Leaders Without Barriers: Bridging Nations, Transforming Lives

 

Leaders Without Barriers: Bridging Nations, Transforming Lives     

Author : AM Tris Hardyanto

In every generation, some leaders do more than govern; they break barriers, ignite hope, and build bridges between divides: rich and poor, past and future, and tradition and innovation. These leaders did not just change policies; they changed possibilities.

The stories below celebrate 12 transformative leaders who reshaped their nations and inspired the world, creating pathways for a better life and a happier future.

The landscape of leadership has continually evolved through the ages, marked by the impactful presence of transformational leaders who thrive on breaking barriers and establishing connections across various sectors of society. These leaders are not merely executors of policies; they embody a vision that transcends conventional limitations, inspiring those around them to strive for a greater collective future. Transformational leadership is characterised by leaders who motivate and inspire their followers to exceed their own self-interests for the sake of the organisation's broader social objectives. Leadership style is critical for navigating the complexities of contemporary socio-economic challenges, where the divide between privilege and disadvantage is stark and pervasive.

Transformational leaders have the capacity to ignite hope among followers by fostering a collective vision and empowering individuals to pursue their goals and aspirations. This is evidenced by Holstad et al. (Holstad et al., 2014), who indicate that transformational leadership serves to stimulate followers' motivation and promote their professional ambition. By enhancing their followers' emotional resilience and emphasising their potential for growth, transformational leaders create a supportive environment where individuals can thrive, ultimately contributing to organisational effectiveness and social progress. This is corroborated by Naderi et al. (Naderi et al., 2019), who argue that transformational leadership cultivates social capital, fostering a community where individuals support each other's development and aspirations.

Moreover, the role of transformational leaders goes beyond mere motivation; they instigate a ripple effect that fosters social cohesion and drives collective action towards shared goals. For example, leaders embodying these principles are critical in education settings, where their influence can enhance classroom management and create a conducive learning environment, as suggested by Purwandoko et al. (Purwandoko et al., 2023). Their findings indicate that effective classroom management relies heavily on transformational leadership strategies that directly influence students' learning experiences and outcomes. The transformational approach facilitates more profound engagement among students and educators alike, reaffirming the significant impact of leadership in shaping future generations.

Transitioning from education to the business sector, Liu's research sheds light on the correlation between transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Liu, 2023). He asserts that leaders who harness transformational attributes are more likely to embrace organisational practices that prioritise social welfare, thereby enhancing service innovation. Correlation highlights the dual responsibility that transformational leaders must balance between economic growth, ethical considerations, and community engagement. Furthermore, Bryson et al. (2021) argue that such leaders must cultivate adaptive, relational, and visionary leadership styles that are essential for addressing multifaceted societal challenges, illustrating the profound need for socially mindful decision-making in contemporary organisations.

At the intersection of leadership and social entrepreneurship, transformational leaders create an ecosystem of innovation that fosters social capital and engagement. The evidence indicates that adequate transformational leadership mobilises collective resources, engaging followers in the pursuit of social justice, equity, and sustainable development.

The implications of transformational leadership stretch far beyond immediate organisational outcomes; they also influence team dynamics and foster an inclusive culture. Research conducted by Tian et al. (2022) demonstrates that transformational leadership can mitigate teacher burnout by nurturing positive teacher-student relationships and enhancing social-emotional competencies among educators. The study underscores the crucial role of emotional intelligence in transformational leadership, acknowledging the importance of interpersonal relationships in fostering sustainable performance in educational environments.

In the context of public health, transformational leadership plays a pivotal role in building resilient health systems capable of confronting emerging global challenges. As explored by Doutchi et al. (Doutchi et al., 2024), leaders in the health sector must adopt transformative strategies to enhance collaboration, empower health workers, and address public health challenges more effectively. Through fostering a culture of trust and shared purpose, transformational leaders can elevate health outcomes and ensure equitable access to care, particularly in underfunded communities.

Further research articulates the nuanced effects of transformational leadership on various industries, including the manufacturing sector in Iraq, where such leadership styles significantly influence sustainable practices through CSR initiatives (Mohammed, 2023). Encouragingly, organisations led by transformational leaders seem more committed to environmental stewardship and community responsibility, making them allies in the broader fight against climate change and social inequities. The multifaceted impact of transformational leadership highlights its potential to create aligned values between corporate objectives and communal welfare.

Transformational leadership is a powerful vehicle for enacting meaningful change, bridging divides, and fostering connections among divergent groups. The leaders discussed various contexts, from education to public health and business, illustrating the capacity of transformational leadership to reshape organisational cultures, empower individuals, and drive social progress. By championing ethical stewardship, fostering collaboration, and inspiring shared visions, transformational leaders are indeed creating pathways for a better future, highlighting their vital roles in contemporary society.

 

1. Nelson Mandela (South Africa)  “From Prisoner to President”

When Mandela walked free after 27 years in prison, he had a choice: seek revenge or build unity.
He chose forgiveness, dismantling apartheid, and inspiring reconciliation.
His leadership taught the world that peace can be more powerful than punishment.

Hidden Issue:
Mandela faced a fractured society — deep racial wounds, economic disparity, and global isolation. However, by championing truth commissions instead of revenge, he created a blueprint for healing divided nations.

Nelson Mandela stands as a symbol of courage and transformation in global history, exemplifying leadership that transcended personal suffering to forge a path of reconciliation and unity for a nation deeply scarred by apartheid. His remarkable journey from prisoner to president is not just a story of liberation; it is a testament to the power of forgiveness and the necessity of embracing a broader vision for societal healing. After spending 27 years in prison, Mandela chose to engage with his oppressors rather than seek revenge, setting forth a new paradigm for leadership where peace is prioritised over retaliation.

Choice underlines one of his fundamental teachings: that authentic leadership lies in the ability to envision a united future that inclusively reconciles a divided past. Such leadership is profoundly relevant in contemporary discussions on post-conflict recovery and reconciliation, making Mandela an enduring model for leaders aspiring to navigate complex societal fractures (Nelson Mandela, 2014; Pietersen, 2015).

The issues Mandela faced were complex and multifaceted, including deep-seated racial wounds, significant economic disparity, and South Africa’s international isolation. However, rather than fostering enmity, Mandela promoted initiatives like truth commissions, aimed at addressing past injustices without escalating tensions into violence. The approach not only facilitated national healing but also allowed for constructive dialogue about the future (Wyk, 2014; Thwala, 2023). Scholars argue that Mandela’s emphasis on forgiveness and communal healing represents a vital framework for post-conflict societies striving for unity and reform, making his leadership style an invaluable case study in conflict resolution (Sewpaul, 2016).

 Mandela's leadership exemplifies the qualities of what is termed "Ubuntu," an African philosophy emphasising interconnectedness and communal care. Oppenheim notes ideology as integral to Mandela’s leadership, highlighting how it shaped his governance by fostering empathy and resilience among the populace, creating an environment conducive to reconciliation (Oppenheim, 2012; Elkington, 2020).

The notion of ubuntu illustrates that one’s individual well-being is tied to the well-being of others, a principle that manifested in Mandela’s emphasis on community welfare over individual advancement. One aspect of his leadership fundamentally redefines success not merely as political power but as societal transformation, aligning with the broader themes of servant leadership, where the leader prioritises the needs of the community (Koshal, 2024).

Further, Mandela’s visionary leadership and ability to communicate a hopeful narrative were pivotal in uniting a divided nation. His ability to connect with various demographics, including white South Africans who had previously benefited from apartheid, showcases his capacity. His strategy was characterised by exceptional emotional intelligence, which enabled him to engage in meaningful conversations that bridged societal divides (Mallaby et al., 2017). Studies support the notion that transformational leadership, characterised by motivation, inspiration, and nurturing a sense of community, was key to Mandela’s success as a leader (Nderi, 2024).

Modern frameworks for leadership studies further contextualise Mandela's approach by emphasising ethical practices and community-oriented governance. Research illustrates that Mandela’s leadership was both ethical and transformational, fostering an inclusive political environment where previously marginalised voices were heard and valued (Pietersen, 2015; Andrews, 2009). His insistence on reinstating dignity to Black South Africans, through public policy and cultural initiatives, was vital in this regard. Commitment to human rights helped heal fractured relationships and provided a robust foundation for a democratic society (Garba & Akuva, 2020).

Moreover, the framework of Mandela’s leadership raises important discussions about the implementation of truth and reconciliation commissions as a mechanism for societal healing. By advocating an approach, he created a blueprint that has influenced other post-conflict nations striving for peace amid persistent divisions. His methodologies resonate strongly with modern restorative justice practices, which aim to repair harm by encouraging accountability and forgiveness rather than cycles of punishment and retaliation (Wyk, 2014; Sewpaul, 2016).

Such frameworks have inspired other leaders facing similar societal challenges across the globe, yielding lessons that extend beyond geographical constraints. Mandela’s legacy continues to provoke dialogue in leadership studies, particularly concerning how leaders can effectively navigate complex socio-political landscapes in diverse contexts. His life and actions embody a unique blend of humility, courage, and wisdom – traits that are vital for contemporary leaders who aspire to instigate meaningful change. In the pursuit of a more equitable society, Mandela has become a case study for aspiring leaders who wish to employ ethical practices rooted in collective well-being and peace, reinforcing the notion that effective governance transcends mere policy implementation (Garba & Akuva, 2020).

Further research into the implications of Mandela’s leadership style reveals the significance of cultivating trust within communities. As Mallaby et al. point out, Mandela’s interpersonal leadership qualities were critical in rebuilding trust among a populace keen on healing decades of racial animosity (Mallaby et al., 2017). His ability to navigate the delicate dynamics of a fractured society while emphasising collective aspirations showcases his sophisticated understanding of leadership, which is urgently needed in this polarised world.

Nelson Mandela’s journey from prisoner to president serves as a powerful reminder of the transformative potential of visionary leadership grounded in forgiveness and unity. The lessons drawn from his leadership style extend far beyond historical significance; they offer invaluable insights for current and future leaders facing complex societal challenges. Mandela emphasised that acknowledging past injustices while promoting healing is fundamental to society’s progress. The multidimensional approach to leadership stands as a guiding principle for fostering peaceful coexistence and building resilient communities amid adversity.

 

2. Deng Xiaoping (China)  “Opening the Dragon’s Gate.”

The Cultural Revolution left China isolated, impoverished, and scarred in the late 1970s.
Deng introduced “Reform and Opening-Up,” which involved unleashing markets, inviting foreign investment, and encouraging innovation.
Within four decades, 700+ million people escaped poverty.

Hidden Issue:
 Transformation was not just economic; it rewired China’s identity. Deng bridged the gap between communism and capitalism, showing the world that pragmatism can redefine national destiny.

Deng Xiaoping emerged as a pivotal figure in shaping modern China, implementing the transformative “Reform and Opening Up” policy in 1978 in a context characterised by economic isolation, widespread poverty, and the lingering consequences of the Cultural Revolution. His leadership reversed decades of stunted economic growth and realigned China’s identity on both domestic and global stages. By liberalising market forces, inviting foreign investment, and fostering an environment for innovation, Deng catalysed a process through which over 700 million Chinese citizens ascended from poverty within the ensuing four decades, exemplifying the profound impact of effective leadership by valuing pragmatism and adaptation over rigid ideological adherence (Gu, 2022; Shen, 2018).

The transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented framework presented monumental challenges, primarily due to the inherent contradictions of embracing capitalist elements while maintaining the Communist Party’s ideological facade. Deng’s approach fundamentally redefined the socio-economic landscape of China, illustrating how flexibility in governance and economic strategy can yield substantial benefits while upholding foundational political principles (Shi & Sun, 2016; Yong et al., 2016). The duality of maintaining a one-party state while embracing market mechanisms demonstrates his innovative approach to leadership, the ability to balance competing interests while pursuing holistic national progress (Kwon & Zhou, 2009; Puppin, 2020).

Deng’s policies initiated a shift not only in economic paradigms but also in the cultural and social identities of the Chinese people. The resulting economic overhaul nurtured an entrepreneurial spirit that had been suppressed under previous regimes, fostering a newfound focus on personal agency and national pride (Fowler & Fowler, 2017; Fowler et al., 2010). This transformation encouraged a cultural renaissance that spurred creativity, technological advancements, and cultural exchanges, broadening China’s perspective on global citizenship. The interplay of local initiatives with global market dynamics illustrated Deng’s vision of ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’, creating a model for development that encompassed both domestic growth and international integration (Shen et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2014).

In the realm of foreign relations, Deng’s opening policies represented a significant shift toward engagement with the global community. The mechanisms he established, including special economic zones (SEZs), attracted considerable foreign direct investment, catalysing significant infrastructure development and industrialisation (Wang et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2024). These policies stimulated economic growth and reshaped China’s role in international trade, embedding it within global supply chains and fostering interdependence with other economies (Shi & Sun, 2016; Yong et al., 2016). As a result, Deng effectively repositioned China from a state of isolation to being one of the leading economic forces in the 21st century, encouraging similar nations to reconsider their economic models and policies.

Moreover, Deng’s pragmatic approach to governance has been credited with fostering stability amid rapid changes. His leadership style emphasised results and adaptability over ideological rigidity, which became crucial as China navigated the complexities of modernisation while addressing the sociopolitical legacies of the past (Zhou, 2023; Fa, 2024). The economic reforms provided necessary momentum for societal advancements, including improvements in education and healthcare, as Deng sought to enhance not only economic metrics but also the living standards of the citizenry (Shen et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2013).

His understanding of gradual reform characterises Deng’s legacy as an essential strategy for facilitating systemic change. Unlike the shock therapy approaches seen in other nations, China’s reforms were incremental, allowing for fine-tuning and corrective measures as necessary. The approach minimised societal disruptions that could arise from abrupt transitions, thus ensuring a more stable emergence after decades of economic stagnation (Shi & Sun, 2016; Cai, 2023). Deng’s methodical approach, embodied by the mantra of “crossing the river by feeling the stone”,  resonated with the discourse on governance amidst transformational changes.

As China’s landscape continues to evolve under the foundational principles laid by Deng Xiaoping, the implications of his leadership resonate not only within China but also internationally. His success has sparked discussions among other nations regarding the adaptability of market reforms within various ideological frameworks, suggesting pathways for economic integration that do not necessitate the wholesale abandonment of traditional governance models (Shen, 2018; Kwon & Zhou, 2009). It showcases the potential of emerging economies to create a unique developmental trajectory informed by local realities and international norms (Yan & Tang, 2022; Yong et al., 2016).

In essence, Deng Xiaoping’s leadership during the Reform and Opening-Up era serves as a compelling case study for contemporary and future leaders. By demonstrating that innovation and resilience can coexist with foundational governance principles, Deng dismantled the historical confines that had long limited China’s potential on both domestic and global stages. His focus on pragmatism and efficiency serves as a reminder that real progress requires not merely vision but also the courage to adapt and redefine what is possible in the face of entrenched norms (Shen, 2018; Zhu, 2019).

Through his initiatives, Deng Xiaoping transformed China, instilling in its citizens the belief that a dynamic economy can be sustained without sacrificing political ideals. The approach brings home an important point for all leaders: the power of inclusive and adaptive governance to address pressing socio-economic challenges and cultivate a thriving society that embraces both heritage and modernity.

 

3. Mahatma Gandhi (India)  “The Quiet Force of Freedom.”

Armed with only truth and nonviolence, Gandhi mobilised millions against British colonial rule.
He transformed salt into a symbol of sovereignty during the Salt March and inspired civil rights movements worldwide.

Hidden Issue:
Gandhi understood that absolute freedom was not just political independence; it was self-reliance. His push for spinning one’s own cloth was not symbolic; it was a fight for economic dignity.

Mahatma Gandhi’s transformative role in India’s struggle for independence is marked by his unparalleled dedication to nonviolence and truth, fundamentally changing the trajectory of Indian society and having a lasting effect on the global discourse of civil rights. Known as “the quiet force of freedom, Gandhi mobilised vast segments of the Indian population against British colonial rule through peaceful means. His approach focused on political independence and encompassed a broader vision of self-reliance and economic dignity. The symbolic Salt March epitomised philosophy, as the act of collecting salt became a profound statement against colonial oppression, showcasing how everyday actions could challenge the might of an empire (Dheeraj, 2017).

The Salt March was a calculated strategic move that galvanised a nation. By engaging in a collective act of civil disobedience, Gandhi illuminated the oppressive nature of colonial regulations, serving as a blueprint for future movements globally, as highlighted in the analysis by various scholars (Lengefeld et al., 2022). The event underscored the power of non-violent resistance, demonstrating how peaceful protest could effect meaningful change against oppressive regimes. Gandhi’s method of Satyagraha, or “truth force underscores his belief that genuine liberation involves moral and spiritual upliftment along with political freedom; it emphasises living truthfully and in accordance with one’s principles and moral beliefs (Narayanan et al., 2017).

Parallel to his political endeavours, Gandhi advocated self-reliance through initiatives like spinning one’s own cloth, known as Khadi, which served as a metaphor for economic independence. It was not simply an act of thrift; it was a means of empowering the Indian population to reclaim their economic sovereignty from British manufacturers and promote local industries (Kareemulla et al., 2013). His emphasis on Khadi symbolised resistance to foreign goods and advocated for economic dignity, reflecting a vision that transcended mere political autonomy to encompass all aspects of life, including economic engagement and personal responsibility (Tripathi & Singh, 2018).

Gandhi’s ideologies reflect a profound understanding of the interconnection between personal and collective freedom. His call for self-sufficiency aligned with his belief that true independence requires individuals to take practical actions for themselves and their communities. The viewpoint provides an early framework for what is now known as sustainable development and community empowerment. Scholars argue that his vision laid the groundwork for many rural development programs in India, showcasing the enduring relevance of Gandhi’s principles in contemporary social policy (Chopra, 2019; Patra & Dash, 2023).

Furthermore, Gandhi’s influence extended beyond the borders of India, inspiring civil rights movements globally, including the American civil rights struggle led by figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. These connections illustrate how Gandhi’s methods of non-violent protest gained traction in various contexts, promoting a universal discourse on human rights and justice (Nair et al., 2013; Rayappa & Bavaiah, 2021). His principles resonate in modern movements advocating for social change, cementing a legacy that  asset system  oppression can be dismantled through moral and ethical empowerment rather than confrontation.

When reflecting on Gandhi’s impact, it is important to recognise the complexities and contradictions in his life and ideology. His idealism often faced practical challenges, and critiques of his approach to social and economic issues indicate that the implementation of his ideals was not without tensions. Some scholars suggest that while Gandhi’s focus on self-reliance and local production was empowering, it occasionally overlooked more profound systemic inequalities (Usmani et al., 2022; Fraser, 2015). Nevertheless, his commitment to ethical leadership and the empowerment of marginalised communities continues to be a cornerstone of discussions on effective leadership and transformative social justice.

Additionally, Gandhi’s legacy is expressed in contemporary programmes, such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which embodies his principles of dignity at work and economic independence for the rural poor (Venkataratnam & Professor, 2024; Simha, 2018). MGNREGA advocates for the rights of the most vulnerable by providing guaranteed employment and supporting rural livelihoods, illustrating that Gandhi’s vision remains significantly relevant today.

Mahatma Gandhi’s quiet force for freedom was characterised by a multifaceted approach to liberation, one that bridged the political, economic, and moral realms. His teachings on nonviolence, self-reliance, and collective engagement significantly influenced India’s independence movement and are still inspiring global narratives on social justice and human rights. Gandhi’s legacy reinforces the idea that absolute freedom extends beyond political independence; it is interwoven with personal dignity, community empowerment, and sustainable economic practices. His call for a life of simplicity and deep commitment to social equity provides practical advice for contemporary leaders navigating the complexities of modern governance and inspiring profound societal change.

 

4. Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore), “From Fishing Village to Financial Titan”

When Lee took office in 1959, Singapore was a muddy trading port with limited resources.
Through strategic planning, anti-corruption reforms, and world-class infrastructure, he transformed Singapore into a global powerhouse.

Hidden Issue:
Lee faced scepticism—no natural resources, no land, no chance. However, he proved that education, clean governance, and vision could outweigh geography.

Lee Kuan Yew, often revered as the founding father of modern Singapore, is a significant figure in the narrative of global leadership. He became Prime Minister in 1959 when Singapore faced numerous challenges, including being a small trading port with limited natural resources. Lee’s vision catalysed Singapore’s transformation into a global financial hub through strategic foresight and commitments to anti-corruption, robust education, and infrastructural development (Bebbington, 2014; Quah, 2022).

Upon taking office, Lee confronted critical issues, including limited resources and socio-economic instability. Many critics doubted that Singapore could progress due to its geographical constraints and lack of natural resources. Lee effectively invested in education and skills development, creating a competent workforce suited for a globalised economy. As noted by Bebbington, Lee envisioned an educational framework that would develop a “pyramidal structure” of leaders and skilled citizens, allowing human capital to compensate for the country’s resource limitations (Bebbington, 2014).

Corruption was a significant obstacle during Lee’s time. He implemented a rigorous strategy of zero tolerance towards corruption, thereby emphasising integrity and accountability in governance (Quah, 2022; Quah, 2015). The approach built trust in public institutions and attracted foreign investments. By enhancing public servant salaries and establishing stringent anti-corruption measures, Lee developed a dedicated civil service focused on national progress (Quah, 2022). Academic discussions reveal that, under Lee’s leadership, Singapore set a global standard for anti-corruption practices, highlighting the critical role of clean governance in development (Quah, 2015; Neudorf, 2014).

Infrastructure development was also essential to Lee’s strategy, focusing not only on physical infrastructure but also on establishing a robust social and economic framework. He prioritised the construction of advanced transportation and communication systems to facilitate the efficient movement of goods and people, integrating Singapore into global supply chains (Dergachev, 2021; Quah, 2022). These investments were supported by policies that welcomed foreign investment and established free trade agreements, positioning Singapore as an essential player in the Asian market (Khiun, 2015; Weiss, 2020).

Lee’s governance style, often described as “benign authoritarianism”, blended authoritarianism with economic liberalism. Criticism exists regarding the restrictions on political freedoms, yet many studies note that Singapore’s model demonstrates how effective governance can foster social cohesion and stability in ways that might differ from Western democratic models (Choi, 2018; Weiss, 2020). Lee acknowledged that Singapore’s unique sociopolitical climate required a tailored approach to democracy to ensure stability while gradually promoting civic engagement. Lee’s strategic vision extended to foreign policy as well; he aligned Singapore’s foreign relations with regional dynamics, fostering partnerships with significant powers and promoting regional cooperation through ASEAN. The approach bolstered Singapore’s sovereignty and enhanced its international reputation (Dergachev, 2021; Hoo, 2015).

