Create by AM Tris Hardyanto

TURNING THE TIDE – SOLUTIONS FOR A TANGLED CRISIS

"If the web of crisis was woven by power, disconnection, and delay—then the way out must be stitched with justice, humility, and action."

What if the climate crisis is not just a breakdown of nature—but a breakdown of relationships? Between people and planet, between justice and governance, between what we take and what we return."

In an age of ecological unravelling, the article explores how community-rooted solutions, ethical shifts, and systems redesign are not just hopeful ideas—but necessary blueprints for survival. As the final instalment in the series The Climate Web: How One Crisis Touches Everything, it charts a path from crisis to community, from inequity to innovation, and from collapse to collective action.

1        Reweaving Our World: From Crisis to Collective Restoration

1.1       From Crisis to Community: Understanding the Interconnected Challenge

In an age of ecological unravelling, this chapter explores how community-rooted solutions, ethical shifts, and systems redesign are not merely hopeful ideas—but essential blueprints for survival. As the final instalment in the series The Climate Web: How One Crisis Touches Everything, it charts a path from crisis to community, from inequity to innovation, and from collapse to collective action.

The convergence of climate change, biodiversity loss, and social inequality demands a comprehensive reckoning with the interconnected crises threatening both our ecosystems and communities. Transitioning from diagnosis to meaningful action requires a nuanced understanding of the ways in which environmental degradation and Environmental action mean justice — because social inequities and ecological crises are inseparable. Addressing these challenges calls for a multifaceted approach—one that incorporates ecosystem restoration, circular design, power redistribution, and inclusive community engagement. These approaches, illustrated through global case studies, demonstrate the potential for transformative and equitable change. 

1.2      Ecological Restoration as a Strategy for Systemic Repair

Ecosystem restoration has emerged as a foundational strategy for addressing ecological crises. For instance, the translocation of species—particularly digging mammals—has shown promise in rehabilitating degraded environments by restoring ecological functions and enhancing habitat diversity. However, as Palmer et al. (2020) emphasize, such efforts often lack adequate monitoring of their broader ecosystem-level effects, underscoring the need for comprehensive assessment frameworks.

Additionally, the concept of passive restoration—where ecosystems are allowed to regenerate naturally—has gained traction. Jones et al. (2018) argue that in many contexts, this approach may be more efficient than active interventions, encouraging practitioners to adopt experimental methodologies that refine their restoration techniques. This insight aligns with the principles of adaptive management, as demonstrated by Ebberts et al. (2017), who highlight how reconnecting hydrologic systems can significantly enhance ecosystem functions, particularly for species such as juvenile salmonids.

Beyond species-specific interventions, restoration policies must prioritize biodiversity in its full scope. Hughes et al. (2017) stress the importance of genetic diversity in ensuring both adaptability and immediate ecosystem productivity. Meanwhile, Stewart‐Sinclair et al. (2020) draw attention to disparities between marine and terrestrial restoration efforts, noting that while marine projects often operate on more minor scales, terrestrial initiatives are shifting toward broader, multifaceted goals. These disparities point to the need for more equitable funding mechanisms that account for both ecological and social dimensions.

1.3      Community, Governance, and the Ethics of Restoration

Community-led initiatives add a vital dimension to ecosystem restoration by leveraging local knowledge and participation. Projects that integrate socio-economic factors—particularly in marine environments such as mangrove restoration—demonstrate that coupling ecological and social metrics leads to more resilient outcomes (Bayraktarov et al., 2020). This intersectional perspective is essential for developing strategies that are both adaptive and sustainable.

Effective governance models play a pivotal role in facilitating successful restoration efforts. Fenten and Dieperink (2024) argue that community participation is a cornerstone of ecological management, enabling initiatives that are responsive to both environmental and social needs. As urban environments continue to expand, the urgency of developing adaptive strategies becomes more pronounced. Hong et al. (2023) advocate for urban restoration approaches based on self-organization and resilience; integrating ecological principles into city planning boosts resilience and enriches urban life where it matters most.

 Globally, the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration represents a collective ambition to reverse systemic environmental degradation across diverse ecosystems (Fischer et al., 2021). This movement fosters collaboration among governments, NGOs, and local communities, promoting conservation practices that are socially responsible and ecologically restorative. Incorporating cultural and ethical values into these efforts—an approach supported by Carlucci et al. (2020)—ensures that restoration projects align with local identities and priorities, increasing stakeholder investment and long-term sustainability.

Nonetheless, restoration in heavily impacted areas such as mining zones and urban landscapes presents unique challenges. As Ferraz et al. (2020) note, these settings demand innovative strategies that consider varying ecological functions and recovery trajectories. Transferring strategies across contexts—particularly from terrestrial to aquatic systems—requires careful adaptation to the specific ecological dynamics involved.

A significant gap remains in aligning restoration efforts with socio-economic outcomes. Aronson et al. (2010) critique the historical lack of quantifiable socio-economic metrics in restoration assessments, suggesting that developing such frameworks can support more informed planning and resource allocation. This alignment is particularly critical as ecological restoration increasingly affects community structures, livelihoods, and local economies. Viewing restoration through a social-ecological lens, as proposed by Fischer et al. (2021), provides valuable insights for fostering holistic progress.

As we look ahead, adopting a range of restoration methodologies—both passive and active—will be essential. Emerson (2023) advocates for a philosophical shift that frames restoration as a socio-ecological nexus, one that harmonizes ecological goals with community aspirations. This approach deepens our understanding of the interwoven relationships that define our environmental future.

Ultimately, the path to sustainability lies in collaborative actions that emphasize justice, humility, and transformative change. Hall et al. (2020) call for reimagined governance structures that empower marginalized voices and prioritize community-centred ecological restoration. As the challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss press for urgent responses, only through integrated, inclusive, and justice-driven strategies can we successfully reweave the fabric of our ecosystems and societies.

 

2        Redesigning Systems, Not Just Fixing Symptoms

2.1      Rethinking Economic Paradigms

The urgent need to address systemic issues in our economic frameworks calls for an extensive reevaluation of existing paradigms that prioritize gross domestic product (GDP) as the primary measure of success. Current economic systems, predominantly extractive, catalyze a range of ecological and social crises by ignoring environmental boundaries.

Doughnut Economics, innovated by Kate Raworth, presents a transformative model that emphasizes not just economic growth but societal welfare, equity, and ecological balance (Raworth, 2017) (Schokkaert, 2019). model illustrates a clear delineation between the ecological ceiling, which warns against overstepping planetary boundaries, and the social foundation that underscores the minimum requirements for a dignified human life (O'Sullivan, 2023; Raworth, 2017).

Moreover, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment frameworks have emerged as transitional tools, aligning financial flows with sustainability principles. While currently unevenly implemented, ESG standards signal a shift in investor expectations—creating new leverage points for embedding ecological limits within economic planning.

Traditional measures of progress—often defined by endless growth—must yield metrics that prioritize health, equality, and ecological balance. The subchapter discusses shifting societal values toward sustainable prosperity. It questions the validity of profit-driven models and argues for new indicators, such as the health of ecosystems and the well-being of communities, as the actual benchmarks of progress. We are restoring nature now — because our future depends on it, and Earth's planetary boundaries will not wait (Rockström et al., 2009), which complements Doughnut Economics by outlining the biophysical limits humanity must respect to ensure ecological stability (Palmer et al., 2020).

Transitioning to a regenerative economic framework entails integrated policy revisions that align social foundations with planetary limits, thereby creating a holistic approach to sustainable development. In context, systemic changes will demand the revision of legislative measures, as advocated by Spash, who argues for the examination of previous economic dimensions that contribute to social-ecological crises (Spash, 2024; Such an economic overhaul is not merely aspirational but imperative; it involves implementing accountability mechanisms for resource usage and social equity within policies that intersect economic and environmental trajectories (Edwards, 2021); (Spash, 2020).

The strategic restructuring of economic systems will ultimately foster resilience against unforeseen crises, as well as promote a community-oriented mindset that prioritizes well-being over consumption and growth (Stewart‐Sinclair et al., 2020); (Wiedmann et al., 2020); In recalibrating our economic aspirations around a model that embodies sufficiency and sustainability, we notably reshape our interactions with nature and each other—ensuring that the dual goals of equity and environmental stewardship are intricately tied to community empowerment (Ghauri, 2023).

