WASTEWATER FUTURES: RESOLVING THE SUSTAINABILITY PARADOX THROUGH TRANSPARENT GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL JUSTICE

 

Author: AM Tris Hardyanto

Introduction

In a world increasingly shaped by climate volatility, urban expansion, and deepening inequities, wastewater management stands at a critical crossroads. Once considered a purely technical endeavour, wastewater treatment now reveals itself as a mirror of our broader societal contradictions—where infrastructure designed to protect the environment paradoxically contributes to its degradation, where public-private partnerships are struck without public oversight, and where billions remain excluded from safe sanitation despite global wealth. This article unpacks three interlinked crises that define the future of wastewater systems: the sustainability paradox of energy-hungry, emission-intensive treatment plants; the governance gap characterized by data opacity and weak civic participation; and the urgent need for transformative, rights-based solutions that prioritize equity, transparency, and innovation. By synthesizing insights from global practices and forward-thinking policies, we chart a pathway toward wastewater systems that not only serve technical and environmental goals but also uphold justice and human dignity.

Building on this foundation of justice and environmental stewardship, we now turn to the very heart of the technical dilemma: the sustainability paradox. In Chapter 1, we unpack how facilities designed to protect our water resources often undermine broader climate objectives, setting the stage for urgent innovation.

1  The Sustainability Paradox – When Treatment Pollutes

1.1: Energy-Hungry Infrastructure

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) reveal a critical sustainability paradox: while they are designed to purify water, they paradoxically consume a significant portion of global electricity, accounting for approximately 3–4% of the total energy use worldwide, predominantly through energy-intensive activated sludge processes (Giwa et al., 2024; Afferden et al., 2015). The operational inefficiency of these systems results in considerable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, specifically methane and carbon dioxide, thereby challenging the sector's ostensibly green image and reinforcing its environmental footprint (Starkl et al., 2022; Sahreen & Mukhtar, 2024). This raises pertinent questions about how the wastewater treatment sector can be reconciled with global climate objectives.

High operational costs and substantial energy consumption compel many WWTPs to reconsider their design and function. As these facilities are essential to public health, the paradox lies in their dual role: while they contribute to environmental protection through water purification, they simultaneously impose an environmental burden through high energy use and GHG emissions (Lupu & Allegro, 2024). Hence, innovative strategies targeting energy efficiency and operational optimization are paramount to mitigating these negative impacts. Integrating renewable energy sources into WWTP operations could significantly lower their carbon footprint, enabling a transition from traditional models towards more sustainable solutions (Kazora & Mourad, 2018).

While energy efficiency offers one pathway to reconcile treatment plants with climate goals, the chemical pathways inside these plants introduce a second, equally potent challenge: greenhouse gas emissions from core biological processes.

To illustrate the implications of energy consumption, it is crucial to note that some pioneering WWTPs have initiated projects focused on energy recovery and efficiency, emphasizing the need for a systemic shift within the sector (Rüd & Marth, 2011). Such initiatives underscore the importance of advancing the dialogue about sustainable wastewater management solutions that can rectify this paradox while ensuring the effectiveness of wastewater treatment processes.

1.2  Emissions from Nitrification and Digestion

The nitrification and denitrification processes, integral to nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment, are significant sources of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions— a greenhouse gas nearly 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide (Warshauer, 2018). The operational protocol involving these processes inherently results in emissions that exacerbate global warming, raising concerns about the overall climate impact of conventional WWTPs (Agrahari & Kumar, 2023). Additionally, methane is released during the anaerobic digestion of sludge, compounding the detrimental climate effects associated with traditional treatment systems (Rao, 2025).

Emissions mitigation strategies are urgently needed to counter the adverse environmental impacts associated with core treatment processes. Techniques involving improved oxygen control, advanced aeration strategies, and biogas capture must be adopted to minimize GHG emissions from wastewater treatment processes (Edunjobi, 2024).

However, emission reduction is only one side of the sustainability coin. If we reframe wastewater as a source of valuable materials, treatment plants can shift from being mere consumers of energy to generators of resources.

This highlights the need for a holistic approach to wastewater management that not only prioritizes treatment efficacy but also actively seeks to minimize environmental harm through innovative technologies.