The remarkable transformation of Singapore from a developing to a developed nation under Lee Kuan Yew challenges the standard predatory state model seen in resource-dependent nations. Instead, Lee’s experience illustrates the pivotal role of human capital, effective governance, and infrastructure investment in promoting socio-economic development regardless of naturally occurring disadvantages (Biswas & Tortajada, 2023; Khiun, 2015). The legacy of Lee Kuan Yew continues to inform contemporary policymakers, as they seek to adapt the “Singapore model” to fit their unique contexts.

Lee Kuan Yew exemplifies impactful governance marked by vision, integrity, and pragmatism. His pivotal role in turning Singapore into a leading financial centre, accomplished amidst scepticism regarding its prospects, highlights the importance of strategic foresight in leadership. Lee’s legacy demonstrates that education, integrity in governance, and a compelling vision can surmount national challenges, significantly influencing narratives of national success in the global context.

 

5. Abraham Lincoln (USA), “Keeping a Nation Whole”

During America’s darkest hour, the Civil War, Lincoln preserved the Union and abolished slavery.
His Gettysburg Address reshaped the meaning of democracy: “Government of the people, by the people, for the people.”

Hidden Issue:
Lincoln led amid deep division, facing assassination threats and political rebellion. However, he understood that leadership means sacrificing popularity for principle.

Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, serves as a prime example of transformative leadership during one of the most tumultuous periods in American history, the Civil War. His efforts to preserve the Union and abolish slavery were monumental achievements, characterised by profound moral and ethical challenges. Serious national fracturing, persistent threats to his life, and intense political strife tested Lincoln’s leadership. His discourse regarding democracy, encapsulated in his Gettysburg Address, redefined governance in the United States, emphasising a vision of a government that is “of the people, by the people, for the people” (Lincoln, 2020).

Lincoln faced scepticism regarding his ability to unify a nation embroiled in civil conflict. Early in his presidency, his attempts to navigate the war often seemed to exacerbate divisions rather than resolve them (Lohrke et al., 2011). However, with a steadfast commitment to his principles, he navigated the complexities of wartime leadership, demonstrating that effective governance often requires sacrificing immediate popularity in favour of long-term ethical imperatives, the abolition of slavery being the keystone of his moral vision (Finkelman, 2010). His use of executive power, particularly with measures like the Emancipation Proclamation, underscored the necessity of moral conviction in leadership strategies, marking a shift in the war’s objectives from merely restoring the Union to also addressing the moral catastrophe of slavery (Finkelman, 2010).

During the period, Lincoln demonstrated remarkable courage and vulnerability. His leadership style was characterised by deep empathy; he often interacted with soldiers and families affected by the war, which reinforced his understanding of the human costs of conflict (Rutledge, 2020). Historical analyses illustrate that Lincoln’s resolve was fortified by his ability to articulate a vision that aligned closely with the democratic values upon which the nation was founded, thereby enshrining principles of equality and liberty as paramount goals of the Union’s survival (Foner, 2005).

The political landscape during Lincoln’s presidency was fraught with turmoil, indicated by rising threats against his life (Williams, 2024). Nevertheless, Lincoln maintained a critical focus on coalition-building, bringing together a diverse cabinet that included voices from various factions of the political spectrum. Assemblage ironically evolved to be referred to as his “Team of Rivals”, a strategic and courageous move that positioned him to face dissent within his administration while promoting unity among disparate groups with often conflicting interests (Greenstein & Anderson, 2013).

Commitment to inclusivity and dialogue marked a significant transformational approach that faced substantial political risks yet was pivotal in driving the war effort and legislative reforms necessary for national healing. Lincoln’s leadership during the unprecedented crisis involved complex decision-making under pressure, where he often had to weigh military strategies against political ramifications. The deployment of his rhetorical abilities to inspire the nation was evident in his speeches, particularly during defining moments such as the Gettysburg Address and his Second Inaugural Address, where he highlighted themes of healing, reconciliation, and unified purpose (Lincoln, 2020).

Academic evaluations of Lincoln’s leadership reveal a deeper appreciation for the interplay between leadership, moral courage, and political acumen during the Civil War. Research indicates that his commitment to necessary change—namely, the abolition of slavery—was not merely a political tactic; rather, it stemmed from profound ethical convictions that resonated with broader humanitarian ideals, laying the groundwork for a new understanding of American identity and democracy (Choi & Liu, 2023). A perspective on leadership provides essential lessons applicable to contemporary leaders who must navigate divisions within their societies.

In sum, Abraham Lincoln’s presidency epitomises the essence of transformative leadership, faced with the dual trials of a divided nation and a complex battlefield. His decisive actions and profound commitment to the principles of equality and democracy demonstrate that effective leadership often requires resolve in the face of adversity, as well as the courage to prioritise moral imperatives over political expediency. Lincoln’s legacy, defined by his ability to maintain the Union while abolishing slavery, reinforces the notion that leadership can profoundly shape the trajectory of nations, emphasising that enduring change is often born of deep convictions articulated through courageous governance.

 

6. Xi Jinping (China)  “The Chinese Dream”

Xi envisions a national rejuvenation where technology, innovation, and culture elevate China’s global role.
Through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), he connects over 140 countries with trade, infrastructure, and cooperation.

Hidden Issue:
Behind the ambition lies a deeper struggle: balancing growth with equity and national pride with global collaboration. Xi’s vision forces the world to rethink what power and prosperity mean.

Xi Jinping’s vision of the “Chinese Dream” represents a significant ideological and policy framework aimed at national rejuvenation, emphasising China’s rise as a significant global player through technological advancement, cultural reaffirmation, and international connectivity. Central to this ambition is the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a massive infrastructure and economic programme launched in 2013 that seeks to enhance China’s trade relationships across more than 140 countries through infrastructural investments and cooperative projects (Usman, 2023; Barman, 2023). In context, Xi aims to reshape global economic landscapes while fostering a narrative that positions China as a contributor to global development and shared prosperity.

The BRI is pivotal for Xi’s goal of connecting China with various regions, facilitating trade, and enhancing diplomatic ties, fitting firmly within the broader aspirations encapsulated by the Chinese Dream (Barman, 2023; Al-Fadhat & Prasetio, 2022). Critics, however, emphasise the challenges inherent in executing such ambitious projects, particularly the balance between promoting growth and ensuring equitable benefits for participating nations (Al-Fadhat & Prasetio, 2022; Hayes, 2024).

 The initiative’s critics often note the debt burdens placed on some partner countries, questioning the sustainability of such investments and the implications for international relations stemming from perceived debt-trap diplomacy (Al-Fadhat & Prasetio, 2022; Gering, 2023). Hence, while BRI heralds an era of connectivity, it raises vital discussions about equity, sovereignty, and economic dependency within the framework of globalisation.

Under Xi’s leadership, there exists a duality in strategy—while promoting an expansive vision of international cooperation, there is also an internal focus on maintaining national pride and social cohesion amid rising global competition (Nakano, 2022). Xi’s adaptation of socialism with Chinese characteristics pushes for a modernisation drive that positions China not just as a regional power but as a fundamental player on the global stage, challenging established power dynamics long dominated by Western ideals (Mazuelos, 2022; Carrai, 2020). This shift encourages other nations to redefine their relationships with China while they navigate the complexities of Chinese influence and address their own national interests.

Xi has acknowledged the importance of innovation and technology in achieving the Chinese Dream. Significant investments in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields aim to elevate China’s status as a leader in global innovation (Han & Appelbaum, 2018). The national emphasis on advancing technology converges with efforts to create a knowledge-based economy, leverage China’s vast labour resources, and grow the tech industry to foster sustainable economic growth. The strategy seeks to transform China’s economic model from being dependent on manufacturing to being centred on innovation and services, fundamentally changing the narrative of what power and prosperity entail.

However, the push for national rejuvenation brings forth intrinsic tensions; balancing growth with equity remains a paramount challenge. As China rapidly advances technologically and economically, addressing disparities within its vast population becomes increasingly imperative. There looms the risk that the focus on national grandeur may overlook the needs of its diverse populace, thereby necessitating policies that ensure inclusive growth and equitable resource distribution (Syam & Fatia, 2022; Noesselt, 2023). “Common prosperity”, which Xi has touted as a guiding principle, aims to address these disparities. However, its implementation remains a question of profound importance, as it must reconcile ambition with the economic realities faced by many Chinese citizens (Wang, 2024).

Moreover, Xi’s foreign policy framework, including the BRI, now intersects with broader ideological strategies that promote China’s vision of a “community of common destiny”, reflecting a desire to showcase a more collaborative approach to international relations. The ideological shift aims to position China as a cornerstone of global governance efforts, creating a narrative that champions cooperation over competition (Sinaga, 2021; Zhang, 2019). As Xi navigates his path, he simultaneously faces scepticism and resistance from established powers who are wary of China’s growing influence, conditioning relationships based on shared benefits while ensuring China’s centrality in the dialogue.

Xi Jinping’s vision, encapsulated in the Chinese Dream and the BRI, represents a profound rethinking of global power dynamics and relationships. As China aims for rejuvenation, the complicated relationship among ambition, internal stability, and global collaboration will define its path forward. Nonetheless, the pursuit of these transformative goals will require navigating the complexities inherent in balancing national pride with the necessity of equitable growth, a challenge that will undoubtedly shape China’s narrative in the decades to come.

 

7. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (Liberia) – “The Iron Lady of Africa”

After years of civil war, Sirleaf rebuilt Liberia’s institutions and became Africa’s first elected female head of state.
She restructured debts, restored international credibility, and expanded schools and healthcare.

Hidden Issue:
Sirleaf fought entrenched patriarchy and corruption, proving that gender is no barrier to nation-building.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, often referred to as the “Iron Lady of Africa,”, holds a distinctive place in the annals of global leadership as Liberia’s first elected female head of state. Her journey to the presidency, marked by resilience and resolve, emerged in the context of a nation ravaged by civil war. Sirleaf’s leadership was not simply about governance; it was a bold assertion of gender equality in a socio-political landscape that was historically dominated by patriarchal structures. As she undertook the daunting task of rebuilding Liberia’s institutions and restoring its international credibility, her governance style became a vital narrative of hope and reform (Söderström, 2013; Jones, 2015).

Upon taking office in 2006, Sirleaf faced the enormous challenge of revitalising Liberia, which had suffered a prolonged civil war that severely disrupted societal structures and governance. Significant infrastructural and institutional damage necessitated immediate attention, and Sirleaf’s administration prioritised education, healthcare, and economic reform (Arthur et al., 2022; Nabyonga-Orem et al., 2016). Her commitment to restructuring Liberia’s debts and fostering international relations was pivotal; laying the groundwork for attracting foreign investment was crucial for national recovery. Scholars assert that Sirleaf’s effective financial management and stakeholder collaboration represented an important step towards stabilising and expanding the country’s economy (Alonge et al., 2019; Tyner, 2024).

Moreover, efforts to expand educational opportunities and healthcare access throughout Liberia marked Sirleaf's administration. With initiatives aimed at improving literacy rates and health outcomes, Sirleaf not only acknowledged the critical role of education in nation-building but actively pushed for reforms that would create sustainable pathways for future generations (Wodon, 2012; Phiri et al., 2022). Her advocacy for women’s rights further compounded her legacy, as she worked to combat entrenched gender biases within the political sphere, illustrating that gender is not a barrier to national leadership nor to effective governance (Jones, 2015; Wenham et al., 2019).

