Weaponizing Water: The Impact of Privatization on Access and Equity in Jakarta and Beyond

Author: AM Tris Hardyanto

What happens when the tap becomes a tollbooth? In Jakarta and beyond, the privatization of water has turned a fundamental human right into a luxury for the few. “Drying Out the People” exposes how global water governance has been hijacked by profit, leaving poor communities parched and powerless. This story isn’t just about infrastructure—it’s about inequality, exclusion, and resistance. From slum protests to legal battles, the fight for water justice reveals a more profound crisis: when public goods serve private interests, democracy itself runs dry. This is a powerful call to reclaim water as a right, not a revenue stream. The world must choose: profit or people?

1. The Politics Behind the Pipe

Water governance is an intricate tapestry woven from political, economic, and social threads, revealing the multifaceted nature of public access to essential resources. The commodification of water, particularly in urban centers like Jakarta, demonstrates the adverse effects of neoliberal policies that prioritize profitability over public welfare. The imposition of privatized water systems often exacerbates inequalities in access, leaving marginalized communities struggling for essential resources while powerful elites profit from their plight (Kooy & Walter, 2019; Bakker, 2007;

Water privatization is a worldwide movement that has its roots in extensive neoliberal changes. That took hold in the late 20th century, fueled by institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that promoted structural adjustment programs. These initiatives often carry the implicit condition of reframing water as a commodity rather than a human right (Abouharb & Cingranelli, 2006);, (Ioris, 2012; Neoliberalism, fundamentally grounded in free market ideology, systematically dismantles public systems, thereby creating a vacuum in social infrastructure that leaves the most vulnerable populations without affordable access to clean water (Roberts, 2008; Ioris, 2012)

In Jakarta, where Governments (or private companies) have implemented water privatization, the burgeoning market in water services has led to significant social stratification;  commodified access to water creates a scenario where wealth directly determines water security. The privatized water system has resulted in increased rates for consumers, disproportionately impacting low-income households who find themselves spending a significant portion of their income on essential water supply, often exceeding the World Health Organization's benchmark of 5% (Kooy & Walter, 2019; Yanidar et al., 2020). Studies indicate that the lack of appropriate governance mechanisms and inclusive water policies has compounded these inequalities, leading to widespread social unrest and legal challenges against private water corporations (Bakker, 2007; Colven, 2020).

Jakarta is hardly the only place affected by these neoliberal practices; they reverberate across the Global South, where similar privatization measures have sparked movements resisting the commodification of essential resources. Anti-privatization campaigns often articulate a reimagined understanding of water governance that upholds the human right to water as a fundamental component of social justice Bakker, 2007;  global resistance strengthened by the recognition bolstered by the realization that excessive privatization can undermine democracies by creating oligopolistic structures that prioritize corporate interests over public welfare, as evidenced by the experiences in Latin America (Ioris, 2012; Kohl, 2006).

Beyond monetary implications, the privatization of water also engenders a profound political crisis. Schisms between the government and the public due to discontent with privatization efforts culminate in increased tensions and instability, often manipulated by opposition parties to gain political traction (Heo, 2015). Dynamic underscores a broader critique of neoliberal governance, highlighting the erosion of institutional legitimacy as governments capitulate to market pressures at the expense of serving the populace's needs (Madariaga, 2020).

Moreover, critically analyzing Jakarta's case provides essential insights into how infrastructural degradation, exemplified by the city's alarming land subsidence due to over-extraction of groundwater, creates an unsustainable urban environment that further complicates access to clean water (Colven, 2020). The regulatory frameworks in place have shown inadequate responsiveness to environmental and social injustices, leading to a vicious cycle of inequality and ecological degradation (Kooy & Walter, 2019; Colven, 2020). Sustainable water management strategies must evolve from neoliberal ideologies that commodify resources to frameworks that ensure equitable access, environmental stewardship, and communal welfare.

 Analysis prompts a deeper inquiry into the implications of neoliberalism and the privatization of water on global social justice initiatives. It suggests the necessity of researching alternative governance models to revitalize the public sector's role in water management, ensuring inclusivity and accountability in access to water resources. Initiatives led by civil society and grassroots organizations represent crucial avenues for promoting equitable water access and resisting exploitative capitalist paradigms (Bakker, 2007; Robertson, 2007).

The case of Jakarta serves as both a cautionary tale and a model for understanding the broader implications of neoliberal water policies globally. It raises critical questions about the future of public services and the role of citizens in demanding their rights to clean and affordable water, emphasizing the need for comprehensive frameworks that balance public accountability with environmental sustainability (Abouharb & Cingranelli, 2006; Bakker, 2007; Hess, 2011). Moving forward, it will be imperative for stakeholders—ranging from local governments to international organizations—to work collaboratively towards strategies that transcend mere profitability and uphold the intrinsic value of water as an everyday good essential for human dignity.

2. Jakarta's Water Wars – Contracts, Cronies, and the Cost of Control

2.1 The Suharto Legacy: Water Deals Behind Closed Doors

The privatization of Jakarta's water services in 1997 was predominantly orchestrated during the Suharto regime, a period characterized by significant corruption and cronyism. Water contracts were awarded without transparency, favouring companies closely linked to Suharto himself, thereby entrenching elite interests in water distribution (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). practice fostered an oligarchic structure that ensured the control of water resources in the hands of a few while denying equitable access to the broader population. This situation has perpetuated inequality (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The legacy of privatization continues to influence the political landscape of Indonesia, emphasizing the consequences of decisions that prioritize elite benefits over public welfare (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). As Bakker points out, such privatized arrangements not only deprived the majority but also solidified a system where public resources are treated as private assets (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

When examining Jakarta's water sector through the lens of governance, it becomes evident that the historical roots of these contractual agreements have led to systemic issues that extend beyond mere economic transactions, intertwining with notions of state legitimacy and accountability. The lack of institutional checks and balances allowed for contracts to be renegotiated behind closed doors, leading to allegations of widespread corruption and mismanagement (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The contracts often contained clauses that permitted private operators to bypass community interests, thus exacerbating social and spatial divides in access to water resources, particularly in lower-income neighborhoods (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

The ramifications of these water deals are stark, as local communities have been left to grapple with inadequate infrastructure and service delivery. The Suharto legacy has become a symbol of how governance is intimately linked to the social fabric of access to essential resources, showcasing the importance of transparency in mitigating the negative impacts of privatization (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The drive for profit maximization has resulted in a focus on high-return investments, frequently at the expense of sustainable and equitable distribution of water in a city marked by rapid urbanization and population growth (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

2.2 The Price of a Pipe: How Privatized Water Left Jakarta's Poor Behind

Following the privatization of water services, Jakarta developed a stark two-tier system where access to clean water became heavily stratified along economic lines. Tariffs for water services nearly doubled post-privatization, placing an unsustainable burden on slum dwellers who remained disconnected from reliable piped water systems (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The result was a bleak reality where wealthy neighbourhoods enjoyed subsidized, high-quality water, while poorer areas were relegated to purchasing higher-cost alternatives, frequently of dubious safety (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Research indicates that the inequities exacerbated by the privatization model have broader social implications, deepening the divide between the affluent and those living in informal settlements (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Many households in slum areas resorted to informal water vendors who charged exorbitant rates for unreliable supplies, thus perpetuating cycles of poverty and poor health outcomes (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The disregard for people experiencing poverty in the design of water tariffs undermined principles of universal access and equity in water governance, further entrenching disparities (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Moreover, community resilience in response to these challenges has been limited by an overarching lack of governmental support and effective monitoring of private sector behaviours. Many low-income residents lack the means to contest the privatization framework that has fundamentally altered their access to essential resources (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). As exemplified in comparisons with informal settler communities globally, the struggle for equitable water access has become emblematic of broader socioeconomic injustices, urging calls for reform that emphasize universal rights to essential services over profit considerations (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Databases constructed to monitor water access inequalities reveal significant discrepancies in service provision, indicating that marginalized communities are often left to contend with inadequate infrastructure and service delivery (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Dynamic illustrates the limitations of privatized systems in delivering equitable service, raising questions about their sustainability and ethical justifications. As noted, a re-examination of water governance in Jakarta is imperative for addressing systemic inequities and fostering social justice within urban infrastructures (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

2.3 Community Drought: Slums, Leaks, and Informal Settlements Ignored

The realities of water access in Jakarta's informal settlements illustrate the stark neglect inflicted by privatized water systems. Private operators have directed their investments primarily towards affluent districts, leaving low-income neighborhoods without adequate infrastructure (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The Prioritization of profit margins over equitable distribution has resulted in chronic leakage and wastage, with many communities reliant on dilapidated pipes that deliver contaminated water, increasing the health risks faced by residents (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

The failure to address infrastructural disparities contributes not only to immediate public health concerns but also to broader environmental and social ramifications. Residents, particularly those in informal settlements, face systemic challenges, including rationing and inadequate water quality, which often lead to severe health implications (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Such conditions are compounded by the lack of regulatory oversight and accountability mechanisms that ideally should govern private sector activities in public service realms (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Moreover, findings demonstrate a clear relationship between inadequate water supply infrastructure and social inequalities, reflecting studies from other cities facing similar privatization issues (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). In Jakarta, unmet water service demands among the urban poor have emerged as a direct consequence of prioritizing lucrative investments in wealthier areas, illustrating the negative externalities of unequal umetropolitandevelopment (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The system hinges on a model of financial optimism at the expense of vulnerable communities, precipitating a humanitarian crisis that necessitates urgent reform and redress.