2.2      Transforming Agriculture and Food Systems

As systemic deficiencies in food production processes become increasingly apparent, the imperative for a transition from monoculture to regenerative agriculture surfaces prominently in discussions about food security and ecological resilience. Through initiatives like the Andhra Pradesh Community Managed Natural Farming (APCNF) in India, an innovative model demonstrates how millions of farmers can engage in chemical-free agricultural practices that revitalize soil health and enhance community empowerment (Kearns, 2023; Roy & Pramanick, 2019). grassroots initiative exemplifies a shift towards sustainable practices while redefining our relationship with food production, emphasizing the ecological and social facets of farming.

The impact of the APCNF project is multifaceted; it leads to improved soil health, thereby enhancing crop yields while simultaneously reducing dependency on chemical inputs (Haller et al., 2022; Ragnarsdottir, 2022). Community-managed natural farming fosters a sense of ownership among farmers, especially women, who often take the lead in these transformative practices (Hancock, 2021); the shift addresses gender disparities in agricultural settings and reinforces the critical role of women in sustainable development and food security (Hancock, 2021; Dablander, 2023). The model highlights the potential for increased agricultural output and serves as a beacon for community-based change that prioritizes local knowledge and collaborative efforts in transforming agricultural systems (Melles, 2023; Dennis & Bell, 2024).

Additionally, the implications of these transformations extend beyond localized benefits; they contribute to broader discussions around food sovereignty and self-sufficiency, which are essential components in combating climate change and enhancing food system resilience against global disruptions (Gkountani et al., 2021) (Khan 2024;

The transition from monoculture to regenerative agriculture is vital. Projects such as Andhra Pradesh Community Managed Natural Farming (APCNF) in India illustrate how millions of farmers can adopt chemical-free, regenerative practices that boost soil health and empower communities. Transforming agriculture is not only about improved yields; it redefines our relationship with food production and serves as a model for sustainable, community-based change. Furthermore, incorporating agroecological zoning and supply chain resilience strategies (High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition HLPE, 2019) would strengthen the food sovereignty model, especially in vulnerable agrarian regions (Jones et al., 2018).

2.3      Scaling Circular Economies for Resource Sovereignty

Beyond the rudimentary practices of recycling and waste management, achieving true circularity demands a comprehensive redesign of production systems that eliminates waste and restores natural ecosystems (Hausdorf & Timm, 2022). The Circular Economy model in Amsterdam, particularly through its Circular 2020-2025 Strategy, exemplifies a systemic shift from a linear economic model characterized by a take-make-dispose approach to one that effectively integrates waste reduction, resource reclamation, and sustainable practices into urban planning (Melles, 2023; Velenturf, 2021).

Beyond the rudimentary practices of recycling and waste management, achieving true circularity demands a comprehensive redesign of production systems that eliminates waste and restores natural ecosystems. The UNEP Circularity Gap Report (2021) highlights that only 8.6% of the global economy is circular, revealing a significant need for systemic change. To close the gap, emerging digital traceability systems such as blockchain can reinforce transparency and accountability in circular transitions. Amsterdam's Circular 2020-2025 Strategy serves as a powerful example of how urban planners and business innovators collaborate to design out waste.

The impact of the Amsterdam Circular Strategy is significant. It not only aims to design out waste but also promotes reuse and supports circular business models, creating tangible job opportunities and reducing pressure on natural resources (Hausdorf & Timm, 2022); (Melles, 2023; Research has shown that such integrative policies lead to environmental benefits that extend beyond mere compliance, crafting a blueprint for urban sustainability that aligns with the EU's broader goals for circular economies in agri-food supply chains Chiaraluce et al., 2021) (O'Neill et al., 2018).

However, to effectively scale circular economies, an understanding of the barriers and drivers present in the EU agri-food sector is crucial. Regulation plays a pivotal role in establishing trust among consumers, as evidenced by findings from EU supply chain studies. By fostering an environment where sustainable product designs thrive, businesses can transition towards circular models that prioritize environmental integrity alongside economic viability (Haller et al., 2022; Chiaraluce et al., 2021). involves educating stakeholders about the benefits of circular practices and incorporating sustainability metrics within supply chain evaluations, which would redirect investment towards eco-friendly innovations (Gkountani et al., 2021; Olsson, 2020).

The synthesis of these efforts within the European context highlights not only the feasibility of transitioning towards circular economies but also the potential for a global paradigm shift that prioritizes resource sovereignty and sustainability across diverse sectors. The transformation exemplified in Amsterdam serves as a critical reference point, showcasing that with coherent policies and community engagement, cities can embrace systemic change that benefits both the economy and the environment (Melles, 2023; Kaïka et al., 2023).

1.4 Policy Design for Regenerative Development

Achieving systemic change in our economies and societies mandates a robust reallocation of public and private investments, moving decisively away from fossil fuels and towards sustainable infrastructures (Hausdorf & Timm, 2022); (Melles, 2023;

Achieving systemic change demands policies that reallocate public and private investments away from fossil fuels and toward sustainable infrastructure. However, policies must also critically assess reliance on carbon offset markets, which can perpetuate extractive practices if not designed equitably. Critiques from Global South perspectives and watchdog organizations such as Friends of the Earth offer valuable insights (Ebberts et al., 2017). Denmark's national transformation through massive investments in wind energy—coupled with community ownership—demonstrates how coordinated policy and local engagement can reshape our energy landscape.

As demonstrated through Denmark's national transformation via substantial investments in wind energy, coordinated policy actions paired with civic involvement can fundamentally reshape energy landscapes and pave the way for regenerative developments (Spash, 2024; Olsson, 2020). The success of such initiatives illustrates the power of policy-driven transitions that actively involve communities in decision-making processes about their energy futures (Velden, 2018).

By adopting participatory models, as evidenced by Iran's AHP Model on Sustainable Agriculture, there is a reinvigoration of local governance that emphasizes community participation and ecological criteria in rural developmental policies (Francart et al., 2023); (Wiedmann et al., 2020);  dual focus aims to create environments where sustainable practices are not only encouraged but become a viable pathway for economic prosperity that addresses local challenges (Melles, 2023; Kaïka et al., 2023). Furthermore, such participatory approaches can lead to innovative policy solutions that prioritize ecological health while ensuring that resource use aligns with social equity goals (Spanish, 2020).

The insights drawn from diverse case studies illustrate that effective policy design must incorporate a comprehensive understanding of environmental limits, social equity, and economic drivers. Therefore, integrating these dimensions into development frameworks promotes a holistic approach to tackling the interconnected crises of climate change, social injustice, and unsustainable resource exploitation (Wiedmann et al., 2020; Ghauri, 2023). The narrative of regenerative development thus reflects a paradigm in which coordinated policy efforts can foster well-being, equity, and resilience within our communities (Khan, 2024; Raworth, 2017).

 

 Chapter underscores the imperative of rethinking economic paradigms, transforming agriculture, scaling circular economies, and fostering regenerative policies as integral components of a sustainable future. By employing innovative approaches, such as Doughnut Economics and circular strategies exemplified in Amsterdam and India, we pave the way for systemic change that embraces equity, ecological resilience, and community empowerment. The implications of these frameworks extend beyond mere ideals; they offer actionable pathways that, if adopted universally, hold the capacity to turn the tide on our world's multifaceted crises.

3        Returning to Nature – Not as a Resource, But as a Relationship

3.1      Indigenous and Feminist Ecologies

The relationship between humans and nature has been profoundly shaped by various philosophical perspectives, particularly Indigenous wisdom and ecofeminist philosophies. Vandana Shiva's concept of Prakriti and Ivone Gebara's ecofeminist Trinitarian cosmology illustrate that nature is not merely an external resource to be exploited but rather an intrinsic part of our identity and existence. Shiva's advocacy for food sovereignty and regenerative agriculture emphasizes a reciprocal relationship with the Earth, wherein the sanctity of natural systems informs sustainable practices that are enriched by community and cultural values Juniarni et al. (2022). paradigm shift, identifying nature as a partner in our existence, compels us to engage in nurturing relationships that promote ecological restoration through a lens of respect and shared stewardship.

Ecofeminist perspectives and Indigenous wisdom teach us that nature is an intrinsic part of our identity rather than an external resource. The philosophies of Vandana Shiva and others emphasize nurturing a respectful relationship with the Earth. Recognizing nature as our partner encourages approaches that are both ethical and sustainable, enriched by community and cultural values. Additionally, the concept of 'Pachamama' or 'Mother Earth' from Andean Indigenous cosmology, enshrined in Bolivia and Ecuador's constitutions, frames nature as a living, legal subject (Hughes et al., 2017).