Sirleaf’s fight against corruption was another cornerstone of her tenure; she recognised that transparent governance was essential for reinstituting public trust in the government and fostering a conducive environment for development (Harry & Niekerk, 2023; Adams, 2008). The emphasis on anti-corruption measures was not merely a political slogan for Sirleaf but a necessity in the post-conflict context of Liberia, where corruption had long undermined state legitimacy. Her administration’s initiatives focused on building robust institutions capable of holding individuals accountable and ensuring that governmental processes were conducted ethically (Nabyonga‐Orem et al., 2016; Bett & Ngala-Dimba, 2022).

In confronting the challenges of entrenched patriarchy, Sirleaf’s administration emphasised the values of representation and inclusivity. She endeavoured to include women in leadership positions, which meant promoting female participation across various governmental roles, thereby setting a precedent for future generations to follow (Adams, 2008; Bauer, 2009). Emphasis on women in leadership has informed discussions surrounding gender equity in governance across Africa, positioning Liberia as a case study in the potential for transformative, inclusive political dialogues (Spears, 2007; McMillan et al., 2011).

Nevertheless, Sirleaf’s path to establishing a new Liberia was fraught with numerous challenges, including instability stemming from historical grievances and economic inequities. Her administration needed to navigate these complexities while fostering a narrative of national pride and unity (Bauer, 2009). The process of managing competing interests in Liberian society necessitates a careful balancing act to ensure that the gains achieved do not come at the expense of marginalised communities. Sirleaf’s ability to maintain dialogue and engagement with various factions is often highlighted as a crucial aspect of her leadership strategy, demonstrating her understanding that sustainable peace requires collaboration and a shared vision (Scully, 2024; Pailey & Harris, 2017).

The significance of Sirleaf’s presidency extends beyond national borders; her tenure illuminated a broader discourse on women’s leadership in Africa. By breaking gender barriers and proving that women can effectively lead even the most challenging environments, Sirleaf’s presidency became a beacon of inspiration for many aspiring female leaders both within Liberia and across the continent (Adams, 2008; “Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: ‘A Voice for Freedom’", 2023). The transformative nature of her leadership has prompted discussions about the unique strengths that women bring to governance, particularly in post-conflict settings where empathy, collaboration, and resilience are fundamental to recovery and nation-building (Sharpe, 2012; KATAMBA, 2022).

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf's tenure as president of Liberia exemplifies how resilient leadership can emerge from conflict, paving the path for national recovery and empowerment. Her resolve in redefining the notion of leadership through the lens of gender equality, anti-corruption, and community engagement has solidified her legacy as an iconic figure not just in Liberia but in the global narrative of women's empowerment in politics. As Liberia continues to face new challenges, the framework laid by Sirleaf will be indispensable in guiding future leaders in their pursuit of a more equitable and prosperous nation.

 

8. Jacinda Ardern (New Zealand), "Leading with Empathy"

After the Christchurch mosque attacks in 2019, Ardern wore a headscarf, hugged survivors, and said, "They are us."
Her compassionate leadership turned tragedy into unity, earning global admiration.

Hidden Issue:
In an era of polarisation, Ardern showed that kindness can be a political force, redefining leadership beyond authority into human connection.

Jacinda Ardern's leadership during her tenure as Prime Minister of New Zealand exemplifies the power of empathy in governance, particularly in the aftermath of the tragic Christchurch mosque attacks in 2019. Her response to the national crisis, characterised by compassion, inclusivity, and a strong moral compass, transformed trauma into a potent narrative of unity, setting a global standard for empathetic leadership (Safdar et al., 2024; Frasure-Yokley & Wilcox-Archuleta, 2019). By donning a headscarf in solidarity with the Muslim community and delivering poignant messages emphasising collective grief and resilience, Ardern embodied the sentiment that "they are us," thereby reinforcing national cohesion during a time of polarising emotions (Addy et al., 2021; Khan et al., 2019). Ardern's leadership offers profound insights into the role of emotional intelligence in political discourse. In the face of adversity, she demonstrated how compassion can transcend traditional political boundaries and transform grief into a catalyst for positive social change (Cheng et al., 2021; Blackington et al., 2024).

Her response to the Christchurch attacks united New Zealanders and won her admiration globally for handling a complex and sensitive situation with grace and sincerity. Her response to the Christchurch attacks exemplifies the potential for kindness to be a political force, as it challenges the often adversarial nature of contemporary politics by prioritising connectivity over division (Maggi & Ossa, 2020; Niemi et al., 2021).

The hidden issue under Ardern's empathetic leadership is an ongoing struggle against the backdrop of increasing polarisation in global politics. As contemporary leaders grapple with divisive narratives, Ardern's approach illustrates the potential for empathy to serve as a counterbalance to hatred and fear. Her leadership style reveals that embodying kindness and compassion can forge stronger connections between diverse communities, promoting harmony and shared humanity even in the face of adversity (Cheng et al., 2021; Fardian et al., 2024). Ardern's ability to genuinely connect with her constituents exemplifies how emotional transparency can enhance public trust and strengthen democratic engagement.

In an era where political polarisation seems to dominate discussions, Ardern's governance contrasts sharply with the authoritarian responses found in some global contexts. Her commitment to open dialogue and community engagement, including directly hugging survivors and fostering understanding, reinforces an essential aspect of her leadership philosophy: that vulnerability and authenticity can be sources of strength in leadership (Larasatie et al., 2022; Kling et al., 2021). This approach unites her nation and serves as a model for leaders worldwide to reevaluate their strategies for meaningfully connecting with their populations.

The ramifications of Ardern's empathetic leadership extend beyond national borders, sparking discussions on the impact of emotional intelligence in statecraft globally. Her approach has encouraged leaders in other countries to consider the value of integrating compassion into their governance models, particularly in how they respond to crises that threaten social cohesion. The global admiration for her handling of the tragedy in Christchurch symbolises a potential shift in public expectations of leadership towards a model that embraces healing over hostility (Zhao et al., 2019; Sætra, 2021).

Ardern's leadership also highlights the strategic importance of unity in addressing national challenges. By emphasising shared humanity, she was able to galvanise a collective response to not only the attacks but also the ongoing issues of domestic extremism and intolerance. illustrates an important point for leaders: that fostering a sense of belonging and community through acts of empathy can indeed lead to constructive engagement and proactive solutions to societal issues (Ashfaq et al., 2021; Anyidoho et al., 2020).

Moreover, her actions have sparked widespread media coverage and a positive global narrative regarding New Zealand's approach to governance following crises. Such media representations contribute to reshaping international perceptions of political leaders as advocates for kindness and solidarity, reinforcing the notion that leadership can be defined beyond power dynamics, embodying a holistic approach that balances authority with affection and respect for human dignity (Zhou et al., 2023; Shaykhutdinov, 2019).

Jacinda Ardern's leadership during and after the Christchurch attacks serves as a powerful reminder of the role that empathy can play in governance. Her narrative of unity, compassionate public engagement, and commitment to healing outlines a transformative vision for political leadership that prioritises human connections, an approach that is not only timely but imperative in today's increasingly polarised political landscape. As both a national and global leader, Ardern illustrates that the strength of a leader lies not only in their ability to govern but also in their capacity to connect with their constituents on a profoundly human level.

 

9. Muhammad Yunus (Bangladesh)  "Banker to the Poor"

Yunus pioneered microfinance through Grameen Bank, giving tiny loans to millions without collateral.
From rural Bangladesh to global finance, his model empowered the voiceless and created entrepreneurs.

Hidden Issue:
Poverty is not just about money; it is about opportunity. Yunus successfully bridged the gap between despair and dignity, demonstrating that modest resources can ignite ambitious aspirations.

 

Muhammad Yunus, a distinguished social entrepreneur from Bangladesh, is a transformative figure in the realm of microfinance, which he pioneered through the creation of Grameen Bank. His innovative approach fundamentally revolutionised the financial landscape for the poor, particularly in rural Bangladesh, by providing small loans without requiring collateral. Yunus's vision highlights that poverty extends beyond mere financial deprivation; it is deeply rooted in systemic barriers to opportunities, dignity, and economic participation (Kaboski & Townsend, 2005; Sarto et al., 2023). By addressing these gaps, Yunus demonstrated how microfinance can empower the disenfranchised and inspire entrepreneurship among marginalised communities.

The foundational concept of microcredit, as introduced by Yunus, was that access to financial resources could enable individuals to transcend their circumstances and create businesses that foster economic independence. Research has demonstrated that the Grameen Bank model, which emphasises group lending without collateral, significantly impacts women. Research indicates that the higher impact of microcredit on women underscores the model's effectiveness not only in alleviating poverty but also in enhancing gender empowerment within these communities (Kaboski & Townsend, 2005; Chowdhury & Somani, 2020). A strategic focus on women has allowed microfinance institutions to facilitate broader social change by reorganising power dynamics among households and communities across Bangladesh. Yunus's efforts have sparked significant academic and policy discussions regarding the efficacy of microfinance in addressing systemic poverty. Critics question the long-term sustainability of such programmes and their potential to generate dependency among borrowers. However, empirical evidence indicates that microfinance can effectively increase income, promote better health and education outcomes, and elevate the overall quality of life for recipients (Waddington et al., 2012; Hudon & Sandberg, 2013). The nuances in these discussions emphasise that measuring impact involves more than immediate financial returns; true success encompasses fostering an environment where opportunities flourish along with entrepreneurial aspirations (Uddin et al., 2024; Yee et al., 2023).

Moreover, Yunus's entrepreneurial mindset and the Grameen Bank's success have influenced broader financial frameworks and innovations not only in Bangladesh but also globally. His advocacy for social entrepreneurship has inspired similar initiatives across various developing countries, where diverse models of microfinance have emerged, tailored to local contexts and needs (Muhammad et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023). Yunus asserts that the essence of microfinance lies in providing tools for self-employment and systemic participation in economic growth, a vision he persistently promotes on global platforms (Zhang et al., 2023; Kono & Takahashi, 2010).

Despite the substantial progress achieved through microfinance, significant challenges remain. Issues related to the cyclical nature of debt, client over-indebtedness, and the accountability of microfinance institutions have surfaced in various evaluations (Hudon & Sandberg, 2013; Pless et al., 2021). Thus, while microcredit has enabled many impoverished individuals to access financial services, it is crucial to adopt a balanced approach that acknowledges the sustainability of both microfinance institutions and their borrowers (Auvinet & Lloret, 2015).

In essence, Yunus's vision and the operationalisation of Grameen Bank have reshaped our understanding of poverty eradication by emphasising the role of opportunity, dignity, and empowerment in elevating the underprivileged economically. As his model continues to encourage advancements in social finance and entrepreneurship, it raises vital questions about the future of inclusive economic growth. Recognising poverty as a multifaceted issue emphasises the necessity of holistic strategies aimed at dismantling systemic barriers while fostering environments conducive to financial freedom and business innovation.

The "Banker to the Poo" narrative symbolises not merely financial success but a broader movement toward acknowledging human resilience and the impactful roles that small resources can play in igniting substantial societal change. Yunus's legacy is likely to inspire future generations of leaders and change-makers striving to innovate in the face of persistent social challenges, demonstrating that even the smallest resources can lead to significant dreams coming true.

 

10. Thomas Sankara (Burkina Faso)  "Africa’s Che Guevara”

Sankara’s radical reforms – free vaccinations, women’s empowerment, and anti-corruption drives made him a symbol of African pride.
He rejected foreign aid dependency, urging self-reliance.

Hidden Issue:
Sankara’s assassination at 37 reminds us that visionary leadership often threatens entrenched power.