Community engagement strategies have emerged as a potential recourse, but widespread efforts to involve local populations in decision-making have yet to gain traction (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Enforcing participatory governance in water management frameworks is vital to transforming inequitable access into a more just and sustainable model—one that emphasizes community needs above profit-driven motives and restores dignity to marginalized populations (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Addressing issues of leakage, rationing, and negligence within informal settlements is not just a logistical challenge but also a fundamental human rights issue that requires coordinated action from both the government and civil society (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

2.4 The Constitutional Court Ruling: When Citizens Fought Back

In 2015, the Constitutional Court made a significant ruling for water rights advocacy in Indonesia, ruling that access to water is a human right and declaring the privatization of water as unconstitutional. This ruling marked a pivotal shift towards recognizing water as a public good, a crucial step in reclaiming rights for those marginalized by previous governance models (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Legal victory has galvanized community movements across Jakarta and beyond, emphasizing the need for public ownership and control of essential services as a counter to the privatization narrative (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Legal frameworks that uphold constitutional rights to water access resonate with broader global discourses advocating for human rights in the face of neoliberal policies that commodify public goods (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). By asserting that water is not merely a commodity but rather a public resource that must be managed in the interest of all citizens, the ruling has opened pathways for policy reforms aimed at enhancing water security, especially for vulnerable populations (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

The grassroots campaigns leading to the ruling have stressed the importance of civic engagement in governance processes, illuminating the power of collective action in challenging systemic inequalities (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). These movements brought together a diverse coalition of stakeholders, including NGOs, local communities, and legal advocates, illustrating the potential for alliances in addressing pressing urban issues like water access (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Significantly, the ruling underscores the state's obligation to ensure that all citizens have access to safe and affordable drinking water, making it imperative for policymakers to reconcile privatization policies with constitutional mandates ensuring public welfare (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Moving forward, the focus must now shift to consolidating these legal victories into actionable policies that dismantle the remnants of privatization and establish equitable water governance frameworks, safeguarding access for all Jakartans (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

2.5 Essential WASH: From Commodity to Covenant

The rampant privatization of water has transformed the once inherent right to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) into a commodity—a transition that has detrimental effects on public health, social equity, and individual dignity (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The commodification of WASH services, particularly in urban contexts marred by poverty, presents profound health risks that disproportionately affect marginalized groups (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Moreover, the prioritization of profits over people ultimately compromises the fundamental dignity of individuals by subjecting communities to unsafe and unreliable water sources (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Research findings reveal that inequities in access to safe water and sanitation services exacerbate health disparities, perpetuating a continual cycle of poverty among those most in need (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). The failure to prioritize WASH as a right further reinforces systemic inequalities that leave the urban poor susceptible to health hazards associated with inadequate access to clean water and sanitation facilities (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). As demonstrated in global contexts, combatting these challenges necessitates reconstituting water management paradigms away from commodification and towards frameworks that emphasize human welfare (Kooy & Bakker, 2008).

Moving forward, stakeholders must work collaboratively to reclaim WASH as a public resource, requiring robust legal and policy frameworks that reinforce the principles of inclusivity and equity (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). Addressing WASH as a covenant rather than a commodity not only affirms the intrinsic dignity of all individuals but also re-establishes the state's responsibility towards its citizens, particularly the most vulnerable (Kooy & Bakker, 2008). By championing policies that ensure access to safe and sanitary water, Jakarta can forge a path towards a more equitable future and a restored sense of communal responsibility for one's neighbors.

 

3. Math, Money, and Monopoly – The True Cost of Privatized WASH

3.1 Public vs. Private: A Water Tariff Comparison Across Countries

The landscape of water services globally reveals a stark dichotomy between public and privatized provisions. Studies indicate that remunicipalized water services often outperform their privatized counterparts in terms of cost-efficiency and service quality. A notable case is that of Paris, where the return to public control over water services resulted in reduced tariffs and improved service quality for residents (Brauman et al., 2016). example highlights how the public management of water resources can prioritize long-term public welfare instead of short-term profit, promoting equitable access to clean water (Brauman et al., 2016).

In examining the disparities in water charges, it is evident that privatized water systems frequently impose higher tariffs on consumers, which disproportionately affect low-income populations (Brauman et al., 2016). Research has shown that privatization does not necessarily lead to improved financial performance or better services but instead often results in increased costs and reduced accessibility for disadvantaged groups (Brauman et al., 2016). Comparatively, public water systems tend to prioritize health and environmental standards, resulting in better public health outcomes (Brauman et al., 2016). Such findings reinforce the idea that reclaiming water services from privatization can lead to a more equitable management structure that places community interest above corporate profitability.

An analysis of international tariff structures illustrates that public systems are capable of maintaining lower operational costs while ensuring high service delivery standards. For instance, cities that have reverted to public water management typically report enhanced financial transparency and reduced costs of maintenance and service delivery (Brauman et al., 2016). calls for further investigation into the economic structures underpinning both public and private water systems, necessitating a shift towards models that guarantee access for all, regardless of socioeconomic status (Brauman et al., 2016).

3.2 PPPs or Power Plays?

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the water sector often face criticisms for limiting public accountability and maintaining opaque operational structures. Contracts associated with PPPs frequently include risk guarantees for private operators and clauses that enforce secrecy regarding financial dealings, thereby restricting community access to decision-making processes (Smith et al., 2006). Inherently undermines public trust and engagement in water governance (Smith et al., 2006).

When PPPs obscure vital information from communities, they create an environment ripe for exploitation, where corporate interests overshadow public needs (Smith et al., 2006). Such dynamics lead to a concentration of power among elite stakeholders while disenfranchising local populations from asserting their rights and interests in essential service provisions (Smith et al., 2006). In many instances, the lack of adherence to transparency standards within PPP contracts has incited public backlash and civil society activism, reinforcing the necessity for regulatory frameworks that prioritize accountability (Smith et al., 2006).

Furthermore, the overall success of PPPs in improving water access and quality has been called into question. Evidence suggests that the expectations set forth by PPP proponents—such as enhanced infrastructure and innovation—are often unmet (Smith et al., 2006). Instead, many of these arrangements result in unequal investments and a widening gap between high and low-income service areas, ultimately betraying the promise of improved public benefits (Smith et al., 2006).

The critical role of public accountability cannot be overstated; without it, marginalized communities risk being locked out of decisions that affect their daily lives, leading to deeper socioeconomic divides. As numerous studies have highlighted, engaging the public in monitoring and evaluation processes can significantly improve governance in the water sector and hold private partners accountable for their compliance and service standards (Smith et al., 2006).

3.3 The 5-Point Risk Assessment Toolkit

The complexities surrounding WASH privatization bring forth several associated risks that warrant careful consideration during decision-making. A comprehensive 5-Point Risk Assessment Toolkit aims to address critical red flags:

1. Lack of transparency,
2. Exclusionary pricing,
3. Weak regulation,
4. Elite ties,
5. Legal loopholes.

Each of these factors contributes to systemic inequities within water service provision. For example, a lack of transparency can lead to corrupt practices and misallocation of resources, hampering efforts to ensure equitable access to clean water for all (Smith et al., 2006). Exclusionary pricing often renders water unaffordable for low-income households, perpetuating cycles of deprivation and health risks (Smith et al., 2006).

Weak regulation can diminish the accountability of private operators, allowing them to circumvent standards that protect public interests (Smith et al., 2006). Strong ties to elite interests further cloud the governance landscape in water management, often resulting in policy decisions that do not reflect the needs and desires of the broader community (Smith et al., 2006). Finally, legal loopholes may offer private companies the opportunity to evade responsibility for service disruptions or quality failures, thereby undermining the rights of consumers (Smith et al., 2006).

Leveraging a rigorous risk assessment toolkit becomes paramount in guiding policy decisions regarding WASH privatization. By systematically addressing these risks, stakeholders can work to ensure that water is managed as a public good and that services address the needs of the most vulnerable populations (Smith et al., 2006).

3.4 Transparency Crisis: Hidden Costs, Hidden Losses

The crisis of transparency in Jakarta's water privatization further exacerbates the challenges faced by communities reliant on these services. Opaque contracts have concealed financial details vital to public oversight, shielding private operators from accountability (Smith et al., 2006). Secrecy fosters an environment where corruption can thrive, undermining public trust in both private and governmental institutions tasked with managing essential services (Smith et al., 2006).

Research on Jakarta's privatized water deals reveals how financial data manipulation and lack of disclosure have resulted in substantial losses for communities—hidden costs that only come to light after the fact (Smith et al., 2006). Such practices facilitate an environment where the financial implications of water service delivery are obscured from public scrutiny, leading to mistrust and social unrest as communities feel disenfranchised from the decision-making processes governing their access to water (Smith et al., 2006).

Reforming these systems to enhance transparency and public engagement is imperative for rebuilding trust and ensuring that water services fulfill their fundamental role as human rights (Smith et al., 2006). Initiatives aimed at increasing openness regarding contract negotiations, financial reporting, and service performance metrics are critical steps necessary for restoring accountability in the water sector (Smith et al., 2006). By aligning water governance with principles of transparency, stakeholders can forge stronger ties between communities and water service providers, fostering collaborative efforts towards equitable access (Smith et al., 2006).

