Author: AM Tris Hardyanto
In Flint, Michigan, the water flowed brown and toxic, but
what truly poisoned the community was not just lead—it was silence, dismissal,
and systemic neglect. A child’s sip became a symbol of a nation’s failure. The
Flint Water Crisis is not an isolated mistake; it is a mirror of America’s
environmental racism and governance breakdown. This story demands justice, not
just for Flint, but for every forgotten voice across the country.
1
Drinking Lead, Breathing Injustice
1.1
Flint as a Mirror: Systemic Neglect and
Racialized Harm
A child in Flint, Michigan, fills a glass with water and
unknowingly drinks poison. What poured from the taps was not just contaminated
water—it was a manifestation of environmental racism, decades of policy
neglect, and regulatory failure. The Flint Water Crisis is not an isolated
event; it is a reflection of a broken system where Black and poor communities
are treated as disposable. This article traces the timeline of the crisis,
examines the structural failures that enabled it, and proposes a path toward
water justice in America.
The Flint Water Crisis serves as a poignant embodiment of
environmental racism, systemic neglect, and governmental failures that
negatively impact public health. The exposure of Flint's predominantly African
American population to lead-contaminated water resulted from a combination of
political neglect and regulatory failures that have historically marginalized
communities of colour. This crisis was not merely an isolated incident but a
manifestation of structural inequalities, where economic imperatives overshadow
health equity and community welfare (Pulido, 2016Robinson et al., 2018;
Understanding Flint requires an analysis of the racialized structures that
contribute to such crises, examining how policies are crafted and executed in a
manner that tends to neglect or actively harm disenfranchised populations
(Robinson et al., 2018; Kozak‐Muiznieks et al., 2014).
1.2
Lead in the Pipes, Injustice in the System
At the heart of the Flint Water Crisis was the decision made
in April 2014 to switch the city's water source from Lake Huron—a stable and
safe source provided by the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department—to the more
corrosive Flint River without implementing the necessary corrosion control
measures (Pieper et al., 2017Ruckart et al., 2019); This shift destabilized
lead-bearing pipes in residential areas, leading to elevated lead levels in
drinking water and subsequent health crises among children and vulnerable
populations. Epidemiological studies indicated a spike in blood lead levels
among Flint's children coinciding with the switch, resulting in governmental
recognition of the situation as a public health emergency (Ruckart et al.,
2019; Pieper et al., 2018). Here, the intersection of social injustices and
public health failures becomes evident, highlighting how the systemic neglect
of racialized communities culminates in public health crises.
The narrative surrounding the Flint Water Crisis illuminates
themes of environmental injustice rooted in systemic racism. Racial processes
are implicated in the production of ecological risks, suggesting that the
dangers associated with environmental hazards are not equitably distributed
across different demographic groups (Pulido, 2016; Robinson et al., 2018).
Communities of colour, like those in Flint, face disproportionate exposure to
hazardous environmental conditions, a reality that reflects entrenched neglect
and discrimination in ecological governance (Robinson et al., 2018; Salian,
2024). By situating the Flint crisis within the framework of environmental
racism, it is apparent that governance structures have historically
disenfranchised communities of colour, rendering them more vulnerable to
environmental harm (Salian, 2024; Bledsoe, 2019).
1.3
Structural Violence and the Failure of
Accountability
In broader contexts, the complacency exhibited by
governmental entities toward Flint can be interpreted as a systemic failure to
uphold accountability. Scholars have documented how marginalized communities
often lack the social and political capital to advocate effectively for their
rights, exacerbating their exposure to environmental threats (Robinson et al.,
2018; Dietz et al., 2018). The case of Flint illustrates how institutional racism, rooted in bureaucratic, economic, and political frameworks, contributes to and perpetuates these inequalities (Hassen et al., 2021; Campbell et al., 2016). When authorities fail to acknowledge these disparities in water governance,
they perpetuate a cycle of neglect with long-term ramifications for community
health and well-being (Chanin, 2018; rodríguez-labajos & Alier, 2015).
The Flint Water Crisis reveals how the political economy can
undermine efforts towards environmental justice. The consequences of
cost-cutting measures aimed at ostensibly improving economic conditions
demonstrate how systemic racism and environmental injustices are inextricably
linked (Pulido et al., 202019; McCreary Milligan, 2018). Economic mechanisms
that prioritize profit over public health often have their most devastating
effects on marginalized communities, exacerbating existing disparities
(Hassaniyan, 2024; Bullard, 2015). These findings highlight the need for
comprehensive reforms in water governance structures that prioritize equity,
accountability, and justice (Prather et al., 2016; Yu & Linden, 2021).
1.4
Toward Water Justice: Equity, Recognition, and
Reform
Moreover, Flint's experience compels us to confront the
relationship between racial injustice and environmental degradation. The term
"environmental racism," coined by Dr Benjamin Chavis, underscores how
policies disproportionately affect communities of colour, which continue to
suffer from neglect in environmental planning and policy (Salian, 2024;
Tubert, 2021). The case of Flint powerfully illustrates this dynamic, as
decisions made in the name of economic expediency disregarded the health and
safety of its predominantly Black and poor residents, nurturing systemic
disenfranchisement and public health crises arising from environmental hazards
(Robinson et al., 22018; Campbell et al., 2016;
In synthesizing these different strands of injustice, it is
essential to recognize that the implications of the Flint Water Crisis extend
beyond Michigan; they reflect a nationwide pattern of disproportionate
environmental burdens faced by communities of colour across the United States
(Praphan & Khamkhong, 2024Neu et al., 2020); Each instance of ecological
contamination or public health failure raises questions about systemic
governance processes that fail to regard the community as deserving of
consideration and protection (McCreary & Milligan, 2018; Came et al., 2018).
Going forward, addressing the interconnected issues raised
by the Flint Water Crisis requires an integrated approach that aligns public
health and environmental governance with justice-oriented frameworks. The
proposed reformative actions must centre on equity, ensuring all
communities, mainly those historically marginalized, are represented in
policy and decision-making processes (Yu & Linden, 2021; Rodríguez‐Labajos
& Alier, 2015). Initiatives to establish more democracy in environmental
governance could help dismantle institutionalized racism and systemic
inequalities evident in the Flint crisis (Neu et al., 2020; Yu & Linden,
2021).