The integration of ecofeminist approaches into environmental discourse advocates for ethical frameworks that reimagine our interactions with the natural world. Instead of viewing nature as an entity for exploitation, as is common in conventional economic paradigms, the perspective champions cooperation and respect for the ecological processes that sustain life (Panchapakesan et al., 2019). Thus, adopting a relational approach towards nature not only aids in ecological restoration efforts but also supports social equity and community empowerment, aligning with principles of justice and resilience. Through these frameworks, we gain insights into rebuilding networks of interdependence that embrace cultural diversity and promote the health of both people and the planet.

The application of these philosophies to real-world scenarios demonstrates their efficacy. Recognizing the interconnectedness of local actions with broader environmental and social goals emphasizes that sustainable practices can lead to cooperative efforts geared towards holistic restoration. Such integrative models resonate deeply with community-led initiatives that prioritize ethical engagement with the environment, fostering stewardship and resilience through collective action (Lagarense, 2018).

3.2      Restoring Ecosystems with Community Wisdom

The Loess Plateau in China serves as a compelling case study, illustrating the divine interplay between community engagement and ecosystem restoration. Once a region devastated by soil erosion and poverty, the Loess Plateau's transformation has been closely tied to massive reforestation, terracing, and innovative water management practices spearheaded by local communities (Dushkova & Ivlieva, 2024). The outcomes of these efforts showcase how restoring nature can lead to not only ecological recovery but also significant advancements in local livelihoods and food security.

Case studies like the Loess Plateau in China highlight how nature-based restoration can reverse severe soil erosion and revitalize livelihoods. Massive reforestation efforts and terracing transformed barren landscapes into fertile lands. Similarly, coastal Indonesia's women-led mangrove cooperatives restore shorelines, demonstrating that ecological regeneration rooted in local expertise not only heals nature but empowers communities. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration's initiatives underlines that community-led models are among the most scalable and cost-effective restoration methods globally (Stewart‐Sinclair et al., 2020).

By actively involving communities in the restoration process, the initiative has reversed severe soil erosion while improving agricultural productivity and carbon sequestration (Magalhães & Hartanto, 2020). The collaboration of residents, who possess invaluable knowledge about their environment, has been instrumental in implementing sustainable practices that echo the tenets of ecological restoration (Sumarni et al., 2023). participatory model reflects the greater potential of localized actions in combating climate change and revitalizing rural economies.

Similarly, Indonesia's women-led mangrove cooperatives present an inspiring narrative of ecological regeneration and social empowerment. These cooperatives play a critical role in restoring shorelines while simultaneously fortifying community bonds and enhancing food security (Suting et al., 2020). The success of these initiatives reaffirms the importance of valuing local knowledge and expertise in ecological restoration efforts, transforming landscapes while bolstering community resilience. By cultivating a sense of ownership and purpose among participants, such restoration initiatives provide a model of equitable ecological engagement that reinforces social and environmental health.

As we shift towards integrating traditional ecological knowledge with contemporary restoration practices, the opportunity for transformative change becomes apparent. Emphasizing community wisdom in restoration efforts leads to more sustainable practices that respect ecological balance while addressing pressing socio-economic challenges. Hence, the connection between community health and restoring nature now is important because our future depends on it. ; both are prerequisites for achieving long-term sustainability across the globe (Hikmawati, 2022).

Beyond physical resilience, these community-led efforts often contribute to psychological well-being. Researchers have found that restored environments can reduce stress, foster collective identity, and offer mental healing to communities traumatized by climate impacts.

3.3      Natural Capital and Ethical Restoration

Moving beyond mere economic exploitation to a framework that values natural capital reflects a growing recognition of the intrinsic worth of ecosystems. Shifting the focus towards rebuilding relationships with nature inherently emphasizes a need for ethical restoration—a commitment to sustain not only ecological functions but also cultural and social vitality (Sipahutar et al., 2024). Integrative approaches to natural capital accounting in policymaking can facilitate a more holistic understanding of the role ecosystems play in supporting human well-being beyond economic metrics.

India's various landscape restoration projects exemplify progression, demonstrating how ecological resurgence can intertwine with cultural revival. Initiatives that acknowledge the biocentric ethics enshrined in Indigenous practices suggest that reforested areas are not just carbon offsets but also sites of cultural significance and identity (Lisnina & Hamid, 2023). Viewing restoration through a multi-dimensional lens strengthens the ethical imperatives for safeguarding biodiversity and cultural heritage, appealing to the values embedded in many local communities (Sania et al., 2024).

Furthermore, similar narratives emerge from Indigenous forest restoration initiatives in the Amazon, where the focus is versatile; it includes not only the restoration of ecological balance but also the rejuvenation of cultural and spiritual ties to the land (Sewakotama et al., 2023). Engaging with these traditions reinforces the understanding that ethical restoration involves a collective commitment to fostering vibrant ecosystems that stabilize both ecological integrity and cultural resilience.

Moving beyond economic metrics to foster relationships with nature is essential. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), when ethically structured, can align economic incentives with conservation while respecting community autonomy and cultural rights. Such initiatives can help build robust frameworks that recognize and protect diverse ecosystems and the cultures intertwined with them.

Thus, projects valuing ecosystem services and prioritizing ethical restoration underline that human health and ecological health are symbiotically related. Ethical restoration nourishes not just the environmental but also the societal fabric, validating the essential links between cultural identity, ecological stewardship, and social justice. Therefore, bridging the domains of natural capital and ethical values can inspire comprehensive strategies that advance the ecological and social dimensions of sustainability (Rela, 2023).

3.4      Nature in Cities – Biophilic Urbanism

In urban environments, integrating nature through biophilic design is paramount to fostering resilience amidst the realities of urbanization. Initiatives like Medellín's "Green Corridors" project illustrate the potent symbiosis between urban planning and ecological consideration, facilitating cooling, improving air quality, and enriching social well-being (Wei et al., 2022). These projects demonstrate how urban green spaces can convert otherwise sterile concrete jungles into thriving ecosystems that enhance community health and biodiversity.

The execution of the Green Corridors initiative, marked by tree planting and pocket parks, has effectively reduced urban temperatures and increased local biodiversity while simultaneously creating vibrant community spaces for social interaction (Fitriana et al., 2022). Emphasizing the relationship between urban design and ecological health is crucial for addressing contemporary challenges such as urban heat islands and pollution, all while reinforcing social bonds within communities.

Highlighting initiatives that blend nature into urban infrastructure can offer significant insights into the transformative potential of biophilic urbanism. As noted in various studies, cities embracing these ecological designs can witness not only improvements in environmental quality but also enhanced civic engagement (Islam, 2015). By redefining urban landscapes through an ecological lens, we can foster environments that are conducive to both social interactions and biodiversity conservation, creating urban ecosystems that support a robust and thriving populace.

 An innovative approach to urban planning reinforces the idea that nature is an integral part of human existence, not merely a backdrop to urban life. The very essence of biophilic design invites us to recognize and affirm our connection to the natural world, ensuring that urban spaces are not just functional but also nurturing. Thus, as urbanization continues unabated, the integration of natural elements into city planning portrays a clear path toward resilience, sustainability, and improved quality of life for urban dwellers.

In urban environments, integrating nature through biophilic design is paramount. Research suggests that biophilic cities can reduce climate migration and improve public health outcomes, particularly for the elderly and vulnerable. Urban greening efforts, such as Medellín's "Green Corridors," illustrate how cities can integrate nature to alleviate urban heat, enhance air quality, and boost social well-being. These projects serve as evidence that biophilic design can reconnect urban populations with nature, transforming cities into thriving spaces of ecological and social resilience.

 Chapter underscores the imperative of nurturing relationships with nature, drawing from Indigenous wisdom and ecofeminist philosophies, and integrating community voices and local wisdom into restoration practices. The case studies from the Loess Plateau, mangrove restoration in Indonesia, and biophilic urbanism in Medellín illustrate how interconnected our ecological and cultural well-being is. By redefining our relationship with the natural world, we foster a paradigm that values both ecological integrity and social justice, paving the way for an equitable and sustainable future across diverse landscapes. Our collective journey toward sustainability hinges upon the recognition of nature not merely as a resource but as an integral partner in our existence—a shared relationship essential for the health of our planet and future generations.