 

4. Resistance and Reform From Jakarta to Cochabamba

4.1 Global Backlash

The global backlash against water privatization has manifested prominently in cities such as Cochabamba, Berlin, and Paris, where public pressure has successfully led to the municipalization of water services. Shift signifies a reclaiming of water as a public good, demonstrating the capacity of collective community action in confronting corporate dominance over essential resources (Abouharb & Cingranelli, 2006). The Cochabamba Water War in 2000 serves as a quintessential example, where widespread protests against privatization culminated in the annulment of a contract with a private operator, ultimately reinstating public control over local water resources (Abouharb & Cingranelli, 2006). movement not only called attention to the inadequacies of privatization but also galvanized a global dialogue on water rights and equity.

Cities around the world have begun to scrutinize the implications of privatizing essential services, focusing on successful municipalization efforts that advocate for public control over water systems. The transition in Berlin, where municipal authorities reverted to control of water services from private companies, yielded increased transparency and improved service delivery, highlighting the potential advantages of public management (Silver, 2023). Furthermore, the deepening recognition of water as a human right has catalyzed communities to assert their agency in governance, fostering a global perspective that prioritizes public welfare over profit.

Ultimately, these movements represent a significant ideological shift, moving away from profit-centered frameworks toward governance models that emphasize accountability, community involvement, and the intrinsic value of water as a shared resource. The global backlash against the privatization wave signals a fundamental re-evaluation of the role of public services in society, indicating a potential roadmap for other regions, including Jakarta, where similar sentiments are rising against entrenched privatization policies (Silver, 2023).

4.2 Community Ownership Models

Community-led governance paradigms have emerged as vital models for sustainable and inclusive WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) governance, demonstrating that local participation can enhance both efficacy and social equity. Indigenous-led water trusts in Canada and women-led councils in Kenya serve as compelling examples of how community ownership fosters resilience and accountability (Figueroa et al., 2022). These community management systems engender a sense of ownership among residents, which has been shown to enhance engagement, compliance with regulations, and, ultimately, the quality of service delivery (Figueroa et al., 2022).

In many instances, these grassroots models challenge traditional top-down approaches to water governance, advocating for adaptive management strategies that are contextually relevant and tailored to local needs. Through the incorporation of indigenous knowledge and cultural practices, communities can implement sustainable water management systems that respect both environmental and social frameworks. Furthermore, the involvement of women in water governance has been instrumental in promoting not only gender equity but also holistic decision-making processes that prioritize the health and well-being of families and communities (Figueroa et al., 2022).

By translating local needs into actionable policies, these community ownership models have proven effective in addressing systemic challenges that often accompany privatized water systems, such as inadequate infrastructure and service inequities. They also highlight the importance of participatory governance in fostering resilience against external shocks, be it climate-related disasters or economic pressures. Participatory approach contrasts starkly with privatized systems, where decision-making is frequently detached from the realities of those most affected (Figueroa et al., 2022). As such, scaling up these inclusive models could provide pivotal frameworks for governments in urban centres like Jakarta, encouraging reforms that prioritize equitable water access.

4.3 Legal Reforms and Remunicipalization

The evolution of water governance has necessitated significant legal reforms, particularly in countries like Uruguay and South Africa that have successfully reclaimed water access as a constitutional right. These reforms have emerged in response to the inadequacies of privatized water services, pivoting towards models that guarantee universal access and public accountability (Ambuehl et al., 2021). For instance, the constitutional amendment in Uruguay recognized the right to water and sanitation, thereby legally binding the state to ensure equitable access for all citizens (Ambuehl et al., 2021).

Similarly, South Africa's post-apartheid constitution enshrined the right to access sufficient water, which has further illuminated the path toward remunicipalization efforts aimed at reversing the privatization trend. Legal frameworks that bolster water access as a fundamental human right have provided community advocates with the tools necessary to challenge existing privatization contracts that threaten public welfare (Ambuehl et al., 2021). By integrating social justice into the legal discourse surrounding water governance, these nations serve as beacons for others grappling with similar privatization challenges.

Furthermore, successful municipalization efforts grounded in constitutional rights reflect a broader societal understanding of water not merely as a commodity but as an inseparable part of human dignity and survival. Shift reinforces the moral imperative for governments to prioritize public welfare through regulatory mechanisms that guarantee community access to crucial resources. The implementation of such legal reforms illustrates the vital role of advocacy and civic engagement in shaping water governance, enabling communities to reclaim control over their resources and redefine the relationship between citizens and the state.

4.4 Protecting Defenders

As the struggle for water rights intensifies, the emergence of water justice activists underscores the pressing need for protective measures. Legal frameworks that safeguard the rights of these defenders must be articulated and enforced to ensure their ability to protest and organize without fear of repression or harm (Razavi, 2019). The challenges faced by activists in various parts of the world, including legal harassment and violence, highlight the urgent need for mechanisms that both recognize and protect the integrity of civic engagement in water governance (Razavi, 2019).

Active advocacy for human rights in the context of water access is essential in buffering efforts against corporate encroachment and authoritarian responses to grassroots organizing. International legal protections and local policies must converge to fortify the rights of activists, ensuring that their voices and actions remain integral within the broader dialogue surrounding water governance (Razavi, 2019). By establishing a supportive legal environment, societies can encourage diverse participation, thereby enriching the policymaking process and ultimately leading to more equitable outcomes in resource allocation.

Equally important, the protection of water defenders owes to their role as critical stewards of public health and environmental sustainability. When empowered, these advocates can drive systemic change, fostering dialogues about equitable access and community management that resonate across national borders (Razavi, 2019). The interconnected nature of water issues demands collaborative approaches that prioritize inter-community solidarity, urging governments to recognize the importance of safe and strategic activism within the context of global water rights advocacy (Razavi, 2019).

In summation, the case studies and reforms presented from Jakarta to Cochabamba illustrate a movement toward reclaiming water as a public resourc. These necessitating modelst prioritize community involvement, legal recognition, and protection of advocates. The ongoing fight for equitable water access reflects a growing recognition of the intertwined nature of social justice, governance, and human rights—a potent reminder that access to clean water remains a fundamental aspect of human dignity. Building on these successes, future reforms must continue to evolve with a commitment to inclusivity, transparency, and accountability.

 

5. Reclaiming the Flow – A Roadmap for Equitable Water Governance

5.1 Policy Proposals: Enshrine Water Rights

A critical step towards achieving equitable water governance is the need to enshrine water as a constitutional guarantee. By embedding water rights within national constitutions, governments can create legally binding commitments that bolster accountability and support reforms aimed at ensuring access for all citizens, regardless of socioeconomic status (Six, 2003). The framework not only provides individuals with a legal basis to demand their rights but also emphasizes the duty of the state to prioritize public welfare in all water-related policies (Six, 2003).

Legal frameworks that enshrine water rights further facilitate the development of robust institutions tasked with water governance. Such institutional structures can serve to enforce accountability mechanisms that prevent mismanagement and protect vulnerable populations from exploitation (Six, 2003). By taking a rights-based approach, countries can foster a more equitable distribution of water resources, enabling responses to crises such as drought and contamination with a solid foundation rooted in law (Six, 2003).

Countries that have established clear water rights within their constitutions often witness a more profound commitment to sustainable resource management and equitable access, which can significantly alter the landscape of WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) services (Six, 2003). Commitment not only addresses immediate access issues but also promotes long-term sustainability by encouraging community participation and the integration of local knowledge into decision-making (Six, 2003).

Moreover, by substantiating local water rights, states can dismantle oppressive structures that prevent marginalized groups from obtaining resources essential for their survival. Overall, legal recognition of water rights is a foundational step necessary for transforming governance practices and restoring community trust in water management systems (Six, 2003).

5.2 Institutional Actions: Oversight and Audits

Strengthening water governance requires robust institutional actions, particularly in establishing independent regulators and citizen-led audits that ensure transparency and accountability in service delivery. Independent regulatory bodies are essential for separating political interests from water management, allowing for an impartial oversight mechanism that evaluates performance and enforces standards in the public interest (Cuaresma, 2006). Such institutions can help identify inefficiencies, ensure fair pricing models, and prevent monopolistic practices that compromise service quality.

Citizen-led audits are equally important as they allow communities to actively participate in monitoring the quality of services and resource allocationGrassrootsts involvement enhances transparency while empowering citizens to hold operators accountable (Cuaresma, 2006). By integrating community input into audits, stakeholders can identify local needs and tailor solutions that address equity issues while fostering a sense of ownership over water services.

Additionally, these institutional frameworks can illuminate the hidden costs associated with privatization, as audits may expose financial mismanagement or instances of corruption that often remain obscured in privatized systems (Cuaresma, 2006). Investigating the discrepancies in service delivery and access can lead to more robust policies that promote inclusive water management. These measures foster collaboration among civil society, government entities, and service providers, ensuring that all voices are heard in the formulation of water policies.

Furthermore, revitalizing oversight mechanisms must translate into tangible improvements in service delivery outcomes. By ensuring that performance metrics are aligned with community needs and expectations, water governance can evolve to prioritize public welfare over profit (Cuaresma, 2006). Overall, the implementation of independent regulation and citizen accountability can drive significant reform in the management of water resources, fostering a system that truly serves the public good.

5.3 Local Leadership: Community-Driven Planning

Effective WASH planning hinges on the involvement of grassroots actors who understand their community's unique context and challenges. By empowering local leadership, governance structures can become more responsive to the needs of the people they serve (Robinson & Minikin, 2011). Initiatives that promote community-driven planning leverage local knowledge and facilitate a collaborative approach, ultimately leading to long-term sustainability in water management.

Local leadership ensures that planning processes reflect the priorities of diverse community stakeholders, particularly vulnerable groups who have often been marginalized in traditional decision-making frameworks (Robinson & Minikin, 2011). Engagement fosters a sense of responsibility among community members and encourages them to become active stewards of their water resources. Consequently, community-driven planning cultivates resilience as residents develop the capacity to adapt to environmental fluctuations and economic challenges (Robinson & Minikin, 2011).