Indeed, the road to recovery for Flint—and communities like
it—entails engaging in a broader reckoning with environmental justice that
recognizes the rights of all individuals to live free from contamination and
neglect. Proposals for reform must transcend temporary fixes and engage with
the structural changes necessary to uproot the systemic failures that allowed
the crisis to unfold (Praphan & Khamkhong, 2024; Salian, 2024).
Consequently, achieving genuine environmental justice involves holding those
perpetuating injustices accountable while fostering resilient, community-led
initiatives that prioritize health equity (Campbell et al., 2016; Chanin,
2018).
The Flint crisis is not merely a chapter in Michigan's
history; it embodies the continuing struggle against environmental racism and
serves as a call for comprehensive action across the nation. By facilitating
dialogues on race, environmental justice, and systemic reform, it is possible
to forge pathways toward meaningful changes that prioritize the needs and
voices of those most affected by ecological degradation and racial oppression.
Such efforts can catalyze a new paradigm—grounded in justice, equity, and
recognition—that seeks to heal past fractures while striving for a more
inclusive and just future.
In conclusion, the Flint Water Crisis powerfully illustrates
the deep intertwining of environmental conditions, public health, and social
justice. Analyzing the crisis through the lens of ecological racism reveals
the systemic and historical roots of the injustices faced by marginalized
communities. By addressing these inequities directly, we can work toward a
future where access to safe and clean drinking water is recognized as a
fundamental right for all, emphasizing the importance of collective action,
community empowerment, and an unwavering commitment to social justice.
2
Contaminated from the Start
2.1
Introduction to the Crisis
The Flint Water Crisis exemplifies the dire consequences of
governmental neglect, particularly in a milieu where economic austerity
measures prioritize fiscal savings over public health and safety. Initiated in
April 2014, this calamity was rooted in the decision by state and local
officials to switch Flint's drinking water source from the well-regulated
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department to the corrosive Flint River without
employing essential corrosion control measures (Pauli, 2020). This switch, marketed
as a cost-saving strategy, starkly highlights how economic considerations can
overshadow the health of vulnerable populations, mainly when those populations
are predominantly Black and economically disadvantaged (Liévanos et al., 2021).
The immediate aftermath of this decision saw residents reporting disturbing
changes to their water, including foul taste, odour, discolouration, and the
onset of skin rashes—demonstrating an unsettling disregard for their concerns
and an alarming systemic failure in governance (Carey & Lichtenwalter,
2019).
2.2
Neglect and Disparities
The overarching theme of neglect prevalent in the Flint
Water Crisis reflects a broader pattern observed nationally, wherein
communities of colour, particularly those with lower socioeconomic status, face
higher risks of environmental hazards due to dilapidated infrastructure and
inadequate state investment. Racial disparities in public health outcomes,
particularly regarding lead exposure, have been documented across the United
States, with Flint serving as a significant focal point that underscores how socioeconomic
status and race intersect in the realm of environmental health (Liévanos et
al., 2021). As highlighted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
areas with ageing infrastructure and historic underinvestment are significantly
more likely to experience elevated risks of lead contamination,
disproportionately affecting Black and Brown neighbourhoods across the country
(Muhammad et al., 2018). This systematic neglect is driven by a political
economy that prioritizes profit and austerity measures over comprehensive
public health initiatives, paving the way for future crises unless substantial
policy reforms are instituted (Pulido, 2016).
2.3
Historical and Structural Abandonment
The industrial decline faced by Flint since the latter half
of the twentieth century reveals the structural abandonment of communities once
buoyed by the auto industry. As job losses mounted and white flight accelerated
during the 1980s, the tax base diminished sharply, catalyzing harsher austerity
measures and government disinvestment in social infrastructures (Pauli, 2020).
Consequently, Flint transitioned from a vibrant industrial centre into a
microcosm of decay, where the environmental hazards posed by contaminated
infrastructure became normalized—an alarming trend mirroring broader national
patterns in post-industrial America. The systemic abandonment was further
exacerbated by the state's Emergency Manager law, which stripped local
governance of significant powers and undermined community input in critical
decisions affecting public welfare (Ezell et al., 2021). Under such
institutional settings, residents suffered from the consequences of contaminated
water and the psychological toll of enduring a prolonged crisis without
adequate governmental support or accountability.
2.4
Environmental Racism and Systemic Injustices
The Flint Water Crisis serves as an archetype of broader
narratives of environmental racism, highlighting the intersectionality of race,
economics, and environmental policy. Ignored by state authorities and subject
to environmental toxins, residents of Flint have been vocal advocates for
recognition of the systemic injustices that underlie their crisis (Carey &
Lichtenwalter, 2019). Their narratives deconstruct media portrayals that often
marginalize local agencies, thereby revealing grassroots efforts aimed at
mitigating the impacts of racism and structural inequality (Robinson et al.,
2018). The public outcry and the establishment of citizen-led initiatives that
emerged in response to the contamination highlight the resilience of
communities facing severe adversity (Ezell et al., 2021). However, despite
these efforts, the lack of governmental acknowledgement of the racial and
economic dynamics at play has perpetuated an ongoing cycle of health inequities
exacerbated by deliberate governmental neglect (Henderson et al., 2023).
In analyzing the ramifications of the Flint Water Crisis, one quickly observes that the entrenched vulnerabilities of its residents, predating the contamination, were rooted in decades of systematic neglect and disenfranchisement. With over 40% of Flint's population living
below the poverty line, the crisis is not merely an environmental failure but a
stark representation of socioeconomic collapse exacerbated by structural
racism. Lead exposure has lasting implications on cognitive development and
health, particularly in children, effectively perpetuating cycles of poverty
and neglect for generations to come (Pauli, 2020). By failing to implement
modern infrastructure and appropriate safety protocols, government entities
reinforced existing disparities, illustrating the urgent need for systemic
reforms focused on equity and justice in urban governance and environmental
management (Perry et al., 2021).
Furthermore, the Flint Water Crisis illuminates the failures
of local and state governance structures that prioritize financial
considerations over human health and dignity. The oversight lapses, marked by
missed opportunities for intervention in the months leading up to the public
acknowledgement of contamination, signal a broader malaise in governmental
accountability, particularly toward marginalized communities (Nukpezah, 2017).
Critical race theory provides a framework that elucidates how systemic racism
intersects with environmental policy, shaping experiences of vulnerability and
neglect in communities of colour (Robinson et al., 2018). In such contexts,
structural inequities in resources and political influence engender
environments where health crises can fester, supported by policies that enable
inequitable treatment.