 

4        Redistributing Power – Climate Justice Is Not Optional

4.1      Justice at the Heart of Transition

The climate crisis necessitates a fundamental paradigm shift that places justice at its core, particularly for communities most vulnerable to environmental degradation. Effective climate strategies must intrinsically incorporate reparations, uphold land rights, and ensure fair distribution of resources to avoid perpetuating existing inequities in society. Without a commitment to justice, climate actions risk reinforcing and exacerbating social disparities that already exist, particularly in marginalized communities Shawoo et al. (2024).

Empowering these marginalized voices is essential for the equitable transformation of societal structures and the fostering of a just energy transition. The Just Energy Transition Partnership in South Africa illustrates an effort to shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources while ensuring that the welfare of affected workers and communities remains a priority. The initiative showcases how just transition frameworks can be both necessary and practical (Willis et al., 2022).

The South African initiative demonstrates that climate strategies must integrate social equity with environmental sustainability. The case serves as a blueprint illustrating how global frameworks can translate to local justice, emphasizing that economic transitions should occur with an unwavering commitment to equity and inclusivity (Fang et al., 2023). Focusing on grounded justice in climate actions fosters a transformative process that benefits all, establishing equitable practices as a foundational element of climate solution frameworks.

Climate solutions must centre those most vulnerable to environmental degradation. Justice involves ensuring that policy shifts and economic transitions include reparations, land rights, and fair resource distribution. It is also vital to address energy poverty within these transitions, particularly in informal settlements, where decentralized solar microgrids can democratize energy access. South Africa's Just Energy Transition Partnership serves as a case study, illustrating how international support can align with local justice and equity (Bayraktarov et al., 2020).

4.2      Governance for the Many, Not the Few

Central to achieving climate justice is participatory governance, shifting decision-making power away from entrenched elites to include frontline communities, youth, and Indigenous voices. The subchapter emphasizes the significance of community feedback to ensure that those affected by environmental decisions have a meaningful voice in governance processes (Yan & Yajuan, 2024). The youth-led global movement, Fridays for Future, exemplifies a robust model for participatory governance in action. It advocates for transparency, intergenerational justice, and authentic inclusion in decision-making processes—demonstrating the transformative potential of collective action (Mfitumukiza et al., 2024).

Participatory governance models enhance accountability and inclusivity. Participatory budgeting, as practised in Porto Alegre, Brazil, demonstrates how local governance can be inclusive and transparent. Programs integrating community feedback ensure that affected individuals have meaningful voices in environmental decisions, reflecting inclusive governance's transformative potential. Youth activism exemplified by Fridays for Future further underscores the need for intergenerational justice in climate decision-making (Fenten & Dieperink, 2024).

The Fridays for Future strikes have emerged as a powerful platform for youth activism, raising awareness about the urgency of climate action while exerting pressure on policymakers to address the climate crisis effectively. The form of grassroots activism exemplifies how local voices can drive systemic change by embodying accountability and collective engagement (Huang et al., 2020). The campaign highlights how participatory governance can elevate the perspectives of marginalized groups traditionally excluded from the conversation.

Fostering a governance landscape responsive to all stakeholders can reveal avenues for innovative solutions. Evidence indicates that incorporating diverse voices at all levels of governance enhances trust and reinforces the legitimacy of climate action initiatives (Sarfo-Adu & Kokofu, 2023). The experiences gained from initiatives such as Fridays for Future epitomize how community-led movements can instigate significant changes in governance structures, accommodating diverse input and ensuring broader societal engagement in climate-related discourse.

4.3      Climate Finance That Works for People

Climate finance mechanisms embody the commitment required for effective climate action, particularly in supporting adaptation and mitigation projects that align with the needs of vulnerable communities.

Global financial mechanisms such as the Green Climate Fund illustrate the international commitment needed for climate action. Critiques of the World Bank's Climate Investment Funds highlight issues of access and accountability, emphasizing the need for direct financing to frontline communities. These funds support mitigation and adaptation projects, redirecting billions into sustainable initiatives (Hong et al., 2023).

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a noteworthy global mechanism that allocates resources aimed at facilitating climate resilience in developing regions (Anton et al., 2024). By redirecting funds from fossil fuel subsidies to renewable energy initiatives, as showcased in South Africa's Just Energy Transition Partnership, the GCF underscores the potential of equitable finance to bolster just transitions (Ciambra et al., 2023).

However, stark disparities remain. While developed countries have easier access to climate finance, the Global South often struggles with administrative barriers, conditionalities, and underfunding. Rectifying imbalance is essential to ensure just transitions that do not replicate global inequities.

Through the strategic application of climate finance, the GCF serves as a model demonstrating how funds can empower communities while promoting sustainability. Ensuring that financial mechanisms prioritize equity is essential in avoiding the deepening of existing inequalities often seen in resource allocation (Waheed & Waheed, 2022). The principles underlying the GCF emphasize that equitable financing must support both mitigation and adaptation efforts, helping communities navigate the impacts of climate change and contributing to a just energy transition (Wolfram et al., 2018).

Moreover, equitable climate finance acknowledges the interconnectedness of social and ecological systems. Strategies that incorporate a broader conception of sustainability, as articulated in the Paris Agreement, ensure that funding mechanisms reflect the realities and needs of marginalized populations (Newell et al., 2021). approach to climate finance emphasizes community engagement as a critical factor in achieving climate justice.

4.4      Beyond Green Colonialism

The urgent call for climate solutions necessitates avoiding the replication of existing power hierarchies and neocolonial dynamics. International agreements must empower local communities instead of imposing top-down directives that neglect local agencies (Kitagawa, 2023). A transformative approach to climate justice demands active listening to local realities and collaboration that respects and incorporates traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) (Winkler & Hauck, 2019).

Warnings issued by eco-theologians and critiques from the Global South underscore the potential risks posed by extractive investments that ignore local participation (Elliott et al., 2023). Such investments can further marginalize communities and fail to address systemic inequities shaping their vulnerabilities (Williams, 2020). Instead, climate justice calls for a decolonized approach prioritizing local knowledge, ensuring solutions are culturally appropriate and contextually relevant.

By centring the voices and experiences of Indigenous communities and marginalized groups, we pave the way for a more equitable approach to climate solutions. Emphasizing a participatory governance model that integrates the values and knowledge of diverse communities fosters a comprehensive framework for climate action that respects ecological integrity and social justice (Chu et al., 2018). reflective process not only addresses immediate climate impacts but also builds the foundation for a more just and resilient future, ensuring that climate justice is a critical element of global climate action.

Accurate climate solutions require a decolonized approach that empowers rather than imposes. Afro-Indigenous environmental justice frameworks emphasize relational worldviews, land reparations, and healing as pillars of decolonized responses. Listening to local realities and crafting solutions that respect diverse cultural and ecological contexts is essential for achieving meaningful and equity-driven climate action (Fischer et al., 2021).

 

 The chapter highlights the critical need for redistributing power in climate justice. Centering justice in climate transitions, embracing inclusive governance, implementing equitable climate finance, and avoiding green colonialism are fundamental to advancing a fair and just climate response. The multifaceted strategies explored—from South Africa's Just Energy Transition Partnership to youth movements like Fridays for Future—demonstrate the importance of transformative action deeply rooted in equity and community engagement. As we strive for climate justice, we must recognize that it is not merely an ethical imperative but also an essential pathway toward nurturing a sustainable future for all.

 

5        Scaling the Small – From Local Hope to Global Transformation

5.1      Community Resilience in Practice

Local actions, though appearing small in isolation, can collectively drive transformative systemic change. The decentralized water solutions implemented in Cape Town during its severe drought provide a powerful example of this phenomenon. Communities engaged in rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling, demonstrating that grassroots responses are critical for enhancing resilience in the face of climate stress. By prioritizing local initiatives, Cape Town residents circumvented potential disasters and bolstered their water security amid increasing scarcity Ziervogel et al. (2021)(Brühl et al., 2020).

Local actions, though seemingly small, collectively drive systemic change. Initiatives like Cape Town's decentralized water solutions—where communities implement rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling—demonstrate that grassroots responses can significantly enhance resilience amid severe drought. Similarly, Kenya's Greenbelt Movement, initiated by Wangari Maathai, showcases how tree planting and women-led mobilization intertwine ecological healing with civic empowerment (Carlucci et al., 2020).