Moreover, successful examples from around the world demonstrate how local leadership can effectively bridge the gap between citizens and policymakers. Drawing lessons from indigenous water management practices or community councils in regions like Kenya can offer insights into how these models can be adapted and scaled to suit various contexts (Robinson & Minikin, 2011). By integrating community voice into governing frameworks, policymakers can establish legitimacy while ensuring that their strategies are more inclusive and equitable.

Empowering local leaders not only secures community buy-in but also enhances accountability. When communities take an active role in managing their water resources, they are more likely to demand higher standards of quality and efficiency from service providers (Robinson & Minikin, 2011). Ultimately, community-driven planning represents an essential component of equitable water governance that can lead to transformative change across regions facing challenges associated with privatization and inequitable access.

5.4 International Solidarity

The quest for equitable water governance transcends borders, necessitating international solidarity through global networks such as the Blue Communities Project. Such platforms allow cities and organizations worldwide to unite in resistance against privatization while sharing best practices and strategies for sustainable water management (Keessen et al., 2016). Collective action fosters a robust dialogue among various stakeholders, reinforcing the notion that water is a global right that deserves protection.

By participating in international solidarity networks, communities can draw on the experiences and successes of others facing similar challenges. The exchange of knowledge and resources can prove invaluable, particularly for marginalized regions that cannot advocate for their rights independently (Keessen et al., 2016). These networks provide a platform for grassroots movements to amplify their voices, encouraging collaboration and drawing attention to best practices in water governance.

Moreover, solidarity fosters an understanding of global water issues as interconnected. Climate change, population growth, and socioeconomic disparities all exert pressure on water resources. Engaging communities internationally can empower local actors to champion their causes while addressing shared challenges through unified actions (Keessen et al., 2016). The combined effort of regional and global movements can create synergies that amplify advocacy efforts, ensuring that water governance is approached from both local and international perspectives.

In conclusion, reclaiming equitable water governance requires a multifaceted approach characterized by the enshrinement of water rights, the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks, community leadership, and international solidarity. Each of these components contributes to a roadmap that empowers communities, promotes transparency, and enhances access to clean water as a fundamental human right. By prioritizing these efforts, societies can pave the way toward a more sustainable and just future for all.

Conclusion: Democracy at the Tap

Water privatization in Jakarta and across the globe represents more than a mere service delivery issue; it is a profound matter of power, equity, and dignity. The case of Jakarta epitomizes a broader global crisis whereby public goods are commodified, culminating in the exclusion of people with low incomes from essential resources. The resultant urban phenomenon is not simply an issue of access to clean water. Still, it highlights the systemic injustices prevalent in markets where the powerful thrive at the expense of the vulnerable (Kooy & Walter, 2019).

Reclaiming water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) as a public right entails a multifaceted approach centered around collective action, legal reform, and robust democratic governance. It necessitates the realization that water access must be enshrined as a constitutional guarantee, reinforcing the state's obligation to ensure every citizen's right to vital resources (Kooy & Walter, 2019). Such legal frameworks inherently serve as leverage for accountability and catalyze meaningful reforms that align with the principles of social justice.

Moreover, instituting prohibitions against opaque public-private partnership contracts is essential to facilitate transparency and ensure that the community's interests are at the forefront of water governance (Bakker, 2007). Enhanced oversight through public audits, paired with citizen engagement, forms a crucial pillar that fortifies accountability within water services. Through these mechanisms, communities can monitor service quality, pricing, and infrastructure development, thus recapturing agencies in a domain that corporate interests have mainly dominated.

Empowering community-led governance models presents a path not only toward improved services but also toward fostering social cohesion. Initiatives that integrate grassroots participation into WASH planning are vital for ensuring that local needs and voices shape the policies affecting their daily lives. The agency of local actors, such as indigenous groups and women's councils, must be recognized and amplified to develop solutions that advance sustainability and equitable access (Abouharb & Cingranelli, 2006).

Finally, the role of international solidarity cannot be underestimated. Establishing global water justice coalitions can unify resistance against privatization and foster a collective learning environment where best practices are shared. Networks like the Blue Communities Project embody the pirit of solidarity, demonstrating that collective action can challenge entrenched power structures and reinstate water as a public good (Ioris, 2012).

Recommendations

In light of the conclusions drawn, the following recommendations propose to ensure equitable water governance:   subsequent recommendations aim to establish equitable water governance.

1. Enshrine Water Access in Constitutional Law: Water should be recognized constitutionally as a fundamental human right, ensuring state accountability and commitment to universal access.
2. Prohibit Opaque PPP Contracts: Legal frameworks must be established to prevent non-transparent contracts that restrict accountability and public participation, ensuring that water governance remains in communities' hands.
3. Implement Public Audits and Citizen Oversight: Independent regulatory bodies and citizen-initiated audits are established to improve transparency and strengthen community trust in WASH delivery systems.
4. Empower Community-Led WASH Governance: Policy frameworks have been established that emphasize local involvement and prioritize local engagement, recognizing the importance of grassroots participation in creating sustainable solutions for water management.
5. Support Global Water Justice Coalitions: Strengthening international networks that promote water justice will facilitate the sharing of best practices, provide solidarity in efforts to reclaim water as a public resource, and inspire localized movements worldwide.

References 

Abidin, H. Z., et al. (2011). Land subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its relation with urban development. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9866-9.

Abouharb, M. R., & Cingranelli, D. L. (2006). The Human Rights Effects of World Bank Structural Adjustment, 1981-2000. International Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00401.x.

Bakker, K. (2007). The 'Commons' Versus the 'Commodity': Alter‐globalization, Anti‐privatization, and the Human Right to Water in the Global South. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00534.x.

Barlow, M. (2013). Blue Communities: A Global Movement for Water Justice.

Colven, E. (2020). Subterranean Infrastructures in a Sinking City: The Politics of Visibility in Jakarta. Critical Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1793210.

Colven, E. (2022). A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta's water crisis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221110883.

Cuaresma, J. (2006). Pro-poor water services in Metro Manila: In search of more significant equity. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847203076.00020.

Ezebilo, E. E., & Savadogo, P. (2021). Preferences for Infrastructure and Determinants of Decision to Live in a Makeshift House in Informal Settlements. Economies. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040183.

Figueroa, C., Lee, K., & Jepson, W. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in the water industry: A critical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1607.

Hall, D., & Lobina, E. (2005). Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). The challenge of remunicipalization: A new era of water management. https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576360208.

Heo, U. (2015). Neoliberal Developmentalism in South Korea: Evidence from the Green Growth Policymaking Process. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12093.

Hess, D. J. (2011). Electricity Transformed: Neoliberalism and Local Energy in the United States. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00842.x.

Ioris, A. A. R. (2012). The Persistent Water Problems of Lima, Peru: Neoliberalism, Institutional Failures, and Social Inequalities. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12001.

Keessen, A., et al. (2016). Solidarity in water management. Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08874-210435.

Kishimoto, S., & Pahwa, D. (2015). Remunicipalization: A Global Trend Towards Water in Public Hands. Transnational Institute. https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062042000313304.

Kohl, B. (2006). Challenges to Neoliberal Hegemony in Bolivia. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00581.x.

Kooy, M., & Bakker, K. (2008). Technologies of Government: Constituting Subjectivities, Spaces, and Infrastructures in Colonial and Contemporary Jakarta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00791.x.

Kooy, M., & Walter, C. (2019). Towards A Situated Urban Political Ecology Analysis of Packaged Drinking Water Supply. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020225.

Lobina, E., & Hall, D. (2007). Problems with Private Water Concessions: A Review of Experiences and Analysis of Dynamics. International Journal of Water Resources Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062042000313304.

Madariaga, A. (2020). Neoliberal Resilience. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691182599.001.0001.

Mbuehl, B., et al. (2021). The role of psychological ownership in safe water management: a mixed-methods study in Nepal. Water, 13(5), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050589.

McIntyre, N., et al. (2022). Can catchment groups fill the democratic deficit? Catchment groups are a hydrological phenomenon in Waikaka, Southland. New Zealand Geographer. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12323.

Murphy, H. M., et al. (2015). Estimating the Burden of Acute Gastrointestinal Illness Due to Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Campylobacter, E. coli O157, and Norovirus Associated with Private Wells and Small Water Systems in Canada. Epidemiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268815002071.

Nurcahyono, S., et al. (2019). Reconstructing Clean Water Policy Based on the Perspective of the Idea Law of Pancasila Indonesia's Principles. https://doi.org/10.2991/sores-18.2019.33.

Oskam, L., et al. (2021). Socioeconomic Inequalities in Access to Drinking Water among Inhabitants of Informal Settlements in South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910528.

Razavi, N. (2019). 'Social control' and the politics of public participation in water municipalization, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Water, 11(7), 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071455.

Roberts, A. (2008). Privatizing Social Reproduction: The Primitive Accumulation of Water in an Era of Neoliberalism. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00623.x.

Robertson, M. (2007). Discovering Price in All the Wrong Places: The Work of Commodity Definition and Price under Neoliberal Environmental Policy. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00537.x.

Robinson, L., & Minikin, B. (2011). Developing strategic capacity in Olympic sports organizations. Sport Business and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426781111162648.

Silver, J. (2023). Infrastructuring urban futures. https://doi.org/10.47674/9781529225648.