Transitioning to low-emission treatment methods can significantly reduce the overall carbon footprint of WWTPs. For instance, the implementation of membrane bioreactors, which enhance nutrient removal efficiency with reduced energy input, represents a forward-thinking solution to the challenge of emissions reduction (Posnaya et al., 2024). By focusing on both energy efficiency and emissions mitigation, WWTPs can reconcile their essential role in public health with their environmental responsibilities.

1.3  Circular Resource Recovery

Amidst these challenges, some countries are pioneering closed-loop resource recovery models that highlight the transformative potential of wastewater management systems. In places like Singapore and Sweden, WWTPs are reimagined to actively extract biogas, phosphorus, and heat from wastewater and sludge, exemplifying a shift towards circular economy principles (Narasimhan et al., 2023; Adebayo et al., 2024). Sweden's Sjölunda facility serves as a pertinent case study of this transition, operating as a near-zero-emission plant by leveraging anaerobic digestion, solar energy, and thermal recovery (Kazora & Mourad, 2018).

This evolution in wastewater treatment infrastructure—not merely seen as a waste management solution but as a resource recovery enterprise—illustrates how treatment plants can contribute to sustainability goals while also enhancing energy and nutrient recovery (Khoroshilov, 2020). Successful models exemplified by these countries highlight the potential of integrating resource recovery with water treatment processes, allowing WWTPs to function as resource factories rather than merely treatment facilities (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024).

Transforming plants into resource hubs often demands significant retrofitting. In the next section, we explore how innovative design and digitalization can revitalize legacy infrastructure for a low-carbon future.

Incorporating circular economy principles into wastewater management provides an avenue to address the sustainability paradox. By viewing wastewater as a valuable resource, facilities can be reassessed in terms of their design, function, and operational paradigms, ultimately contributing to broader sustainability frames that align environmental stewardship with resource efficiency (Mariz et al., 2024).

1.4: Smart Plant Design and Retrofitting

Technological innovation presents significant opportunities for the transition toward low-carbon wastewater systems. The integration of advanced technologies such as membrane bioreactors, IoT-based sensors, and AI-driven analytics can improve energy efficiency while optimizing treatment processes (Aras & Furtuna, 2024). Retrofitting legacy systems with these cutting-edge tools holds the promise of drastically reducing emissions associated with wastewater treatment operations (Sami et al., 2024).

Real-time data capabilities enabled by these technologies facilitate predictive maintenance and adaptive control strategies, which can enhance operational performance while simultaneously minimizing waste generation and extending the lifespan of treatment equipment (Zhang, 2024). The implementation of innovative technologies within existing infrastructure not only contributes to enhanced efficiency but also supports the alignment of WWTP operations with sustainability benchmarks (Xiang et al., 2024).

Even with cutting-edge hardware and controls, we need robust metrics to assess actual environmental performance. Chapter 1.5 turns to life-cycle and sustainability standards that capture hidden impacts.

By prioritizing innovation in the design and retrofitting of wastewater treatment infrastructure, stakeholders can foster resilience and adaptability in the face of evolving environmental challenges (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024). This approach positions WWTPs not merely as sinks for pollutants but as dynamic facilities that leverage data intelligence to promote sustainability and energy conservation.

 1.5: Rethinking Sustainability Standards

Conventional sustainability assessments for WWTPs frequently overlook critical factors such as energy use and emissions generation (Holodkova et al., 2024). Expanding metrics to include life cycle assessments (LCA) provides a more nuanced understanding of the sustainability benchmarks for these facilities. Implementing LCA frameworks illuminates the hidden costs associated with energy-intensive operations and guides the development of climate-smart solutions for wastewater management (Mishra, 2024).

Together, these technical advances—energy efficiency, emission controls, resource recovery, innovative design, and updated metrics—reveal the full scope of the sustainability paradox. We close this chapter by synthesizing these threads into a unified understanding of the dilemma.

A holistic sustainability perspective evaluates performance across multiple domains—energy consumption, emissions output, and circular resource flows. This broader assessment framework not only identifies areas for improved operational efficiency but also enhances accountability within the wastewater sector as it transitions toward more sustainable practices (Shkodinа, 2024). By utilizing comprehensive assessment methodologies, stakeholders can better navigate the complex interplay between treatment efficacy and environmental impact (Nurein, 2025).

