The Evolving Role of the Quantity Surveyor in Modern Infrastructure

 

The Evolving Role of the Quantity Surveyor in Modern Infrastructure

by AM Tris Hardyanto

Introduction: More Than Just Numbers

The role of the Quantity Surveyor (QS) has undergone significant transformation over recent decades, particularly as the construction industry increasingly faces the complexities associated with mega infrastructure projects. Traditionally viewed as financial controllers, QS professionals have evolved into vital experts who undertake a variety of strategic responsibilities, encompassing not only cost management but also risk mitigation, contractual compliance, value engineering, and the adoption of advanced technologies such as Building Information Modelling (BIM).Evolution reflects a broader recognition of the crucial function that QSs serve in ensuring the success of complex projects that involve significant investment and engineering challenges (Chan et al., 2018; Ying & Kamal, 2021; Babatunde et al., 2019).

In modern mega infrastructure projects, the QS is integral to the planning and operational phases, utilising advanced methodologies to achieve accurate quantification and costing. The sophistication of projects—including wastewater treatment plants and extensive tunnel networks—requires a nuanced understanding of various factors that impact costs and timelines. By leveraging digital tools such as BIM and geospatial data, QS professionals can provide reliable bills of quantities (BOQs) that reflect the variable realities on the ground, thereby enhancing overall cost certainty (Koseoglu et al., 2019; Ying & Kamal, 2021).approach is particularly critical in regions where large-scale projects face unique challenges in material procurement and lifecycle cost modelling (Wang et al., 2023).

Moreover, the necessity for QSs to engage meaningfully in contract administration and compliance has intensified amid the increasing complexity of mega projects, particularly those falling under various contractual frameworks such as FIDIC and NEC (Ward et al., 2019). The evolution of procurement methods, primarily through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), has necessitated a balance between public accountability and private sector efficiency. Consequently, QS professionals are tasked with navigating these intricate operational frameworks while managing complex payment schedules and ensuring contractual fidelity (Ward et al., 2019; Journal, 2024). Their role extends to safeguarding project budgets by implementing phased material scheduling and closely monitoring supplier performance, thus fostering an environment conducive to adherence to budgetary constraints (AAG & Latief, 2023; Kadiri et al., 2024).

Risk management has also emerged as a significant aspect of the QS’s responsibilities, with many projects adopting risk-adjusted quantitative measures early in the planning process.A proactive stance allows QS professionals to embed flexibility into contracts, ensuring accurate quantification of scope changes. The ability to document, defend, and navigate claims effectively has become paramount as cost overruns remain a common issue in mega projects. Additionally, as the landscape of risk continues to evolve, particularly in the wake of global phenomena such as the COVID-19 pandemic, QS practitioners find themselves at the forefront of developing and implementing robust risk mitigation strategies to address unforeseen challenges effectively (et al., 2023; Abdullahi et al., 2023).

The changing professional landscape has underscored the importance of integrating QS expertise into the early phases of project planning. Studies indicate that engaging QS professionals at the onset can lead to improved cost control, better risk allocation, and enhanced project outcomes (et al., 2023; Sroka, 2021). For instance, integration of QS skills has demonstrated significant advancements in lifecycle cost management in various projects, showcasing the potential for optimised resource allocation when these professionals are involved from inception to completion (Wang et al., 2023; Nahyan et al., 2012). Thus, the evolution of the quantity surveyor role is not confined to cost management but extends to strategic project integration (Zhao & Cheng, 2018).

Furthermore, the advent of technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data analytics is reshaping the profession, emphasising that modern QSs must be adept at leveraging data for cost estimation and financial forecasting. These digital tools enhance the ability to analyse historical data and project future costs more accurately than traditional methods permit (Khairina et al., 2021; Mustafa et al., 2024). Quantity surveyors must now combine traditional quantitative skills with computational capabilities to optimise project delivery, maintain financial viability, and improve overall project outcomes.

