121012863
McFarlane, C. (2019). Sanitation and inequality in the
Global South. Geoforum, 104, 110–120.
Mohammadifardi, N., et al. (2022). Financial models in
wastewater investment. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 28(4), 04022045.
Msaki, G., et al. (2022). Social knowledge, attitudes
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 12(2), 223-241.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2022.096
Njeru, B. (2019). Urban wastewater flows and health risks.
Environmental Planning and Management, 62(6), 987–1004.
Nourbakhsh, S. et al. (2021). A wastewater-based epidemic
model https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.21260773
Qu, Y., et al. (2022). Digital wastewater management. Smart
Water, 7, 21–35.
Rahman, H., et al. (2023). Jakarta's sanitation crisis.
Asian Cities Review, 19(2), 75–92.
Rani, M., et al. (2022). Gendered health risks in
sanitation-deficient areas. Water Policy, 24(1), 118–136.
Sarfefa, A., et al. (2024). Sanitation service chain
governance. Urban Water Journal, 21(1), 23–35.
Sheth, K. et al. (2024). Wastewater targets pathogens
Emerging Infectious Diseases, 30(8). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3008.231564
Sheth, K. et al. (2024). A novel framework for internal
responses Public Health Reports, 140(1), 22-31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241253787
Sidjabat, H., & Gunawan, T. (2020). Women's access to
WASH in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Gender Studies, 11(2), 200–215.
Silveira, J., et al. (2025). Behavioural change in urban
sanitation. Global Public Health, 20(1), 76–90.
Smith, M., et al. (2024). Seasonality of viruses Msphere,
9(5). https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00105-24
Stefanakis, A. I. (2019). Constructed wetlands in climate
adaptation. Ecological Engineering, 138, 109–125.
Tao, W., et al. (2024). Urban wastewater treatment models.
Water Environment Research, 96(1), 51–62.
Teklu, K., et al. (2019). Virological quality of urban
rivers The Open Microbiology Journal, 13(1), 164-170.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801913010164
UN-Water. (2023). Progress on Wastewater Treatment – SDG
6.3. Geneva: United Nations.
UN-Water. (2024). Global Acceleration Framework for Water
Action. New York: UN-Water.
Weidhaas, J., et al. (2020). Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
in wastewater https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-40452/v1
Wolfe, A., et al. (2021). Gender-sensitive infrastructure
design. Journal of Urban Policy and Equity, 18(4), 423–439.
Yazdandoost, F. (2022). Sanitation equity in megacities.
Habitat International, 117, 102504.