Advocating for updated sustainability metrics that align wastewater management operations with ecological objectives is essential to resolving the sustainability paradox (Hilbig & Rudolph, 2018). Through collaborative efforts to redefine standards in wastewater treatment, it is possible to create a future where these facilities contribute positively to environmental and public health outcomes.

 1.6 Paradox wastewater treatment

The sustainability paradox within wastewater treatment exposes a fundamental contradiction: facilities intended to safeguard the environment inadvertently contribute to its degradation through high energy use and emissions. The operational inefficiencies, combined with the greenhouse gas emissions associated with nitrification and digestion processes, underscore the high but often unacknowledged environmental costs of conventional wastewater management ("Islamic Development Bank—ISDB", 2020).

Nevertheless, emerging technologies and practices rooted in circular models provide a hopeful pathway forward. By prioritizing energy efficiency, emissions reduction, and resource recovery, the wastewater treatment sector can realign itself with broader environmental goals. Initiatives that demonstrate innovative practices—like Sweden's Sjölunda WWTP—illustrate the possibilities inherent in a future where wastewater management complements rather than contradicts sustainability (Shkodkina & Sklyar, 2013).

To effectively navigate this sustainability paradox, systemic reforms must be implemented across the sector. Aligning treatment operations with environmental imperatives will not only fulfil the practical objectives of public health and sanitation but also contribute meaningfully to global sustainability initiatives. The wastewater treatment industry needs to embrace this transformative potential, promoting a vision where treatment processes foster ecological integrity and resource efficiency (Chávez, 2024).

Technical fixes alone cannot resolve wastewater's deeper challenges. Chapter 2 shifts attention to the governance landscape—how data gaps, opaque partnerships, and weak civic voice perpetuate these environmental burdens.

 

2  Data, Governance, and the Cost of Silence

2.1 The Transparency Deficit

One of the most pressing challenges in wastewater governance arises from the transparency deficit. The lack of real-time, publicly accessible data regarding water quality and treatment processes hampers effective governance and accountability (Giwa et al., 2024). Many countries suffer from outdated or insufficiently disseminated information, which complicates the ability of communities and regulators to accurately identify service gaps and inadequacies (Afferden et al., 2015). This deficit not only erodes public trust but also fosters an environment conducive to inefficiencies and the potential for corruption, as critical oversight mechanisms rely heavily on transparent data (Starkl et al., 2022).

The implications of such a transparency gap extend beyond mere governance issues; they directly impact public health outcomes and the environment. When communities lack timely access to relevant information, they cannot engage in informed decision-making about their water resources, leading to potential neglect of health hazards related to wastewater (Sahreen & Mukhtar, 2024). This situation underscores an urgent need for the establishment of comprehensive data reporting frameworks that prioritize accessibility and timeliness, thereby enabling better water quality management and community engagement.

Moreover, effective transparency mechanisms ought to integrate citizen-oriented platforms that empower individuals to seek and utilize this data, facilitating active participation in governance processes. This aligns with the growing discourse emphasizing the vital role of citizen engagement in enhancing accountability within public governance structures (Lupu & Allegro, 2024). Implementing such initiatives could mitigate the transparency deficit and foster greater public confidence in management systems surrounding wastewater (Kazora & Mourad, 2018).

Transparency builds trust, but real change often hinges on how projects are structured. Next, we examine public-private partnerships that proceed without genuine public oversight.

 2.2  PPPs Without Public Oversight

The concept of public-private partnerships (PPPs) is often met with optimism regarding their potential inefficiencies and innovative solutions in wastewater management. However, many of these partnerships operate in a landscape characterized by limited transparency, where accountability remains a secondary consideration (Rüd & Marth, 2011). The absence of clear performance benchmarks severely hinders the practical evaluation of these initiatives, leading to resource allocation that often skews toward industrial interests rather than public health priorities. Furthermore, affected communities frequently find themselves sidelined during project planning and execution phases, resulting in a disconnect between public needs and actual investments (Warshauer, 2018).

