Abstract
Water is not simply a transparent liquid but a complex medium that often harbours invisible threats, including pathogens, chemicals, and micro-pollutants. Ensuring safe drinking water requires a robust system of treatment, monitoring, and governance that transforms raw water into a safe and potable resource. This article outlines the foundational processes of water treatment, explores the challenges of emerging contaminants, presents case studies of failures and frontiers, and highlights future-ready innovations. It calls for a paradigm shift from reactive treatment toward predictive, decentralized, and equitable systems that address not only technical challenges but also social and environmental justice. Through a multi-disciplinary lens, this article emphasizes the importance of integrating advanced technology, public education, and nature-based solutions to build resilient and sustainable water systems for all.
Chapter 1: Foundations of Water Treatment
1.1 From Source to Tap: The Core Treatment
Stages
Transforming
water from raw sources into safe, drinkable forms involves a series of critical
steps, traditionally beginning with screening and coarse filtration. These
processes remove debris and large particulates, preparing the water for finer
treatments. The following stages—coagulation and flocculation—involve adding
coagulants like alum to destabilize particles, which aggregate into flocs.
These flocs are subsequently removed through sedimentation, where gravity
allows them to settle. Following sedimentation, water undergoes filtration
through layers of sand, gravel, or membranes to eliminate residual solids and
microbial pathogens. Finally, disinfection using chlorination, ultraviolet (UV)
radiation, or ozonation ensures the elimination of remaining harmful
microorganisms. Each of these processes plays a specific role in safeguarding
public health by progressively eliminating contaminants and reducing the
biological and chemical load of the water (Razali et al., 2023; Diharjo et al.,
2022).
1.2 Innovations in Technology: AOPs,
Membranes, and Beyond
In
response to emerging challenges, water treatment technologies have evolved
beyond traditional methods. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) employ powerful
oxidants like hydrogen peroxide and ozone to degrade persistent organic
pollutants. Meanwhile, membrane technologies—such as nanofiltration and reverse
osmosis—provide high precision in separating contaminants, including
pharmaceuticals and PFAS, from water. These technologies offer high efficiency
but also pose challenges related to cost, energy consumption, and maintenance
(Cardoso et al., 2021; Makhoul et al., 2023). Nevertheless, their integration
into water treatment infrastructures has marked a significant leap in our
ability to address both known and emerging threats to water safety.
1.3 Monitoring and Quality Assurance
Real-time
monitoring and quality assurance are indispensable in maintaining safe water
standards. Parameters such as pH, turbidity, microbial presence, and chemical
composition must be consistently measured. Innovations in machine learning and
AI now allow predictive modelling and anomaly detection, enabling proactive
interventions before issues escalate. For instance, AI systems can anticipate
equipment failures or microbial surges, allowing timely maintenance or
recalibration of treatment systems (Wang, 2024). This shift from periodic
sampling to continuous monitoring ensures compliance with global standards and
reduces risks associated with delayed detection.
1.4 Challenges in Water Treatment
Despite technological advancements, water treatment systems face significant hurdles. Ageing infrastructure, underfunding, and rising levels of complex pollutants strain existing systems. Many low-income regions still lack basic treatment facilities, let alone advanced systems. Furthermore, balancing operational costs with environmental sustainability remains a persistent concern. Energy-intensive processes such as ozonation and membrane filtration, though effective, may not be feasible for wide-scale deployment without strategic investment and innovation (Basri et al., 2020).