In summary, the evolving role of quantity surveyors in modern infrastructure projects encapsulates a shift from traditional cost control to strategic engagement in project management, risk mitigation, and technological adoption. Transformation underscores the critical importance of QSs in navigating the complexities associated with mega projects, ensuring they not only meet financial and operational targets but also contribute more broadly to sustainable and strategic infrastructure development (Chan et al., 2018; Babatunde et al., 2019). As the industry continues to evolve, the competencies required of quantity surveyors will expand, demanding continuous professional development and adaptation to emerging technologies and methodologies.

In conclusion, the quantity surveyor’s role is increasingly pivotal in steering the construction industry toward more sustainable and efficient practices, effectively transforming them into strategic leaders capable of delivering value beyond mere numerical metrics.

Core Responsibilities: Precision at Scale

In the context of the Jakarta Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) project, the role of the Quantity Surveyor (QS) is multifaceted and pivotal in achieving precise financial management and project execution. The responsibilities include a range of tasks that require analytical and practical skills, ensuring that costs are managed effectively and that the project progresses within its defined parameters.

One of the core responsibilities of a QS on a project involves quantity takeoffs and vendor evaluation. This process encompasses the extraction of precise material and labour requirements from technical drawings. By systematically analysing these specifications, the QS can prepare accurate estimates that directly inform procurement strategies. Furthermore, evaluating vendor quotations is essential; it allows the QS to ascertain the best value propositions without compromising on quality, thereby ensuring financial efficacy throughout the project’s lifecycle (Yap et al., 2021). Rigorous assessment helps minimise cost overruns by leveraging competitive pricing while maintaining standards (AAG & Latief, 2023).

Subsequently, the drafting of subcontract and procurement agreements becomes crucial. Clear contracts delineating deliverables, timelines, and payment terms are vital to mitigating the risks of disputes among stakeholders (Victar et al., 2022). An effective QS delivers contracts that not only protect the project’s interests but also promote transparency and accountability between parties involved (Victar et al., 2023). Contractual clarity extends to the as-built measurements, where the QS is responsible for validating completed works against initial design specifications. Validation ensures that all financial claims reflect the actual work completed, thereby preventing discrepancies that could lead to payment issues down the line (Akomea-Frimpong et al., 2024).

Moreover, developing accurate cost estimates and forecasts is foundational within the QS’s role, supporting financial planning from the feasibility stage through to project closure. Such forecasts must be dynamic, taking into account market fluctuations and incorporating contingency allowances for identified risks (“Innovative Changes in Quantity Surveying Practice through BIM, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning”, 2020). A forward-looking perspective bolsters the project’s financial strategy and allows for informed decision-making regarding resource allocation (Theddy & Pranoto, 2024).

A significant aspect of financial oversight during project execution involves claims verification. The process ensures that all invoices submitted by subcontractors and suppliers accurately reflect the progress made on-site, thus protecting the project’s financial integrity before any payments are authorised (Alimi et al., 2021). Inevitably, disputes could arise; hence, the QS must have a methodical approach to verify these claims against documented progress and quality standards (et al., 2023).

Additionally, Variation Order Management highlights the QS’s capacity to adapt to changing project requirements and client requests. The QS coordinates with various stakeholders, particularly consultants, to assess and approve changes that impact the project’s budget or timeline without causing disruptions (Siahaan et al., 2024). function demands an agile mindset and the ability to negotiate and communicate variances effectively, which ensures continued project alignment with initial objectives (Park et al., 2020).

As these responsibilities unfold, the demand for speed and precision has intensified. Hence, the adoption of modern technologies plays a crucial role in the QS’s effectiveness. AI-powered construction technologies augment traditional methodologies, offering enhanced data accuracy and efficiency in tasks such as cost estimation and project monitoring (Victar et al., 2023). These technologies not only accelerate processes but also improve the reliability of financial analyses, supporting the QS in navigating the complexities of mega infrastructure projects.

In conclusion, the role of the quantity surveyor in the Jakarta WWTP project is strategically vital for delivering a successful outcome. Their involvement spans from early planning through to execution, integrating cost management, contractual negotiation, and technological innovation to ensure that every aspect of the project is meticulously controlled. The QS not only ensures compliance with financial constraints but also enhances overall project delivery by maintaining focus on quality and efficiency throughout the life of the project.