This lack of public oversight is especially troubling in contexts where inequalities are deepened rather than alleviated through PPP strategies (Agrahari & Kumar, 2023). It highlights the urgency of strengthening oversight mechanisms to ensure that partnerships align not just with economic efficiency but also with social and environmental objectives (Rao, 2025). Mechanisms that include community input and foster collaborative decision-making can enhance accountability and ensure that investments in wastewater infrastructure serve the public good effectively.

Guaranteeing that governance models incorporate due diligence practices while engaging diverse stakeholders, including local communities, can create a framework that prioritizes both stakeholder interests and public health (Edunjobi, 2024). This alignment could lead to more equitable outcomes, where communities impacted by wastewater systems are actively involved throughout the planning and execution phases, facilitating a more just approach to infrastructure development and management.

Accountability demands both clear rules and reliable data. In the following section, we explore how digital tools can transform wastewater oversight and empower communities.

2.3 The Role of Digital Tools in Accountability

Digital technologies present unique opportunities to enhance accountability and transparency in wastewater governance. IoT-enabled sensors, blockchain compliance tracking, and open-access data dashboards can significantly improve the availability of real-time data on wastewater quality (Posnaya et al., 2024). By integrating such technologies, governments can establish robust monitoring systems that deter data manipulation and enhance regulatory compliance (Narasimhan et al., 2023).

Examples such as Singapore's PUB smart water grid and India's SBM portal illustrate the practical application of digital platforms in monitoring and managing wastewater systems (Adebayo et al., 2024). These platforms not only track water quality but also make pertinent data accessible to the public, encouraging community engagement and fostering a culture of accountability (Kazora & Mourad, 2018). Enhancing citizen access to information can empower communities to participate actively in governance processes, leading to improved oversight and more responsive governance mechanisms.

Citizen science platforms present another innovative avenue, allowing local populations to directly report on water conditions and engage in data collection efforts. Such initiatives nurture a sense of ownership and responsibility towards local resources and promote collective action aimed at improving environmental health outcomes (Khoroshilov, 2020). In implementing digital solutions, however, governments must ensure that communities possess the requisite skills and resources to engage with these technologies effectively, thus avoiding potential disparities in access (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024).

While technology strengthens monitoring, legal frameworks cement accountability. Section 2.4 delves into the laws and advocacy mechanisms needed to safeguard clean water.

The adoption of digital tools serves not only to streamline data management but also invites a paradigm shift in community engagement, fostering participatory governance models characterized by transparency and collaboration (Mariz et al., 2024). This transition holds the promise of revitalizing public interest in wastewater governance while ensuring accountability remains paramount throughout decision-making processes.

2.4  Legal Mechanisms and Citizen Advocacy

A robust legal framework is essential in combating the inherent corruption that often permeates wastewater governance. Legal measures, such as whistleblower protections and mandatory disclosure laws, can provide essential safeguards for those willing to expose malpractice and misconduct in the governance sphere (Aras & Furtuna, 2024). By enhancing legal accountability, stakeholders can deter corruption and ensure that wastewater governance actions align with the public interest (Sami et al., 2024).

Moreover, strengthening environmental justice laws is critical in guaranteeing communities have access to pertinent wastewater data and can actively participate in decision-making processes that affect them (Zhang, 2024). Implementing transparency audits, akin to those developed by the Water Integrity Network, can serve as practical tools to diagnose governance gaps, facilitate critical dialogues, and inform necessary reforms (Xiang et al., 2024). Such legal instruments empower advocacy groups and civil society organizations to demand greater transparency and accountability from governmental authorities.

Encouraging a culture of accountability via robust legal frameworks not only mitigates corruption but also fosters public participation (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024). When communities are assured that their rights to information and participation are protected, it emboldens them to engage in the governance process, leading to more equitable and effective outcomes in wastewater management (Holodkova et al., 2024). Thus, aligning legal mechanisms with community empowerment strategies is critical in transforming the governance landscape surrounding wastewater.

Legal rights set the stage for participation, but genuine trust arises when communities see their voices shape outcomes. In 2.5, we examine participatory models that build social capital and collective ownership.