Challenges
in Water Treatment
Despite
technological advancements, water treatment systems face significant hurdles
worldwide. Ageing infrastructure, underfunding, and rising levels of complex
pollutants continue to strain existing systems. According to the World Bank
(2023), global investment needs for water infrastructure are estimated at $6.7
trillion by 2030 and could reach $22.6 trillion by 2050 to meet the demands of
growing populations and climate change. The OECD (2022) similarly highlights a
persistent annual investment gap of $114 billion for water supply and
sanitation globally ([OECD, 2022]
Many
low-income regions still lack basic treatment facilities, let alone advanced
systems. However, water crises are not limited to developing countries. For
example, in Jackson, Mississippi (USA), a high-income country, ageing water
infrastructure and underinvestment led to catastrophic system failures in 2022,
leaving thousands without safe drinking water for weeks. Similarly, in the
United Kingdom, the city of London has faced repeated issues with water
shortages and leakage, with over 600 million litres lost daily due to old
pipes, prompting urgent calls for infrastructure upgrades ([BBC, 2023]
Furthermore,
balancing operational costs with environmental sustainability remains a
persistent concern. Energy-intensive processes such as ozonation and membrane
filtration, though effective, may not be feasible for wide-scale deployment
without strategic investment and innovation (Basri et al., 2020).
Water treatment challenges are universal, affecting both low- and high-income countries. Massive investment is needed globally to upgrade and maintain water infrastructure, close funding gaps, and ensure resilient, sustainable water systems.
1.5 Future Innovations in Water Treatment
Looking ahead,
several promising innovations offer pathways to more sustainable and effective
water treatment. Biofiltration using natural materials and microbes present
low-energy, cost-effective alternatives. Smart membranes, embedded with
responsive materials or graphene-based composites, promise higher selectivity
and fouling resistance. Additionally, integration with solar-powered systems
and decentralized, modular units enhances the resilience and adaptability of
treatment solutions. As these technologies mature, their combination with
digital tools and ecological design principles could redefine water treatment
for future generations (Deyab et al., 2015; Nguyễn et al., 2021).
Chapter 2: Emerging Threats and Paradigm Shifts
2.1
The Rise of Emerging Contaminants
Water
treatment systems today must contend with a growing class of pollutants known
as emerging contaminants. These include pharmaceutical residues, microplastics,
endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).
Unlike conventional pollutants, these substances often exist in trace
quantities, making them difficult to detect and remove using standard methods.
For example, PFAS compounds are highly persistent and resist degradation,
earning them the moniker "forever chemicals" (Gekenidis et al.,
2018). Their presence in drinking water has been linked to reproductive harm,
developmental delays, and increased cancer risk (Kachalla et al., 2022).
Similarly, microplastics can adsorb and transport toxic chemicals, acting as
vectors of pollution across aquatic ecosystems (Ghazal et al., 2024). These
threats challenge the efficacy of conventional water treatment processes and
necessitate more sophisticated, adaptive technologies.
2.2
From Linear Treatment to Circular Water Thinking
Traditional
water treatment follows a linear model: extract, treat, distribute, and
discard. However, this model fails to account for long-term sustainability and
resource limitations. The shift to a circular water economy envisions water as
a reusable resource within a closed-loop system. Circular practices include the
reuse of greywater for non-potable purposes, recovery of nutrients and energy
from wastewater, and stormwater harvesting. Technological innovations such as
zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) systems and membrane bioreactors are instrumental
in this transition. Furthermore, smart water grids integrated with real-time
monitoring allow dynamic management of supply and demand, improving resilience
and reducing waste (Singh et al., 2023).
2.3 Reimagining Water Safety Through Predictive Intelligence
A
predictive, AI-powered framework redefines how water safety is achieved.
Instead of reacting to contamination, smart sensors embedded in water systems
continuously monitor quality and environmental conditions. These sensors
transmit data to AI algorithms capable of recognizing anomalies and predicting
potential failures. In turn, water managers can act preemptively, adjusting
chemical dosages or rerouting flow to protect public health. This
transformation from static infrastructure to intelligent systems represents a
paradigm shift—one that aligns with the principles of Industry 4.0 and the
Internet of Things (IoT) (Romaniak et al., 2020).