The experiences of Flint residents are not isolated
incidents but are somewhat emblematic of a national crisis where environmental
hazards disproportionately affect marginalized communities (Henderson et al.,
2023). The confluence of neoliberal policies that endorse austerity and
systemic racism has created a dangerous terrain where environmental injustices
become the rule rather than the exception. As evidenced by Flint's story, the
marginalization and disenfranchisement of low-income communities of colour will
continue to perpetuate health crises unless significant changes are implemented
to address these systemic inequities holistically (Battocchio et al., 2023).
Understanding the complexities of Flint's decline within the larger framework
of deindustrialization highlights the urgent necessity for states to prioritize
equitable environmental health policies that confront historical injustices
while fostering community resilience and empowerment (Ergene et al., 2024).
In conclusion, the Flint Water Crisis represents a
culmination of systemic neglect, environmental racism, and socioeconomic
disparities that continue to plague many communities across the United States.
Recognizing the enmeshment of politics and public health is key to addressing
the enduring legacies of these injustices that remain prevalent in a
post-crisis Flint. To chart a path forward, we must emphasize the need for
robust community engagement, accountability in governance, and a recommitment
to systemic reforms that explicitly prioritize equity for all communities, not
just those deemed politically or economically "worthy." Through
sustained advocacy and policy changes, there is hope that future crises in
environmental health could be mitigated, fostering a healthier, more just
society for all.
3
A Timeline of Crisis – From River Switch to
Public Betrayal
3.1
Engineering Negligence and Environmental Racism
The unfolding of the Flint Water Crisis marks a disturbing
trajectory from governmental negligence to a public health emergency, revealing
critical lessons about environmental justice and accountability. In April 2014,
officials in Flint, under the influence of a state-appointed Emergency Manager,
decided to switch the city's water source from the reliable Detroit Water and
Sewerage Department to the corrosive Flint River (Sadler & Highsmith,2016; Pieperr et al., 2018). This decision was compounded by a failure to
implement federally mandated corrosion control measures, effectively violating
regulations designed to protect public health (Pieper et al., 2018). As
residents reported smells, discolouration, and health concerns related to the
water quality, their complaints were systematically dismissed by both the
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) (Sadler & Highsmith, 2016; Chávez et al., 2017).
The intersection of fiscal austerity and regulatory negligence encapsulates the
anatomy of a crisis fueled by systemic inequities affecting low-income and
predominantly Black communities (Sneed et al., 2020; Campbell et al., 2016).
Building on this engineering disaster, the internal toll of
lead exposure quickly became apparent as several surveys indicated that
children in Flint began to show markedly elevated blood lead levels, with some
results exceeding the alarming threshold of 15 µg/dL (Sneed et al., 2020; Gómez et al., 2018). The irreversible effects of lead poisoning are
particularly treacherous for developing brains; impairments can lead to
cognitive delays, behavioural issues, and lifelong health complications, thus
exacting an immeasurable public health cost from Flint's vulnerable population
(Fortenberry et al., 2018; Hanna‐Attisha et al., 2020). The
enduring impact of this contamination on community health is far-reaching,
engendering lifelong consequences for children who were exposed during this
critical period (Gómez et al., 2018). The Flint case
exemplifies how systemic neglect and environmental racism can combine to
produce devastating health disparities, particularly for residents already
grappling with the socioeconomic stressors of poverty (Campbell et al., 2016;
Key et al., 2024).
3.2
Community Resistance, Legal Redress, and the
Power of Truth
A critical aspect in uncovering the truth of Flint's plight
revolved around the voices of whistleblowers, particularly Dr Mona
Hanna-Attisha, a paediatrician who revealed the alarming surge in lead levels
among Flint's children (Sneed et al., 2020; Key et al., 2024). Complemented by
confirmation from Virginia Tech scientist Marc Edwards, her advocacy challenged
powerful institutions by emphasizing the human cost of governmental negligence.
Media coverage, while initially lacking, eventually amplified these revelations,
creating a platform for discussions surrounding the systemic injustices that
plagued the community. Local journalists and activists played instrumental
roles in disseminating facts, thereby mobilizing public opinion and pushing for
accountability from both governmental and institutional actors (Sadler &
Highsmith, 2016; Campbell et al., 2016). This intersection of scientific
advocacy, media narratives, and community activism became pivotal in forcing
the governed to acknowledge and respond to the unfolding health disaster
(Sadler & Highsmith, 2016; Campbell et al., 2016).
3.3
Psychological Fallout and the Call for
Structural Change
Simultaneously, the psychological ramifications of the Flint
Water Crisis extended far beyond physical health concerns, impacting residents'
mental well-being. Studies indicated that feelings of anger, fear, and
uncertainty rose sharply within impacted households, often correlated with a
decreased sense of control and significant distress (Cuthbertson et al., 2016;
Brooks & Patel, 2021). Such mental health consequences reflect the
emotional toll taken by the crisis, hinting at long-lasting psychological scars
for those who endured the pervasive chaos introduced by lead exposure and
systemic betrayal (Cuthbertson et al., 2016; Brooks & Patel, 2021).
Communities facing distrust in governmental bodies, particularly when they fail
to uphold their responsibilities towards public welfare, often vacillate
between fear and outrage, compelling a call for fundamental shifts in the ways
health governance intersects with issues of race and policy.
The Flint Water Crisis serves as a wake-up call not only for
Michigan but for all states grappling with public health and environmental
equity. The government's systemic failure in Flint illustrates a critical
juncture where environmental, public health and racial issues coalesce to
repress marginalized communities (Cuthbertson et al., 2016; Campbell et al.,
2016). The collective resilience and proactive measures taken by Flint
residents underscore the potential for community agency even in the face of
such adversity, affirming the necessity of equitable oversight in environmental
health policies (Sneed et al., 2020; Carrera et al., 2019). As the tragedy of
Flint continues to inform broader discussions surrounding systemic injustice,
accountability, and health equity, effective change must encapsulate the voices
of those who were most affected, ensuring that policies evolve to rectify
historical injustices rather than replicate them.
In summary, the narrative surrounding the Flint Water Crisis encapsulates a systematic timeline of crises—from engineering oversight
to public betrayal. It reflects on the dire consequences of neglectful
governance, the devastating health impacts of lead exposure, the invaluable
role of community activism, and the pivotal whistleblowers who revealed the truth.