2.5 Building Trust Through Participation

Civic engagement emerges as a core tenet of promoting trust within the frameworks of wastewater governance. The establishment of participatory channels that allow community voices to influence wastewater strategies is vital for ensuring that governance processes reflect local needs and priorities (Mishra, 2024). Community WASH committees, citizen reporting mechanisms, and participatory planning initiatives facilitate shared ownership and enhance service outcomes, particularly within vulnerable communities (Shkodinа, 2024).

As engagement increases, so does the social capital within communities, fostering resilience and collective action oriented toward improving public health and sustainability (Nurein, 2025). Governments, alongside non-governmental organizations (NGOs), must institutionalize inclusive engagement practices within sanitation planning, recognizing that effective governance necessitates the input and collaboration of those directly affected by decisions (Hilbig & Rudolph, 2018).

By promoting participatory governance, governments can create a supportive environment that nurtures trust between citizens and institutions. Moreover, it facilitates a feedback loop where the community's needs inform policy decisions, paving the way for more responsive governance strategies ("Islamic Development Bank—ISDB", 2020). Leveraging the potential of civic engagement not only empowers individual citizens but also cultivates a more informed and active populace committed to advocating for their rights and interests in wastewater management.

Collectively, these governance failures—data gaps, opaque PPPs, under-resourced digital oversight, and weak legal safeguards—create a deafening silence around critical water issues. We close this chapter by summarizing these intertwined crises.

2.6 Wastewater Critical Issue

The silence surrounding wastewater governance highlights critical issues marked by data deficiencies, inadequate accountability, and limited public involvement, which collectively impair health outcomes and environmental justice. To break this silence, stakeholders must institutionalize transparency and digitize oversight while reforming public-private partnerships to prioritize community engagement. By promoting civic participation, implementing innovative technologies, and enforcing anti-corruption safeguards, wastewater governance can evolve into an inclusive system that honours democratic processes alongside technical efficacy. These concerted efforts will ensure wastewater systems serve not only technical objectives but also contribute to a broader commitment to equity and sustainability in governance.

Systems thinking provides the blueprint, but global alignment gives it muscle. In 3.2, we explore how cross-regional cooperation and policy harmonization propel progress toward the SDGs.

With both technical and governance dimensions laid bare, Chapter 3 casts forward: What global strategies, financing models, and ethical frameworks can steer us toward just and sustainable wastewater futures?

 

3  Looking Ahead – Global Priorities for Just and Sustainable Wastewater Systems

3.1 A Systems Thinking Approach

Wastewater management must be understood and addressed through a systems thinking perspective, which recognizes the interconnectedness of various domains, notably the water-energy-food-health nexus. Emphasizing integrated solutions rather than isolated interventions ensures that the multifaceted challenges associated with wastewater are adequately addressed (Giwa et al., 2024);, (Afferden et al., 2015). Siloed approaches hinder overall effectiveness, highlighting an urgent need for coherent strategies that can foster concurrent advancements in public health, environmental sustainability, and agricultural productivity (Starkl et al., 2022). A systems-thinking approach illustrates the co-benefits of interventions, such as the potential for nutrient recovery from wastewater to enrich agricultural lands, demonstrating a pathway for sustainable resource use within agricultural systems (Starkl et al., 2022).

Moreover, this integrated approach can facilitate energy reuse practices, where the biogas generated from wastewater treatment can serve as a renewable energy source, thus reducing reliance on fossil fuels and curbing greenhouse gas emissions (Giwa et al., 2024);, (Starkl et al., 2022). This interconnected perspective is crucial, particularly in urban environments where wastewater facilities also interact with energy demands and public health needs. The complexity of these interactions necessitates interdisciplinary research centres that bring together expertise from engineering, public health, and governance to tackle wastewater management holistically (Sahreen & Mukhtar, 2024).

For effective implementation, there is a pressing need for policy frameworks that prioritize collaborative governance. Such frameworks should not only encourage stakeholder engagement but also incorporate insights from various disciplines to address the root causes of wastewater challenges (Afferden et al., 2015). Strong linkage and communication pathways among sectors can enhance adaptive management strategies that are responsive to evolving environmental and societal challenges (Starkl et al., 2022). Thus, investing in robust research infrastructures that can synthesize diverse academic insights into actionable wastewater policies forms a foundational element of a sustainable future.