Thomas Sankara, often referred to as "Africa's Che Guevara," served as president of Burkina Faso from 1983 until his assassination in 1987. His leadership was marked by a series of radical reforms that aimed to uplift the impoverished populace, foster self-reliance, and empower marginalised groups, particularly women. Sankara’s administration achieved major successes in education, healthcare, and anti-corruption measures, positioning him as a symbol of African pride and a champion of social justice (Harsch, 2013; Fors, 2016). His belief that poverty transcends financial hardship to encompass a lack of opportunity resonates deeply within the ethos of his policies and leadership style.

Upon assuming power, Sankara rapidly enacted reforms that transformed the social and economic landscape of Burkina Faso. He prioritised free vaccinations, which substantially reduced child mortality rates, and implemented educational initiatives that made strides in literacy across the country (Harsch, 2013). His push for women’s empowerment was particularly revolutionary; he advocated for gender equality in a heavily patriarchal society, championing women’s rights and placing them in positions of leadership within government and society (Bakyono et al., 2020; Zandile & Phiri, 2019).

His commitment aimed to rectify gender imbalances and recognise women's contributions as integral to national development efforts. Sankara’s rejection of foreign aid dependency represented a key tenet of his governance philosophy. He famously stated that “he who feeds you controls you”, emphasising his belief that self-reliance and local resource mobilisation were essential for true economic independence (Spanou & Sotiropoulos, 2011). approach aimed to cultivate a sense of dignity among the Burkinabé people, challenging the established systems of dependency that characterised much of Africa’s post-colonial landscape. His strategies for enhancing food security through agriculture reform and land redistribution contributed to the creation of a more resilient economy, despite significant external pressures and limitations (Lawson, 2009).

The hidden issue surrounding Sankara’s leadership is the reality that visionary approaches often threaten entrenched power structures, leading to violent backlash. His assassination at the age of 37 serves as a tragic reminder of the risks associated with transformative leadership, particularly when it challenges established elites (Yesufu, 2022). His legacy still motivates movements advocating for radical change across the continent, illustrating the ongoing struggle against systemic oppression and exploitation (Fors, 2016).

Sankara’s philosophy was rooted in a broader context of African solidarity. His efforts promoted a sense of solidarity not only within Burkina Faso but also across the continent, advocating for collective action among African nations to dismantle neocolonial influences (Carvalho et al., 2015). His call for action was pioneering; he emphasised that economic and political independence hinged upon regional cooperation and solidarity among African peoples, a vision that remains relevant as contemporary leaders grapple with similar challenges (Poshakwale & Qian, 2011).

Moreover, his commitment to anti-corruption was foundational in his governance strategy. By prioritising transparency and accountability, Sankara aimed to establish a culture of integrity within government institutions and combat the systemic graft that had plagued the nation (Kim & Pirttilä, 2003). His efforts to dismantle corruption and empower the populace through participatory governance resonate with current discourse surrounding democratic governance in Africa, highlighting the importance of ethical leadership in achieving sustainable development goals (Badivuku-Pantina & Zogjani, 2015).

Thomas Sankara’s legacy as “Africa’s Che Guevara” embodies the spirit of revolutionary leadership grounded in empathy, resilience, and a commitment to social empowerment. His multifaceted reforms in education, healthcare, and women’s rights created pathways to dignity and self-sufficiency for countless individuals across Burkina Faso. His assassination symbolises the dangers of transformational leadership in the face of entrenched interests, but his vision and actions continue to inspire hope for a more just and equitable future in Africa. For contemporary leaders, Sankara’s life serves as both a guiding light and a cautionary tale, reminding them that the road to meaningful change is fraught with challenges yet imbued with profound potential for collective empowerment.

 

11. Leymah Gbowee (Liberia), “The Women Who Stopped a War”

With nothing but prayers, white T-shirts, and determination, Gbowee led a women’s peace movement that ended Liberia’s civil war in 2003.

Hidden Issue:
She showed the world that ordinary citizens, not armies, can rewrite national destiny when unity outweighs fear.

Leymah Gbowee, a prominent Liberian peace activist, galvanised women across the nation to form a formidable movement, which played a crucial role in ending the brutal civil war in 2003. Her leadership was characterised by a powerful blend of determination and faith, as well as the simple yet profound act of wearing white clothing as a symbol of peace and unity. Gbowee’s mantra that “ordinary citizens,”, especially women, can reshape their nations illustrates the hidden power of collective action grounded in shared values and resilience (Anfaara, 2025; Ricke‐Kiely, 2016).

Through her approach, she emphasised that while resources and armies may be essential in warfare, the real strength needed to evoke change lies within the community and its capacity for unified kindness and resolve. Gbowee’s efforts culminated in the organisation of the Women of Liberia Mass Action for Peace movement, which exemplified grassroots activism against armed conflict. The movement included various strategies, such as the notable “sex strike” aimed at pressuring combatants to cease fighting (Morales, 2013; Scully, 2024). This form of protest relied upon sisterhood and solidarity, demonstrating that everyday women could challenge and alter the course of history, even amidst the chaos of war. By prioritising non-violent resistance, Gbowee and her fellow activists showcased a blueprint for peacebuilding that transcended traditional paradigms of leadership and emphasised the moral imperative of activism rooted in empathy (Ricke‐Kiely, 2016; Debusscher & Almagro, 2016).

The significance of Gbowee’s movement extended beyond Liberia’s borders, highlighting the critical role women play in peace processes. Her work paved the way for greater gender representation in political dialogues, affirming that women’s rights are essential components of sustainable peace (Debusscher & Almagro, 2016; Borcsa, 2013). The narrative that “ordinary citizens can rewrite national destiny” resonates with Gbowee’s message, inspiring many worldwide to recognise their potential influence over political and social landscapes (Fodor, 2015; Suhita et al., 2025).

However, Gbowee’s journey was not without obstacles, as she faced entrenched patriarchy and social norms that often marginalised women’s voices. Her experience underscores the hidden issue that, although transformative leaders can emerge from grassroots efforts, their struggle against deeply rooted societal structures remains complex (Bussie, 2015; Charley, 2025). In Liberia’s case, Gbowee’s commitment to advocating for women’s issues and confronting systemic inequities highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach in the fight for lasting change.

In 2011, Gbowee was jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, alongside Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Tawakkul Karman, for their non-violent struggle for the safety of women and women’s rights in peacebuilding efforts (“Nobel Prize”, 2018). Recognition stands as a testament to the increasing acknowledgement of women’s contributions to peace initiatives globally, reinforcing the necessity of integrating diverse perspectives into governance and conflict resolution frameworks (Mbara & Gopal, 2020; Debusscher & Almagro, 2016).

Drawing inspiration from her profound experiences, Gbowee’s narrative emphasises a vision where compassion and unified action can prevail against violence and division. By making the invisible struggles of women visible and redirecting national efforts toward peace and inclusion, she has altered public perception in Liberia and provided instructive information about the broader context of social justice movements worldwide (Borcsa, 2013). Leaders in contemporary contexts can draw from Gbowee’s legacy to inform their approaches to activism and community engagement, leveraging the power of empathy and shared purpose to confront pressing societal challenges.

Leymah Gbowee's leadership exemplifies the potential of ordinary citizens to effect significant change in the face of adversity. Her role as a peacemaker demonstrated that when unity and determination supersede fear, transformative outcomes can arise, reshaping the narrative of war into one of hope and resilience. Gbowee’s enduring legacy serves as both an inspiration and a blueprint for future generations committed to fostering peaceful communities worldwide.

 

12. Sun Yat-sen (China), “The Father of Modern China”

The Sun ended 2,000 years of imperial rule, laying the foundations for modern China.
His Three Principles of the People – nationalism, democracy, and livelihood – still inspire both mainland China and Taiwan.

Hidden Issue:
Sun’s dream was not power; it was people’s dignity. His vision bridged tradition and modernity.

Sun Yat-sen, often recognised as the “Father of Modern China”, is a pivotal figure in the nation’s transition from centuries of imperial rule to a modern republican state. His leadership during a crucial era laid the groundwork for contemporary Chinese society and continues to be influential in various political narratives today. The core framework of Sun’s ideology is encapsulated in his Three Principles of the People: nationalism, democracy, and people’s livelihood, which continue to resonate in both mainland China and Taiwan, reflecting his lasting contribution to the quest for dignity and self-determination among the Chinese people (“Sun Yat-sen: ‘The Three Principles of the People’”, 2024).

His deep commitment to the concept of people's dignity and rights significantly influenced Sun's revolutionary vision. As he navigated the complexities of early 20th-century China, his approach emphasised that true power resided not solely in authority but in empowering the populace to participate in governance and societal development (“Sun Yat-sen: ‘The Three Principles of the People’”, 2024). The principles he advocated aimed to replace the old imperial system with a government that genuinely represented the will and welfare of the people, emphasising a comprehensive understanding of democracy that incorporates social and economic rights as well as political freedoms.

A notable aspect of Sun’s legacy is his rejection of foreign interference, which he perceived as detrimental to China’s sovereignty and dignity. His nationalism was a call for political independence deeply intertwined with cultural revival and national identity formation, as he sought to reclaim national pride from centuries of foreign domination. Emphasis on nationalism established a narrative that continued to influence revolutionary thoughts and movements throughout the 20th century, shaping the trajectory of modern Chinese history.

Furthermore, Sun’s focus on livelihood emerged from his recognition that poverty remains a barrier to development and social progress. His advocacy for economic reform aimed to improve the living standards of ordinary citizens and reduce the inequities prevalent in society at his time (Mong, 2024). His insights into the intersection of social welfare and nationalism challenge the notion that economic growth can exist separately from individual dignity and rights.

Sun Yat-sen faced significant challenges amid the political turmoil of his time, including resistance from entrenched warlords and foreign powers seeking to influence Chinese affairs. Nonetheless, his vision provided a cohesive framework that united various factions under a common goal: a modern, prosperous China founded on principles of equity and national identity. These dynamics underscore how transformative leadership often threatens established power structures, as leaders like Sun challenge the status quo in pursuit of broader societal transformation.

The importance of Sun’s legacy extends beyond historical confines; it serves as a source of inspiration for contemporary movements advocating for empowerment and social justice both within and beyond China. His practical synthesis of traditional values with modern governance reflects a leadership model that resonates in modern nation-building efforts across developing nations. Blending of tradition and modernity illustrates how visionary leaders can influence future generations by positioning their ideals within the context of national identity and cultural heritage.

Moreover, Sun’s legacy highlights the value of ongoing dialogue around nationalism and identity in a globalised context. His insistence on self-determination poses important questions regarding how nations can uphold their identities while engaging with an interconnected world. Recognising the nuances of his vision can inform current discussions on balancing local interests and global trends, framing nationalism not merely as an isolationist stance but as a potential force for positive engagement on the world stage.

Sun Yat-sen’s major contribution to creating modern China through his commitment to his Three Principles remains influential and relevant today. His emphasis on dignity, national pride, and economic welfare encapsulates a holistic vision of governance that has inspired leaders and movements worldwide. His assertion that political legitimacy arises from empowering people’s voices serves as a timeless reminder of the essence of leadership, urging contemporary leaders to bridge the gaps between tradition and modernity, ensuring that dignity remains central to governance and societal well-being.

 

The Hidden Thread: What Makes a Leader Without Barriers?

These stories share three timeless truths:

1. Vision Beyond Borders  They see possibilities where others see limits.
2. Unity Over Division  They build bridges, not walls, between communities and nations.
3. Human Dignity First policies succeed when people feel seen, heard, and valued.

The concept of leadership without barriers is encapsulated in the stories of transformative leaders who resonate with three timeless truths: vision beyond borders, unity over division, and human dignity first. Each of these principles is woven into their narratives, demonstrating how effective leadership goes beyond conventional constraints.