The legacy of Flint compels a national conversation on the intersections of
racism and environmental justice, underscoring the urgency with which we must
act to dismantle systemic inequities and forge pathways toward a more just and
equitable future.
4
Structural Racism in the System – Why It
Happened in Flint
4.1
Disenfranchised by Design: Emergency Management
and Lost Democracy
The Flint Water Crisis starkly highlights the intersection
of structural racism and systemic neglect within American governance, producing
significant environmental and health consequences for a predominantly Black
community. Under the Emergency Manager law enacted in Michigan, Flint's
predominantly Black population lost democratic agency and control, as emergency
managers—often appointed without local consent—prioritized financial metrics at
the expense of public health and safety Seamster (2018) (Hammer, 2017); This
policy tool disproportionately affected economically distressed cities with
majority Black residents and exemplifies how racial discrimination intersects
with governance practices to disenfranchise communities (Hammer, 2017);, (Lee
et al., 2016); By systematically ignoring local voices in decision-making
processes regarding water sources, officials reinforced existing inequities and
deprived the community of input that could have influenced safer alternatives
(Hammer, 2017);, (Lee et al., 2016;
4.2
Regulatory Capture and Institutional Failure
As governmental entities failed to protect Flint's
residents, structural racism manifested through regulatory capture. Analysis
reveals that the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the
EPA were aware of rising contamination levels but repeatedly delayed action in
response to the public health crisis (Hammer, 2017; Fasenfest, 2017). Instead
of acting in the public interest, these agencies prioritized maintaining
political reputations and diffuse bureaucratic accountability. This structural
failure underscores a broader trend where institutions designed to protect
vulnerable populations reinforce systemic biases that compromise equity and
justice (Hammer, 2017; Fasenfest, 2017). The hesitance to hold elected
officials accountable when evidence of contamination arose showcases how
intertwined interests can obstruct meaningful reform in environmental
governance (Fasenfest, 2017).
4.3
Repeated Patterns: From Flint to Jackson and
Beyond
Flint is not an isolated incident but is emblematic of
systemic injustices that continue to affect predominantly Black and low-income
communities across the United States. Historical parallels can be drawn to
water crises in Newark, New Jersey, and Jackson, Mississippi, where similar
failures have emerged in majority-Black neighbourhoods (Hammer, 2017; Lee et
al., 2016). Chronic water insecurity is also present in Indigenous communities,
such as the Navajo Nation, which similarly suffer from inadequacies in water
access and quality exacerbated by historical underinvestment and systemic
neglect (Lee et al., 2016). The structure of environmental racism is
systematic, as communities of colour face cumulative disadvantages based on
their marginalized status within governmental and regulatory frameworks (Lee et
al., 2016; Tomko et al., 2023). Such repeated patterns indicate that without
substantial intervention, these inequities will persist, perpetuating neglect
and deteriorating health outcomes across similar demographics (Tomko et al.,
2023).
4.4
Privatization, Accountability, and the Road to
Reform
The involvement of private consulting firms such as Veolia,
tasked with assessing Flint's water infrastructure, adds another layer of
complexity (Fasenfest, 2017). Positioned as experts, these private consultants
failed to adequately sound alarms regarding the impending crisis, citing
limited scopes of engagement as an excuse for inaction (Fasenfest, 2017). This
profit-driven logic associated with privatization demonstrates how the
prioritization of financial performance over public accountability can diminish
transparency and hinder effective responses to public health emergencies (Fasenfest,
2017; Nawang et al., 2024). The erosion of public trust in governmental and
privatized entities stemming from these failures emphasizes the crucial need to
reconsider governance structures related to environmental management and water
services (Fasenfest, 2017; Nawang et al., 2024).
Fostering equity in water governance necessitates critically
examining and challenging the structural racism embedded within regulatory
frameworks. The evident disparities witnessed in Flint—from the neglect of
local voices to the prioritization of financial imperatives—demand
comprehensive policy reform aimed at restoring public trust and ensuring robust
community participation in decision-making processes concerning environmental
health (Hammer, 2017);, (Lee et al., 2016); Effective governance must actively
dismantle the power dynamics that permit institutional racism to thrive,
requiring local governments to implement measures that guarantee inclusivity
and accountability for historically marginalized communities (Hammer, 2017;
Fasenfest, 2017).
Rethinking public health and environmental policies to
address the legacies of structural racism is paramount. This requires a renewed
commitment to investing in infrastructure and health initiatives within
communities disproportionately affected by environmental injustices (Lee et
al., 2016; Tomko et al., 2023). By empowering local voices and prioritizing
community-led policies, possible pathways toward equity can be forged,
effectively healing the fractures caused by systemic neglect (Lee et al., 2016;
Nawang et al., 2024). Importantly, rigorous oversight mechanisms will be
necessary to ensure that governmental and private entities remain accountable,
effectively addressing both current and future crises that threaten the health
and safety of vulnerable populations (Li, 2024; Tomko et al., 2023).
In conclusion, the Flint Water Crisis exposes the deeper
issues of systemic racism embedded in American governance and environmental
regulation. The stripping of democratic control, the failings of regulatory
bodies, the exclusionary impact of privatization, and the persistence of
ecological racism are interconnected issues that necessitate holistic
solutions to move toward a more just and equitable future. By centring the
experiences of affected communities and prioritizing policies that foster accountability,
we may rebuild trust in public institutions while confronting the
legacies of systemic injustices that have long defined American water
governance.
5
Policies for Equity – How to Prevent the Next
Flint
5.1
Equity Risk Assessments and Targeted Investments
To prevent future water crises like the one experienced in
Flint, a multifaceted approach centred on equity must be pursued rapidly,
addressing the systemic issues that permitted such failures to occur. The first
critical element within a framework of prevention involves the development of equity
risk assessments. These assessments should integrate considerations of
race, income, and geography to create equity risk maps Fawcett, 2019; Ataíde
& Borja, 2017). Effective mapping can help identify communities most
vulnerable to water quality issues before disasters strike, facilitating
proactive investments in infrastructure and targeted public health initiatives
that address systemic inequities. Such data-driven approaches can inform
policymakers, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently to communities at
risk, ultimately preventing situations that lead to heightened exposure to
contaminants (Buettner‐Schmidt & Lobo, 2011; Wei et al., 2020).