3.2: Global Cooperation and Policy Alignment

Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to water and sanitation necessitates harmonizing international policies and practices regarding wastewater management. The Global Acceleration Framework established by UN-Water emphasizes the importance of cross-regional collaboration and the implementation of holistic sanitation strategies (Lupu & Allegro, 2024). This framework envisions milestone-based planning to enhance cross-sector cooperation, which is echoed in frameworks proposed by organizations such as the OECD (Kazora & Mourad, 2018). Through these collaborative efforts, governments are encouraged to embed accountability and transparency in their wastewater targets, ensuring alignment with regional priorities and global aspirations (Lupu & Allegro, 2024).

Multi-stakeholder coalitions play a vital role in promoting such initiatives, as they enable diverse voices—including those of marginalized communities—to be heard in decision-making processes. Accountability in governance mechanisms is crucial to ensure that intended benefits from wastewater projects are equitably distributed among all socio-economic groups, thereby addressing historical injustices related to access and quality of sanitation services (Lupu & Allegro, 2024), (Rüd & Marth, 2011). Such coalitions also encourage innovative policy dialogues that can adapt to specific regional contexts while aligning with broader international standards and commitments (Lupu & Allegro, 2024).

Furthermore, enhancing monitoring and evaluation frameworks is essential for tracking progress towards these sanitation goals. Mechanisms that synchronize monitoring efforts across different governance levels, from local to global scales, can facilitate more coherent and unified action plans in wastewater management (Warshauer, 2018). This is particularly critical for developing countries, where disparities in infrastructure and resource allocation often lead to unequal service delivery in wastewater treatment (Agrahari & Kumar, 2023). Cooperation among nations can foster effective knowledge sharing, enabling adaptive strategies to be developed based on best practices observed in diverse contexts (Rao, 2025).

Policy frameworks set the stage, but money sets projects in motion. Section 3.3 examines innovative financing tools that can scale equitable wastewater investments.

 3.3 Financing Mechanisms for Scale

Innovative financing mechanisms are pivotal for scaling equitable wastewater investments, particularly in the context of developing nations where financial constraints are a significant barrier to sustainable infrastructure development. Implementing financial instruments such as ecotaxes and green bonds can catalyze the necessary funding for wastewater infrastructure while simultaneously promoting sustainable practices (Edunjobi, 2024; , Posnaya et al., 2024). For instance, ecotaxes can create financial incentives for industries to minimize wastewater discharge, thus linking economic activities with sustainability goals (Narasimhan et al., 2023).

Blended finance models that combine public and private investments are also gaining traction, allowing for risk-sharing that can attract private capital into wastewater projects (Adebayo et al., 2024). These models ensure that investments not only focus on infrastructure expansion but also incentivize sustainability measures, thus addressing both supply and demand for wastewater management solutions (Kazora & Mourad, 2018). Such frameworks must prioritize social equity, ensuring that marginalized communities benefit from these investments and that financing mechanisms do not further entrench existing inequalities (Khoroshilov, 2020).

Furthermore, the establishment of climate adaptation funds represents an opportunity to scale decentralized wastewater management systems in vulnerable areas where traditional infrastructure is impractical (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024). By channelling resources towards innovative, localized solutions, these funds can empower communities to improve their resilience against climate impacts while simultaneously enhancing local sanitation and health outcomes (Mariz et al., 2024). Public-private partnerships should be prioritized for projects that can demonstrate both social and environmental impacts, offering a balanced approach to financing that supports sustainable development (Aras & Furtuna, 2024).

Financing unlocks action, but technology and know-how build capacity. In 3.4, we detail how technology transfer and knowledge exchange accelerate global innovation.

3.4  Innovation in Technology and Knowledge Transfer

Cross-border technology transfer emerges as a crucial component in advancing sustainable wastewater solutions worldwide. Collaboration between nations—particularly partnerships between developed and developing countries—facilitates the sharing of innovative practices and knowledge that can enhance wastewater treatment methods (Sami et al., 2024). Initiatives such as South-South collaborations and knowledge exchange programs can allow for the adaptation of successful technologies from one region to suit local contexts in another, thus strengthening global wastewater management efforts (Zhang, 2024).