2.4
Nature-Based, Low-Energy Solutions
Modern
water challenges are not just technical but ecological. Nature-based solutions
such as constructed wetlands, riparian buffers, and biochar filtration offer
low-energy, regenerative pathways for water purification. These systems mimic
natural processes, enabling water to percolate through biologically active
media that remove contaminants. Mycoremediation and phytoremediation techniques
further expand this toolkit by using fungi and plants to metabolize pollutants.
These approaches not only provide clean water but restore ecosystems and
enhance biodiversity. When paired with decentralized treatment, nature-based
solutions are particularly effective in rural and peri-urban areas where
centralized infrastructure is lacking (Thatcher et al., 2022).
2.5
Equity and Access: Rethinking Governance and Inclusion
Water
safety is not solely a technological issue—it is also deeply political and
social. Billions globally lack access to safe drinking water, not due to an
absence of treatment methods but because of infrastructural inequities and
governance failures. Urban-rural disparities, underfunded utilities, and
privatization often exacerbate access issues. To bridge this divide, future
water systems must prioritize decentralized, community-based models that
empower local stakeholders. Policy reforms must include co-governance
strategies, transparent funding mechanisms, and educational initiatives that
promote water literacy. Safe water must be reframed not as a service but as a
right—equally accessible regardless of geography or income level (UNICEF &
WHO, 2019).
Chapter 3: Governance, Inequity, and Human Systems
3.1
Global Standards vs. Local Realities
The
World Health Organization (WHO) provides comprehensive guidelines for drinking
water quality, covering microbial, chemical, and radiological parameters. These
standards serve as the benchmark for governments and water utilities worldwide.
However, adherence remains inconsistent, especially in low-income and rural
regions where financial, infrastructural, and political barriers prevent the
implementation of safe water systems (Mahmud et al., 2019). Field studies in
refugee camps, such as those in Bangladesh, reveal pervasive microbial
contamination in drinking water due to inadequate treatment and monitoring,
underscoring the urgent need to bridge this global-local divide (Matsumoto et
al., 2019).
The
World Health Organization (WHO) provides comprehensive guidelines for drinking
water quality, addressing microbial, chemical, and radiological parameters.
These standards are intended to serve as global benchmarks for governments and
water utilities, ensuring the safety and health of populations worldwide.
However, adherence to these standards is often inconsistent, particularly in
low-income, rural, and conflict-affected regions, where financial,
infrastructural, and political barriers obstruct implementation (Mahmud et al.,
2019).
Conflict-Zone Challenges: Gaza and Sudan
Gaza In conflict zones like Gaza, water
governance faces extreme challenges:
·
Over
97% of Gaza's water supply is unfit for human consumption, mainly due to
contamination by seawater intrusion and sewage, as well as over-extraction of
the coastal aquifer ([UNICEF,
2023](https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/gaza-water-crisis)).
·
Electricity
shortages and damaged infrastructure (from recurrent conflict) severely limit
the operation of water treatment and desalination plants.
·
According
to the WHO, outbreaks of waterborne diseases are common in Gaza, with children
especially vulnerable to diarrhoea and other illnesses.
·
Humanitarian
agencies have reported that access to safe water can drop to as little as 3 litres
per person per day during escalations, far below the WHO minimum standard of 15
litres/day for basic needs.
Sudan Similarly, in Sudan:
·
Ongoing
conflict and displacement have left millions without reliable access to safe
drinking water. The destruction of infrastructure and insecurity impede both
repair and development efforts.
·
In
Darfur, and more recently in conflict-affected urban areas, water sources are
frequently contaminated due to the breakdown of sanitation services and the use
of unprotected wells \
·
In
2023, cholera outbreaks were reported in several regions, directly linked to
poor water quality and lack of adequate water treatment.
·
Humanitarian
organizations face restricted access and funding shortages, further limiting
their ability to ensure water quality monitoring and emergency interventions.
Broader Implications
These
cases from Gaza and Sudan underscore the gap between global standards and local
realities, especially in conflict zones. While the WHO guidelines set a clear
benchmark, political instability, damaged infrastructure, and resource scarcity
make compliance nearly impossible. This results in widespread microbial and
chemical contamination, with severe public health consequences.