Challenges in Conventional QS Practice

In the realm of traditional Quantity Surveying (QS) practice, several persistent challenges hinder efficiency and effectiveness. These challenges include data fragmentation, manual repetition, reactive risk management, and slow collaboration among stakeholders. Each of these factors contributes to increased project risks, reduced productivity, and missed opportunities for value optimisation, highlighting critical areas where improvements are necessary.

Data fragmentation is a significant challenge within conventional QS workflows. Information related to construction projects is often scattered across various platforms, including emails, technical drawings, paper files, and siloed databases. Fragmentation leads to difficulties in information retrieval, which can be slow and error-prone (Nawi et al., 2014). The implications of the issue are severe, as delayed access to crucial information can impede decision-making processes and ultimately affect project timelines and budgets (Tanga et al., 2022).

Furthermore, the reliance on manual methods for measuring quantities, counting symbols on drawings, and cross-checking invoices results in manual repetition that consumes considerable time and resources. Manual oversight can cause delays in processes that require prompt feedback and corrective actions. As a result, the overall efficiency of the QS function may diminish, complicating the timely delivery of projects (Ingle et al., 2020). The repetitive nature of these tasks can also lead to human error, further exacerbating the likelihood of inaccuracies in cost estimation and reporting (Nawi et al., 2014).

Reactive risk management is another challenge facing traditional QS practice. In conventional workflows, issues such as cost overruns and contractual disputes are often identified only after adverse consequences have occurred. A reactive approach to risk management is increasingly recognised as inadequate in an environment where rapid changes in project scope are common (Abdul‐Rahman et al., 2015). Suboptimal risk identification processes can lead to adverse outcomes for projects, necessitating a shift toward more proactive methodologies that emphasise early detection and resolution of potential issues (Basir et al., 2023).

Finally, slow collaboration among various project stakeholders, including QS teams, engineers, and contractors, results from the absence of a unified data platform. Without real-time access to shared documents and updated information, teams may operate on conflicting versions of project data, leading to inconsistencies and misaligned objectives (Eze et al., 2019). The fragmented communication channels not only impede effective coordination but also foster an environment ripe for misunderstandings and mismanagement, thereby increasing project risks further (Latiffi & Zulkiffli, 2022).

In conclusion, the integration of advanced technologies and collaborative tools presents significant potential for addressing these traditional challenges in QS practice. By adopting integrated management information systems and digital platforms, the construction industry can streamline data processes, improve risk management, and foster better communication among stakeholders. Transitioning from fragmented practices to a more cohesive and collaborative model is paramount for optimising project outcomes.

AI as a Catalyst for QS Evolution

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Quantity Surveying (QS) practices has emerged as a pivotal development, addressing many of the longstanding challenges inherent in traditional methodologies. As the construction industry evolves, AI technologies catalyse a revolution in how QS professionals operate, enabling them to transcend repetitive tasks and enhance their strategic decision-making capabilities. A detailed exploration of AI-driven innovations reveals their transformative potential within the sector.

One of the most significant advancements brought about by AI is the automation of quantity takeoffs. Platforms such as Autodesk Takeoff utilise advanced algorithms to automatically detect and quantify elements on digital drawings, leading to a considerable reduction in the time traditionally required for manual measurements.Shifting from manual to automated processes not only accelerates the overall project timeline but also minimises human error, thereby improving the accuracy of assessments significantly. The reliance on AI for this purpose allows QS professionals to redirect their focus from laborious quantity measurement to more strategic responsibilities that demand their expertise.

Moreover, predictive insights facilitated by AI technologies empower QS professionals to address potential financial and operational risks proactively. By analysing historical data and identifying patterns, AI systems can flag potential cost overruns and highlight performance risks associated with subcontractors well before these issues escalate into disputes.Predictive capability transforms risk management from a reactive to a proactive stance, enabling better foresight and planning, which is crucial for the timely delivery of projects and maintaining budgetary constraints.