Six, P. (2003). Institutional viability: a neo-Durkheimian theory. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 16(4), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161032000163593.

Smith, M. P., et al. (2006). Outbreaks of Waterborne Infectious Intestinal Disease in England and Wales, 1992–2003. Epidemiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268806006406.

Suleiman, R. (2011). Civil society: a revived mantra in the development discourse. Water Policy. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.087.

Yang, H. Y., et al. (2013). Water Safety and Inequality in Access to Drinking Water between Rich and Poor Households. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303345p.

Yanidar, R., et al. (2020). Water Availability for a Self-Sufficient Water Supply: A Case Study of the Pesanggrahan River, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Advances in Science, Technology, and Engineering Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050543.

 

Toilets, Contracts, and Capture: The Hidden Cost of Corruption in South Africa's Sanitation Crisis

                                                         Author : AM Tris Hardyanto

When a child dies beneath a collapsing school toilet, and the contract was sealed not by merit but by proximity to power, it is not just a tragedy; it is a revelation. It reveals a system in which public trust is sold, justice is buried under cement, and dignity has a price. Sanitation is not charity — it is a right. To remain silent is to become part of the rot. Corruption kills. Integrity builds. Choose your side.

1. Infrastructure for Whom?

In the global discourse surrounding water and sanitation (WASH) infrastructure, systemic failures often stem from corrupt governance systems rather than a lack of financial resources or technological shortcomings. South Africa serves as a poignant case, showcasing how elite manipulation of public goods can transform essential services into profit-generating ventures for a select few.

"Sanitation is not a service; it is a survival mechanism." The death of Michael Komape in 2014, who drowned in a school pit latrine, was not an accident; it was a direct consequence of infrastructural neglect and state apathy. Such tragedies underscore the need to rethink WASH not just as development but as justice work, focused on accountability and equity for communities long denied their dignity.

The situation is illustrated by the tragic incidents surrounding school sanitation, exemplified by the death of Michael Komape in 2014, who drowned in a pit latrine due to inadequate facilities and negligence. Such examples underscore the imperative to rethink WASH policies to emphasize justice and equity for impoverished communities, necessitating a focus on accountability and social equity in the allocation of resources and infrastructure commitments (Robins, 2014; Hanf et al., 2011).

The allegation of elite capture in WASH services highlights a broader issue where the interests of the wealthy overshadow the essential needs of poorer populations. Specifically, in South Africa, the complex interplay of politics and corruption, especially during Jacob Zuma's presidency, reveals how the allocation of contracts to private firms, often with ties to political elites, can circumvent ethical and operational standards for effective public service (Robins, 2014; McFarlane & Silver, 2016; Barnes, 2018). As global research illustrates, the prevalence of corruption significantly undermines public welfare initiatives, leading to cycles of neglect among vulnerable communities (Hanf et al., 2011; Karim et al., 2023). Policymakers must create frameworks ensuring that WASH contracts are transparently awarded, effectively monitored, and accountable to the communities they serve, affirming sanitation as a fundamental human right (Carrard et al., 2020; Meier et al., 2012).

2. Anatomy of a Scandal: Gupta Contracts and School Toilets

The contracts scandal linked to the Gupta family under Jacob Zuma exemplifies the nexus of elite capture and governmental corruption within South Africa's sanitation sector. These contracts granted significant sums to firms closely associated with the Guptas for constructing toilets in rural schools, resulting in facilities that were poorly built or left incomplete. The implications of the misallocation of resources highlight severe failures in oversight and accountability mechanisms. Reports indicate that many of these contracts were structured in a way that bypassed standard operational protocols and quality checks, increasing risks to the very children they were intended to benefit (McFarlane & Silver, 2016; Coultas et al., 2022).

The outcomes of these contract mismanagements reflect broader systemic issues where neoliberal policies have eroded stringent oversight in favor of profit-driven motives. Consequently, public funds designated for critical infrastructure have become tools of patronage, benefitting only a select elite under the guise of developmental aid. The South African experience aligns with trends seen globally; corrupt practices consistently lead to inadequate sanitation services, directly affecting health outcomes and perpetuating inequities for marginalized populations (Pusok, 2016; Valcourt et al., 2020; Bayu et al., 2020). Thus, advancing legal frameworks that expose and dismantle cartel-like behaviors within sanitation contracts is crucial for restoring public trust and ensuring the right to safe sanitation for all citizens (Lucas, 2016; Alfada, 2019).

The WASH sector is the perfect storm: weak regulation, high public spending, and low accountability.

One approach to reforming these systemic failings involves developing robust legal instruments and accountability structures aimed at deterring corrupt practices in service delivery. Research supports establishing more apparent legal avenues for public accountability and implementing rigorous judicial oversight of procurement processes. Countries facing similar challenges have witnessed varying levels of success with such frameworks, suggesting that international best practices, especially those enhancing transparency, can be tailored to local contexts to mitigate corruption risks in the sanitation sector (Bennett‐Guerrero et al., 2014; Carrard et al., 2020;

Moreover, education and advocacy initiatives aimed at empowering community stakeholders are critical. By fostering greater involvement from civil society, local governments can be held accountable for ethical practices in service delivery, ensuring community needs take precedence in sanitation projects (Hutton, 2012; Schumacher, 2013). Such shifts not only reinforce democratic governance but also advance social justice imperatives, positioning sanitation as an area ripe for reform that prioritizes the rights and dignity of the disenfranchised (Hanf et al., 2011; Carrard et al., 2020).

As South Africa grapples with these pressing issues, policymakers must draw insights from both local and global experiences of corruption in the ASH sectors. A comprehensive approach incorporating diverse strategies—from robust legal frameworks to community engagement—provides a pathway to restore integrity and efficacy within sanitation services, enabling the realization of universal access to safe sanitation as a cornerstone of public health and human rights. The focus must remain on separating public governance from elite capture, ensuring that priorities align with the well-being of the most impoverished and vulnerable, thereby repositioning sanitation as integral to social justice (Robins, 2014; Carrard et al., 2020).

Toward Justice-Oriented Design in WASH Policies

Reflecting on the South African sanitation crisis necessitates acknowledging corruption's profound impact on public health and social equity. The crisis extends beyond a local issue; it is illustrative of a global predicament where political capture and regulatory failures allow elite interests to undermine essential services. As policymakers seek answers to critical questions surrounding access and infrastructure in WASH, empirical evidence suggests a compelling need for justice-oriented designs that hold entities accountable and prioritize the voices of the affected communities (Francois et al., 2020; Mphambukeli, 2020).

The implications of these insights are multifaceted. Policymaking must evolve, embracing comprehensive strategies that integrate community input, robust legal frameworks, and stringent accountability measures within sanitation projects. By decisively addressing corruption and elevating the experiences of people with low incomes, South Africa and similar emerging economies can strive toward a more equitable state in WASH service delivery that honors the intrinsic human right to sanitation and builds a just society (Carrard et al., 2020; Karim et al., 2023).

In conclusion, addressing the complex nexus of politics, corruption, and infrastructure requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses not just policy and reform but an overarching commitment to social justice and empowerment of marginalized communities. As the world witnesses ongoing challenges posed by inadequate sanitation and political corruption, the need for sustained efforts aimed at safeguarding public interests and ensuring equitable access to water and sanitation services remains paramount—a clarion call for justice in the urban landscape of South Africa and beyond (Robins, 2014; McFarlane & Silver, 2016; Bayu et al., 2020).

 

3. Hidden Mechanisms of Capture: Shell Firms, Loopholes, and Silence

The phenomenon of elite capture remains a critical barrier to adequate sanitation and water service delivery, characterized by the strategic use of opaque procurement systems and shell companies. In South Africa, the construction of sanitation infrastructure has been severely compromised by the operational practices of contractors who utilize convoluted financial structures to disguise their true identities and evade rigorous scrutiny. Manipulation is exemplified by the establishment of companies that lack adequate transparency and effectively function as vehicles of corruption within the WASH sector. The resultant consequences are dire, leading to infrastructure failures that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The role of governmental agencies, often weakened by political interference, further exacerbates the problem, as these bodies fail to conduct necessary due diligence, thereby facilitating the perpetuation of a corrupt ecosystem (Correa et al., 2019).

These mechanisms tend to flourish within regulatory environments that are inadequately equipped to counteract such behaviors. As shown in research conducted within the Brazilian context, political interference often undermines the regulatory autonomy of agencies, systematically impairing their ability to execute effective oversight (Correa et al., 2019; Woods, 2017). Similarly, in South Africa, instances of direct political meddling in the decision-making processes of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and contractors handling sanitation projects foster environments where elites can operate with impunity. For instance, the Gupta family's involvement in sanitation contracts highlights how state capture diverts state resources intended for public goods towards personal gain, showcasing the failure of both governance structures and regulatory frameworks to protect public interests from the predations of oligarchs (Correa et al., 2019).

Another pivotal aspect of elite capture involves institutional silence and complicity among stakeholders who are either unwilling or unable to resist corrupt practices. In many instances, the entrenchment of corrupt systems is paradoxically sustained by the silence of affected communities and civil society organizations. Silence stems from fear of retribution, lack of agency, and a pervasive belief that engagement with corrupt systems may yield better individual outcomes than opposition. Consequently, the failure to voice concerns about substandard sanitation conditions becomes a critical factor in sustaining the corrupt practices that proliferate within damaged governance structures ( Patacconi & Vikander, 2015).

"When toilets collapse, so does trust in the state."