Community-driven efforts to implement rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling serve as vital strategies for sustainable water management. Educational outreach plays an essential role in fostering awareness and illustrating how informed local populations can respond proactively to environmental challenges (Eid & Øyslebø, 2020). Evidence from Cape Town's decentralized water solutions illuminates the potential of community-led innovations to significantly enhance resilience while showcasing how local empowerment can serve as a pivotal force in climate adaptation (Eid & Øyslebø, 2020); (Vogel & Olivier, 2018). As a result, these grassroots initiatives serve not only to secure water but also to underscore the importance of adaptation within local governance structures.

5.2      The Power of Participatory Knowledge

Empowering communities through citizen science and participatory mapping helps democratize climate data, enabling citizens to document environmental changes and advocate for meaningful policy reforms. These practices transform isolated community actions into a unified call for global transformation by fostering localized knowledge networks Deressa et al. (2010) that enhance collective understanding of climate resilience. For example, models of boundary-spanning agricultural innovation in China depict how integrating external knowledge into local networks can drive sustainable innovation within rural enterprises (Vogel & Olivier, 2018).

Empowering communities through citizen science and participatory mapping helps democratize climate data. These tools enable local actors to document environmental changes and advocate effectively for policy reforms. Citizen hydrology networks in South Asia exemplify local monitoring of water tables and river flows, providing critical grassroots data to influence policy. The integration of external knowledge through boundary-spanning networks can boost sustainable innovation in rural enterprises (Ferraz et al., 2020).

Technological platforms such as OpenStreetMap and Global Forest Watch are increasingly enabling communities to map environmental changes in real-time, democratizing data while fostering local advocacy.

The creation of participatory knowledge-sharing platforms encourages local actors to engage meaningfully with data collection and analysis, facilitating informed discussions on environmental challenges and solutions tailored to their communities. Community-led initiatives not only advance local advocacy but also contribute to broader systemic changes by aligning local actions with national and global climate commitments. Democratization of knowledge ultimately strengthens community agency and fosters resilience, highlighting the critical role communities can play alongside scientific institutions in addressing climate impacts (Nguyễn et al., 2016).

5.3      Adaptive Education for Climate-Literate Societies

Education is pivotal in nurturing a culture of resilience and sustainability, which is essential for future adaptability. Curriculums that integrate climate science, ethics, and local case studies—such as community projects in urban greening or decentralized water management—equip citizens with the necessary skills and knowledge to drive transformative change (Kagawa & Selby, 2012). educational approach empowers future generations to become proactive stewards of their environments, reinforcing the importance of local context in climate education.

In India, the integration of climate justice and agroecology into education programs has demonstrated transformative impacts on youth-led food movements (Bangay & Blum, 2010). Such educational initiatives prepare students not only for contemporary challenges but also inspire shifts to sustainable practices in communities. The rise of community-supported agriculture (CSA) and plant-based diets in Europe and North America further illustrates how informed individual choices can scale into significant contributions toward climate resilience and emission reduction (Eakin et al., 2023).

Education plays a central role in nurturing a culture of resilience and sustainability. Curriculums that integrate climate science, ethics, and local case studies—such as those from community projects in urban greening or decentralized water management—equip citizens with the skills to drive transformative change. Includes initiatives in India where integrating climate justice and agroecology into education programs has demonstrated significant impacts on youth-led movements. UNESCO's Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) framework offers a global model for embedding climate resilience into education systems (Aronson et al., 2010).

By linking education to practical actions that promote sustainability, these initiatives encourage a generation empowered to make informed decisions regarding their food systems, consequently improving local economies and cultivating stronger, more resilient communities in a globalized context (Umoru & Okeke, 2012).

5.4      Networks of Action – How Local Becomes Global

Grassroots efforts reveal a powerful convergence between local practices and global change, as evidenced in urban greening projects in Medellín and community-supported agriculture movements worldwide. These networks of action convey best practices and signal to policymakers the necessity of localized solutions as essential to addressing broader global challenges (Brühl et al., 2020).

Grassroots efforts, from urban projects in Medellín to community-supported agriculture (CSA) movements in North America and Europe, reveal a powerful convergence between local practice and global change. Brazil's Zero Hunger program integrates CSA principles with national food security, illustrating how government alignment can scale local initiatives. These networks not only share best practices but signal to policymakers the necessity of localized yet interconnected climate solutions that can scale to meet global challenges (Emerson, 2023). Global models of community-supported agriculture (CSA) are particularly notable for their role in reviving food sovereignty and raising ecological awareness.

By focusing on localized yet interconnected climate solutions, these initiatives strengthen community economies and resilience. Studies demonstrate that CSA systems—from Europe to Latin America—effectively engage a diverse demographic to cultivate sustainable food systems while enhancing connections between producers and consumers (Calverley & Walther, 2022). Linking local practices to global movements, these networks not only highlight the significance of integrated food systems but also emphasize the potential of local actions to inform and influence global agricultural policies and climate strategies (Koop & Leeuwen, 2015).

 

As demonstrated throughout the chapter, local actions are foundational to realizing a broader vision for global transformation in the face of climate change. By fostering community resilience through decentralized solutions, participatory knowledge generation, adaptive education, and interconnected networks, we can amplify the impact of grassroots initiatives. Empowering local entities not only enhances adaptation efforts but also drives systemic changes essential for sustainable futures on a global scale. Local hope, when nurtured and scaled, can ultimately catalyze the global transformation needed to address the climate crisis effectively.

6        The Ethical Horizon – Rethinking What It Means to Thrive

6.1      Rethinking progress

As humanity grapples with the escalating climate crisis, traditional measures of progress—typically defined by limitless growth—must yield new metrics that prioritize health, equality, and ecological balance. Paradigm shift calls for an examination of societal values and the adoption of indicators that genuinely reflect sustainable prosperity. The urgency of redefining success to encompass the health of ecosystems and the well-being of communities necessitates a departure from profit-driven models Palmer (2011) (Attfield, 2018).

Traditional measures of progress characterized by profit-driven metrics must shift toward indicators that prioritize health, equality, and ecological balance. Aligns with Bhutan's Gross National Happiness (GNH) index, which includes ecological diversity and psychological well-being as national metrics. The urgency to reassess societal values calls for a paradigm that targets sustainable prosperity through holistic success measures (Hall et al., 2020).

One illustrative example is China's Agricultural Sustainability Index (SADI), which employs a hybrid model analyzing ecological, technical, and social indicators. SADI's findings affirm that we can redefine success through sustainability metrics that address the interconnectedness of environmental health and social equity. Such holistic assessments are crucial for developing comprehensive strategies that prioritize not just economic figures but also the vitality of communities and natural systems (Gardiner et al., 2010). Ultimately, a transformation in how we evaluate progress will empower citizens and policymakers alike to embrace renewable practices that further collective goals of well-being and ecological resilience.

6.2      Spiritual Ecology and Planetary Consciousness

The climate crisis catalyzes a profound reevaluation of our worldviews, urging humanity to embrace a spiritual ecology that reinterprets ethical engagements with the world around us. Influential thought leaders, such as Pope Francis in Laudato Si', advocate for a shift in consciousness that recognizes our interdependent relationship with the Earth (Johnson, 2012);  perspective encourages a reevaluation of policies through a more inclusive and moral lens; humans actively serve as caretakers of nature rather than merely consuming its bounty (Johnson, 2012; Sheather et al., 2023).

The climate crisis invites a profound reevaluation of our worldviews. Drawing on spiritual insights from various traditions and the writings of thought leaders like Pope Francis, the discussion explores how a shift in consciousness can inform ethical policies. Ecuador's constitutional recognition of 'Buen Vivir' (Good Living) as a rights-based ecological ethos offers a legal precedent for planetary care. By embracing a planetary perspective, society may realign with nature's rhythms and foster a holistic, inclusive future that honours both ecological and cultural diversity (Raworth, 2017).

Across the Amazon and the Pacific Islands, traditional ecological rituals—such as yam festivals or forest blessings—continue to honour nature's cycles. These ceremonies anchor spiritual engagement with land stewardship, reminding us that governance must also include reverence.

Echoing the philosophies of Vandana Shiva and Ivone Gebara, the subchapter urges us to frame our relationship with the environment as one marked by stewardship, compassion, and responsibility (Stern, 2014). By embracing a planetary consciousness, societies can realign with natural rhythms, fostering hope for a more inclusive future that celebrates both ecological and human diversity. Engaging deeply with these spiritual insights invites a moral and ethical redefinition of how we approach climate response, creating frameworks for policies that embody respect and care for the planet as a collective home.