Generative AI has also found its place in the documentation processes of QS practices. Large Language Models (LLMs) can now draft tender documents, summarise contracts, and extract relevant clauses rapidly and accurately. Not only does it save time, but it also enhances the quality of the documentation by ensuring consistency and precision in the language used across various contracts. Such capabilities significantly streamline the administrative burden on QS teams, allowing them to focus on more complex contractual negotiations and strategic planning.

In addition to these functionalities, intelligent search capabilities integrated into Common Data Environments (CDE) enable QS teams to access vast amounts of historical data, vendor performance records, and technical specifications with unprecedented speed. Tools like ChatGPT can interactively provide insights and retrieve relevant information instantaneously, contextualised to current project requirements. The ability to quickly access and process critical data fosters a collaborative environment where QS professionals can make informed decisions swiftly, thus reducing delays caused by information retrieval.

Ultimately, the infusion of AI tools into QS practices does not signify a replacement of the quantity surveyor; rather, it liberates them from mundane, repetitive tasks, allowing for a more strategic deployment of their skills. The ability to harness AI technologies translates to enhanced efficiency, reduced error rates, and improved collaborative dynamics among project stakeholders. As the construction industry increasingly embraces these technological advancements, the future role of the QS will likely focus on higher-level strategic functions, including value optimisation, risk management, and stakeholder engagement.

 Evolution underscores the importance of ongoing professional development in the face of technological changes. Quantity surveyors must become adept at utilising AI and related tools to stay competitive and relevant in a rapidly changing landscape. Continuous training and adaptability will be essential for leveraging these innovations to improve project outcomes and enhance the overall efficacy of construction processes.

In conclusion, the incorporation of AI in quantity surveying practices heralds a transformative shift, empowering professionals to enhance their strategic roles within the construction environment. As AI technologies mature, their integration promises not only to address existing pain points but also to redefine the scope and impact of the QS profession.

The Human–AI Partnership

The evolution of the Quantity Surveyor (QS) role in the construction industry is significantly influenced by the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, paving the way for a hybrid professional landscape. While AI provides remarkable efficiencies in data handling, analytics, and documentation, the human element remains crucial for negotiating, understanding client needs, and balancing multifaceted project demands. Interaction, particularly in major initiatives, exemplifies the necessity of combining human expertise and AI capabilities for project success.

AI’s contribution to the QS field is apparent in key areas. Automated systems enhance the accuracy and speed of quantity takeoffs. For instance, tools like Autodesk Takeoff utilise algorithms to analyse digital drawings, enabling QS professionals to determine required material counts quickly. These systems significantly reduce the time involved in manual measurements, a process that is labour-intensive and prone to human error (Victor, 2023). Consequently, automation allows QSs to focus their efforts on higher-level thinking and strategic analysis.

Moreover, predictive insights from AI tools aid in identifying potential risks, such as cost overruns and subcontractor performance issues, allowing QS teams to implement preventive measures earlier. By leveraging historical data with AI analytics, quantity surveyors enhance their risk assessment and management capabilities (Gao et al., 2023; Obiuto et al., 2024).

In documentation, generative AI contributes significantly by draughting contracts, summarising complex agreements, and extracting crucial clauses efficiently. Large language models like ChatGPT assist in reducing administrative burdens while ensuring compliance with legal standards in documentation, which is vital for large-scale projects requiring meticulous oversight (Rane et al., 2023; Victor, 2023).

Additionally, intelligent search functions within Common Data Environments (CDEs) facilitate rapid access to historical project data and documents. Centralised information enhances collaboration and decision-making among project participants, further reducing the time spent on information retrieval and reliance on outdated documents (Fernández et al., 2022; Ali et al., 2022).Real-time access fosters better communication, reduces conflict, and creates a more cohesive project team atmosphere.

Despite the efficiency gains from AI, the indispensable role of human judgement remains vital. Negotiating with contractors and interpreting client needs requires a nuanced understanding and empathy that machines cannot replicate. Human professionals excel in balancing competing project priorities, which often involve managing stakeholder expectations and navigating the complexities of construction logistics (Eber, 2020). The human touch in project management, particularly concerning relationship building and conflict resolution, is crucial for ensuring project goals are met satisfactorily.