To confront these challenges, governments must develop comprehensive strategies aimed at dismantling the mechanisms that allow for oligarchic control over essential services. Reform initiatives should prioritize the establishment of transparent procurement processes, robust accountability frameworks, and stringent oversight measures to mitigate the influence of corrupt practices in the WASH sector (Hsu & Chao, 2022). For instance, enhancing agency capacity through professional development initiatives and increasing community involvement in decision-making processes can bolster efforts to prevent elite capture and improve accountability in sanitation service delivery (Greenstein, 2023). Furthermore, employing technology-driven solutions, such as blockchain for tracking contracts and expenditures, may enhance transparency and deter corrupt practices by providing verifiable records of transactions and contract allocations (Woods, 2017).

3.1 Policy Recommendations: Preventing Oligarchic Control in WASH

One of the foremost policy recommendations involves instituting rigorous legal frameworks focused on transparency and accountability in procurement processes. Effective implementation of conflict-of-interest regulations that disallow companies with prior political connections from obtaining contracts can significantly mitigate the risk of elite capture. Continuous audit and evaluation of financial activities, empowered by independent oversight bodies, can serve as effective deterrents against corrupt practices Patacconi & Vikander, 2015; Correa et al., 2019). Alongside legislative measures, fostering civil Society's role in monitoring sanitation projects can strengthen community engagement and accountability. Civic engagement should be catalyzed through partnerships between governmental authorities and nongovernmental organizations to amplify the voices of marginalized communities who are often most affected by these failures Correa et al., 2019).

Additionally, policies designed to prevent urban real estate oligarchs from exploiting WASH improvements must centre on the preservation of community assets and rights. Policymakers should aim to establish zoning laws that protect informal settlements from encroachment while ensuring that any infrastructure improvements truly benefit resident communities rather than serve to increase property values at their expense Inusah & Dwommor, 2018). For instance, regulatory frameworks could be established requiring comprehensive impact assessments for sanitation projects to identify potential displacement issues proactively, thereby safeguarding resident interests and minimizing adverse effects on already vulnerable populations.

In response to urban land pressures, the approach to WASH improvements should encompass a rights-based framework that prioritizes the needs of existing community members rather than the economic aspirations of developers. Policies that promote participatory planning methods where residents have a direct role in defining sanitation and water management priorities further reinforce community ownership of such projects, creating an intrinsic disincentive against elite appropriation Greenstein, 2023).

3.2  Ensuring Justice in Sanitation Services

Addressing the entwined issues of elite capture, corruption, and inadequate sanitation systems is fundamental for establishing justice-oriented governance in South Africa and similar contexts. Systematic reforms that prioritize transparency, accountability, and community empowerment can dismantle the entrenched structures that facilitate elite control and perpetuate inequality. The establishment of sound policies aimed at combating both direct and indirect forms of corruption within the WASH sector, alongside proactive measures to protect marginalized communities from displacement, reflects a commitment to human rights and social equity. Through these approaches, governments can move toward a framework of accountability that not only serves the necessities of development but also embodies the aspirations for equitable access to essential services, reclaiming water and sanitation as fundamental rights rather than commodity-controlled privileges for the elite Correa et al., 2019; Woods, 2017).

4. Human Impact: When Pit Toilets Kill

The human toll of inadequate sanitation in South Africa, particularly the use of pit toilets, presents a tragic reflection of systemic failures in governance and infrastructure. Children are frequently victims of poorly designed and maintained pit latrines, which serve not merely as unsanitary installations but as instruments of negligence that can lead to severe injuries and fatalities. Such incidents result in profound trauma for families and communities, impacting their trust in governmental promises for improved living conditions. As these tragic narratives unfold, they illustrate a broader pattern of state failure that is increasingly normalized for many rural citizens. The section seeks to explore the multifaceted human costs associated with sanitation failures while drawing on testimonials and reports that highlight how poor infrastructure delivery exacerbates inequality and disenfranchises the vulnerable Acharya et al., 2013; Minh & Hung, 2011).

The reality in many communities is one of systemic neglect, where safety and sanitation converge to create environments that are perilous for the most defenceless citizens, particularly children. Numerous reports have emerged detailing incidents where children have tragically drowned in open sewage pits or been injured due to the collapse of poorly constructed facilities. Such instances result not only in immediate physical harm but also create lasting psychological and social scars on affected families, thus manifesting long-term repercussions for community cohesion (Schiel et al., 2021). Families that experience these tragedies often feel abandoned as trust in government services dissipates, leading to a resignation that fosters a collective sense of helplessness. The cycle of trauma and disenfranchisement illustrates the crucial failures of state and local authorities in delivering essential services and operationalizing commitments to human rights regarding sanitation (Freitas et al., 2023).

Toilets should not be tools of tyranny."

Moreover, the strategic placement of such facilities in areas controlled by powerful interests further complicates the situation. In regions where oligarchic structures dominate the political landscape, the challenges in implementing effective WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) policies are magnified. The presence of entrenched interests and corrupt practices inhibits the ability of governments to prioritize and meaningfully support sanitation improvements, effectively rendering legislative efforts futile in the face of systemic deprivation (Rêgo et al., 2013; Kamara et al., 2017). Consequently, the inability to create equitable sanitation access becomes a tool of oppression, particularly affecting low-income communities that lack the political leverage or resources to voice their grievances efficiently. The challenges facing families in such settings are not only health-related; they encompass deep-seated social justice issues that highlight the inequitable distributions of power and resources (Jung et al., 2017).

Efforts to address these challenges must begin with an acute awareness of communities' lived experiences, ensuring that WASH policies are not merely theoretical frameworks but practical, ground-level implementations that reflect the needs of disempowered populations. Engaging community members in the design and operationalization of sanitation initiatives is a critical step towards rectifying the historical neglect they have faced. By incorporating local voices into policymaking processes, the government can foster a sense of ownership among residents and enhance the efficacy of sanitation interventions aimed at addressing the unique risks present in their environments (Kwiringira et al., 2014).

 

4.1 Overcoming Implementation Challenges in Oligarch Areas

Obstacles to WASH policy implementation in sectors controlled by powerful interests are multifaceted and deeply entrenched. One significant challenge is the culture of impunity that often accompanies such control, as elite interests utilize their positions to influence governmental decisions and public resource allocation. Such dynamics can lead to a disproportionate emphasis on profit over the public good, resulting in sanitation projects that cater to affluent populations while neglecting the needs of marginalized communities (Rêgo et al., 2013; Kamara et al., 2017). These influences can create an environment where corruption is both normalized and expected, effectively diffusing accountability.

Overcoming these challenges necessitates a multipronged approach aimed at reforming governance structures, enhancing transparency, and empowering local communities. Integrated systems of accountability must be established to ensure that project allocations are directly tied to community needs and real-world impacts rather than the interests of financially powerful entities. Policy frameworks must advocate for enhanced public consultation processes, where community stakeholders are actively involved in decision-making concerning sanitation services (Baum et al., 2013).

Research has illustrated that strong community engagement results in improved health outcomes and public trust in government initiatives (Shahraki et al., 2010). Programs implemented without sufficient local insight often yield little benefit; conversely, those that actively involve the community in dialogue and decision-making processes tend to produce far more promising results. For instance, in regions facing severe sanitation challenges, interventions designed with community input have demonstrated substantial declines in sanitation-related diseases, underscoring the potential benefits of participatory governance models (Kwiringira et al., 2014).

"Safe sanitation is the front line of gender justice." In addition, educational initiatives can play a pivotal role in shifting public perceptions about the importance of sanitation and hygiene. Awareness campaigns highlighting the health implications tied to poor sanitation practices and infrastructure can galvanize community action, potentially even pressuring local leaders to act in their constituents' best interests (Kwiringira et al., 2014). Such educational efforts should not only target local populations but also aim to engage broader national and international stakeholders, emphasizing the urgent necessity of addressing systemic inequities exacerbated by elite control over sanitation services (Schiel et al., 2021; Godana & Mengistie, 2017).

Finally, to effectively mitigate the impact of elite control, legislation mandating transparency in public contracting and procurement must be vigorously enforced. Requiring all sanitation contracts to undergo rigorous public scrutiny and third-party evaluation can constrain corrupt practices and underline the importance of accountability (Baum et al., 2013). By implementing such measures, governments can begin to dismantle the networks of influence that bolster oligarchic control while also reinforcing community trust in the state and its commitment to providing fundamental human rights.

4.2 A Call for Equitable Sanitation Solutions

The rising urgency surrounding South Africa's sanitation crisis, particularly the tragedy of pit toilets, serves as a grim reminder of the systemic failures at play. As children continue to suffer and die due to preventable sanitation-related incidents, it is clear that the issues extend far beyond infrastructural inadequacies; they underscore deep-rooted inequities in society that must be addressed head-on. Empowering communities, enforcing transparent governance practices, and fostering inclusive policymaking can play essential roles in creating a more equitable future for sanitation access.

Ensuring that marginalized communities have a voice in discussions about their health and safety is crucial to effecting lasting change. As local contexts differ significantly, adopting practices that promote community ownership and stakeholder engagement can help delineate effective sanitation strategies that respond not only to individual needs but also to broader social dynamics. It is only through these comprehensive, community-led initiatives that systemic inequities fostered by corruption and elite controls can be dismantled.

By recognizing the painful human impact of sanitation failures and committing to principled, equitable systems of decision-making and resource allocation, South Africa can move toward a future where the rights to safe, dignified sanitation are guaranteed for every citizen, regardless of their socioeconomic background. Accountability, empowerment, and transparency must become the guiding principles of sanitation policy implementation, ensuring no child suffers needlessly and that collective trust in government institutions is reinstated.