Field
studies in refugee camps—such as those in Bangladesh—similarly reveal pervasive
microbial contamination due to inadequate treatment and monitoring (Matsumoto
et al., 2019). The situations in Gaza and Sudan highlight the urgent need for
targeted international support, innovative governance, and resilient
infrastructure to bridge the global-local divide in water safety.
The
existence of robust global standards for real-world implementation is hampered
by local realities, especially in conflict zones. The examples of Gaza and
Sudan provide concrete evidence of how war, displacement, and under-resourced
governance can lead to catastrophic failures in water safety, far below
international benchmarks. This highlights the critical need for
context-sensitive solutions and sustained international engagement.
3.2
Policy, Equity, and Human Capital Perspectives Water
governance
is deeply intertwined with equity. Urban residents often enjoy piped water
treated in centralized facilities, while rural populations depend on informal,
often unsafe sources. Policy frameworks frequently neglect these marginalized
groups. Furthermore, the "invisible labour" behind water
safety—engineers, technicians, and community workers—remains under-recognized
and under-resourced. Empowering this workforce with training, equipment, and
fair wages is essential to maintaining operational quality and expanding
access. Strategic policy reform must include investment in human capital,
decentralization of service models, and enforcement mechanisms that prioritize
health equity (Conroy-Ben & Crowder, 2020).
3.3
Systemic Gaps in Enforcement and Oversight
Even
where policies exist, weak enforcement mechanisms undermine their
effectiveness. Many developing countries suffer from fragmented institutions,
poor inter-agency coordination, and lack of real-time water quality monitoring.
Corruption and political neglect exacerbate the problem. Regulatory failure in
places like Flint, Michigan, or Jakarta, Indonesia, illustrates that water
safety cannot be guaranteed by legislation alone—it must be actively monitored,
enforced, and upheld through participatory governance (Reuben et al., 2022).
3.4
Inclusive Governance and Community Participation
Water
governance structures have historically been top-down, excluding communities
from decision-making processes. However, inclusive models—where users,
municipalities, and civil society organizations co-manage water systems—are
proving more sustainable and equitable. Participatory budgeting, local water
councils, and citizen science initiatives enhance transparency, improve
compliance, and build public trust. These models recognize communities not as
passive recipients but as active stewards of water resources (IWA, 2022).
3.5
Rethinking Water Justice
The
notion of water justice encompasses access, affordability, safety, and the
equitable distribution of risks and benefits. It demands that policies account
for social determinants such as gender, class, ethnicity, and geography. For
example, women and girls bear disproportionate burdens in water collection and
management in many societies. A rights-based approach to water reframes it as
an essential service that must be universally accessible and democratically
governed, with special protections for vulnerable populations (UNDP, 2021).
Chapter 4: Case Studies – Failures and Frontiers
4.1
The Flint Crisis and Systemic Neglect
The
Flint water crisis is one of the most prominent examples of systemic failure in
water governance. In 2014, the city of Flint, Michigan, switched its water
source from the Detroit system to the Flint River as a cost-saving measure. Due
to the lack of corrosion control, lead leached from ageing pipes into the
drinking water supply, exposing tens of thousands of residents to hazardous
levels of contamination (Reuben et al., 2022). The failure to respond swiftly
to public concerns, compounded by institutional denial, resulted in a public
health disaster. This crisis highlighted the consequences of austerity-driven
decisions, weak regulatory enforcement, and the lack of public engagement in
water governance.
4.2
Singapore's NEWater and Urban Innovation
In
contrast to Flint, Singapore's NEWater initiative showcases a success story in
water reuse and urban water resilience. Faced with limited natural freshwater
resources, Singapore invested in high-tech solutions such as microfiltration,
reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet disinfection to treat and recycle wastewater
into potable water (Roy et al., 2024). The public's initial scepticism was
addressed through an intensive education campaign emphasizing safety,
transparency, and sustainability. Today, NEWater contributes significantly to
the city-state's water supply and demonstrates how centralized planning, public
trust, and investment in innovation can overcome water scarcity.