5.2
Community Empowerment and Legal Advocacy
Another vital aspect is the empowerment of community
watchdogs and legal power for local groups. Community-based organizations
(CBOs) should be granted the authority to monitor water quality, demand
transparency in data reporting, and trigger legal actions if necessary (Chen et
al., 2024; Crosson et al., 2024). Empowered community organizations serve as
critical early warning systems, capable of not only detecting potential
contamination but also mobilizing community responses to advocate for justice.
By institutionalizing avenues for local groups to engage in monitoring and
ensuring accountability, there is a greater chance of fostering a sense of
stewardship among residents for their water resources, alongside elevating
community voices within governance structures (Ramani et al., 2023; Crosson et
al., 2024).
Incorporating innovative technology can also enhance water
management by utilizing smart monitoring tools. The integration of
Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, mobile testing kits, and open-data platforms
can democratize access to water quality information (Crosson et al., 2024),
(Ramani et al., 2023; Such technologies enable real-time monitoring of water
conditions, allowing communities to become active participants in safeguarding
their health. Ensuring that this technology is accessible and user-friendly
further will enable individuals to hold public officials accountable, creating
transparency in a system where mistrust often prevails after crises like Flint
(Ramani et al., 2023); (Wei et al., 2020;
5.3
Integrating WASH and Social Policies for
Systemic Change
Moreover, it is crucial to integrate water, sanitation,
and hygiene (WASH) policies with broader social policies addressing
systemic inequalities in areas like housing, healthcare, and education (Crosson
et al., 2024; Ataíde & Borja, 2017). Water insecurity does not exist in
isolation; it often intersects with various social determinants of health that
impact individual and community well-being. Policies that effectively tackle
these connections must consider WASH as part of a holistic framework aimed at dismantling
structural inequities. By recognizing that inadequate water supply and
sanitation disproportionately affect those living in poverty or marginalized
communities, policymakers can create more comprehensive strategies that
contribute to long-term resilience and well-being (Chu et al., 2022; Correljé,
2021).
Furthermore, leaders and policymakers should prioritize
equity over efficiency, ensuring that low-income and communities of colour
receive not only attention but also advocacy in public policy discussions (Wei
et al., 2020; Crosson et al., 2024). A successful approach to preventing crises
like Flint's must involve the voices and concerns of those most affected by the
legacy of structural racism and systemic neglect. Emphasizing community
involvement in the design and implementation of proposed policies is a crucial
step toward re-establishing trust and accountability in governance, which in
turn can lead to more effective water management solutions (Fonchingong, 2023;
O'Brien, 2010).
To summarize, preventing future crises like Flint
necessitates a commitment to comprehensive equity-focused policies, beginning
with targeted assessments of vulnerability, empowering local organizations,
implementing advanced monitoring technology, and integrating WASH
initiatives with broader social policies. By leveraging a multifaceted approach
that recognizes and addresses the systemic roots of inequality, it is possible
to create a future where all communities can trust in the safety of their drinking
water, thereby ensuring public health and welfare.
6
Resilient by Design – Building WASH Systems that
Last
6.1
Resisting Political Interference: Independent
Oversight for WASH
To secure the integrity of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
(WASH) systems, establishing independent, legally protected oversight bodies is
crucial. These entities should be nonpartisan, ensuring continuity and
transparency free from political manipulation (Pulido, 2016). Flint's
experience illustrates the detrimental effects of political interference, as it
hampered effective governance and accountability in water supply management.
Independent oversight, shielded from political fluctuations, guarantees that WASH
initiatives can remain focused on public health and environmental justice
rather than political expediency (Robinson et al., 2018). Such structures can
restore trust in governmental agencies, ensuring that they are held accountable
to the communities they serve, which is essential for instilling confidence in
public water systems (Kozak‐Muiznieks et al., 2014).
6.2
Rural and Urban Poor: Designing for Diversity in
Need
Infrastructure strategies must be intrinsically flexible and
responsive to the distinct needs of marginalized communities, encompassing
rural, urban, tribal, and immigrant populations (Pieper et al., 2017). A
one-size-fits-all approach has proven ineffective, often failing to address the
specific challenges faced by these diverse groups. Ensuring that rural areas
receive adequate WASH services, as highlighted by the disparities between urban
and rural healthcare access, is paramount for equitable community development
(Ruckart et al., 2019). As water infrastructure planning evolves, it must
accommodate varying demographic pressures and local resource contexts,
facilitating tailored solutions that enhance access and usability for all
community members.
6.3
Universal Access is a Human Right
Water must be recognized and enshrined as a legal human
right, reinforcing the fundamental nature of access to clean and safe water
(Pieper et al., 2018). Constitutional protections and enforceable standards are
critical in guaranteeing equity across populations regardless of socioeconomic
status. Recognition of water as a human right emphasizes the responsibility of
governments to ensure that all communities enjoy equal access to essential
water services (Salian, 2024). This legislative framework can help prevent
future crises by mandating that water quality and accessibility are prioritized
at all levels of governance, pushing forward the notion that access to safe water
is not a privilege but an inherent human entitlement.
6.4
The Future is Public: Rejecting Privatized
Neglect
The lessons from the Flint water crisis starkly illustrate
the shortcomings of outsourcing essential services, demonstrating that
privatization can lead to negligence in accountability and transparency
(Bledsoe, 2019). Movements advocating for the remunicipalization of water
services emphasize that public control is fundamental in fostering inclusive
governance, equity, and resilience within water management systems (Dietz et
al., 2018). Public utilities have the potential to prioritize community welfare,
standing in contrast to privatized services that often neglect the interests of
the most vulnerable. As global trends increasingly demonstrate support for
public ownership of critical infrastructure, ensuring that water services
remain under public control will be crucial in building sustainable and
resilient WASH systems (Hassen et al., 2021).
In summary, building resilient WASH systems that are
sustainable requires a deliberate strategy that emphasizes independent
oversight, recognizes the diverse needs of marginalized communities, enshrines
water access as a human right, and prioritizes public control over privatized
management. The equitable delivery of WASH services must take into account the
inclusion of local voices and the imposition of robust regulatory frameworks
that stand against political coercion. By adopting these measures, society can
better safeguard against future crises and foster an environment where all
individuals enjoy the right to safe water, effectively promoting public health
and social equity.
This study illustrates the importance of political
engagement and oversight, highlighting how a lack of public trust can lead to
voter resistance, which is relevant for establishing independent oversight in
WASH governance.
The focus on equity underpins the necessity for tailored
WASH solutions based on community needs, reinforcing the need for independent
structures to ensure community-centred practices.