 

Vision Beyond Borders

Leaders such as Nelson Mandela and Jacinda Ardern exemplify the ability to envision possibilities where others see limitations. A profound vision of reconciliation in a nation fraught with division marked Mandela’s journey from prisoner to president. He famously chose forgiveness over revenge, emphasising a national identity rooted in unity rather than segregation (Nelson Mandela, 2014). long-term vision laid the groundwork for a post-apartheid South Africa that fosters inclusivity and social justice. Such leadership’s core aspect involves seeing potential in the most challenging circumstances, an attribute reflected in Ardern’s empathetic response to the Christchurch mosque attacks, where she galvanised a collective effort toward healing and community identity (Anyidoho et al., 2020).

 

Research in leadership communication underscores the role of vision in motivating and encompassing a wider audience. Madlock’s research emphasises that leadership styles that communicate effectively help cultivate environments where followers feel empowered and motivated toward shared goals (Madlock, 2008). The participatory dynamics, which emphasise a vision that listens to and incorporates diverse voices, enhance the leader's ability to transcend boundaries and foster collective interests.

 

Unity Over Division

The principle of unity over division manifests powerfully in the narratives of leaders like Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. During her presidency, Sirleaf made significant efforts to bring a fractured Liberia back together after the civil war. By prioritising reconciliation and empowerment, she fostered a climate where diverse community voices contributed to nation-building (Tyner, 2024). The synthesis of local perspectives and needs elevated collective well-being, demonstrating that unity creates a foundation for enduring stability. Academic discourse on leadership reinforces perspective, affirming that effective leaders must cultivate shared visions that promote inclusiveness and cooperation among heterogeneous groups (Amin et al., 2020).

 

Human Dignity First

Muhammad Yunus's leadership vividly illustrates the emphasis on human dignity as a foundation for lasting policies. His pioneering work with Grameen Bank exemplified the understanding that poverty is not merely a financial condition but a denial of opportunity and dignity (Kaboski & Townsend, 2005). Yunus’s innovative microfinance model was not only about providing financial resources but also about empowering individuals, particularly women, to reclaim their voices and destinies. His assertion that small resources can spark big dreams points out the likelihood of transformation when individuals feel valued and capable of effecting change (Shaykhutdinov, 2019).

 

Research conducted by Iqbal et al. reinforces leadership, characterised by value and internationalism, that values organisational cultures and environments where dignity thrives, encouraging individual growth and communal solidarity (Iqbal et al., 2018). His research promotes the idea that leaders should prioritise recognising effective governance, understanding that policies succeed when individuals feel seen, heard, and valued.

 

 

Leaders without barriers inspire through their visionary outlook, commitment to unity, and prioritisation of human dignity. Their stories illustrate the profound impact that empathetic, inclusive, and forward-thinking leadership can have on communities and nations alike. Academic discourse supports the notion that effective leadership is fundamentally about fostering connections, encouraging empowerment, building collective aspirations, bridging divides, and elevating marginalised voices. As the world continues to grapple with polarisation and division, adopting these timeless principles can guide future leaders toward fostering a more cohesive and dignified society.

 

 

The World They Dreamed Of

A leader without barriers does not just change a nation; they change humanity’s narrative.
They teach us that progress is possible, that differences can be strengths, and that happiness grows where dignity thrives.

In a fractured world, their legacies whisper a simple truth:

“The bridge to a better life is built, not found.”

 

In closing, the narrative of leaders without barriers reveals a profound understanding of how transformative leadership can change humanity’s trajectory. These stories of visionary leaders demonstrate that they do not merely impact their nations; they reshape the very fabric of societal cohesion and global perspective. The mechanisms through which they achieve this are captured in three timeless truths: Vision Beyond Borders, Unity Over Division, and Human Dignity First.

Vision Beyond Borders

Leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Jacinda Ardern epitomise the ability to see possibilities where many only perceive limits. Their visions extended beyond geographical and political borders, inspiring collective aspirations toward universal values of justice, equality, and unity. For instance, Gandhi’s doctrine of Satyagraha proved pivotal not only in India’s struggle for independence but also in influencing global civil rights movements. Research into leadership communication suggests that such visions, articulated effectively, foster environments conducive to shared progress (Madlock, 2008).

Similarly, Sun Yat-sen envisioned a modern China where dignity and national pride transcended centuries of imperial history. His Three Principles of the People served as a rallying call for change that united diverse demographics under a shared vision for the future (“Sun Yat-sen: ‘The Three Principles of the People’”, 2024). Ultimately, leaders like Sun teach us that the development of visionary leadership is fundamental to crafting narratives that resonate across cultures and generations.

Unity Over Division

A cornerstone of transformational leadership is the principle of unity over division, seen clearly in the legacies of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Thomas Sankara. Experiences like Sirleaf’s efforts to rebuild Liberia after civil conflict underscore how inclusive governance can forge national unity from historical wounds. Sirleaf’s emphasis on collective healing and empowerment illustrates that political leaders must prioritise collaboration over historical animosities. Research indicates that leaders who cultivate unity within diverse communities capitalise on social capital that bridges divides and fosters resilience (Amin et al., 2020).

Likewise, Sankara’s radical reforms in Burkina Faso emphasised solidarity and self-reliance as mechanisms for national rejuvenation. His holistic approach united citizens under a shared vision of dignity, appealing for collective action against neocolonial dependencies and internal corruption. Their stories demonstrate that effective leadership can stitch together fragments of society into cohesive wholes, transforming division into opportunities for collective advancement.

Human Dignity First

Muhammad Yunus perhaps best illustrates the recognition that human dignity must be the foundation of all policies. His pioneering microfinance initiatives with Grameen Bank aimed not only to alleviate poverty in Bangladesh but also to empower individuals by promoting dignity and fostering economic independence. Yunus’s assertion that poverty is fundamentally about opportunity rather than mere lack of resources embodies this principle profoundly. His work exemplifies how acknowledging people's voices and prioritising their needs leads to sustainable progress.

Additionally, the compassion exhibited by leaders like Ardern in times of tragedy echoes sentiment, revealing that kindness and human connection are not weaknesses in leadership. By showcasing empathy during crises such as the Christchurch mosque attacks, Ardern established a narrative that resonates powerfully in contexts across the globe. Responding to community needs and prioritising individual dignity confir leadership that successful leadership transcends traditional power structures.

The Bridge to a Better Life

In a world characterised by increasing polarisation, the legacies of these leaders whisper the essential truth: “The bridge to a better life is built, not found.” Their stories affirm that leadership transcends personal ambition; it necessitates a voracious dedication to the collective good, catalysing the possibility of transforming societies through shared dreams and values. As we reflect on these narratives, it becomes clear that the most impactful leaders are those who emphasise vision, unity, and dignity—building bridges that enable us all to thrive.

 

 

Reference

Holstad, T. J., Korek, S., Rigotti, T., Mohr, G. (2014). The relation between transformational leadership and follower emotional strain: The moderating role of professional ambition. *Leadership*, 10(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013476083

Naderi, A., Vosta, L. N., Ebrahimi, A., Jalilvand, M. R. (2019). The contributions of social entrepreneurship and transformational leadership to performance. *International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy*, 39(09-Oct), 719-737. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-06-2019-0124

Purwandoko, E., Burmansah, B., Poniman, Priono, P., Anggraini, T. R. (2023). Classroom Management: the Impact of Transformational Leadership of Homeroom Teachers to the Effectiveness of Class Management in High Schools. , 1(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.60046/joeri.v1i1.26

Liu, L. (2023). Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility and service innovation among catering enterprises in China: Basis for sustainable catering service strategy. *International Journal of Research Studies in Management*, 11(8),  https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2023.1106

Bryson, J. M., Barberg, B., Crosby, B. C., Patton, M. Q. (2021). Leading Social Transformations: Creating Public Value and Advancing the Common Good. *Journal of Change Management*, 21(2), 180-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917492

Tian, J., Zhang, W., Mao, Y., Gurr, D. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership on teachers' job burnout: the mediating role of social-emotional competence and student-teacher relationship. *Journal of Educational Administration*, 60(4), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-04-2021-0075

Doutchi, M., Ghousmane, A., Zampaligre, F., Moussa, B., Ishagh, E. K., Marc, O. T., Oumarou, B., Harouna, H., Tamuzi, J. L., Ndwandwe, D., Katoto, P. D., Wiysonge, C. S., Anya, B. M., Tshikolasoni, M. C. (2024). Building Resilient Health Systems in Africa through Improved Leadership, Management, and Governance: An evaluation of Niger's Ministry of Health Transformative Training Program. ,   https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5183135/v1

Mohammed, R. (2023). The Effect of Transformational Leadership Style on the Sustainable Performance of manufacturing Industry in Iraq: The mediating role of Social Responsibility. *Journal of Economic Development Environment and People*, 12(2), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v12i2.807

(2014). Nelson Mandela. *Africa Research Bulletin Political Social and Cultural Series*, 50(12),  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-825x.2014.05457.x

Pietersen, W. (2015). WHAT NELSON MANDELA TAUGHT THE WORLD ABOUT LEADERSHIP. *Leader to Leader*, 2015(76), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.20180

Wyk, R. V. (2014). Nelson Mandela’s defence: A psychological capital documentary analysis. *South African Journal of Science*, 110(11-Dec), 7. https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130366

Thwala, P. (2023). The Leadership Dilemma in South African Presidency: A Focus on the Post Nelson Mandela Messiah Leadership Discourse. *International Journal of Political Science and Public Administration*, 3(1), Jan-20. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijpspa.3.1.2023.1-20

Sewpaul, V. (2016). Politics with soul: Social work and the legacy of Nelson Mandela. *International Social Work*, 59(6), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815594226

Oppenheim, C. E. (2012). Nelson Mandela and the Power of Ubuntu. *Religions*, 3(2), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3020369

Elkington, R. (2020). Ancient Wisdom for Ethical Leadership: Ubuntu and the Ethic of Ecosophy. *Journal of Leadership Studies*, 13(4), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21672

Koshal, J. (2024). Servant-Leadership Practices of Nelson Mandela, African Culture and a Thriving Future for Africa. *International Journal of Servant-Leadership*, 18(1),  https://doi.org/10.33972/ijsl.411

Mallaby, S. J., Price, G., Hofmeyr, K. (2017). The transition to general management in South Africa. *Sa Journal of Human Resource Management*, 15(0),  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.846

Nderi, C. W. (2024). SELF-LEADERSHIP IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY: CASE OF WINSTON CHURCHILL AND NELSON MANDELA. *Journal of Human Resource &Leadership*, 7(2), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.53819/6789797a8095

Andrews, M. (2009). Building Leadership out of Conflict. *Development Outreach*, 11(2), 32-34. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797x_11_2_32

Garba, D., Akuva, I. (2020). The Leadership Styles of Nelson Mandela as a Pattern for African Leaders. *Covenant University Journal of Politics & International Affairs*, 8(1),  https://doi.org/10.47231/zmpq6582

Gu, C. (2022). Interpreters as Vital (Re)Tellers of China’s Reform and Opening-Up Meta-Narrative: A Digital Humanities (DH) Approach to Institutional Interpreters’ Mediation. *Frontiers in Psychology*, 13,  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892791

Shen, Y. (2018). Forty years of Open and Reform: in restrospect and in prospect. *China Economic Journal*, 11(3), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2018.1529876