 

5. Rewiring the System—From Contracts to Communities

The imperative for structural reforms in South Africa's water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) sector has gained notable traction in the wake of the Zondo Commission's findings regarding state capture. The challenge now lies in translating these legal determinations into practical, people-centered WASH systems that prioritize community needs and foster transparency. The approach can be achieved through various key reforms, including the implementation of transparent digital procurement processes, the use of blockchain technology for fund tracking, the establishment of independent WASH ombudsperson offices, and the introduction of participatory budgeting mechanisms. Such reforms not only promote accountability but also encourage community engagement in decision-making processes that affect their lives Daniel et al., 2021; Garuba et al., 2016).

Transparent digital procurement systems can significantly transform the contracting landscape in WASH. By utilizing platforms that allow stakeholders to view contracts, expenditures, and project timelines in real time, communities can hold contractors and governmental bodies accountable for delivering promised services. Promotes a culture of transparency that directly counters the past practices of corruption and mismanagement that have marked the sector (Garuba et al., 2016). Integrating blockchain technology for fund tracking further enhances transparency by providing an immutable record of financial transactions, ensuring that funds are traceable, and allowing community members to engage in oversight effectively (VilaGuilera et al., 2021).

Additionally, the establishment of independent WASH ombudsperson offices can serve as a critical intervention point, allowing communities to report malpractices and seek redress without fear of reprisal. These offices would operate with a mandate to investigate complaints regarding service delivery, providing a platform for elevating community voices and ensuring their concerns are addressed (Fisher et al., 2015). Coupled with participatory budgeting initiatives, wherein community members are actively involved in prioritizing how WASH funds are allocated, such reforms can shift power dynamics. A community-centric approach not only empowers residents but can lead to more aligned priorities concerning local sanitation needs, ultimately enhancing service delivery (Walther et al., 2025).

A fundamental change to the current system also includes implementing community-based monitoring systems, which can take the form of "toilet report cards" or similar evaluative tools. By collecting feedback directly from users on the quality of sanitation facilities and the surrounding infrastructure, communities can create a grassroots level of accountability. Input can guide local authorities in making informed decisions and improvements while fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility among residents (Barrington, 2025).

5.1 Policies to Enhance Financial Transparency

In order to guarantee that there is a requirement for and an ability to enforce financial openness among elites, policymakers can adopt frameworks that hold public officials and contractors to rigorous standards of accountability. Mandatory disclosure laws could require that all financial transactions related to public contracts, especially in the WASH sector, be made available for public scrutiny (Jordanova et al., 2015). Implementing comprehensive auditing processes that include community representatives can deter financial mismanagement by adding a layer of oversight that serves as both a check and a balance against corrupt practices. Furthermore, penalties for noncompliance should be sufficiently stringent to act as a deterrent to unethical behaviour (Nounkeu et al., 2023).

In addition, the establishment of whistleblower protections can encourage citizens and employees to report corruption without fear of retaliation. By fostering a culture of integrity and transparency, the government can help dismantle the silos of secrecy that often surround elite financial dealings. Training programs aimed at informing community members about their rights and the processes for authorities should also instate a system to report irregularities, thus further empowering citizens to partake in governance (Han, 2018).

5.2 Tailoring WASH Policies to Impoverished Communities

Designing WASH policies to address the needs of impoverished communities necessitates explicitly understanding the unique challenges these populations face and the socioeconomic conditions influencing their access to water and sanitation services. Research highlights that community ownership, fostering a sense of investment in local WASH initiatives, dramatically improves the sustainability and effectiveness of these programs (Armah et al., 2018). Customizing interventions that resonate with local realities and cultural practices can enhance acceptance and participation among community members.

A crucial policy component should also involve investing in education and capacity building within impoverished communities. Empowering residents with the knowledge to manage their sanitation needs effectively can lead to improved community health outcomes and greater self-sufficiency (Domini et al., 2022). Moreover, policies should prioritize equitable resource allocation that considers the specific needs and vulnerabilities of these populations. Policymakers must ensure that they do not disproportionately divert resources to wealthier neighborhoods under the pretext of improved service delivery (Keller et al., 2021).

Furthermore, inclusive programming that engages women and marginalized groups in the design and implementation of WASH projects is vital to achieving transformative social change. Historical gender biases in service delivery often mean women bear the brunt of poor sanitation. Policies that recognize and address these inequities can create more just systems (Berendes et al., 2022).

5.3 A Path Toward Empowered and Transparent WASH Systems

The evolution of South Africa's WASH infrastructure from a system plagued by corruption and inefficiency to one that embodies transparency, accountability, and community engagement is both imperative and achievable. By embracing modern technologies and participatory governance models, the state can realign WASH services to reflect the rights and needs of impoverished communities. Effort necessitates a collective commitment from all stakeholders, including residents, governmental authorities, and civil society organizations, to advocate for transformative changes across the sector.

The required shift recognizes water and sanitation as not merely services but fundamental human rights and public goods that deserve robust protection against elite capture and mismanagement. With sustained commitment to these reforms, South Africa can lead by example in demonstrating how community-driven and transparent governance can successfully address longstanding disparities within the WASH sector, ultimately paving the way toward equitable access to essential services for all citizens (Wada et al., 2022; Geremew et al., 2023).

6. Aid, Advocacy, and the International Lens

International aid plays a crucial role in funding various Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) programs in countries characterized by fragile democracies. However, in the absence of robust accountability mechanisms, there is a tangible risk that international aid may inadvertently reinforce elite capture, thereby entrenching the very inequities it seeks to address. The section discusses several strategies through which aid agencies can enhance their accountability safeguards, facilitating effective and equitable disbursement of funds while fostering community-led initiatives. It will also examine the importance of advocacy and awareness campaigns in promoting robust WASH policies among the general public Cifuentes‐Faura, 2023)(Pamment, 2019;

6.1 Leveraging International Aid for WASH Initiatives

One of the fundamental ways that governments and organizations can leverage international aid to support WASH initiatives, particularly in poverty-stricken areas, is through the implementation of equity impact assessments. These assessments allow donors and development partners to gauge the effectiveness of proposed interventions on vulnerable groups, ensuring that support is directed toward those who need it most. Effectively integrating an equity lens into program design involves evaluating the socioeconomic conditions of target communities and measuring potential impacts on various population segments, particularly marginalized groups (Wijayanti et al., 2023; Milić et al., 2022). ensures that funds are allocated in a manner that promotes social justice rather than merely perpetuating existing power dynamics.

Additionally, incorporating community-based auditing practices can significantly enhance the effectiveness of aid disbursements. By empowering local citizens to oversee the financial flow and implementation of WASH projects, aid agencies can create a system of shared responsibility and transparency. Community members, well-acquainted with local needs and challenges, are uniquely positioned to identify discrepancies and inefficiencies within funded initiatives. Joint assessment tools that integrate traditional methods with modern technology, such as mobile reporting applications, enable real-time monitoring and data collection, thereby elevating community input in decision-making processes and refining project delivery (Jones & Hameiri, 2021; Holzapfel, 2016).

Another critical measure involves conditioning disbursements on established transparency benchmarks. Aid agencies should implement policies that require recipient governments and organizations to provide regular reports on expenditure and service outcomes, which independent auditing mechanisms could verify. As evidenced by other regions experiencing similar challenges, countries that maintain focused transparency requirements often witness improved governance and reduced instances of corruption. Direct linkage affirms the need for constant dialogue between aid agencies and local actors, ensuring that aid flows contribute to sustainable WASH improvements rather than exacerbate elite capture (Keijzer, 2015); (Arapis & Reitano, 2017;

6.2 Advocacy and Awareness Campaigns for WASH Policies

Advocacy and awareness campaigns can be powerful tools in promoting WASH policies among the general public. They can capitalize on local and international media platforms to shed light on persistent injustices. Such campaigns can act as a catalyst for change by mobilizing community members, local stakeholders, and global citizens, emphasizing the critical nature of sustainable WASH services. For instance, utilizing powerful storytelling techniques to share personal experiences of individuals affected by inadequate sanitation services can evoke strong emotional responses, thereby fostering a greater understanding of the specific challenges faced by disenfranchised communities (Amin et al., 2023; Palagashvili & Williamson, 2021).

Social media platforms can serve as ideal avenues for amplifying these stories, reaching broader audiences while encouraging public dialogue about the necessity of improved WASH services. Advocacy efforts that harness digital storytelling, combined with traditional outreach strategies, enhance public awareness and ultimately stimulate political action aimed at challenging institutional apathy regarding sanitation issues (Simmons et al., 2021; OmosaManyonyi et al., 2023).

Furthermore, coalition building among civil society organizations working across sectors—such as health, education, and women's rights—can significantly amplify voices advocating for WASH improvements. When organizations representing diverse interests unify their efforts, they can present a more coherent and powerful narrative that underscores the interconnections between sanitation, health, and socioeconomic development. Collaborative advocacy can attract broader support for policy changes at both local and national levels (Pamment, 2019; Arapis & Reitano, 2017).

 

6.3 A Collaborative Path Forward

Until communities control their toilets, they will not control their futures."

Transforming the landscape of WASH in poverty-stricken areas demands a concerted effort to leverage international aid effectively while ensuring that transparency, community engagement, and inclusivity become integral components of service provision. Through the implementation of equity impact assessments and community-led auditing processes, aid agencies can foster sustainable enhancements in WASH. At the same time, conditioned disbursements anchored in accountability frameworks can mitigate the risks of elite capture.