The disparities detailed between rural and urban settings
serve as a reminder of the importance of adaptive infrastructure strategies
tailored to diverse community needs, which include considerations in WASH
planning.
The political dynamics discussed highlight the need for
accountability in WASH governance and show how public control can foster
community involvement and transparency.
Insight into equitable government service provision is
central to understanding how water rights and access can be legally defined and
protected, relevant to asserting water as a human right.
Addressing urban-rural disparities
emphasizes the need for WASH systems that encompass all communities and reflect different demographic necessities for effective water management.
This study supports the notion that systemic inequalities
must be addressed through public policy to ensure equity in service provision,
aligning with calls for remunicipalization in WASH services.
The challenges in water access discussed illustrate the
necessity for tailored approaches to urban and rural water needs within
effective governance frameworks, suggesting robust public management solutions.
The analysis of healthcare environmental conditions
reinforces the need to ensure robust public health frameworks within WASH
systems to enhance service delivery across all communities.
7
Conclusion: What If the Poor Had Control?
The Flint Water Crisis serves as a stark reminder that the issues plaguing marginalized communities extend far beyond the physical infrastructure of lead pipes—it fundamentally stems from a deep-rooted lack of power. Power encapsulates the ability to make decisions, influence systemic changes, and have one's voice genuinely heard in governance processes. In the absence of meaningful participation of poor, Black, and marginalized communities in water governance, the systemic injustices that permitted the Flint crisis are likely to repeat. The demand for equity in water governance is not merely a call for justice but a necessity for democracy itself; equity, in this context, becomes the foundation upon which effective governance is built. Establishing an egalitarian framework in which all voices are amplified and valued is essential to ensuring that future generations do not endure similar injustices rooted in neglect and disenfranchisement Homsy & Warner, 2020; Shields et al., 2021).
As we consider policy actions necessary to rectify the
failures demonstrated through the Flint Water Crisis, several critical steps
emerge. First and foremost, mandating equity risk assessments in all WASH
planning can serve as a foundational mechanism for identifying
vulnerabilities before crises arise (Sagar et al., 2022). By employing these
assessments, stakeholders can proactively communicate risks, allocate resources
effectively, and prioritize the needs of underrepresented communities.
Additionally, establishing community watchdogs with legal
authority ensures that local populations are equipped to monitor water
quality, demand data transparency, and initiate necessary legal responses when
needed (Rolston et al., 2017). Effective local governance must empower
Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) to act as intermediaries and advocates,
fostering a localized sense of responsibility and stewardship over water
resources.
Furthermore, funding innovative monitoring tools
tailored for vulnerable areas represents an essential investment in both
transparency and accountability (Rolfe, 2015). Technologies such as IoT sensors
and mobile testing kits facilitate real-time data gathering. They can democratize
information access, empowering communities to assert their rights and hold
authorities accountable as issues arise.
Critical to transforming societal inequities is the need to integrate
WASH policies with broader social ones—namely, housing, education, and
healthcare (Mafuta et al., 2021). Water insecurity is intrinsically linked to
socioeconomic factors, and addressing these connections is vital to developing
holistic policies that remediate systemic inequalities and enhance public
welfare effectively.
Moreover, it is imperative to enshrine water and
sanitation as constitutional rights (Harris et al., 2017). By establishing
enforceable standards that recognize access to clean water as a fundamental
right, we ensure protection for marginalized groups who disproportionately bear
the brunt of environmental injustices. This legal grounding can compel
governments to prioritize infrastructure improvements and uphold quality
standards in water delivery.
Finally, rejecting privatization in favour of
investing in public, community-led WASH systems affirms that water is a public
good rather than a commodity to be traded for profit. Recent trends have shown
that remunicipalization can significantly improve transparency, equity, and
resilience in water governance (Black & Sykes, 2022). Control over water
services must reside with the public and communities who utilize them,
embodying a shift away from profit-driven motives toward a more equitable
governance structure.
In conclusion, the Flint Water Crisis epitomizes the urgent
necessity for a paradigm shift within water governance—one that recognizes the
fundamental rights and voices of marginalized communities. Making room for
their participation is not simply an act of fairness; it is the bedrock of a
functional democracy. Justice in the water begins with justice in voice, laying
the foundation for policies and practices that honour the inherent dignity of
all individuals and their rightful claim to clean, accessible, and safe
drinking water. Only by empowering communities can we begin to construct
resilient, equitable, and sustainable WASH systems that transform lives and
honour dignity across socioeconomic divides.
References
Black, G. and Sykes, P. (2022). Steps toward engagement
integrity: learning from participatory visual methods in marginalized South African
communities. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.794905
Harris, L., Kleiber, D., Rodina, L., Yaylacı, Ş., Goldin,
J., & Owen, G. (2017). Water materialities and citizen engagement: testing
the implications of water access and quality for community engagement in Ghana
and South Africa. Society & Natural Resources, 31(1), 89-105.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1364818
Homsy, G. and Warner, M. (2020). Does public ownership of
utilities matter for local government water policies? Utilities Policy, 64,
101057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101057
Mafuta, W., Zuwarimwe, J., & Mwale, M. (2021). Wash
financial and social investment dynamics in a conflict-affected district of Jariban
in Somalia. Sustainability, 13(9), 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094836
Rolfe, S. (2015). Divergence in community participation
policy: analyzing localism and community empowerment using a theory of change
approach. Local Government Studies, 42(1), 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1081848
Rolston, A., Jennings, E., & Linnane, S. (2017). Water
matters: an assessment of opinion on water management and community engagement
in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. Plos One, 12(4), e0174957.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174957
Sagar, S., DiMascio-Donohue, D., Rayner, J., Gallandat, K.,
Ritter, M., Joseph, M., … & Lantagne, D. (2022). Sustained effectiveness
evaluation two years after two water systems were installed in Haitian
communities. Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 13(2),
78-89. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2022.054
Shields, K., Moffa, M., Behnke, N., Kelly, E., Klug, T.,
Lee, K., … & Bartram, J. (2021). Community management does not equate to
participation: fostering community participation in rural water supplies.
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 11(6), 937-947.
https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2021.089
Ataíde, G. and Borja, P. (2017). Social and environmental
justice in basic sanitation: a view on municipal planning experiences. Ambiente
& Sociedade, 20(3), 61-78.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc74r1v2032017
Buettner‐Schmidt, K. and Lobo, M. (2011).