Shi, W., Sun, J. (2016). The impact of privatization on efficiency and profitability. *Economics of Transition*, 24(3), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12094

Yong, C. C., Yew, S., Huang, X., Chin, M. (2016). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Spatial Panel Analysis. *International Journal of Management Studies*, 23,  https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms.23.1.2016.10464

Kwon, Y., Zhou, W. (2009). A Study on the Changes of China's FDI Policies after WTO: Implications for Korean Firms. *International Area Review*, 12(3), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386590901200307

Puppin, G. (2020). Forty Years of the Return of Advertising in China (1979–2019): A Critical Overview. *Jomec Journal*, 0(15), 1. https://doi.org/10.18573/jomec.201

Fowler, A. R., Fowler, J. G. (2017). Façade, Fashion and Fornication: Exploring the Embodiment of Self in Chinese Consumer Culture. *Global Business Review*, 18(3_suppl), S145-S156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917693161

Fowler, A. R., Gao, J., Carlson, L. (2010). Public Policy and the Changing Chinese Family in Contemporary China: The Past and Present as Prologue for the Future. *Journal of Macromarketing*, 30(4), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146710377095

Shen, Y., Shen, H., Cheng, Q., Huang, L., Zhang, L. (2020). Monitoring Three-Decade Expansion of China’s Major Cities Based on Satellite Remote Sensing Images. *Remote Sensing*, 12(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030491

Feng, L., Bao, H. X. H., Yan, J. (2014). Land reallocation reform in rural China: A behavioral economics perspective. *Land Use Policy*, 41, 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.05.006

Wang, X., Hong-li, Y., Li-bin, E., Huang, X., Wen, H., Chen, Y. (2022). The Impact of Foreign Trade and Urbanization on Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from China. *Sustainability*, 14(3), 1464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031464

Liu, H., Chen, W., Sun, S., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Ye, C. (2024). Revisiting China’s Urban Transition from the Perspective of Urbanisation: A Critical Review and Analysis. *Sustainability*, 16(10), 4122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104122

Zhou, Q. (2023). A Comparative Study of Household Solid Waste Regulations in Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou. *Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences*, 8, 1740-1748. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4573

Fa, Z. (2024). The Application of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to Human Resource Management System in China. *Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media*, 70(1), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/70/20241015

Liu, H., Emsley, R., Dunn, G. (2013). China's 2009 health reform: What implications could be drawn for the NHS Foundation Trusts reform?. *Health Policy and Technology*, 2(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.03.004

Cai, J. (2023). Studies on China's Economic Development since the Reform and Opening Up : A Literature Review. *Multidiszciplináris Kihívások Sokszínű Válaszok*, (1), Mar-36. https://doi.org/10.33565/mksv.2023.01.01

Yan, T., Tang, J. (2022). Revival on the Other Side of the Country: Cantopop in Mainland China. *Frontiers in Art Research*, 4(9),  https://doi.org/10.25236/far.2022.040902

Zhu, Y. (2019). New National Initiatives of Modernizing Education in China. *Ecnu Review of Education*, 2(3), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119868069

Dheeraj, R. P. (2017). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE ACT (MGNREGA). *Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences*, 6(6), 08-Dec. https://doi.org/10.24105/gjiss.6.6.1702

Lengefeld, E., Stringer, L. C., Nedungadi, P. (2022). Livelihood security policy can support ecosystem restoration. *Restoration Ecology*, 30(7),  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13621

Narayanan, S., Das, U., Liu, Y., Barrett, C. B. (2017). The “Discouraged Worker Effect” in Public Works Programs: Evidence from the MGNREGA in India. *World Development*, 100, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.024

Kareemulla, K., Ramasundaram, P., Kumar, S., Rao, C. R. (2013). Impact of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in India on Rural Poverty and Food Security. *Current Agriculture Research Journal*, 1(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.12944/carj.1.1.02

Tripathi, S. K., Singh, P. .. (2018). ECONOMIC EVALUATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME IN VARANASI, INDIA: A CASE STUDY. *International Journal of Technical Research & Science*, 3(3), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.30780/ijtrs.v3.i1.2018.017

Chopra, D. (2019). Taking Care into Account: Leveraging India's MGNREGA for Women's Empowerment. *Development and Change*, 50(6), 1687-1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12535

Patra, M., Dash, D. N. (2023). Mgnrega and livelihood promotion of rural poor: An empirical study of Odisha. *International Journal of Political Science and Governance*, 5(1), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2023.v5.i1d.227

Nair, M., Ariana, P., Ohuma, E. O., Gray, R., Stavola, B. D., Webster, P. (2013). Effect of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) on Malnutrition of Infants in Rajasthan, India: A Mixed Methods Study. *Plos One*, 8(9), e75089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075089

Rayappa, V. K., Bavaiah, M. D. (2021). The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) - An Overview. *Shanlax International Journal of Arts Science and Humanities*, 8(4), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v8i4.3658

Usmani, A., Pipal, D. K., Bagla, H., Verma, V., Kumar, P., Yadav, S., Garima, G., Rani, V., Pipal, R. K. (2022). Prediction of Mortality in Acute Thermal Burn Patients Using the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index Score: A Single-Center Experience. *Cureus*,   https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26161

Fraser, N. (2015). Social Security through Guaranteed Employment. *Social Policy and Administration*, 49(6), 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12164

Venkataratnam, S., Professor, A. (2024). A Study on Mahatma Gandhi’s Perceptions of Women. , 12(6),  https://doi.org/10.48047/resmil.v12i6.30

Simha, S. L. N. (2018). Significance and Relevance of the Leadership Qualities, Ideals and Values of Mahatma Gandhi, in Sustaining Successful Businesses in Today’s World. *International Journal of Knowledge Engineering*,  91-95. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijke.2018.4.2.107

Bebbington, A. (2014). 14 Social capital and development. ,  174-178. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203528983-37

Quah, J. S. (2022). Lee Kuan Yew’s role in minimising corruption in Singapore. *Public Administration and Policy*, 25(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-04-2022-0037

Quah, J. S. (2015). Lee Kuan Yew’s enduring legacy of good governance in Singapore, 1959-2015. *Asian Education and Development Studies*, 4(4), 374-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-05-2015-0020

Neudorf, L. (2014). Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore. by Jothie Rajah. [New York: Cambridge University Press. 2012. 343 pp. Paperback £19.99. ISBN 9781107634169.]. *The Cambridge Law Journal*, 73(1), 206-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197314000300

Dergachev, V. (2021). Lee Kuan Yew. Father of Singapore's "economic miracle". *Вісник Книжкової Палати*, (10), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.36273/2076-9555.2021.10(303).22-25

Khiun, L. K. (2015). ‘I am Limpeh (your father)!’ Parodying Hegemony, Anti-nostalgic Cultural Insurgency and the Visual Amplification of Lee Kuan Yew in Late Authoritarian Singapore. *Journal of Creative Communications*, 10(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258615569949

Weiss, M. (2020). Hegemonic Electoral Authoritarianism in Singapore. ,  154-199. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501750045.003.0006

Choi, F. K. (2018). How to establish a good government? Lessons from Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore and Deng Xiaoping in China. *Public Administration and Policy*, 21(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-10-2018-007

Hoo, T. B. (2015). Lee Kuan Yew's China Wisdom. ,  62-66. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814723893_0011

Biswas, A. K., Tortajada, C. (2023). Global crisis in water management: Can a second UN Water Conference help?. *River*, 2(2), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/rvr2.40

Lincoln, A. (2020). Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address. ,   https://doi.org/10.3735/9781935306528.book-part-060

Lohrke, F. T., Ahlström, D., Bruton, G. D. (2011). Extending Turnaround Process Research. *Journal of Management Inquiry*, 21(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611411906

Finkelman, P. (2010). Lincoln and Emancipation: Constitutional Theory, Practical Politics, and the Basic Practice of Law. *Journal of Supreme Court History*, 35(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5818.2010.01249.x

Rutledge, P. E. (2020). Trump, COVID-19, and the War on Expertise. *The American Review of Public Administration*, 50(06-Jul), 505-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020941683

Foner, E. (2005). Abraham Lincoln: The Great Emancipator?. ,   https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263242.003.0007

Williams, F. J. (2024). "A Look at Lincoln". *Civil War Book Review*, 26(2),  https://doi.org/10.31390/cwbr.26.2.02

Greenstein, F. I., Anderson, D. (2013). What Difference Did the President Make?. ,   https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691151991.003.0008

Choi, S. Y., Liu, J. H. (2023). Identifying stories of ‘us’: A mixed‐method analysis of the meaning, contents and associations of national narratives constructed by Americans. *European Journal of Social Psychology*, 54(2), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3025

Usman, S. M. (2023). The Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on China’s Economy. *Asr Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities*, 10(2),  https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2023.014

Barman, J. (2023). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: An Analysis. , 2(3), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.53989/jcp.v2i3.23.11

Al-Fadhat, F., Prasetio, H. (2022). How China’s Debt-Trap Diplomacy Works in African Countries: Evidence from Zimbabwe, Cameroon, and Djibouti. *Journal of Asian and African Studies*, 59(5), 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221137673

Hayes, A. (2024). The New Cold War, great power rivalry and Papua New Guinea. ,  207-237. https://doi.org/10.22459/cpng.2024.09

Gering, T. (2023). A Xinderella Story: Turning the Chinese Dream Into China’s Master Narrative. *China Report*, 59(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455231188351

Nakano, R. (2022). A Geocultural Power Competition in UNESCO’s Silk Roads Project: China’s Initiatives and the Responses From Japan and South Korea. *Journal of Current Chinese Affairs*, 52(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026221094054

Mazuelos, J. A. C. (2022). The Chinese Dream of National Rejuvenation and Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. *Agenda Internacional*, 29(40), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.202201.002

Carrai, M. A. (2020). Chinese Political Nostalgia and Xi Jinping's Dream of Great Rejuvenation. *International Journal of Asian Studies*, 18(1), Jul-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591420000406

Han, X., Appelbaum, R. P. (2018). China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot. *Plos One*, 13(4), e0195347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195347

Syam, F., Fatia, U. (2022). CORRUPTION ERADICATION POLICY IN CHINA DURING XI JINPING ERA. *Journal of Social Political Sciences*, 3(1), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v3i1.96

Noesselt, N. (2023). Chinese Contemplations on Utopian and Dystopian Democratic Governance. *Democratic Theory*, 10(1), Jan-18. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2023.100102

Wang, L. (2024). Theoretical Advancement of Xi Jinping’s Socialist Thought with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era under the Construction of Knowledge Map. *Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences*, 9(1),  https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0608

Sinaga, L. C. (2021). Xi Jinping, “China Dream”,  and Chinese Military Diplomacy to ASEAN. *Jas (Journal of Asean Studies)*, 8(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v8i2.6483

Zhang, F. (2019). The Xi Jinping Doctrine of China's International Relations. *Asia Policy*, 26(3), Jul-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2019.0029

Söderström, J. (2013). Second time around: Ex-combatants at the polls in Liberia. *The Journal of Modern African Studies*, 51(3), 409-433. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x13000414

Jones, L. M. (2015). Chapter 13. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. ,  315-344. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.63.14jon

Arthur, R. F., Horng, L., Bolay, F. K., Tandanpolie, A. F., Gilstad, J. R., Tantum, L. K., Luby, S. P. (2022). Community trust of government and non-governmental organizations during the 2014-16 Ebola epidemic in Liberia. *Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases*, 16(1), e0010083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010083