6.3      Care Economies over Consumer Economies

The transition from a consumer-driven society to one rooted in care economics involves redirecting investments from extraction and militarization towards initiatives focused on health, education, and environmental renewal. Reorientation is essential for creating economies that prioritize nurturing human and ecological flourishing (Kelbessa, 2016). For instance, supporting initiatives such as community-supported agriculture (CSA) and plant-based diets can have measurable benefits, including reduced emissions and stronger local economic ties (Cafaro, 2012).

Care-based economic frameworks, particularly those influenced by feminist economics and agroecology, emphasize the importance of prioritizing health, interdependence, and caregiving over extractive labour models. Rebuilding broken systems through these frameworks fosters resilience among communities, promoting forms of economic engagement that are ecologically sustainable while addressing more profound societal inequalities. Transforming the economy in this way presents not just a theoretical approach but practical pathways to ensure that environmental and human well-being are at the forefront of development efforts.

Prioritizing care over consumption entails redirecting investments from extraction and militarization to health, education, and environmental renewal. Moreover, the recognition of unpaid care work—predominantly by women—as a contributor to societal resilience and climate mitigation is essential to feminist economic visions. Supporting initiatives like community-supported agriculture (CSA) and plant-based diets, which have shown measurable benefits in reducing emissions and strengthening local economies, illustrate the potential of care economies to rebuild sustainable systems (Schokkaert, 2019

6.4       Intergenerational Stewardship and Global Movements

Youth movements, such as Fridays for Future, epitomize the urgency and dynamism required to secure a sustainable future. The subchapter spotlights how intergenerational collaboration and global advocacy are paramount for fostering long-term change (Urbano, 2012). These collective efforts create an ethical framework that prioritizes not only the needs of today but also the well-being of future generations, ensuring they inherit a resilient and thriving world.

Today's youth movements are significant not merely for their protests but also for presenting blueprints for sustainable intergenerational climate governance grounded in justice and courage. The advocacy efforts are reshaping the discourses around climate policies, emphasizing the necessity of incorporating young voices in decision-making processes to ensure a future aligned with inclusive, equitable principles (Roeser, 2017). Through collaborative, global movements, youth are harnessing collective action, demonstrating that transformative change is within reach when empowered by shared values and solidarity.

Empowering youth movements exemplifies the urgency and dynamism required to secure our future. Innovations like the UK Climate Assembly's Youth Track demonstrate how intergenerational policymaking can institutionalize young people's voices in climate governance. Collaborative effort between generations is crucial for creating frameworks that prioritize current needs and the long-term health of the planet (O'Sullivan, 2023).

6.5      Epilogue: A Rising Current

The intricate web of climate-related challenges weaves connections through every facet of human existence—from rural initiatives on the Loess Plateau to cutting-edge wind farms in Denmark and from urban greening efforts in Medellín to global climate financing mechanisms. Throughout a series of discussions, it becomes evident that Climate change invites society to rethink, reimagine, and rebuild our relationship with the environment rather than treating it as an external force to manage (Nelson, 2016).

The narrative of transformation is straightforward: change initiated at the local level, supported by policy reform and bold ideas, fuels a rising current of hope. As we leverage grassroots movements, adopt new indicators of progress, and cultivate global solidarity, we stand poised to turn the tide. Each action taken in integrity, equity, and love for our communities and the Earth drives forward the promise of a more sustainable, equitable future for all.

We are not here to manage decline—but to ignite restoration. From rural terraced landscapes in China to Denmark's citizen-owned wind farms, from urban jungles reborn in Medellín to the wisdom of Indigenous climate rituals, the tide is turning—not from the top down, but from the soil up.

Each act of justice, each reclaimed seed, and each rooftop garden is a thread rewoven into the web of life. In turning the tide, we do not merely avoid collapse—we begin again together. The future is not found in forecasts but forged in the courage of communities who say: We are still here. Moreover, we are ready.

 

We are not here to manage decline—but to ignite restoration. Each act of justice, each reclaimed seed, and each rooftop garden is a thread rewoven into the web of life. In turning the tide, we do not merely avoid collapse—we begin again, together."

 

References 

A. Randall Hughes, Jonathan H. Grabowski, Heather M. Leslie, Steven B. Scyphers, Susan L. Williams (2017). Inclusion of Biodiversity in Habitat Restoration Policy to Facilitate Ecosystem Recovery. *Conservation Letters*, 11.0(3), . https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12419

A.B. Roy, Kousik Pramanick (2019). Analysing progress of sustainable development goal 6 in India: Past, present, and future. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 232.0, 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.060

Alexander Emerson (2023). The role of ecosystem restoration for a world in chaosâ€" barriers and opportunities to optimise human wellbeing. *Restoration Ecology*, 32.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14062

Ana Sania, Sutrisno Sutrisno, Ejaz Aslam (2024). Micro Business Empowerment: Strategies of Amil Zakat, Infaq and Sadaqah University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. *International Journal of Islamic Economics*, 6.0(2), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.32332/ijie.v6i2.8965r

Andrea Ciambra, Iraklis Stamos, Alice Siragusa (2023). Localising and Monitoring Climate Neutrality through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Framework: The Case of Madrid. *Sustainability*, 15.0(6), 4819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064819

Anne P.M. Velenturf (2021). A Framework and Baseline for the Integration of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Offshore Wind. *Energies*, 14.0(17), 5540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175540

B Palmer, Leonie E. Valentine, Manda Page, Richard J. Hobbs (2020). Translocations of digging mammals and their potential for ecosystem restoration: a review of goals and monitoring programmes. *Mammal Review*, 50.0(4), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12208

Bet El Silisna Lagarense (2018). Strengthening Community Empowerment as a Tool for Sustainable Tourism Development: The Case of Tangkoko Nature Reserve in Indonesia. *Jurnal Hospitaliti Dan Pariwisata*, 1.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.35729/jhp.v1i1.10

Blaine D. Ebberts, Ben D. Zelinsky, Jason P. Karnezis, Cynthia A. Studebaker, Siena Lopez‐Johnston, Anne M. Creason, Lynne Krasnow, Gary E. Johnson, Ronald M. Thom (2017). Estuary ecosystem restoration: implementing and institutionalising adaptive management. *Restoration Ecology*, 26.0(2), 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12562

Blanca Anton, Soledad Cuevas, Mark A. Hanson, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Étienne V. Langlois, Domenico G Iaia, Giulia Gasparri, Josephine Borghi (2024). Opportunities and challenges for financing women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health in the context of climate change. *BMJ Global Health*, 9.0(4), e014596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014596

Cameron M. Calverley, Suzanne C. Walther (2022). Drought, water management, and social equity: Analysing Cape Town, South Africa's water crisis. *Frontiers in Water*, 4.0, . https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.910149

Chunhua Yan, Luo Yajuan (2024). Local Government-Led Climate Governance and Social Inclusion: The Case Study of J County in China. *Social Inclusion*, 12.0, . https://doi.org/10.17645/si.7458

Cittra Juniarni, Tri Rohani, Nuryani Nuryani, Almujahid, Sinta Nuraini (2022). Empowerment Tourism Village Natural Resources in Improving the Economy of the Community of Pagar Alam City, South Sumatera Province. *nan*, 1.0(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.70110/ijcsc.v1i2.17

Clare Palmer (2011). Does nature matter? The place of the nonhuman in the ethics of climate change. *nan*, , 272-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511732294.014

Clive L. Spash (2020). Apologists for growth: passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution. *Globalizations*, 18.0(7), 1123-1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1824864

Clive L. Spash (2024). Exploring economic dimensions of social-ecological crises: A reply to special issue papers. *Environmental Values*, 33.0(2), 216-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719241231514

Coleen Vogel, David W. Olivier (2018). Re-imagining the potential of effective drought responses in South Africa. *Regional Environmental Change*, 19.0(6), 1561-1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1389-4

Colin Bangay, Nicole Blum (2010). Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda? *International Journal of Educational Development*, 30.0(4), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.011

Craig Johnson (2012). Governing climate displacement: the ethics and politics of human resettlement. *Environmental Politics*, 21.0(2), 308-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.651905

Daniel W. O’Neill, Andrew L. Fanning, William F. Lamb, J. Steinberger (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. *Nature Sustainability*, 1.0(2), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4