As the construction industry evolves, it is increasingly vital for quantity surveyors to develop a hybrid skill set. The combination of technical proficiency in cost engineering with data analysis positions QS professionals at the forefront of innovative project delivery (Rane et al., 2024; Obiuto et al., 2024). Acknowledging the importance of dual roles enables QSs to navigate modern construction project nuances effectively while leveraging AI technologies fully.

In conclusion, the future of quantity surveying lies in a collaborative synergy between human intelligence and AI. As infrastructure developments become more complex, harnessing AI’s advantages while retaining essential human negotiation and stakeholder management skills will be crucial. Evolution signifies a promising future for the QS profession, merging advanced technological innovations with irreplaceable human expertise, ultimately driving successful project outcomes.

 

Setting the Stage for Transformation

The role of the Quantity Surveyor (QS) is undergoing significant transformation, driven by digital evolution within the construction industry. As the profession integrates core QS competencies with advanced AI-driven capabilities, it is paving the way for a new era characterised by enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and strategic influence in project delivery. Integration—melding traditional skills with innovative technology—marks a pivotal moment for QS professionals, particularly in the context of large-scale projects such as the Jakarta Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).

The adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) technologies has played a crucial role in transformation. BIM systems enable quantity surveyors to automate time-consuming processes, such as quantity takeoffs, thus significantly accelerating the initial phases of cost estimation and project planning (Ying & Kamal, 2021; Babatunde et al., 2018; Evans et al., 2020). Automation through BIM applications allows QS professionals to utilise real-time data, improving their capacity to provide accurate and timely estimates while minimising the errors associated with traditional methods (“Innovative Changes in Quantity Surveying Practice through BIM, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning”, 2020; Ogunseiju et al., 2023). Improves workflow efficiency, leading to better resource allocation and project scheduling, which are essential for maintaining timelines and budgets in megaprojects.

Furthermore, the introduction of AI technologies has enhanced these capabilities, facilitating comprehensive data analysis and risk assessment (Jaud et al., 2020; Zhan et al., 2022; Sepasgozar et al., 2022). For example, predictive analytics can identify potential cost overruns or flag indicators of high-risk subcontractor performance before they escalate, leading to proactive measures that improve project management (Fürstenberg et al., 2024; Adesi et al., 2023). Accordingly, a shift towards data-driven decision-making enhances the strategic role of quantity surveyors, positioning them as key players in guiding projects towards successful outcomes.

Despite these advancements, the human element in quantity surveying remains essential. While AI can streamline data processing and expedite document generation, human judgment is irreplaceable in negotiation contexts, interpretation of unique project dynamics, and balancing competing priorities (Ogunseiju et al., 2023). The QS professional must navigate complex interpersonal relationships with contractors, clients, and stakeholders, utilising their expertise to address nuanced concerns and fulfil strategic objectives. A distinctive combination of technical proficiency and interpersonal skills characterises the modern QS as a hybrid professional, equipped to make informed decisions that advance project objectives amid complexity (Babatunde & Ekundayo, 2019; Moyanga & Agboola, 2020).

Additionally, the ongoing digital transformation mandates that quantity surveyors foster a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation. As new technologies and methodologies emerge, professionals must remain agile and informed to maximise the benefits of digital tools and innovations such as AI and BIM (Tanko et al., 2022; Ebekozien & Aigbavboa, 2023). Commitment to lifelong learning is vital as the industry evolves, offering QS professionals opportunities to redefine their roles and enhance their contributions to project delivery (Vakaj et al., 2023).

In conclusion, the future of quantity surveying is promising and full of opportunities. The convergence of traditional QS skills with AI capabilities signals a more efficient, precise, and impactful profession. By embracing digital advancements and nurturing the human-AI partnership, quantity surveyors are poised to drive substantial transformation in ensuring construction projects are completed on time, within budget, and to the highest quality standards. As evolution unfolds, QS professionals will continue to play a pivotal role within the broader construction ecosystem, fundamentally reshaping how professional services are delivered in an ever-evolving landscape.