For example, partnerships between countries like Singapore and Kenya have yielded promising results in low-cost, innovative monitoring tools that can significantly improve wastewater management in resource-constrained environments (Xiang et al., 2024). These technological innovations offer not just improvements in efficiency but are also essential in developing adaptive methods that embrace localized conditions and community needs (Sami et al., 2024). Moreover, open-source platforms for design and diagnostics can accelerate learning and adoption in under-resourced regions, democratizing access to advanced wastewater treatment technologies (Zhang, 2024).

Nevertheless, capacity building must accompany technology transfer to ensure effective implementation. Technical assistance and training programs aimed at local technicians and engineers can enable communities to harness new technologies effectively (Xiang et al., 2024). This capacity-building approach not only maximizes the value derived from technological innovations but also fosters local ownership and accountability, which are crucial for the long-term sustainability of wastewater systems (Elmahdi & Jeong, 2024). Thus, investment in knowledge transfer initiatives must be viewed as an integral part of the global strategy towards sustainable wastewater management systems that prioritize inclusivity and environmental stewardship.

 3.5  Building a Rights-Based Future

Recognizing sanitation as a human right fundamentally reframes the discussion surrounding wastewater treatment into a moral and ethical imperative (Holodkova et al., 2024). This paradigm shift emphasizes that access to adequate sanitation services is not merely a privilege but a necessity for all, thereby mandating that governance frameworks and regulatory standards are equitable and inclusive (Mishra, 2024). A rights-based approach requires that service access, particularly for marginalized populations, is guaranteed and that there is diligent accountability concerning the environmental harm caused by inadequate or poorly managed sanitation services (Shkodinа, 2024).

The imperative to incorporate equity into wastewater governance cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts public health, environmental integrity, and community well-being (Nurein, 2025). Regulatory frameworks must be reformed to reflect the intrinsic interconnection between human rights and environmental health, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of social status or economic background, have equitable access to safe and dignified sanitation solutions (Hilbig & Rudolph, 2018). Additionally, global frameworks such as the SDGs must capture this paradigm, ensuring collective accountability for achieving universal access to sanitation (Rüd & Marth, 2011).

Moreover, this rights-based approach necessitates robust advocacy and community engagement initiatives that empower local populations to voice their needs and priorities regarding wastewater management ("Islamic Development Bank—ISDB", 2020). By integrating community perspectives into decision-making processes, governance systems can better align with the on-ground realities and challenges faced by marginalized groups (Shkodkina & Sklyar, 2013). Hence, national laws and global commitments must evolve to embody this rights-based framework, ensuring that the moral obligation to provide adequate sanitation is both recognized and operationalized within policy and practice (Chávez, 2024).

These five global priorities—from systems thinking to rights-based governance—converge to illuminate the crises at the heart of wastewater management. We close this chapter by summarizing these interconnected challenges and the pathway forward.

An ethical compass must guide technology and finance. Section 3.5 argues that recognizing sanitation as a human right transforms wastewater from a service into a moral imperative.

3.6  The various crises surrounding wastewater management

 including inadequate infrastructure, environmental damage, and health hazards, reflect deep-seated systemic failures that require urgent reform. These challenges are not merely technical concerns; they are indicative of moral and ethical shortcomings in how societies prioritize equity and justice within environmental management systems (Zhou et al., 2010). Addressing these multifaceted issues necessitates transformative action characterized by collaborative governance, innovative financing, advanced technologies, and a steadfast commitment to the recognition of sanitation as a fundamental human right.

A viable global roadmap must integrate interdisciplinary strategies while maintaining policy alignment and adopting milestone-based monitoring to measure progress effectively. Governments must empower local communities, incentivize sustainability through innovative financial models, and uphold transparency throughout processes. When these diverse actors work in concert, they can create wastewater systems that are not only efficient but also equitable and resilient (Zhou et al., 2010).

Embracing a holistic commitment to safeguarding health, advancing equity, and regenerating ecosystems through innovative wastewater management practices is not just a desirable outcome; it is essential for building a sustainable future. Through shared commitment and collaborative implementation, societies can rise to the challenge of creating wastewater systems that reflect justice, inclusivity, and environmental stewardship, ultimately contributing to the broader agenda for global sustainability.