David Mfitumukiza, Gordon Yofesi Mwesigwa, Ellen Jessica Kayendeke, Vincent B. Muwanika (2024). Local Context Capacity Building Needs for Climate Change Adaptation among Smallholder Farmers in Uganda: Policy and Practice Implications. *Climate*, 12.0(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010010

David Olsson (2020). The Transformative Potential of Resilience Thinking: How It Could Transform Unsustainable Economic Rationalities. *Alternatives Global Local Political*, 45.0(2), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375420938284

David Samuel Williams (2020). Enhancing Autonomy for Climate Change Adaptation Using Participatory Modeling. *Weather Climate and Society*, 12.0(4), 667-678. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-20-0024.1

Diana Dushkova, Olga Ivlieva (2024). Empowering Communities to Act for a Change: A Review of the Community Empowerment Programs towards Sustainability and Resilience. *Sustainability*, 16.0(19), 8700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198700

Elisa Bayraktarov, Shantala Brisbane, Valerie Hagger, Carter S. Smith, Kerrie A. Wilson, Catherine E. Lovelock, Chris L. Gillies, Andy Steven, Megan I. Saunders (2020). Priorities and Motivations of Marine Coastal Restoration Research. *Frontiers in Marine Science*, 7.0, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00484

Eric Chu, Todd Schenk, James Patterson (2018). The Dilemmas of Citizen Inclusion in Urban Planning and Governance to Enable a 1.5 °C Climate Change Scenario. *Urban Planning*, 3.0(2), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i2.1292

Erik Schokkaert (2019). Review of Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics. London: Random House, 2017, 373 pp. *Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics*, 12.0(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v12i1.412

Fabian Dablander (2023). Understanding and Preventing Climate Breakdown: A Guide for Social and Behavioral Scientists. *nan*, , . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4uzjs

Fitriana Fitriana, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Ranto Ranto (2022). Ecology-Based Coastal Community Empowerment Innovation in Batu Beriga Village, Central Bangka Regency. *International Journal of Regional Innovation*, 2.0(3), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.52000/ijori.v2i3.54

Fumiyo Kagawa, David Selby (2012). Ready for the Storm: Education for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation¹. *Journal of Education for Sustainable Development*, 6.0(2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475200

Gavin Melles (2023). The Circular Economy Transition in Australia: Nuanced Circular Intermediary Accounts of Mainstream Green Growth Claims. *Sustainability*, 15.0(19), 14160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914160

Gina Ziervogel, Johan Enqvist, Luke Metelerkamp, John van Breda (2021). Supporting transformative climate adaptation: community-level capacity building and knowledge co-creation in South Africa. *Climate Policy*, 22.0(5), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1863180

Giulia Chiaraluce, Deborah Bentivoglio, Adele Finco (2021). Circular Economy for a Sustainable Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Review for Current Trends and Future Pathways. *Sustainability*, 13.0(16), 9294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169294

Gordon Kofi Sarfo-Adu, Henry Kwabena Kokofu (2023). Climate Vulnerability, Justice, and Financing Nexus: A Case For Optimising Climate Interventions. *Global Journal of Science Frontier Research*, , 17-27. https://doi.org/10.34257/gjsfrhvol23is5pg17

Hallie Eakin, Ralph Hamann, Gina Ziervogel, Clifford Shearing (2023). Emergent governance responses to shocks to critical provisioning systems. *NPJ Urban Sustainability*, 3.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00123-y

Han Wei, Jiayu Wang, Shan Zhang, Tanruiling Zhang (2022). Chinese cultural values influence residents' sense of empowerment at sustainable tourism destinations. *Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal*, 50.0(2), 2015-01-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.11154

Handri Suting, Hamsiah Hamsiah, Danial Sultan (2020). KAJIAN PENGEMBANGAN EKOWISATA MANGROVE BERBASIS MASYARAKAT DI DESA POREANG KECAMATAN TANALILI KABUPATEN LUWU UTARA. *Journal of Indonesian Tropical Fisheries (Joint-Fish) Jurnal Akuakultur Teknologi Dan Manajemen Perikanan Tangkap Ilmu Kelautan*, 3.0(2), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.33096/joint-fish.v3i2.76

Henrik Haller, Anna‐Sara Fagerholm, Peter Carlsson, Wilhelm Skoglund, Paul J. Van den Brink, Itai Danielski, Kristina Brink, Murat Mirata, Oskar Englund (2022). Towards a Resilient and Resource-Efficient Local Food System Based on Industrial Symbiosis in Härnösand: A Swedish Case Study. *Sustainability*, 14.0(4), 2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042197

Holly P. Jones, Peter C. Jones, Edward B. Barbier, Ryan C. Blackburn, José María Rey Beñayas, Karen D. Holl, Michelle L. McCrackin, Paula Meli, Daniel Montoya, David Moreno‐Mateos (2018). Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems. *Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences*, 285.0(1873), 20172577. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2577

Ira Meilani Sipahutar, Khairani Alawiyah Matondang, Hannisa Novita Sari Sitorus, Angelina Rolas Olivia Naibaho (2024). Implementation of the Corporate Social Responsibility Program through Empowering Rural Communities. *Aurelia Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia*, 3.0(1), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1582

Iskandar Zainuddin Rela (2023). PEMETAAN SOSIAL DAN PARTISIPASI STAKEHOLDER DALAM PERENCANAAN PROGRAM PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT. *Jurnal Ilmiah Penyuluhan Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat*, 3.0(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.56189/jippm.v3i1.35478

James Aronson, James Blignaut, Suzanne J. Milton, David C. Le Maître, Karen J. Esler, A. Limouzin, Christelle Fontaine, Martin de Wit, Worship Mugido, P. J.J. Prinsloo, L. Van der Elst, N. Lederer (2010). Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000-2008) in<i>Restoration Ecology</i>and 12 Other Scientific Journals. *Restoration Ecology*, 18.0(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2009.00638.x

Jane O’Sullivan (2023). Demographic Delusions: World Population Growth Is Exceeding Most Projections and Jeopardising Scenarios for Sustainable Futures. *World*, 4.0(3), 545-568. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4030034

Jarle Eid, Tuva Emilie Øyslebø (2020). Collective Responses to the 2018 Water Shortage in Cape Town: An Explorative Qualitative Study. *Sustainability*, 12.0(16), 6638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166638

Joern Fischer, Maraja Riechers, Jacqueline Loos, Berta Martín‐López, Vicky M. Temperton (2021). Making the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration a Social-Ecological Endeavour. *Trends in Ecology & Evolution*, 36.0(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.018

Johanna Brühl, Leonard le Roux, Martine Visser, Gunnar Köhlin (2020). Decision-Making in a Water Crisis: Lessons From the Cape Town Drought for Urban Water Policy. *nan*, , . https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.706

Julian Sheather, Katherine Littler, Jerome Amir Singh, Katharine Wright (2023). Ethics, climate change and health †"a landscape review. *Wellcome Open Research*, 8.0, 343. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19490.1

Julie A. Nelson (2016). Ethics and Climate Change Policy. *nan*, , 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7306-5_8

KV Ragnarsdottir (2022). Everything is Connectedâ€" Envisioning How a Regenerative World Looks Like. *nan*, , 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93254-1_9

Kaori Kitagawa (2023). Researcher Positionality in Participatory Action Research for Climate Justice in Indigenous Communities. *International Journal of Qualitative Methods*, 22.0, . https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205178

Kate Raworth (2017). Why it is time for Doughnut Economics. *Ippr Progressive Review*, 24.0(3), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12058

Klara J. Winkler, Jennifer Hauck (2019). Landscape stewardship for a German UNESCO Biosphere Reserve: a network approach to establishing stewardship governance. *Ecology and Society*, 24.0(3), . https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10982-240312

Lilik Sumarni, Siska Yuningsih, Dhea Anggraini (2023). Synergy Model of Community Empowerment of the Pramuka Island in Kepulauan Seribu in the Management of Coastal Areas Based on the Women’s Community. *nan*, , 302-308. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-016-9_30

Lisnina, Ismar Hamid (2023). Menyemai Hidup Berkelanjutan: Etika Lingkungan Hidup Pada Gerakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbasis Eco Fashion. *nan*, 2.0(3), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.20527/h-js.v2i3.102

Lucas Magalhães, Arif Dwi Hartanto (2020). MODEL PEMBERDAYAAN BERBASIS PEMANFAATAN SUMBERDAYA ALAM BERKELANJUTAN: STUDI PADA PROGRAM ENERGI TERBARUKAN DI KABUPATEN JOMBANG. *Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan*, 3.0(1), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdep.v3i1.104