 

 

APA References

 (2020). Innovative Changes in Quantity Surveying Practice through BIM, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. The Journal of Applied Science University, 4.0(2.0), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.18576/jasu/040201

-, C. A. N., -, F. F. F., Nani, G. (2023). Exploring the Role of Quantity Surveyors in Mechanical and Electrical Services Cost Estimation – Challenges and Client Implications. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5.0(6.0). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.10982

Abdul-Rahman, H., Chen, W., Mohamad, F. S. (2015). Implementation of Risk Management in the Malaysian Construction Industry: Case Studies. Journal of Construction Engineering, 2015.0, 2025-06-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/192742

Abdullahi, I., Watters, C., Kapogiannis, G., Lemański, M. K. (2023). Role of Digital Strategy in Managing the Planning Complexity of Mega Construction Projects. Sustainability, 15.0(18.0), 13809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813809

Adesi, M., Owusu-Manu, D., Boateng, F., Addy, M. N., Kissi, E. (2023). The challenges of pricing quantity surveying professional services in Ghana. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 3.0(2.0), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/febe-03-2022-0011

Akomea-Frimpong, I., Jin, X., Osei-Kyei, R. (2024). Fuzzy Analysis of Financial Risk Management Strategies for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Ghana. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1112.v1

Ali, Z. H., Burhan, A. M., Kassim, M., Al-Khafaji, Z. (2022). Developing an Integrative Data Intelligence Model for Construction Cost Estimation. Complexity, 2022.0(1.0). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4285328

Alimi, O. A., Ouahada, K., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M., Rimer, S., Alimi, K. O. A. (2021). A Review of Research Works on Supervised Learning Algorithms for SCADA Intrusion Detection and Classification. Sustainability, 13.0 (17.0), 9597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179597

Babatunde, S. O., Ekundayo, D. (2019). Barriers to the incorporation of BIM into the quantity surveying undergraduate curriculum in Nigerian universities. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 17.0(3.0), 629-648. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-10-2018-0181

Babatunde, S. O., Ekundayo, D., Babalola, O., Jimoh, J. A. (2018). Analysis of the drivers and benefits of BIM incorporation into the quantity surveying profession. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 16.0(5.0), 750-766. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-04-2018-0058

Babatunde, S. O., Perera, S., Ekundayo, D., Adeleye, T. E. (2019). An investigation into BIM-based detailed cost estimating and drivers to the adoption of BIM in quantity surveying practices. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 25.0(1.0), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-05-2019-0042

Chan, A. P., Osei-Kyei, R., Hu, Y., Le, Y. (2018). A fuzzy model for assessing the risk exposure of procuring infrastructure megaprojects through public-private partnership: The case of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. Frontiers of Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2018067

Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C. (2023). Improving quantity surveying education through continually updating the curriculum with digitalisation to meet industry requirements. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 22.0(5.0), 1523-1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0043

Eber, W. (2020). Potentials of artificial intelligence in construction management. Organisation Technology and Management in Construction, an International Journal, 12.0(1.0), 2053-2063. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0002

Evans, M., Farrell, P., Mashali, A., Zewein, W. (2020). Critical success factors for adopting building information modelling (BIM) and lean construction practices on construction megaprojects: a Delphi survey. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 19.0(2.0), 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-04-2020-0146

Eze, E. C., Sofolahan, O., Adegboyega, A. A., Saidu, K. J. (2019). Factors Limiting the Full-scale Adoption of Process and Product Innovation in the Nigerian Construction Industry. Seisense Journal of Management, 2.0(3.0), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v2i3.145

Fernà¡ndez, J. M. M., Moreno, J. J. G., Vergara-Gonzà¡lez, E. P., Alonso-Iglesias, G. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to the Management of Innovation Projects. Applied Sciences, 12.0(22.0), 11743. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211743

Fà¼rstenberg, D., Hjelseth, E., Klakegg, O. J., Lohne, J., Là¦dre‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌, O. (2024). Automated quantity takeoff in a Norwegian road project. Scientific Reports, 14.0(1.0). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50486-6

Gao, S., Low, S. P., Lim, X. Y. V. (2023). Prospects, drivers of and barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in project management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13.0(5.0), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-12-2022-0195