4.3
Reclaiming Nature as Infrastructure
Modern
water systems have long prioritized engineered infrastructure—pipes, pumps, and
treatment plants—while undervaluing nature's role in hydrological regulation. However,
ecosystems such as forests, wetlands, and upstream catchments serve as natural
filters, regulating water flow and quality. In Colombia, the Water Fund model
compensates upstream communities for protecting forests that serve as key
watersheds. Similarly, New York City's investment in protecting the Catskill
watershed proved more cost-effective than constructing a new filtration plant
(McDonald & Shemie, 2014). These examples illustrate that restoring and
preserving nature can serve as resilient and cost-efficient infrastructure.
4.4
Global Gaps and Equity Perspectives
Despite
successful cases, inequities persist globally. In sub-Saharan Africa, over 400
million people still lack access to basic drinking water services (UNICEF &
WHO, 2019). Informal settlements in cities like Nairobi and Mumbai suffer from
contaminated supply lines and unreliable delivery. Disparities are also evident
in water pricing and service quality, where poorer households often pay more
for less. These inequities underscore the need for redistributive policies,
decentralized systems, and stronger accountability mechanisms to ensure water
access is equitable and inclusive.
Despite
notable progress in some regions, deep inequities in water access persist
globally. In sub-Saharan Africa, more than 400 million people still lack access
to basic drinking water services (UNICEF & WHO, 2019). Urban informal
settlements—such as those in Nairobi and Mumbai—are particularly affected,
experiencing contaminated supply lines, unreliable delivery, and frequent
service interruptions. These challenges are compounded by disparities in water
pricing and service quality, where the poorest often pay the most for the least
reliable water.
Urban-Rural Disparities: Data from JMP
2022–2024
Recent
data from the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) highlights
significant urban-rural disparities in both water pricing and service quality:
-
Service Quality:
·
As
of 2022, 86% of urban residents globally had access to safely managed drinking
water, compared to just 60% of rural residents.
·
In
sub-Saharan Africa, only 29% of rural populations had access to safely managed
water, versus 56% in urban areas.
·
Rural
areas are more likely to rely on unprotected wells, surface water, or distant
sources, increasing the risk of contamination and waterborne diseases.
-
Water Pricing:
·
The
JMP and affiliated studies report that urban poor households in informal
settlements often pay 5–10 times more per litre for water from vendors than
wealthier urban residents connected to municipal systems.
·
In
rural areas, while water may be "free" at the point of collection,
the time and physical burden (especially for women and children) is
substantial, and households may still pay high fees for water delivered by
trucks during dry periods.
-
Inequities in Service Delivery:
·
Intermittent
supply and poor water quality are more frequently reported in rural and
peri-urban areas.
·
In
some countries, poorer households spend a much larger share of their income on
water than wealthier households, further entrenching poverty and limiting
opportunities for health and education.
Implications and Recommendations
These
persistent gaps underscore the need for:
·
Redistributive
policies that subsidize water for the poorest and promote cross-subsidization
between wealthier and poorer consumers.
·
Decentralized
systems (e.g., community-managed water points, small-scale treatment) that can
adapt to local contexts and improve reliability.
·
Stronger
accountability and regulatory mechanisms to ensure service providers deliver
safe, affordable water equitably.
Equitable
access to water is not only a matter of infrastructure but also of justice and
governance. Addressing these disparities requires targeted investment,
inclusive policy frameworks, and community engagement to ensure that no one is
left behind.
The
latest global monitoring data shows that urban-rural disparities in water
access, pricing, and quality remain stark, especially for the poorest and most
marginalized. Integrating recent JMP findings highlights that inequality is not
just about infrastructure gaps but also about affordability and reliability,
making a strong case for policies that prioritize the most vulnerable
populations.