Having mapped the technical paradox, governance failures, and global strategies, we arrive at a fundamental insight: wastewater is not a problem to bury but an opportunity to design a just, resilient future. The Conclusion synthesizes this vision and calls for coordinated action.

🔚 Conclusion:

The combined weight of environmental, social, and governance challenges in wastewater management underscores a simple but profound truth: sanitation is not merely a service—it is a reflection of societal priorities and values. As this article has shown, wastewater systems too often perpetuate harm through unsustainable energy use, unchecked emissions, opaque governance, and exclusionary practices. However, hope emerges in the form of integrated solutions rooted in systems thinking, digital accountability, circular resource recovery, legal reform, and inclusive finance. The shift from managing waste to managing futures begins by embracing wastewater not as a burden but as a catalyst for ecological regeneration and social justice. Only through coordinated global efforts, community empowerment, and ethical policymaking can the world realize a vision where every drop treated is a step toward equity, climate resilience, and sustainable development.

 

References

Afferden et al. (2015). A new approach to implementing decentralized wastewater treatment concepts. Water Science & Technology. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.393

Agrahari & Kumar (2023). Phytoremediation: A Shift Towards Sustainability for Dairy Wastewater Treatment. Chembioeng Reviews. doi:10.1002/cben.202300038

Ajani et al. (2024). Building Trust through Citizen Participation. Review of Public Administration.

Amarachi, U., et al. (2023). Innovative Strategies for Emissions Mitigation in WWTPs. Sustainability Studies.

Amarachi, U., et al. (2023). Community Engagement in Wastewater Governance: A Tool for Accountability. Sustainability Studies.

Ding, X., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Transparency Audits and Governance Reform. Water Integrity Network Reports.

Edunjobi (2024). Sustainable supply chain financing models: Integrating banking for enhanced sustainability. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Updates. doi:10.53430/ijmru.2024.7.2.0030

Ejairu et al. (2024). Eco-Friendly Technologies for Wastewater Treatment.

Elmahdi & Jeong (2024). From Debt to Sustainability: Advancing Wastewater Projects in Developing Countries through Innovative Financing Mechanisms-The Role of debt-for-climate-swaps. . doi:10.20944/preprints202405.1561.v1

Flores (2022). Transitioning Wastewater Treatment for Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management.

Giwa et al. (2024). Decentralization of Household Wastewater Streams: Challenges and Perspectives. . doi:10.70107/collectjenvironsci-art0011

IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.

Islamic Development Bank—ISDB (2020). . . doi:10.4324/9781003138587-49

Jain et al. (2023). Smart Water Management Techniques: Sustainable Approaches for WWTPs.

Kazora & Mourad (2018). Assessing the Sustainability of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems in Rwanda. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su10124617

Lupu & Allegro (2024). Circular Financing Mechanisms for Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage. . doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67628-4_20

Msuya (2025). The sustainability paradox in wastewater treatment.

Msuya (2025). The transparency deficit in wastewater governance.

Pajares et al. (2019). Circular Economy in Wastewater Management: Innovations and Challenges.

Rahmani, A., & Anuar (2019). Beyond Treatment: The Impact of Wastewater Infrastructure on Climate Change.

Rahmani, A., & Anuar (2019). Eroding Public Trust and Its Implications. Environmental Governance Studies.

Rao (2025). Microbial Mediated Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment: A Sustainable Approach for Organic Pollutant Removal. International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology. doi:10.46501/ijmtst.v11.i02.pp74-83

Sahreen & Mukhtar (2024). Floating Treatment Wetlands (FTW) for Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Treatment. . doi:10.1039/bk9781837673131-00291

Sarker (2025). Microalgal Wastewater Treatment: A Circular Economy Approach.

Smol (2023). Circular Economy in Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Starkl et al. (2022). Sustainability Assessment for Wastewater Treatment Systems in Developing Countries. Water. doi:10.3390/w14020241

Yaser, A., et al. (2024). Evaluating the Impacts of Transparency Deficits. Journal of Environmental Governance.

Zhou et al. (2010). Sustainability. Water Environment Research. doi:10.2175/106143010x12756668801293