Ingle, P. V., Mahesh, G., Deepak, M. (2020). Identifying the performance areas affecting the project performance for Indian construction projects. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 19.0(1.0), 2020-01-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2020-0027

Jaud, Å. t., Donaubauer, A., Heunecke, O., Borrmann, A. (2020). Georeferencing in the context of building information modelling. Automation in Construction, 118.0, 103211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103211

Journal, I. (2024). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Assessment Models for Mega Infrastructure Ventures. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 8.0(1.0), 2025-10-01 00:00:00. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem28247

Kadiri, D. S., Ugoji, C., Fashola, B. (2024). Involvement of Quantity Surveyors in Oil and Gas Projects in Nigeria. Uniosun Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 6.0(2.0). https://doi.org/10.36108/ujees/4202.60.0240

Khairina, N., Hisham, K., Khairul, M., Othman, F. (2021). Final Account Preparation in the Construction Industry: Competencies and Challenges of Quantity Surveyors. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 6.0(1.0). https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v6i1.12877

Koseoglu, O., Keskin, B., & Zorhon, B. (2019). Challenges and Enablers in BIM-Enabled Digital Transformation in Mega Projects: The Istanbul New Airport Project Case Study. Buildings, 9.0(5.0), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9050115

Latiffi, A. A., Zulkiffli, N. A. (2022). UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP SKILLS IN THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE WITH THE SUCCESS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Asean Engineering Journal, 12.0(2.0), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.17310

Moyanga, D. T., Agboola, A. A. (2020). The growth status of quantity surveying firms in Nigeria: Management Executive’s Perspective. Journal of Surveying Construction & Property, 11.0(1.0), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.vol11no1.7

Mustafa, M. H., Rahim, F. A. M., Jamaludin, A. F., Hin, K. Y. (2024). BIG DATA ANALYTICS (BDA) FRAMEWORK FOR CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATION IN MALAYSIA. Planning Malaysia, 22.0. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1507

Nahyan, M. T. A., Sohal, A. S., Fildes, B., Hawas, Y. E. (2012). Transportation infrastructure development in the UAE. Construction Innovation, 12.0(4.0), 492-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171211272234

Nawi, M. N. M., Baluch, N. H., Bahauddin, A. Y. (2014). Impact of Fragmentation Issue in Construction Industry: An Overview. Matec Web of Conferences, 15.0, 1009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501009

Obiuto, N. C., Adebayo, R. A., Olajiga, O. K., Festus-Ikhuoria, I. C. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Construction Management: Improving Project Efficiency and Cost-effectiveness. , 4.0(2.0), 639-647. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.2.2550

Ogunseiju, O., Odeyinka, H., Yusuf, A. (2023). Usage of Building Information Modelling in Quantity Surveying Firms in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 6.0(2.0). https://doi.org/10.15641/jcbm.6.2.1378

Park, J., Lee, S. J., Jimenez, J. A., Kim, S. K., Kim, J. W. (2020). Indoor positioning-based mobile resource movement data management system for smart factory operations management. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 16.0(3.0), 155014772090976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147720909760

Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Rane, J. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT, Bard, and Leading-Edge Generative Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Design and Engineering: Applications, Framework, and Challenges. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 3.0(2.0), 92-124. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijarp.3.2.2023.92-124

Rane, N. L., Desai, P., Rane, J. (2024). Acceptance and integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the construction industry: factors, current trends, and challenges. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981367-4-9_4

Sepasgozar, S. M. E., Costin, A., Karimi, R., Shirowzhan, S., Abbasian, E., Li, J. (2022). BIM and Digital Tools for State-of-the-Art Construction Cost Management. Buildings, 12.0(4.0), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040396

Siahaan, F., Rahayu, M. I. F., Gunadi, A. (2024). Role Of Quantity Surveyor. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12.0(1.0), e2485. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2485

Sroka, R. (2021). Megaprojects and mega-events: evaluating Vancouver 2010 stadium and convention infrastructure. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 25.0(3.0), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2021.1881590

Tanga, O., Akinradewo, O., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A. E., Adekunle, S. A. (2022). Data Management Risks: A Bane of Construction Project Performance. Sustainability, 14.0(19.0), 12793. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912793