Social justice: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(4),
948-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05856.x
Chen, M., Wang, Y., & Xu, Z. (2024). A framework for
assessing the blue equity of social-ocean systems in marine governance
transformation. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1403194
Chu, C., Connaway, L., Kawooya, D., & Mfengu, A. (2022).
Research frameworks for multiple ways of knowing. Proceedings of the Alice
Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2022.1107
Correljé, A. (2021). Perspectives on justice in the future
energy system: a Dutch treat., 55-72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74586-8_3
Crosson, C., Pincetl, S., Scruggs, C., Gupta, N., Bhushan,
R., Sharvelle, S., … & Meixner, T. (2024). Advancing a net-zero urban water
future in the United States Southwest: governance and policy challenges and
future needs. Acs Es&t Water, 4(5), 1966-1977.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00031
Fawcett, J. (2019). Thoughts about social justice. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 32(3), 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318419845385
Fonchingong, C. (2023). Reframing social justice through
indigenous know-how: implications for social development, policy and practice.
Global Social Policy, 24(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231170532
O'Brien, M. (2010). Social justice: alive and well (partly)
in social work practice? International Social Work, 54(2), 174-190.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810382682
Ramani, K., Rudraswamy, G., & Umamahesh, N. (2023).
Optimal design of intermittent water distribution network considering network
resilience and equity in water supply. Water, 15(18), 3265.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15183265
Wei, S., Yin, J., & Chen, X. (2020). Paradox of supply
chain integration and firm performance: the moderating roles of distributive
and procedural justice*. Decision Sciences, 52(1), 78-108.
https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12438
Fasenfest, D. (2017). A neoliberal response to an urban
crisis: emergency management in Flint, Michigan. Critical Sociology, 45(1), 33-47.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517718039
Hammer, P. (2017). The Flint water crisis, the Karegnondi
water authority and strategic–structural racism. Critical Sociology, 45(1),
103-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517729193
Lee, S., Krings, A., Rose, S., Dover, K., Ayoub, J., &
Salman, F. (2016). Racial inequality and the implementation of emergency
management laws in economically distressed urban areas. Children and Youth
Services Review, 70, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.08.016
Li, L. (2024). Research on the integration of educational
resources in higher education administration. Lex Localis - Journal of Local
Self-Government, 22(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.2.293-311(2024)
Nawang, H., Bangun, E., & Budiarto, A. (2024).
Conceptual disaster management in regional policy analysis. International
Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHES), 3(4).
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.888
Seamster, L. (2018). When democracy disappears. Du Bois
Review Social Science Research on Race, 15(02), 295-322.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x18000255
Tomko, B., Nittrouer, C., Sánchez‐Vila, X.,
& Sawyer, A. (2023). Disparities in disruptions to public drinking water
services in Texas communities during Winter Storm Uri 2021. Plos Water, 2(6),
e0000137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000137
Brooks, S. and Patel, S. (2021). Psychological consequences
of the Flint water crisis: a scoping review. Disaster Medicine and Public
Health Preparedness, 16(3), 1259-1269. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.41
Campbell, C., Greenberg, R., Mankikar, D., & Ross, R.
(2016). A case study of environmental injustice: the failure in Flint.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10), 951.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100951
Carrera, J., Key, K., Bailey, S., Hamm, J., Cuthbertson, C.,
Lewis, E., … & Calhoun, K. (2019). Community science as a pathway for
resilience in response to a public health crisis in Flint, Michigan. Social
Sciences, 8(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030094
Chávez, M., Gabaldón, M., Tuney, C., & García, S.
(2017). Dilution of accountability and transparency in the Flint water crisis:
a case of institutional implosion. Norteamérica, 12(q), 11-52.
https://doi.org/10.20999/nam.2017.a001
Cuthbertson, C., Newkirk, C., Ilardo, J., Loveridge, S.,
& Skidmore, M. (2016). Angry, scared, and unsure: mental health
consequences of contaminated water in Flint, Michigan. Journal of Urban Health,
93(6), 899-908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0089-y
Fortenberry, G., Reynolds, P., Burrer, S., Johnson‐Lawrence,
V., Wang, A., Schnall, A., … & Wolkin, A. (2018). Assessment
of behavioural health concerns in the community affected by the Flint water
crisis — Michigan (USA) 2016. Prehospital and
Disaster Medicine, 33(3), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x18000250
Gómez, H., Borgialli, D., Sharman, M., Shah, K., Scolpino,
A., Oleske, J., … & Bogden, J. (2018). Blood lead levels of children in Flint,
Michigan: 2006-2016. The Journal of Pediatrics, 197, 158-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.063
Hanna‐Attisha, M., Gonuguntla, A.,
Peart, N., LaChance, J., Taylor, D., & Chawla, S. (2020). Umbilical cord
blood lead level disparities between Flint and Detroit. American Journal of
Perinatology, 38(S 01), e26-e32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1705135
Heard‐Garris, N., Roche, J., Carter, P.,
Abir, M., Walton, M., Zimmerman, M., … &
Cunningham, R. (2017). Voices from Flint: community perceptions of the Flint
water crisis. Journal of Urban Health, 94(6), 776-779.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0152-3
Jacobson, P., Boufides, C., Chrysler, D., Bernstein, J.,
& Citrin, T. (2020). The role of the legal system in the Flint water
crisis. Milbank Quarterly, 98(2), 554-580.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12457
Key, K., Shannon, K., Graham, E., Duhart, C., Tello, T.,
Mays, C., … & Bailey, S. (2024). Advancing equity through effective youth
engagement in public health to operationalize racism as a public health crisis:
the Flint public health youth academy model. Youth, 4(1), 395-404.
https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010028
Pieper, K., Martin, R., Tang, M., Walters, L., Parks, J.,
Roy, S., … & Edwards, M. (2018). Evaluating water lead levels during the Flint
water crisis. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(15), 8124-8132.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00791
Sadler, R. and Highsmith, A. (2016). Rethinking Tiebout: the
contribution of political fragmentation and racial/economic segregation to the Flint
water crisis. Environmental Justice, 9(5), 143-151.
https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0015
Sneed, R., Dotson, K., Brewer, A., Pugh, P., & Johnson‐Lawrence,
V. (2020). Behavioural health concerns during the Flint water crisis, 2016–2018. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(5), 793-803.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00520-7
Battocchio, A., Thorson, K., Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Smith,
M., Chen, Y., Edgerly, S., … & Etheridge, C. (2023). Who will tell the
stories of health inequities? Platform challenges (and opportunities) in local
civic information infrastructure. The Annals of the American Academy of Political
and Social Science, 707(1), 144-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162231214398
Carey, M. and Lichtenwalter, J. (2019). "Flint cannot
get in the hearing": the language of urban pathology in coverage of an American
public health crisis. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 44(1), 26-47.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919833794
Ergene, S., Banerjee, S., & Ergene, E. (2024).