Chapter 5: Future-Ready Technologies and Approaches
5.1
AI and Smart Monitoring
Artificial
Intelligence (AI) is reshaping water treatment by offering predictive,
data-driven tools that enhance system responsiveness. Through integration with
Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, AI enables real-time water quality
monitoring, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance. For instance,
sensors can track turbidity, chlorine levels, and microbial indicators, while
machine learning algorithms identify trends and forecast potential
contamination events. Smart water networks are also capable of automatically
adjusting treatment processes based on environmental conditions, thus reducing
human error and increasing operational efficiency (Zhong et al., 2022).
|
Country/ Region |
Application Area |
AI Functionality |
Recent Impact |
|
India |
Urban flood warning, water quality |
Predictive flood modelling, real-time alerts |
Improved evacuation, reduced losses |
|
California, USA |
Flood risk irrigation |
Forecasting, smart allocation, anomaly detection |
Proactive flood response, efficient water use |
|
Netherlands |
Flood defence operations |
Automated dike floodgate management |
Enhanced infrastructure reliability |
|
Bangladesh |
Flood forecasting |
Early warning via mobile, predictive analytics |
Millions receive timely alerts |
|
Singapore |
Urban drainage reservoirs |
Flash flood prediction, water quality monitoring |
Rapid response to water quality/flood events |
5.2
Next-Generation Membranes and Circular Economy Design
Emerging
membrane technologies are revolutionizing filtration processes. Graphene oxide
membranes, known for their high permeability and selectivity, allow for
efficient removal of nano-sized pollutants, including pharmaceuticals and
endocrine disruptors (Ilić et al., 2019). Hybrid membranes that combine
synthetic materials with bioactive compounds offer additional benefits such as
self-cleaning properties and enhanced resistance to fouling. Moreover,
integrating membrane technologies into circular water systems—where treated
wastewater is reused in agriculture, industry, or even potable contexts—aligns
with global goals for zero-liquid discharge and sustainable water reuse (Assad
et al., 2024).
5.3
Decentralized, Modular, and Community-Based Solutions
Decentralized
treatment units offer scalable, context-specific solutions for communities
lacking access to centralized infrastructure. These systems, which may range
from mobile container-based plants to solar-powered filtration kiosks, empower
local stakeholders to manage their water resources. Examples include off-grid
treatment systems in Vietnam and community-scale membrane units in sub-Saharan
Africa. Such models not only increase resilience to natural disasters and
infrastructure failures but also promote local ownership, job creation, and
faster response to emergencies (Seitzhanova et al., 2024).
5.4
Public Education, Engagement, and Empowerment T
technical
innovation alone is insufficient if the public remains unaware or sceptical.
Water literacy initiatives, such as school programs, citizen science projects,
and transparent reporting platforms, help cultivate a more informed and engaged
population. For instance, youth-led monitoring programs have successfully
influenced water policy by providing credible, community-based data. Building
public trust also involves democratizing access to water quality information
and encouraging civic participation in decision-making processes (Jutrović et
al., 2023).
5.5
Closing Reflections: Democratizing Innovation and Resilience
The
future of water safety depends not only on advancing technology but also on
restructuring power dynamics. Equitable access to innovation means supporting
open-source designs, funding underserved regions, and ensuring women and
marginalized groups have a voice in water governance. The shift toward
democratized water systems requires cross-sector collaboration between
engineers, policymakers, community leaders, and citizens—to co-create locally
appropriate solutions that are ecologically sound and socially just. In this
way, safe water transitions from being a commodity to a shared societal
responsibility.
Conclusion
Reframing Water Safety as a Justice Imperative
The
journey from raw water to safe, accessible drinking water is not just a
technical process; it reflects our societal values. Traditional water treatment
methods have laid a vital foundation for public health protection. However, as
we face increasing complexities in pollutants, escalating climate risks, and
entrenched governance disparities, our approach must evolve. Ensuring access to
safe water in the 21st century calls for principles of inclusivity,
transparency, adaptability, and ecological stewardship.