Tanko, B. L., Zakka, W. P., Heng, W. N. (2022). BIM in the Malaysian construction industry: a scientometric review and case study. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 31.0(3.0), 1165-1186. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2021-0324

Theddy, V., Pranoto, W. A. (2024). ANALISIS PERAN QUANTITY SURVEYOR PADA PROYEK JISC (JATILUHUR INDUSTRIAL SMART CITY). JMTS Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v7i1.26672

Vakaj, E., Cheung, F., Cao, J., Tawil, A. H., Patlakas, P. (2023). An Ontology-Based Cost Estimation for Offsite Construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 28.0, 220-245. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.011

Victar, H. C., Perera, B., Palihakkara, A. D. (2022). The role of the quantity surveyor in achieving a circular built environment at the design stage, 936-948. https://doi.org/10.31705/wcs.2022.75

Victar, H. C., Perera, B., Palihakkara, A. D., Dewagod, K. G. (2023). Roles and competencies of quantity surveyors in achieving a circular built environment: an investigation according to 3R principles. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13.0(4.0), 1015-1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-10-2022-0231

Victor, N. O. C. (2023). Optimising Construction Productivity Through Automation and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 3.0(2.0), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijaiml.3.2.2023.28-44

Victor, N. O. C. (2023). The Application of Artificial Intelligence for Construction Project Planning. , 1.0(2.0), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.18178/jaai.2023.1.2.67-95

Wang, J., Luo, L., Sa, R., Zhou, W., Yu, Z. (2023). A Quantitative Analysis of Decision-Making Risk Factors for Mega Infrastructure Projects in China. Sustainability, 15.0(21.0), 15301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115301

Ward, J. M., Dimitriou, H. T., Field, B. G., Dean, M. (2019). The Planning and Appraisal of Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects Delivered by Public-Private Partnerships: The Case for the Use of Policy-Led Multi-Criteria Analysis. Organisation Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 11.0(1.0), 1992-2008. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2019-0007

Yap, J. B. H., Skitmore, M., Lim, Y. W., Loo, S. C., Grey, J. (2021). Assessing the expected current and future competencies of quantity surveyors in the Malaysian built environment. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 29.0(6.0), 2415-2436. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-01-2021-0091

Ying, T. Y., Kamal, E. M. (2021). The Revolution of the Quantity Surveying Profession in the Building Information Modelling (BIM) Era: The Malaysian Perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering Technology, 12.0(1.0). https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.01.019

Zhan, Z., Tang, Y., Chen, W., Yap, J. B. H., Lim, Y. (2022). System Dynamics Outlook on BIM and LEAN Interaction in Construction Quantity Surveying. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Civil Engineering, 46.0(5.0), 3947-3962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00833-w

Zhao, N., Cheng, T. (2018). A Periodic Collaboration and Coexistence Management Model with the Oscillation Effect for Complex Mega Infrastructure Projects under the Risk of Infection. Complexity, 2018.0(1.0). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9846074

[{‘author_name’: ‘Wan Nor Fa’aizah Wan Abdul Basir’, ‘author_slug’: ‘wan-nor-fa-aizah-wan-abdul-RVkPl3’, ‘author_sequence_number’: ‘1’, ‘affiliation’: None, ‘affiliation_slug’: None}, {‘author_name’: ‘Uznir Ujang’, ‘author_slug’: ‘uznir-ujang-6MrnKM’, ‘author_sequence_number’: ‘2’, ‘affiliation’: None, ‘affiliation_slug’: None}, {‘author_name’: ‘Zulkepli Majid’, ‘author_slug’: ‘zulkepli-majid-Pzxr20’, ‘author_sequence_number’: ‘3’, ‘affiliation’: None, ‘affiliation_slug’: None}] (2023). Adaptation 4D and 5D BIM for BIM/GIS data integration in construction project management. Iop Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1274.0(1.0), 12002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1274/1/012002

Aag, R. P., Latief, Y. (2023). Identification of Quantity Surveyor Competency Risk for Cost Overrun. Devotion Journal of Research and Community Service, 4.0(9.0), 1843-1850. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v4i9.531