Nabyonga‐Orem, J., Gebrikidane, M., Mwisongo, A. (2016). Assessing policy dialogues and the role of context: Liberian case study before and during the Ebola outbreak. *BMC Health Services Research*, 16(S4),  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1454-y

Alonge, O., Sonkarlay, S., Gwaikolo, W., Fahim, C., Cooper, J. L., Peters, D. H. (2019). Understanding the role of community resilience in addressing the Ebola virus disease epidemic in Liberia: a qualitative study (community resilience in Liberia). *Global Health Action*, 12(1), 1662682. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1662682

Tyner, K. (2024). The Succession Effect: Change Over Time in Women’s Political Leadership Styles in New Zealand. *Comparative Political Studies*, 58(10), 2202-2236. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241290207

Wodon, Q. (2012). Poverty and the Policy Response to the Economic Crisis in Liberia. ,   https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8979-9

Phiri, K., Ndlovu, S., Khumalo, S., Ncube, S. B., Nyathi, D. (2022). Multiplying Faces and Amplifying Voices: Do Women’s Lives Matter in Local Governance Politics in Gwanda, Zimbabwe?. *Journal of Asian and African Studies*, 59(5), 1484-1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221137658

Wenham, C., Katz, R., Birungi, C., Boden, L., Eccleston-Turner, M., Gostin, L. O., Guinto, R., Hellowell, M., Onarheim, K. H., Hutton, J., Kapilashrami, A., Mendenhall, E., Phelan, A., Tichenor, M., Sridhar, D. (2019). Global health security and universal health coverage: from a marriage of convenience to a strategic, effective partnership. *BMJ Global Health*, 4(1), e001145. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001145

Harry, T., Niekerk, R. v. (2023). Searching for meaning in the life of Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf: A call to meaningful responses to tragedies.. *Journal for Person-Oriented Research*, 9(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2023.25815

Adams, M. (2008). Liberia's Election of Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and Women's Executive Leadership in Africa. *Politics & Gender*, 4(3), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x0800038x

Bett, H. K., Ngala-Dimba, M. A. (2022). The appeals in women contestants’ campaign slogans during the 2017 general elections in Kenya. *Heliyon*, 8(8), e10323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10323

Bauer, J. (2009). Women and the 2005 election in Liberia. *The Journal of Modern African Studies*, 47(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x09003802

Spears, I. S. (2007). When Good Governments Go Bad. *International Journal Canada S Journal of Global Policy Analysis*, 62(2), 344-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070200706200209

McMillan, C., O’Gorman, K. D., MacLaren, A. (2011). Commercial hospitality. *International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management*, 23(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111119329

Scully, P. (2024). Feminist Strike: Liberia. *Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice*, 44(2), 75-77. https://doi.org/10.7202/1109374ar

Pailey, R. N., Harris, D. A. (2017). Liberia’s run-up to 2017: continuity and change in a long history of electoral politics. *Review of African Political Economy*, 44(152),  https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2017.1318361

(2023). Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: “A Voice for Freedom”. ,   https://doi.org/10.3735/9781961844025.book-part-207

Sharpe, T. (2012). Original Sin, Social Justice, and Citizenship. *International Journal Canada S Journal of Global Policy Analysis*, 67(2), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201206700205

KATAMBA, M. (2022). Afrika'nın ilk kadın başkanı olan Ellen Johnson Sirleaf'ın Açılış konuşmasının retorik analizi. *Akdeniz Havzası Ve Afrika Medeniyetleri Dergisi*, 4(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.54132/akaf.1188791

Safdar, G., Raza, H., Javed, M. N. (2024). Effects of Urdu Infotainment Programs on Pakistani People: Entertainment, Cultural and Vulgarity Concerns. *Jurnal the Messenger*, 14(3), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v14i3.2565

Frasure-Yokley, L., Wilcox-Archuleta, B. (2019). Geographic Identity and Attitudes toward Undocumented Immigrants. *Political Research Quarterly*, 72(4), 944-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919843349

Addy, W. O., Yao, H., Otchere, S. K., Beraud, J. D. (2021). Economic Development, Political and Socio-Political Violence Crisis in the Sub-Saharan Africa:  An Economic Panel Study. *European Journal of Business Management and Research*, 6(4), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.4.763

Khan, M. Y., Javeed, A., Khan, M. J., Din, S. U., Khurshid, A., Noor, U. (2019). Political Participation Through Social Media: Comparison of Pakistani and Malaysian Youth. *Ieee Access*, 7, 35532-35543. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2904553

Cheng, L., Gu, T., Chen, J., Liu, Z. (2021). Will Internet Market Newness Improve Performance? An Empirical Study on the Internet Market Innovation of Offline Retailers in China. *Sustainability*, 13(22), 12619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212619

Blackington, C., Димитрова, А., Ionita, I., Vachudová, M. A. (2024). Mobilizing against Democratic Backsliding: What Motivates Protestors in Central and Eastern Europe?. *East European Politics and Societies and Cultures*, 38(4), 1219-1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254231212489

Maggi, G., Ossa, R. (2020). Are Trade Agreements Good For You?. ,   https://doi.org/10.3386/w27252

Niemi, L., Kniffin, K. M., Doris, J. M. (2021). It's Not the Flu: Popular Perceptions of the Impact of COVID-19 in the U.S.. *Frontiers in Psychology*, 12,  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668518

Fardian, M. I., Nazer, M., Muharja, F. (2024). The Impact of Rastra-BPNT Assistance on Household Food Expenditure Patterns and Poverty Status in Indonesia. *Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis*,  28-37. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i1.794

Larasatie, P., Fitriastuti, T., Yovi, E. Y., Purnomo, H., Nurrochmat, D. R. (2022). COVID-19 Anxiety as a Moderator of the Relationship between Organizational Change and Perception of Organizational Politics in Forestry Public Sector. *Forests*, 13(2), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020356

Kling, C., Kunegis, J., Hartmann, H., Strohmaier, M., Staab, S. (2021). Voting Behaviour and Power in Online Democracy: A Study of LiquidFeedback in Germany's Pirate Party. *Proceedings of the International Aaai Conference on Web and Social Media*, 9(1), 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14618

Zhao, W., Liu, X., Liu, Q. (2019). Study of the Relationship between Political Connections and Corporate Re-Entrepreneurial Performance. *Sustainability*, 11(15), 4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154027

Sætra, H. S. (2021). AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System. *Sustainability*, 13(4), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041738

Ashfaq, M., Shahid, N., Zubair, J. (2021). New media and political protest: Framing analysis of news content on Twitter. *Asian Journal of Comparative Politics*, 7(4), 1177-1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211067317

Anyidoho, N. A., Crawford, G., Medie, P. A. (2020). The Role of Women's Movements in the Implementation of Gender-Based Violence Laws. *Politics & Gender*, 17(3), 427-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x19000849

Zhou, J., Qian, C., Li, C. (2023). Political connection heterogeneity and firm innovation: An investigation of privately controlled, publicly listed firms in China. *Journal of Product Innovation Management*, 41(5), 972-998. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12718

Shaykhutdinov, R. (2019). Socialization, Rationality, and Age: Generational Gaps and the Attitudes toward the Chechen War in Russia. *Politics & Policy*, 47(5), 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12323

Kaboski, J. P., Townsend, R. M. (2005). Policies and Impact: An Analysis of Village-Level Microfinance Institutions. *Journal of the European Economic Association*, 3(1), Jan-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476053295331

Sarto, N. D., Bocchialini, E., Gai, L., Ielasi, F. (2023). Microfinance, Microcredit, and Women’s Empowerment: An Exploration of the Grameen Bank Experience for Social Inclusion. *Journal of Accounting and Finance*, 23(5),  https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v23i5.6590

Bakker, A., Schaveling, J., Nijhof, A. (2014). Governance and microfinance institutions. *Corporate Governance*, 14(5), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2014-0032

Amin, S., Ashok, S., Topa, G. (2003). Does microcredit reach the poor and vulnerable? Evidence from northern Bangladesh. *Journal of Development Economics*, 70(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(02)00087-1

Chowdhury, T. A., Somani, S. (2020). Performance Evaluation and Impact of Grameen Bank on Social Development and Women Empowerment in Bangladesh. *International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences*, 5(1), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.136.2020.51.54.73

Waddington, H., White, H., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J. G., Vojtkova, M., Davies, P. R., Bhavsar, A., Eyers, J., Koehlmoos, T., Petticrew, M., Valentine, J. C., Tugwell, P. (2012). How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit. *Journal of Development Effectiveness*, 4(3), 359-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711765

Hudon, M., Sandberg, J. (2013). The Ethical Crisis in Microfinance: Issues, Findings, and Implications. *Business Ethics Quarterly*, 23(4), 561-589. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323440

Uddin, M. N., Saad, N. B., Ismail, Y. B., Nahar, L. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Microfinance Governance: Implications for Impact of Social Inequality and Poverty Reduction. ,   https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004336

Yee, H. W., Ridwan, E., Muharja, F., Kamarni, N. (2023). Impact of Microfinance on Fertilizer Use in the Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar. *Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis*,  622-626. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i2.553

Muhammad, N. M., Kassim, S., Mahadi, N. F., Ali, E. R. A. E. (2022). An Analysis of the Joint Liability Model in Bangladesh: Lessons for the Islamic Microfinance Institutions. *Journal of Islamic Finance*, 11(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.31436/jif.v11i2.697

Zhang, Y., Yang, R., Jin, Y., Wang, S. (2023). Empowerment through Microcredit: An Examination of Grameen Bank Model in China. *Highlights in Business Economics and Management*, 20, 536-541. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.13040

Kono, H., Takahashi, K. (2010). MICROFINANCE REVOLUTION: ITS EFFECTS, INNOVATIONS, AND CHALLENGES. *The Developing Economies*, 48(1), 15-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2010.00098.x

Pless, N. M., Murphy, M., Maak, T., Sengupta, A. (2021). Societal challenges and business leadership for social innovation. *Society and Business Review*, 16(4), 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129

Auvinet, C., Lloret, A. (2015). Understanding social change through catalytic innovation: Empirical findings in Mexican social entrepreneurship. *Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration*, 32(4), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1353

Yesufu, S. (2022). A critical evaluation of Thomas Isidore Noel Sankara’s servant leadership style of government in Burkina-Faso. *Eureka Social and Humanities*, (2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002356

Грузд, М., Єрмоленко, О. (2024). INFLUENCE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY ON PUBLIC  ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN UKRAINE. *Наукові Інновації Та Передові Технології*, (5(33)),  https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-5(33)-18-32

(2024). Sun Yat-sen: “The Three Principles of the People”. ,   https://doi.org/10.3735/9781961844056.book-part-119

Mong, T. N. T. (2024). “The Principle of Livelihood” by Sun Yat-sen and Its Significance for Social Justice and Happiness Values in Vietnam Today. *Journal of Asian Development*, 10(1), Jan-20. https://doi.org/10.52941/jad.v10i1.54

Madlock, P. E. (2008). The Link Between Leadership Style, Communicator Competence, and Employee Satisfaction. *Journal of Business Communication*, 45(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607309351

Amin, W. A. A. W. M., Muda, M. S., Omar, N. W. (2020). The Impact of Leadership Communication and Empowerment on Job Motivation Amongst Public Sector Employees in Malaysia. *Malaysian Management Journal*, 10,  https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj.10.1-2.2006.8940

Iqbal, S., Farid, T., Ma, J., Mehmood, Q. (2018). Cultivating employees’ communal relationship and organizational citizenship behavior through authentic leadership: studying the influence of procedural justice. *Psychology Research and Behavior Management*, Volume 11, 545-555. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s179019