Maja van der Velden (2018). ICT and Sustainability: Looking Beyond the Anthropocene. *nan*, , 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_12

Marc Wolfram, Jeroen van der Heijden, Sirkku Juhola, James Patterson (2018). Learning in urban climate governance: concepts, key issues and challenges. *Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning*, 21.0(1), 2015-01-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2018.1558848

Marcos Bergmann Carlucci, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Rafael Loyola, Marcus V. Cianciaruso (2020). Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. *Restoration Ecology*, 28.0(6), 1372-1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13279

Maria Kaïka, Angelos Varvarousis, Federico Demaria, Hug March (2023). Urbanising degrowth: Five steps towards a Radical Spatial Degrowth Agenda for planning in the face of climate emergency. *Urban Studies*, 60.0(7), 1191-1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231162234

Mark Edwards (2021). The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy. *Business Strategy and the Environment*, 30.0(7), 3079-3094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2790

Mary Kate Dennis, Finn McLafferty Bell (2024). COVID-19 pandemic, climate change and Indigenous knowledge inform the future of social work. *Qualitative Social Work*, 24.0(2025-03-02 00:00:00), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250241300308

Md Shamimul Islam (2015). Impact of ICT on women's empowerment in South Asia. *Journal of Economic & Financial Studies*, 3.0(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v3i03.166

Mei Lan Fang, Judith Sixsmith, Alison Hamilton-Pryde, Rayna Rogowsky, Pat Scrutton, Ro Pengelly, Ryan Woolrych, Rachel Creaney (2023). Co-creating inclusive spaces and places: Towards an intergenerational and age-friendly living ecosystem. *Frontiers in Public Health*, 10.0, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.996520

Michaela Hausdorf, Jana Timm (2022). Business research for sustainable development: How does sustainable business model research reflect doughnut economics? *Business Strategy and the Environment*, 32.0(6), 3398-3416. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3307

Monique Mae Hall, Priscilla M. Wehi, HÄ "mi Whaanga, Erana Walker, Jonni Hazeline Koia, Kiri Joy Wallace (2020). Promoting social and environmental justice to support Indigenous partnerships in urban ecosystem restoration. *Restoration Ecology*, 29.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13305

Nicholas Stern (2014). ETHICS, EQUITY AND THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE PAPER 1: SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY. *Economics and Philosophy*, 30.0(3), 397-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267114000297

Nicolas Francart, C. A. Clausen, Annika Björn, Harpa Birgisdóttir (2023). Building within planetary boundaries: setting and assessing absolute sustainability targets at the building level. *Journal of Physics Conference Series*, 2600.0(15), 152015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/15/152015

Nur Kholifatul Hikmawati (2022). Community Empowerment Efforts. *Journal Intellectual Sufism Research (Jisr)*, 4.0(2), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.52032/jisr.v4i2.110

Padma Panchapakesan, Sundari Ramakrishna, S. Mostafa Rasoolimanesh (2019). Nature-Based Solutions in Tourism: A Review of the Literature and Conceptualization. *Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research*, 46.0(3), 442-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019890052

Peter Kearns (2023). Local economies are preparing for a turbulent future. *nan*, , 2016-01-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk439.01

Peter Newell, Shilpi Srivastava, Lars Otto Næss, Gerardo A. Torres Contreras, Roz Price (2021). Toward transformative climate justice: An emerging research agenda. *Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change*, 12.0(6), . https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.733

Philip Cafaro (2012). Climate ethics and population policy. *Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change*, 3.0(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.153

Phoebe J. Stewart‐Sinclair, Jemma Purandare, Elisa Bayraktarov, Nathan J. Waltham, Simon E. Reeves, John Statton, Elizabeth A. Sinclair, Benjamin M. Brown, Zoë I. Shribman, Catherine E. Lovelock (2020). Blue Restoration †"Building Confidence and Overcoming Barriers. *Frontiers in Marine Science*, 7.0, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.541700

Ping Huang, Vanesa Castán Broto, Linda Westman (2020). Emerging dynamics of public participation in climate governance: A case study of solar energy application in Shenzhen, China. *Environmental Policy and Governance*, 30.0(6), 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1886

Rebecca Willis, Nicole Curato, Graham Smith (2022). Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. *Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change*, 13.0(2), . https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.759

Restra Sewakotama, Arsy A. W. Hamdir, Alfah Putri (2023). Tokenism Analysis in Community Participation: A Case Study from Saung Pandu Program of Badak LNG Bontang. *Influence International Journal of Science Review*, 5.0(2), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v5i2.168

Robin Attfield (2018). 8. The ethics of climate change. *nan*, , 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198797166.003.0008

Ryan C. Urbano (2012). Virtue and Climate Ethics. *Philippiniana Sacra*, 47.0(140), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.55997/ps12025xlvii140a24

Saad Ghauri (2023). Swedish Multinationals and Sustainable Innovations for Transformation: The Doughnut Model^*. *nan*, , 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1876-066x20230000037008

Sabine Roeser (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue on Climate Ethics: Uncertainty, Values and Policy. *Science and Engineering Ethics*, 23.0(5), 1247-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9967-2

Shariq Waheed, Husnain Waheed (2022). Impact of climate finance on gender equity for sustainable global development: Can aid for climate action also aid gender equity? *Brazilian Journal of Science*, 1.0(7), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v1i7.145

Stef Koop, Kees van Leeuwen (2015). Application of the Improved City Blueprint Framework in 45 Municipalities and Regions. *Water Resources Management*, 29.0(13), 4629-4647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1079-7

Stephen M. Gardiner, Simon Caney, Dale Jamieson, Henry Shue (2010). Climate Ethics. *nan*, , . https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195399622.001.0001

Sílvio Frosini de Barros Ferraz, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Joannès Guillemot, Paula Meli (2020). On the Need to Differentiate the Temporal Trajectories of Ecosystem Structure and Functions in Restoration Programs. *Tropical Conservation Science*, 13.0, . https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920910314

Tariqullah Khan (2024). Circular‐ESG Model for Regenerative Transition. *nan*, , . https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1357.v1

Temesgen Deressa, Rashid Hassan, Claudia Ringler (2010). Perception of and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. *The Journal of Agricultural Science*, 149.0(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859610000687

Thomas Wiedmann, Manfred Lenzen, Lorenz Keyßer, J. Steinberger (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. *Nature Communications*, 11.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y

Thị Hương Nguyễn, Helen Boon, David King (2016). Education to Enhance Vietnamese Coastal Communities’ Adaptive Capacity to Cope With Climate Change. *Etropic Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics*, 14.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.14.1.2015.3373

Tina Elliott, Maureen G. Reed, Amber J. Fletcher (2023). Learning from wildfire: co-creating knowledge using an intersectional feminist standpoint methodology. *Frontiers in Environmental Science*, 11.0, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1249598

Titus Amodu Umoru, A U Okeke (2012). THE CHALLENGES OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE-INDUCED CATASTROPHES IN NIGERIA. *African Journal of Teacher Education*, 2.0(1), . https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v2i1.1932

Trevor Hancock (2021). Towards healthy One Planet cities and communities: planetary health promotion at the local level. *Health Promotion International*, 36.0(Supplement_1), i53-i63. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab120

Twan Fenten, Carel Dieperink (2024). Governance Conditions for a Successful Restoration of Riverine Ecosystems, Lessons from the Rhine River Basin. *Water*, 16.0(20), 2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202983

Vasiliki A. Gkountani, Giannis Τ. Tsoulfas, Nikolaos P. Rachaniotis (2021). Circular economy and resilience: convergences and deviations in the case of agri-food supply chains. *Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science*, 899.0(1), 12001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/899/1/012001

Workineh Kelbessa (2016). Climate Ethics and Policy in Africa. *Thought and Practice*, 7.0(2), 41-84. https://doi.org/10.4314/tp.v7i2.4

Wuyang Hong, Dong Han, Biao He, Yelin Li, Minde Liang, Renzhong Guo (2023). Recovery capacity and ecological restoration strategy of urban green space based on the self‐organization†"resilience model. *Land Degradation and Development*, 35.0(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4898

Zoha Shawoo, Kath Browne, Nella Canales, Anisha Nazareth (2024). A framework for distributive equity of adaptation finance: how funders and implementers of adaptation finance can support the most vulnerable populations. *nan*, , . https://doi.org/10.51414/sei2024.050