Innovations
such as AI-based monitoring systems, next-generation membranes, and
decentralized treatment units signify critical technological advancements in
the water sector. However, the success of these innovations relies heavily on
equitable implementation and public empowerment. Building public trust,
education, and engagement in modern water strategies is imperative for
long-term success. Moreover, the emphasis on nature-based systems and circular
design principles serves as a reminder that water safety should be integrated
into broader sustainability frameworks, promoting a mindset where water is not
merely extracted and treated but regenerated and stewarded responsibly.
The
path forward requires democratizing water innovation—investing in local
capabilities, amplifying marginalized voices, and redefining governance
structures to address the needs of all communities. Only through a holistic,
justice-centred lens can we ensure that water safety evolves beyond an
exclusive privilege into a universally guaranteed right. The convergence of
technological advances, policy reform, and community solidarity will ultimately
determine whether the promise of safe water becomes a reachable reality for all
or if it remains an elusive ideal.
The
globally relevant conclusion that synthesizes your points integrates current
global perspectives and ends with a compelling call to action aligned with the
UN 2030 SDG goals, climate resilience, and the One Health approach:
Towards
a Just and Resilient Water Future
Technological
innovation is advancing rapidly: AI-driven monitoring, next-generation
filtration membranes, and decentralized treatment units are redefining what is
possible in water safety and management. However, these breakthroughs will only
fulfil their promise if they are implemented equitably, with a focus on
empowering communities, especially those historically marginalized or
underserved. Building public trust, fostering education, and ensuring
meaningful participation must be at the heart of all modern water strategies.
At
the same time, nature-based solutions and circular water systems remind us that
proper water security is inseparable from ecological stewardship. Water must
not be seen as a resource to be extracted and discarded but as a vital element
to be regenerated, shared, and protected within the broader context of
planetary health.
The
Path Forward
To
realize universal access to safe water, we must democratize water
innovation—investing in local expertise, amplifying the voices of the
vulnerable, and reforming governance structures to be more inclusive and
responsive. This holistic, justice-centred approach ensures that water safety
becomes a guaranteed right for all, not a privilege for the few.
A Call to Action
As
we approach 2030, the world stands at a critical juncture. Achieving the UN
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—especially SDG 6 (Clean Water and
Sanitation)—requires urgent, coordinated action that bridges technology,
policy, and community solidarity. We must:
- Integrate water safety into climate
resilience strategies, recognizing that water security underpins food
production, disaster risk reduction, and adaptation to extreme weather.
- Adopt the One Health framework,
acknowledging the deep interconnections between human health, animal
health, and ecosystem well-being and ensuring that water management
supports all three.
- Champion inclusive, transparent
decision-making so that all communities have a voice in shaping their
water futures.
Let
us seize this moment to redefine water stewardship for a changing
world—investing in solutions that are innovative, inclusive, and sustainable.
Only through collective commitment and global solidarity can we ensure that the
promise of safe water becomes a reality for every person, everywhere,
safeguarding both people and the planet for generations to come.
Together,
let us make safe water a universal right—resilient, just, and central to a
healthy future for all.
References:
Assad, F., Raza, M., & Wahid, A. (2024).
Advancements in hybrid membrane technologies for sustainable water
purification. Membrane Science Today, 14(2), 120–138.
Cardoso, V. L., Pereira, L. S., & de Lima,
L. A. (2021). Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: Fundamentals
and design. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(12), 7558–7574.
Conroy-Ben, O., & Crowder, T. (2020).
Hidden labour and water safety: Recognizing the workforce behind potable water.
Journal of Environmental Health, 83(4), 24–30.
Deyab, M. A., El-Sayed, M., & Hegazy, M.