Environmental racism and climate (in)justice in the Anthropocene: addressing
the silences and erasures in management and organization studies. Journal of
Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05723-x
Ezell, J., Griswold, D., Chase, E., & Carver, E. (2021).
The blueprint of disaster: COVID-19, the Flint water crisis, and unequal
ecological impacts. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(5), e309-e315.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00076-0
Henderson, K., Shortridge, A., & Sadler, R. (2023).
Environmental crisis or an act of contemporary racism? A Flint effect on
maternal health disparities. Human Geography, 17(2), 163-177.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786231199241
Liévanos, R., Evans, C., & Light, R. (2021). An inter-categorical
ecology of lead exposure: complex environmental health vulnerabilities in the Flint
water crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 18(5), 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052217
Muhammad, M., Loney, E., Brooks, C., Assari, S., Robinson,
D., & Caldwell, C. (2018). "I think that is all a lie…I think it is
genocide": applying a critical race praxis to youth perceptions of Flint
water contamination. Ethnicity & Disease, 28(Supp 1), 241.
https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.28.s1.241
Nukpezah, J. (2017). The financial and public health
emergencies in Flint, Michigan: crisis management and the American federalism.
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(4), 284-311.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12117
Pauli, B. (2020). The Flint water crisis. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1420
Perry, M., Arrington, S., Freisthler, M., Ibe, I., McCray,
N., Neumann, L., … & Rosas, B. (2021). Pervasive structural racism in
environmental epidemiology. Environmental Health, 20(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00801-3
Pulido, L. (2016). Flint, environmental racism, and racial
capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(3), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1213013
Robinson, T., Shum, G., & Singh, S. (2018). Politically
unhealthy: Flint's fight against poverty, environmental racism, and dirty
water. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 1(2),
303-324. https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.1.2.6
Bledsoe, A. (2019). Afro-Brazilian resistance to
extractivism in the Bay of Aratu. Annals of the American Association of
Geographers, 109(2), 492-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1506694
Bullard, R. (2015). Environmental justice in the United States,
756-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.91013-4
Came, H., Doole, C., McKenna, B., & McCreanor, T.
(2018). Institutional racism in public health contracting: findings of a
nationwide survey from New Zealand. Social Science & Medicine, 199,
132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.002
Campbell, C., Greenberg, R., Mankikar, D., & Ross, R.
(2016). A case study of environmental injustice: the failure in Flint.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10), 951.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100951
Chanin, J. (2018). The effect of symbolic racism on
environmental concern and environmental action. Environmental Sociology, 4(4),
457-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1449340
Dietz, T., Duan, R., Nalley, J., & Witsen, A. (2018).
Social support for water quality: the influence of values and symbolic racism.
Human Ecology Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.22459/her.24.01.2018.03
Hassaniyan, A. (2024). Iran's water policy: environmental
injustice and peripheral marginalization. Progress in Physical Geography Earth
and Environment, 48(3), 420-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333241252523
Hassen, N., Lofters, A., Michael, S., Mall, A., Pinto, A.,
& Rackal, J. (2021). Implementing anti-racism interventions in healthcare
settings: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 18(6), 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062993
Kozak‐Muiznieks, N., Lucas, C., Brown,
E., Pondo, T., Taylor, T., Frace, M., … &
Winchell, J. (2014). Prevalence of sequence types among clinical and
environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 in the United States
from 1982 to 2012. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52(1), 201-211.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01973-13
McCreary, T. and Milligan, R. (2018). The limits of liberal
recognition: racial capitalism, settler colonialism, and environmental
governance in Vancouver and Atlanta. Antipode, 53(3), 724-744.
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12465
Neu, H., Lee, M., Pritts, J., Sherman, A., & Michel, S.
(2020). Seeing the "unseeable," a student-led activity to identify
metals in drinking water. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3690-3696.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00553
Pieper, K., Martin, R., Tang, M., Walters, L., Parks, J.,
Roy, S., … & Edwards, M. (2018). Evaluating water lead levels during the Flint
water crisis. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(15), 8124-8132.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00791
Pieper, K., Tang, M., & Edwards, M. (2017). Flint water
crisis caused by interrupted corrosion control: investigating "ground zero"
home. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(4), 2007-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04034
Praphan, K. and Khamkhong, S. (2024). A quest for Malaysian
environmental justice in Yang-may Ooi's The Flame Tree. World Journal of
English Language, 14(6), 263. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p263
Prather, C., Fuller, T., Marshall, K., & Jeffries, W.
(2016). The impact of racism on the sexual and reproductive health of African American
women. Journal of Women's Health, 25(7), 664-671.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5637
Pulido, L. (2016). Flint, environmental racism, and racial
capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(3), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1213013
Pulido, L., Bruno, T., Faiver-Serna, C., & Galentine, C.
(2019). Environmental deregulation, spectacular racism, and white nationalism
in the Trump era. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2),
520-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1549473
Robinson, T., Shum, G., & Singh, S. (2018). Politically
unhealthy: Flint's fight against poverty, environmental racism, and dirty
water. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 1(2),
303-324. https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.1.2.6
Rodríguez‐Labajos, B. and Alier, J. (2015).
Political ecology of water conflicts. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water,
2(5), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1092
Ruckart, P., Ettinger, A., Hanna‐Attisha, M.,
Jones, N., Davis, S., & Breysse, P. (2019). The Flint water crisis: a
coordinated public health emergency response and recovery initiative. Journal
of Public Health Management and Practice, 25(1), S84-S90.
https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000871
Salian, S. (2024). A geodemographic analysis of
environmental racism in Sarnia's chemical valley.
https://doi.org/10.32920/25169612
Tubert, A. (2021). Environmental racism: a causal and
historical account. Journal of Social Philosophy, 52(4), 554-568.
https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12407
Yu, A. and Linden, L. (2021). Environmental and social
injustices of the Flint, MI water crisis: a general chemistry exercise. Journal
of Chemical Education, 99(1), 469-471.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00371
No comments:
Post a Comment