The role of advocacy and public awareness cannot be underestimated, as amplifying local injustices and enabling meaningful dialogue about sanitation needs will drive systemic change. By intertwining funding and advocacy efforts, the international community can affirm its commitment to building resilient WASH systems that prioritize the rights and needs of the most vulnerable populations. In sum, a collaborative path forward supported by equitable aid practices and a robust, community-driven advocacy framework is essential for realizing transformative change within WASH services across fragile democracies (Arapis & Reitano, 2017; Holzapfel, 2016).

 

7. Reclaiming WASH from the Elites

The sanitation crisis within South Africa is not merely a tale of systemic failure; instead, it serves as a profound call to action for reforming the governance of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) systems. The revelations surrounding the mismanagement and corruption within the national landscape underscore a pressing imperative: rebuilding trust in WASH services requires a critical reexamination of who holds the power to govern water and sanitation provisions. As long as contracts remain shrouded in secrecy and the voices of communities are marginalized, justice in WASH will remain elusive. Effective reclamation of these systems must hinge on the adoption of vital tools, including legal reform, participatory planning, fiscal transparency, and robust citizen advocacy (Barrington, 2025; Scherer et al., 2021).

7.1 Ensuring WASH Systems Serve People, Not Profits

To ensure that WASH systems serve the public interest rather than profit motives, it is essential to foreground legal reform that promotes accountability and transparency in service delivery. By enacting laws that require open procurement processes and mandate public reporting of outcomes associated with sanitation projects, governments can address the complexities of elite capture and empower local communities (Delvaux & Broeck, 2023; Fuller & Eisenberg, 2016). Furthermore, participatory planning initiatives must involve local populations in decision-making processes surrounding WASH projects, thereby fostering genuine ownership and investment in local sanitation solutions (Madiarsa et al., 2023). Such practices not only ensure that resources are allocated meaningfully but also enhance residents' trust in public institutions.

Fiscal transparency is another critical dimension in the quest to detach WASH from elite interests. Establishing mechanisms that demand rigorous accountability for public expenditures in sanitation can prevent misallocation of resources and ensure that communities receive the services they deserve. Implementing robust monitoring systems, possibly through community-led audits, allows citizens to remain directly informed and engaged in how funds are utilized (Welsh et al., 2024; Hayat et al., 2024). These practices serve dual purposes; they not only deter potential corruption but also encourage citizen participation, engendering a sense of agency and empowerment.

Advocacy remains central to promoting equitable WASH policies, highlighting the critical role of storytelling and media in spotlighting injustices experienced by affected communities. Activism that leverages digital platforms can amplify voices that society often silences; yet acknowledging them helps build a nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between sanitation access, health, and social justice (Botting et al., 2010; Prskalo, 2019). Organizing powerful advocacy campaigns helps to challenge entrenched power dynamics, mobilizing public support for reforms that prioritize human rights over profits.

In addition to advocating for systemic change, it is critical to position the discussion within the broader context of environmental justice and human rights. Reframing WASH as a fundamental human right can catalyze international and local efforts alike to dismantle institutional barriers and facilitate equitable access to these essential services (Truong & Saunders, 2022; Corburn, 2022). Strategies promoting the intersectionality of WASH with other social determinants of health are vital, as they acknowledge the multidimensional nature of inequality faced by marginalized groups (Wutich et al., 2023).

7.2 Setting the Stage for Further Exploration

As the series continues to explore global examples of WASH injustice and resistance, it is imperative to draw lessons from the multifaceted nature of systemic inequalities faced by communities. The ongoing analysis should dissect the interplay of governance, social justice, and citizen engagement across various contexts, aiming to illuminate pathways through which communities can reclaim their rights to safe and dignified sanitation and water services. The power dynamics revealed through the South African sanitation scandal elucidate both the challenges and opportunities present in reenvisioning WASH systems for the future (Enqvist et al., 2020).

The sanitation crisis is a test of the state's commitment to justice, especially for people experiencing poverty. Legal reform, citizen engagement, and fiscal transparency are essential to dismantle elite capture and restore WASH to the people.

Ultimately, the call for action is clear: Leaders and policymakers must reform the power structures that dictate resource distribution and access to essential human needs. The time has arrived for encompassing frameworks that champion inclusivity and accountability in WASH governance. By prioritizing the voices of the marginalized and instituting policies aimed at dismantling corrupt practices, the path toward achieving universal access to safe water and sanitation can be meaningfully advanced, ensuring that WASH systems serve people rather than profits.

 

 References 

Abidin, H. Z., et al. (2011). Land subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its relation with urban development. Natural Hazards. doi:10.1007/s1106901198669.

Abouharb, M. R., & Cingranelli, D. L. (2006). The Human Rights Effects of World Bank Structural Adjustment, 19812000. International Studies Quarterly. doi:10.1111/j.14682478.2006.00401.x

Ambuehl, B., Tomberge, V., Kunwar, B., Schertenleib, A., Marks, S., & Inauen, J. (2021). The role of psychological ownership in safe water management: a mixed-methods study in Nepal. Water, 13(5), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050589

Bakker, K. (2007). The "Commons" Versus the "Commodity": Alter‐globalization, Anti‐privatization, and the Human Right to Water in the Global South. Antipode. doi:10.1111/j.14678330.2007.00534.x

Barlow, M. (2013). Blue Communities: A Global Movement for Water Justice.

Colven, E. (2020). Subterranean Infrastructures in a Sinking City: The Politics of Visibility in Jakarta. Critical Asian Studies. doi:10.1080/14672715.2020.1793210

Colven, E. (2022). A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta's water crisis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. doi:10.1177/0308518x221110883.

Cuaresma, J. (2006). Poor water services in Metro Manila: In search of greater equity. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847203076.00020

Ezebilo, E. E., & Savadogo, P. (2021). Preferences for Infrastructure and Determinants of Decision to Live in a Makeshift House in Informal Settlements. Economies. doi:10.3390/economies9040183.

Figueroa, C., Lee, K., & Jepson, W. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in the water industry: a critical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1607

Hall, D., & Lobina, E. (2005). Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). The challenge of remunicipalization: A new era of water management. doi:10.2753/pmr15309576360208

Heo, U. (2015). Neoliberal Developmentalism in South Korea: Evidence from the Green Growth Policymaking Process. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. doi:10.1111/apv.12093

Ioris, A. A. R. (2012). The Persistent Water Problems of Lima, Peru: Neoliberalism, Institutional Failures, and Social Inequalities. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. doi:10.1111/sjtg.12001

Keessen, A., Vink, M., Wiering, M., Boezeman, D., Ernst, W., Mees, H., … & Eerd, M. (2016). Solidarity in water management. Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/es08874210435

Kishimoto, S., & Pahwa, D. (2015). Remunicipalization: A Global Trend Towards Water in Public Hands. Transnational Institute. doi:10.1080/0790062042000313304

Kooy, M., & Bakker, K. (2008). Technologies of Government: Constituting Subjectivities, Spaces, and Infrastructures in Colonial and Contemporary Jakarta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/j.14682427.2008.00791.x

Lobina, E., & Hall, D. (2007). Problems with Private Water Concessions: A Review of Experiences and Analysis of Dynamics. International Journal of Water Resources Development. doi:10.1080/0790062042000313304

Madariaga, A. (2020). Neoliberal Resilience. doi:10.23943/Princeton/9780691182599.001.0001

McIntyre, N., et al. (2022). Can catchment groups fill the democratic deficit? Catchment groups are a hydrological phenomenon in Waikaka, Southland. New Zealand Geographer. doi:10.1111/nzg.12323

Murphy, H. M., et al. (2015). Estimating the Burden of Acute Gastrointestinal Illness Due to Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Campylobacter, E. coli O157, and Norovirus Associated with Private Wells and Small Water Systems in Canada. Epidemiology and Infection. doi:10.1017/S0950268815002071

Nurcahyono, S., et al. (2019). Reconstructing Clean Water Policy Based on the Perspective of the Idea Law of Pancasila Indonesia's Principles. doi:10.2991/sores18.2019.33

Oskam, L., et al. (2021). Socioeconomic Inequalities in Access to Drinking Water among Inhabitants of Informal Settlements in South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph181910528

Razavi, N. (2019). 'Social control' and the politics of public participation in water remunicipalization, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Water, 11(7), 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071455

Roberts, A. (2008). Privatizing Social Reproduction: The Primitive Accumulation of Water in an Era of Neoliberalism. Antipode. doi:10.1111/j.14678330.2008.00623.x

Robinson, L., & Minikin, B. (2011). Developing strategic capacity in Olympic sports organizations. Sport Business and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426781111162648

Silver, J. (2023). Infrastructuring urban futures. https://doi.org/10.47674/9781529225648

Six, P. (2003). Institutional viability: a neo-Durkheimian theory. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 16(4), 395415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161032000163593

Smith, M. P., et al. (2006). Outbreaks of Waterborne Infectious Intestinal Disease in England and Wales, 1992–2003. Epidemiology and Infection. doi:10.1017/S0950268806006406

Suleiman, R. (2011). Civil Society: a revived mantra in the development discourse. Water Policy. doi:10.2166/wp.2010.087

Yang, H. Y., et al. (2013). Water Safety and Inequality in Access to Drinking Water between Rich and Poor Households. Environmental Science & Technology. doi:10.1021/es303345p

Yanidar, R., et al. (2020). Water Availability for a Self-Sufficient Water Supply: A Case Study of the Pesanggrahan River, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Advances in Science, Technology, and Engineering Systems Journal. doi:10.25046/aj050543