(2015). Sustainable coagulants and disinfection technologies in water
treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 56(4), 982–993.
Diharjo, K., Yuniati, D., & Rachman, R.
(2022). Comparative performance of sedimentation and filtration processes in
small-scale water treatment plants. Water Practice & Technology, 17(3),
877–886.
Gekenidis, M.-T., Schillinger, M., &
Drissner, D. (2018). Persistence of emerging contaminants in treated water. Journal
of Water and Health, 16(6), 981–993.
Ghazal, M. S., Ali, S. H., & Said, M. A.
(2024). Environmental pathways and health risks of microplastics in drinking
water. Environmental Pollution, 322, 121242.
Ilić, M., Milovanović, D. D., & Grujić, S.
(2019). Graphene-based membranes for water purification: A review. Journal
of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(3), 103056.
International Water Association (IWA). (2022).
Principles for Water-Wise Cities: Empowering Inclusive Water Governance.
IWA Publishing.
Jutrović, I., Vuković, M., & Popović, N.
(2023). Civic engagement and youth activism in water quality monitoring:
Insights from the Balkans. Water Policy, 25(1), 112–125.
Kachalla, M. G., Ibrahim, Y. S., & Hassan,
M. M. (2022). Human health risk of PFAS in water supplies: A systematic review.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15),
9345.
Mahmud, Z. H., Islam, M. S., & Khan, M. N.
(2019). Microbial contamination of drinking water and diarrheal diseases in
Bangladesh: A systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(4),
47001.
Makhoul, N., Salameh, M., & Abou Najm, M.
(2023). Hybrid membrane applications in decentralized water treatment systems. Journal
of Water Process Engineering, 54, 102764.
Matsumoto, M., Nakamura, H., & Sawano, T.
(2019). Evaluation of drinking water quality in Rohingya refugee camps. Water
Supply, 19(7), 2031–2038.
McDonald, R. I., & Shemie, D. (2014). Urban
water blueprint: Mapping conservation solutions to the global water challenge.
The Nature Conservancy.
Nguyễn, H. T., Doan, T. P., & Le, H. T.
(2021). Bio-inspired water purification: Applications of natural and synthetic
membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 622, 119054.
Razali, M., Ali, E., & Othman, F. (2023).
An overview of water purification technologies: Past, present and future. Water
Research, 218, 118550.
Reuben, A., Korfmacher, K. S., & Fry, L.
M. (2022). The Flint water crisis, environmental justice, and public trust. Environmental
Science & Policy, 128, 84–93.
Romaniak, A., Wróbel, A., & Dymaczewski,
Z. (2020). Machine learning applications in water system predictive
maintenance. Water Science and Technology, 82(10), 2159–2172.
Roy, S., Singh, A., & Lim, T. (2024).
Technological transitions in urban water reuse: The case of Singapore's
NEWater. Journal of Urban Water Sustainability, 12(1), 45–59.
Seitzhanova, Y., Tashkeyeva, B., &
Sarsembayeva, N. (2024). Decentralized water treatment for disaster-prone
regions: Case studies and design considerations. International Journal of
Water Resources Development, 40(1), 55–73.
Singh, M., Kaushik, A., & Tyagi, V.
(2023). Circular water economy: Transformative solutions for a sustainable
future. Sustainable Cities and Society, 92, 104370.
Thatcher, D., Ramos, M., & Vázquez, B.
(2022). Constructed wetlands for water reuse and habitat restoration. Ecological
Engineering, 178, 106598.
UNICEF & WHO. (2019). Progress on
household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: Special focus on
inequalities. World Health Organization.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
(2021). Human Development Report 2021/2022: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives.
UNDP.
Wang, T. (2024). AI-driven water quality
forecasting models for urban utilities: A case study. Journal of
Environmental Informatics, 39(1), 55–66.
Zhong, Z., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2022).
Smart water quality monitoring systems using AI and IoT technologies. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 380, 134845.
